• No results found

The Degree-of-Engagement diagram: a tool for supporting collaborative business modelling for sustainability by university-industry cooperation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "The Degree-of-Engagement diagram: a tool for supporting collaborative business modelling for sustainability by university-industry cooperation"

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Abstract tool submitted and accepted for

Boundary Spanning Champions Online Forum - Bridging University and Industry

December 2-3, 2020

Spanning Boundaries Forum – UIIN

The Degree-of-Engagement diagram, a tool for supporting collaborative business modelling for sustainability by university-industry cooperation

I.F. Oskam

1

, R.A. Martina

1

Corresponding author: Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Technology, Weesperzijde 190, 1097 DZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands, i.f.oskam@hva.nl

Keywords

Stakeholders, collaboration, innovation ecosystem, sustainable business model, cross-sector, value creation, collaborative business modelling

Introduction & relevance

Universities and the industry are increasingly collaborating in innovation ecosystems that aim to develop sustainable technology to contribute to solving societal challenges. New business models are seen as boundary-spanning devices that can demonstrate the value potential of new sustainable technology and facilitate its breakthrough (Bidmon & Knab, 2018). However, sustainable business models require a multi-stakeholder perspective and need to integrate economic, environmental, and social value (Evans et al., 2017; Breuer et al., 2018). A key challenge for innovation ecosystems is to manage their relationships with stakeholders as these have different and sometimes conflicting interests and value goals (Ritala et al., 2013). As most tools for stakeholder mapping and collaborative business modeling do not facilitate changes in the innovation ecosystem’s stakeholders and partner roles over time (Breuer et al., 2018), practitioners need a tool that helps to span and to manage the boundaries of the innovation ecosystem.

Aim

Rooted in open, collaborative business modelling (Kraaijenbrink et al., 2019), the Degree of Engagement (DoE) diagram (Oskam, 2020) is a tool that can help program and project managers of university-industry collaborations to manage the degree of engagements and roles of stakeholders in the innovation ecosystems in which they are involved.

How it can be applied

The DoE-diagram consists of three elements (Kraaijenbrink et al., 2019; Oskam, 2020): (i) six

segments representing main stakeholder groups (i.e., academia, business, government, media,

(2)

society and environment), (ii) four concentric circles representing different degrees of engagement, and (iii) inward and outbound movements of stakeholders between circles of engagement.

Stakeholders can be identified and plotted in the diagram in the respective segments and circles. Key roles, such as coordinating, expert, or entrepreneurial roles, may be visualised in the diagram. In this way, the different roles and responsibilities of partners can be allocated according to what is needed in a specific stage of development.

The DoE-diagram can be used in a workshop setting, with the initiators of the university-industry collaboration and actors that are part of the core workgroup. The participants execute five consecutive steps:

 Step 1, identifying relevant stakeholders within the six cross-sector stakeholders groups.

 Step 2, plotting each stakeholder in the circle that represents its current degree of engagement.

 Step 3, evaluating what the desired degree of engagement is for each stakeholder based on stakeholder salience.

 Step 4, checking and distributing all necessary roles among the partners.

 Step 5, planning concrete actions to invite stakeholders to engage in the desired role and circle of engagement.

This process of identifying, plotting, evaluating, checking, and planning is repeated regularly, as roles may need to change throughout the different stages of the collaboration and may require certain stakeholders to move to another circle of engagement.

Describe the case of its application

The DoE-diagram is especially suitable for university-industry collaboration in innovation ecosystems that address societal goals. Field examples are smart city initiatives that develop sustainable

technology to contribute to, for example, the transition towards a circular economy or sustainable energy systems. The tool makes it possible to change coordinating roles during the development - for example, from coordination by a university or an intermediary organisation during research and development stages towards coordination by business in later stages - and to specifically address entrepreneurial and user roles. In contrast with other stakeholder tools, the DoE-diagram does not treat the user as a separate segment but as one of the roles that stakeholders may fulfil, as

sustainable innovations may have multiple types of beneficiaries.

The tool may be used in conjunction with other frameworks and tools for business modelling and adds an open perspective and a graphical presentation of the ecosystem’s partners and stakeholders at a certain point in time. The permeability of the circles of engagement enables its users to

accommodate to changes over time in the evolving business model and its context. Inward and

outbound movements of stakeholders between the circles enable innovation ecosystems to keep the

collaboration focussed on developing a viable collaborative business model. In this way, the tool can

act as a boundary-spanning management tool, acknowledging the need for openness towards new

partners, stakeholders, and roles, as well as the necessity of optimal size and configuration of the

innovation ecosystem.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

We propose that managerial cognitive change is triggered by manager-stakeholder interaction, in which latent stakeholders have a relatively prominent role, and is supported by

They argued that teacher involvement in collaborative curriculum design increases the chance that teachers as a team develop ownership for the design and that shared

The initial goal of writing the scenarios aligns with the results, because all interviewees confirmed out- of-the-box thinking resulted from the process. Entrepreneurs, also the

My personal cause remains unchanged – to provide clarity about the true nature of transformation and to inspire people to become transformational leaders – to this.. I

[5] ——, “A dynamic programming approach to trajectory planning of robotic manipulators,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol.. Johanni, “A concept for manipulator

Het zijn montageprincipes die door Bürger op de beeldende kunst zijn toegepast, maar waar het vermoeden van bestaat dat ze ook toepasbaar kunnen worden gemaakt voor het theater..

Controlling for firm and industry specific variables, the results of the multivariate regression analysis indicated compelling evidence that family ownership is positively

The fact that people from the City can reach Borough Market is important, according to Ken, because, just as it was hundreds of yearn ago, this area otfers the people a