• No results found

Appendix I: Coding list

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Appendix I: Coding list"

Copied!
5
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

appendix I

NO VARIABLE CATEGORY SCORE NO VARIABLE CATEGORY SCORE

SITE FILE

multiple scraper on blade 160

1 Site Hekelingen III I composite tooi on blade 170

Leidschendam 2 endscraper on blade 171

Beek-Molensteeg 3 flake (2..) Leilan 4 unretouched (2.0) Belvédère 5 straight convex 210 220 2 Individual 0-9999 concave 230 3 NS coordinates/house 0-99 retouch > 1 mm (2.1) straight 211 4 EW coordinates/pit 0-999 convex concave 221 231 5 Layer/height 0-9 retouch < 1 mm (2.2) 6 Length 0-999.9 mm straight convex 212 222 7 Width 0-999.9 mm concave thumbnail scraper 232 224

8 Thickness 0-999.9 mm multiple scraper on flake 260

9 Weight 0-999.9 gram composite tooi on flake

endscraper on flake

270 271

10 Primary classification flake 1 core (3..)

blade 2 unretouched (3.0)

core 3 straight 310

waste 4 convex 320

splinter 5 concave 330

core fragment 6 retouch > 1 mm (3.1)

other 8 straight 311

unsure 9 convex 321

rejuvenation platform: concave 331

tabular, facetted 10 retouch < 1 mm (3.2)

tabular, not facetted 11 straight 312

rejuvenation coreface: convex 322

parallel 12 concave 332

perpendicular 13 polyhedral blade core 351

crested blade 14 blade core with two platforms 352

decortication flake 15 discoidal

flake core

353 354

11 Typology blade (1..) exhausted flake core 355

(2)

12 Cortex 13 'Patina' 14 Polished fragment 15 Burned 16 Raw matcrial convex 422 concave 432 multiple scraper on waste 460

transverse arrowhead 510 truncated blade 520 backed blade 530 lanceolate point 550 A-point 610 B-point 620 axe 710 tranchet axe 711 barbed arrow head 720 leafshaped arrow head 730

dagger 740 borer 750 point 760 LBK-point 770 not applicable 800 quartier d'orange 850 crescent-shaped sickle 890 unsure 900 none 1 entire 2 dorsai > 50% 3 dorsai < 50% 4 on platform 5 ventral 6 ventral +dorsai » 50% 7 ventral + dorsai < 50% 8 dorsai > 50% + on platform 10 dorsai < 50% + on platform 9 ventral + dorsai < 50% + on 11 platform not patinated 1 lightly patinated 2 heavy gloss patina 3

unsure 9 not 1 dorsai > 50% 2 dorsai < 50% 3 not burned 1 glossy 2 red spots 3 craquele 4 unsure 9 Hekelingen group 1 1 group 2 2 group 3 3 Rijckholt 4 rolled material 5 northern, moraine flint 6

Hekelingen group 4 7

other 8 unsure 9 light-grey Belgian 10

Valkenburg 11 Cap Blanc Nez 12 North Sea flint 13

Kristiansstad 14 17 Grain-size coarse 1 medium 2 fine 3 glass-like 4 unsure 9 18 Fragment complete 1 distal 2 medial 3 proximal 4 along length 5 potlitted 6 not applicable 8 unsure 9 19 Hafting absent 1 retouch 2 notch 3 bitumen 4

with leather (experiments 5 only)

with bone/wood (experiments 6 only)

not examined 7 not interpretable 8

unsure 9

20 Percussion hard hammer I

soft hammer 2

not applicable 8

unsure 9

2! State distal end feather I

hinge 2

reverse hinge 3 with distal end core 4 with cortex on distal end 5

step 6

not applicable (broken) 8

unsure 9

22 Surface platform smooth 1

facetted 2

cortex 3

battered 4

not applicable 8

unsure 9

(3)

NO VARIABLE CATEGORY SCORE 29 Edge angle 0-360

30 Shape surfaces straight II

convex 22

concave 33

(first central than dorsal)

31 Shape edge straight 1

convex 2 concave 3 irregular 4 broken 5 shghtly convex 6 shghtly concave 7 pointed 8

32 Outline edge not apphcable serrated 0 1 denticulated 2 encoche 3 cran 4 epaulement 5 musea u 6 languette 7 pedoncule 8 soie 9

33 Form cross-section straight 1

convex 2 concave 3 wavy 4 irregular 5 slightly concave 6 unsure 9

34 Location retouch ventral only 1

dorsal only 2

dorsal + ventral alternating 3 dorsal + ventral bifacial 4 35 Distribution retouch overlapping 1 close/regular 2 close/irregular 3 wide/regular 4 wide/irregular 5 not applicable 8 36 Width retouch 0-99.9 mm

37 Form retouch 1 scalar well-defined 1 scalar vague 2 lamellar 3 half moon 4 trapezoidal/square 5 other 8 unsure 9 polish 3 straight cross-section 4 ground-axe fragment 5 protruding point 6 38 Form retouch 2 39 Termination retouch I 40 Termination retouch 2 41 Secondary modifications 42 Degree of waar 43 Number of AUAs MICRO-FILE scalar well-defined 1 scalar vague lamellar 2 3 half moon 4 trapezoidal/square other 5 8 unsure 9 step hinge feather 1 2 3 snap other 4 8 unsure 9 step hinge feather 1 2 3 snap other 4 8 unsure 9 no 1 light medium 2 3 heavy burned 4 5 interpretable = 0 not interprable = 9 no traces 1 lightly worn medium worn 2 3 heavily worn 4 lightly-t-possibly resharpened 5 probably uscd 6 perhaps hafting 7 not interpretable 8 unsure 9 0-9 44 PUA no. 45 A U A n o . 46 Location AUA 47 'Use-retouch' location 0-99 0-9

polar coördinates O-17 ventral

dorsal

dorsal -l- ventral alternating dorsal + ventral bifacial 48 'Use-retouch' distribution overlapping

(4)

49 'Use-retouch' width 0-999 mm 58 Polish topography domed flat

1 2

50 'Use-retouch' form scalar well-defined 1 corrugated 3

scalar vague 2 cratered 4

lamellar 3 pitted 5

half moon 4 bubbly 6

trapezoidal/square 5 cornet tails 7

other 8 not applicable 8

unsure 9 pitted and cornet tails 9

51 'Use-retouch' termination step 1 beveled 10

hinge 2 59 Polish width 0-9999 \i

feather 3

snap 4 60 Polish directionality absent 1

other 8 linear perpendicular 2

unsure 9 hnear parallel

hnear diagonal 3 4 52 Edge-rounding sharp slightly rounded 11 22 random 5

very rounded 33 61 Contact-material inferred bone 1

nibbled 44 soft plant 2

(first ventral than dorsal) wood

sickle-gloss

3 4 53 Polish location dorsal + ventral, but dorsal

more

1 'sickle-gloss'-like

dry hide

5 6

dorsal-(-ventral, but ventral 2 fresh hide 7

more hide unspecified 8

dorsal -1- ventral equal 3 antler 9

only dorsal 4 bone/antler 10

only ventral 5 meat 11

54 Polish distribution scintillation 1 Shell 12

on protruding points 2 fish 13

reticulated 3 fired pottery 14

snowlandscape 4 clay/pottery 15

isolated spots 5 soft stone 16

thin line along edge 6 hard material 17

band along edge 7 soft material 18

band away from edge 8 soft animal material 19

other 9 hard animal material 20

spread greasy lustre streaks of polish 10 11 12 tooth bone/wood polish '23' 21 22 23

isolated spots-1-streaks 13 unknown 99

55 Polish contrast great 1 62 Degree of certainty 'certain' inference 1

medium 2 'uncertain' inference 2

little 3 not applicable 8

56 Polish texture smooth

smooth and greasy

1 2

63 Striations location dorsal + vertral, but dorsal more

1 smooth and matt 3 dorsal-(-ventral, but ventral 2

rough 4 more

rough and greasy rough and matt

5 6 dorsal-1-ventral equal only dorsal 3 4

not applicable 8 only ventral 5

57 Polish brightness very bright 1 64 Striations definition deep/short/narrow 1

bright 2 deep/short/wide 2

dull 3 deep/long/narrow 3

not applicable 8 deep/long/wide

shallow/short/narrow

(5)

NO VARIABLE SCORE 63 Striations direction 66 Motion inferred shallow/short/wide shallow/long/narrov shallow/long/wide tilled in parallel perpendicular diagonal random scraping cutting/sawing boring carving/engraving projectile hafting shaving planing unsure whittling adzing longitudinal 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 67 Degree of certainty

FOR EXPERIMENTS ONLY

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

3.3] showed that pseudo partition graphs with diameter D 0 &gt; 3 must have the same intersection arrays as in one of the three families of partition graphs: the folded cubes (α =

Plate 90 of Eigentlyke Afbeeldinge, van Hondert der aldervermaerdste Statuen of Antique-beelden Staande binnen

Als je precies weet welk percentage van een pot gevuld is, kun je de volgende formule gebruiken om het aantal knikkers te berekenen:. pot 3 0, 0191 I K p d =

3p 13 Bereken het maximale aantal knikkers dat volgens de schattingen van Janneke in de glazen pot kan zitten. Licht je

[r]

leidend tot het antwoord 0,31, hiervoor geen scorepunten in mindering

More important is the knowledge of the flow rate within the porous scaffold and the corre- sponding shear stresses exerted on cells attached to the scaffold surface.. Evidently,

A mixed- effects modeling approach was used in which we included not only the target variables (regularity, group, VSTM/VWM) as predictors of children’s accuracy at using inflection,