• No results found

Report on a Symposium ‘Islam and the Changing Identity of Europe’

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Report on a Symposium ‘Islam and the Changing Identity of Europe’"

Copied!
1
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Conference Reports

I S I M

N E W S L E T T E R

2 / 9 9

43

U C Be r kel ey

L A U R E N C E M I C H A L A K & R E N A T E H O L U B

In October 1998, The Middle East and West Europe Cen-ters of the University of California at Berkeley jointly sponsored a two-day symposium, ‘Islam and the Chang-ing Identity of Europe: Culture, Politics and Citizenship in an Era of Globalization’. The programme focused on the deep ideational changes which have been taking place in Europe due to the Muslim populations which have sprung up in the United Kingdom, France, Ger-many and elsewhere. The symposium explored political and cultural aspects of the emerging identities of these relatively new citizens – how they view themselves and how they are viewed by non-Muslim Europeans, as well as how the relatively indigenous populations of Europe are being forced to rethink their own collective identi-ties, both as Europeans and as citizens of specific coun-tries.

In their symposium prospectus and introductory re-marks the organizers argued that these are no longer migration issues in the traditional sense, because most Muslims in Europe are no longer migrants. Muslim pop-ulations have been present in Europe for several gener-ations, although many Europeans have been slow to recognize that Islam is now a European religion.

Report on

a S y m p o s i u m

‘Islam and

the Changing

I d e n t i t y

of Europe’

The conference featured s i x scholars and a number o f discussants:

Tariq Modood (University of Bristol, UK) point-ed out that minorities in the UK are protectpoint-ed as members of ethnic/racial groups rather than as Muslims. As in the US, there has been a shift in emphasis from the right to assimilate, to the right to maintain one’s ‘differences’ and to have them positively valued. Modood contrasted the UK, where a multicultural approach seems to be making headway, with France, which remains essentially assimilationist and anti-multicultural. Michel Wieviorka (École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris) addressed processes of cultural transformation that occur as Muslim youth in Europe inevitably alter the Islamic tra-ditions that shape their responses to non-Islam-ic environments, calling what results the ‘Islam of the Youth’. He placed this in a larger context of French national destructuration and the decline of republicanism and of mechanisms of national integration.

Krishan Kumar (formerly UK, now University of Virginia) spoke on ‘Europe, the Nation-State and the Question of Identity in an Era of Multicultur-alism’, comparing different settings in Europe. Kumar spoke about the dilemma of maintaining one’s cultural origin in the UK, and of a future of hyphenization, hybridity, syncretization and creolization, but he also eloquently defended assimilation for those who choose that path.

Bassam Tibi (University of Göttingen, Ger-many) focused on themes of cultural and politi-cal integration of Muslim groups. The notion of ‘cultural co-existence’, based on principles of diversity and plurality, was central to his address. Tibi suggested that a ‘Euro-Islam’, or European form of Islam, is emerging, but he cautioned against turning a blind eye to the more fundamentalist elements which also exist within the spectrum of European Muslim opin-ion.

Hala Mustafa (Center for Political and Strategic Studies, Al Ahram Foundation, Cairo) addressed political concerns on a more global level, also emphasizing co-existence. Mustafa called for the transformation of existing unequal power rela-tions between Europe and the Islamic states in the developing world, and noted that current processes of globalization would significantly affect this imbalance.

Paul Lubeck (UC Santa Cruz) discussed the economic and sociological issues facing Europe, particularly those issues pertaining to Islamic networks and the challenges they pre-sent to citizenship claims. Lubeck noted that the contributions of future Muslim migrants to Europe’s economy, and hence to its global competitiveness, will not reside primarily in menial labour. Rather, migration trends from Muslim majority countries contribute to the area of technological skills.

Several issues emerged from the presentations and debates:

Regarding the nation-state, some argued that, with the rise of European institutions, the nation-state is being replaced by wider politi-cal entities in terms of both sovereignty and identity. Others argued that such notions are premature, noting also the persistence of sub-national identities, both ethnic and regional.

A second issue is assessing the relative power of assimilationism versus multicultural-ism in different national settings. Assimilation-ists argue that Muslims in Europe will and should gradually become more like other Euro-peans. Multi-culturalists, on the other hand, argue both the inevitability and the desirabili-ty of retaining non-European heritages and promoting cultural diversity.

Finally, how powerful a force is Islam in determining identity? Some suggest that other factors – such as ethnic, national, regional, trib-al, class or economic identities – can often be stronger than religion. The identities of Europe’s Muslim populations are not fixed but vary in both the short term and historically.

Several speakers cautioned against reifying and attributing causality to Islam, noting that there are important differences amongst Mus-lims in Europe – especially between Islamic activists and secularists. While many Muslims resist Euro-American post-industrial culture on moral grounds, they often thrive in the infra-structure of globalization, which is the product of capitalism. In any case, there was general agreement that both Muslims and non-Mus-lims in Europe are articulating new citizenships and new ethnicities through a continuing d i a l e c t i c .

Participants in the conference are revising their papers for a collective volume which is projected for publication in 1999. ♦

Dr Laurence Michalak is Vice Chair of the Center for Middle Eastern Studies and Lecturer in International and Area Studies at the University of

California/Berkeley, USA. E-mail: otis@uclink4.berkeley.edu

Dr Renate Holub is Chair of the Italian Research and Study Group and Adjunct Associate Professor in International and Area Studies, also at the University of California/Berkeley, USA.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

The importance of the ummah for Muslims in Europe is that it constitutes a transnational public sphere, a network of relations and institutions encompass- ing but

– Irfan Ahmad NWO Rubicon Postdoctoral Fellow Contesting Islamism: Immanent Critique of Jamaat e-Islami of India 1 August 2006 – 31 March 2008 – Maurits van den Boogert

UIFNUPEFNPOTUSBUFUIFJS°NPEFSBUF± *TMBNJD DSFEFOUJBMT BOE SFMFWBODF UP OBUJPOBMEFWFMPQNFOUHPBMT FTQFDJBMMZ IPXUIFZQSPWJEFUIFJSTUVEFOUTXJUI

When the Federation of Islamic Organizations in Europe (FIOE, representing the Muslim Brotherhood movement at the European level) presented the European Muslim Charter

Muslims, for their part, have to learn to differentiate between their religion and the cultural traditions that they brought to Europe as immigrants; at the same time, they have

The citizens of Europe understood that the time had come to be innovative in relations between States which had become destructive in the last century and were sidelining Europe on

Liberals are committed to making better use of your money by continuing to cut administrative budgets and lead the fight for a single seat for the European Parliament.. The

As iri the previous cases, it is our contention that the expansion of European financed capitalist agriculture - if at all - developed in the scarcely populated areas, where the