• No results found

PWT vs. IMF economic growth Appendix

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "PWT vs. IMF economic growth Appendix"

Copied!
7
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

31

Appendix

PWT vs. IMF economic growth

In most growth researches the initial GDP variable is from the same source as the dependant GDP growth variable. This setup has been used in the beginning of this research, and holds, as shows from Table 9. However, using the GDP growth from a different source (IMF) already led to a higher explanatory power of the model, as shows in Table 8.

R-squared 0.1787 Prob. > F 0 # of obs. 148

lnyPWT Coefficient Std. Err P>t

k -0.00104 0.000 0.015 n -0.89315 0.248 0.000 O 0.01457 0.006 0.014 sk 0.10292 0.045 0.025 ε 0.91166 0.254 0.000 R-squared 0.2388 Prob. > F 0 # of obs. 148

lnyPWT Coefficient Std. Err P>t

k -0.00030 0.001 0.593 n -1.08033 0.288 0.000 O 0.01892 0.006 0.002 sk 0.12014 0.044 0.008 sh 0.03369 0.020 0.101 lniu -0.01026 0.003 0.001 ε 1.04830 0.292 0.000

When additional variables from different sources than the Penn World Table 6.2 are added to the model, the PWT economic growth variable was found to have a rather high multicollinearity with the internet use, human capital, and initial GDP variable in particular (Table 10). By changing the dependant variable’s source, from PWT to IMF, the multicollinearity was greatly reduced. Therefore the choice has been made to use economic growth from a different source than initial GDP.

R-squared 0.2207 Prob. > F 0 # of obs. 148

lnyPWT Coefficient Std. Err P>t

k -0.00122 0.000 0.000 n -0.85307 0.193 0.000 O 0.01004 0.005 0.029 sk 0.09612 0.035 0.007 ε 0.89970 0.197 0.000 R-squared 0.2857 Prob. > F 0 # of obs. 148

lny Coefficient Std. Err P>t

k -0.00113 0.000 0.009 n -0.76986 0.223 0.001 O 0.01531 0.005 0.001 sk 0.10630 0.034 0.002 sh 0.04964 0.016 0.002 lniu -0.00688 0.002 0.005 ε 0.77452 0.226 0.001

Table 9; Regression, All Countries, PWT growth Table 8; Regression, All Countries, IMF growth

(2)

32

The investment variable

4th quartile of agricultural activities

Table 17; Regression, 4th quartile, [I]=[A] R-squared 0.0978 Prob. > F 0.0594 # of obs. 37 lny Coefficient P>t sk 0.10373 0.059 ε 0.02934 0

Variable Obs Mean Std. Dev Min Max

ygr 37 4.92% 1.97% 1.89% 10.63% k 37 $ 18007 $ 9297 $ 709 $ 41388 n 37 0.91% 1.01% -0.76% 3.25% O 37 99.08% 63.36% 2.14% 300.95% sk 37 19.26% 7.49% 2.21% 33.70% sh 37 44.57% 23.80% 0.87% 85.12% iu 37 28.34% 16.74% 0.75% 58.65% Serv 37 66.01% 12.19% 37.10% 90.00% Manu 37 15.30% 6.73% 2.40% 28.40% Agri 37 2.20% 1.11% 0.10% 4.10% R-squared 0.3614 Prob. > F 0.0052 # of obs. 37 lny Coefficient P>t k -0.00094 0.030 n -0.87426 0.007 O 0.01137 0.017 sk -0.02643 0.624 ε -0.00094 0.030

Variable Obs Mean Std. Dev Min Max

ygr 37 3.99% 2.62% -0.61% 9.94% k 37 $ 1,633 $ 1,195 $ 459 $ 5,207 n 37 2.29% 0.76% 0.04% 3.38% O 37 66.48% 40.57% 11.61% 253.88% sk 37 9.14% 7.56% 2.84% 44.99% sh 37 5.00% 7.16% 0.36% 37.80% iu 37 1.37% 2.41% 0.14% 14.32% Serv 37 41.40% 10.34% 19.90% 58.20% Manu 37 9.17% 4.40% 3.30% 21.50% Agri 37 35.13% 9.19% 22.70% 61.80% R-squared 0.156 Prob. > F 0.2318 # of obs. 37 lny Coefficient P>t k -0.00511 0.175 n -0.46054 0.489 O -0.00431 0.714 sk 0.11118 0.063 ε 0.51095 0.458 R-squared 0.2264 Prob. > F 0 # of obs. 148 sk Coefficient Std. Err P>t Agri -0.26634 0.041 0.000 ε 17.87438 0.832 0.000

Table 12; Descriptives, 1st quartile, agricultural

Table 13; Regression, 1st quartile, agric

Table 14; Descriptives, 4th quartile, agricultural

Table 15; Regression, 4th quartile, agric

(3)

33

Tertiary education, internet use, and hosts

In order to find out whether there is a relation between internet use and tertiary education enrollment a regression has been run in which [ta] is the dependant variable, and [lniu] is the independent variable.

R-squared 0.5739 Prob. > F 0 # of obs. 148 sh Coefficient Std. Err P>t lniu 0.10123 0.007 0.087 ε 0.56909 0.026 0.518 R-squared 0.2687 Prob. > F 0 # of obs. 144 sh Coefficient Std. Err P>t hosts 0.21011 0.029 0.000 ε 0.20917 0.017 0.000

(4)

34

Growth explaining concepts

Although thousands of researches has been done, the most influential researches have been compared in Table 20. Concepts not directly related to growth theory in section “2.1 Neoclassical growth theory” have been omitted. Examples of these are; democracy indexes, geographical indexes, stability indexes and so on.

Table 20; Overview of Growth concepts

Author Initial

GDP

Pop Growth Human Cap Openness Inv

Barro, 1991 -* -* Net fertility > 4 yr old28 +* Prim & Sec Enrollment

+ Market Dist. as

PPP

n.a.

Levine & Renelt, 1992 -* Robust29 -* Robust30 Pop growth +* Robust30 Sec. Enr. + Fragile exports + Robust Mankiw, Romer & Weil,

1992 - - + n.a. + Sala-i-Martin, 1997 -* Not significant Pop growth +* Life expec. &

Prim Enr

+ # years open econ.

+

Sachs & Warner, 1997

- +

Eco active pop growth + Life expec + Index open n.a. Doppelhofer, 2000 - Strongly & Robust Not robust Pop growth + Robust Prim, Life +

Strong & Robust31 n.a.

Fernandez, Ley & Steel, 2001

Most relev (1,00)

Not relevant Life exp = 0,95 Pri=0,18

# yr = 0,50 Exp = not relev.

Equipm. Relevant

Variable Sources

Various sources for the concepts found in Table 20 have been researched for their fit. An overview of the sources researched for the final set of variables is displayed in Table 21.

Table 21; Overview of researched sources

ygr k n O sk sh iu

IMF X X X

Penn World Table X

- Penn WT CGDP X X X X - Penn WT RGDPL X X X X Statistique Canada X X World Bank X UN X ITU / UN X

28 Net fertility = Birth rate – mortality for children up to 4 yr

29 Only when Secondary school enrollment rate is included in the regression 30 Only when Political Instability is included in the regression

(5)

35

Datasets

Included countries, all country dataset

Albania Denmark Kyrgyz Republic Russia

Algeria Djibouti Lao People's Democratic Republic Rwanda

Argentina Dominican Republic Latvia Samoa

Armenia Egypt Lebanon Saudi Arabia

Australia El Salvador Lesotho Senegal

Austria Equatorial Guinea Lithuania Serbia

Azerbaijan Eritrea Luxembourg Sierra Leone

Bahrain Estonia Madagascar Slovak Republic

Bangladesh Ethiopia Malawi Slovenia

Barbados Fiji Malaysia South Africa

Belarus Finland Mali Spain

Belgium France Malta St. Lucia

Belize Gabon Mauritania Sudan

Benin Gambia, The Mauritius Suriname

Bolivia Georgia Mexico Swaziland

Botswana Ghana Moldova Sweden

Brazil Greece Mongolia Switzerland

Bulgaria Guatemala Morocco Tajikistan

Burkina Faso Guinea Mozambique Tanzania

Burundi Guinea-Bissau Namibia Thailand

Cambodia Guyana Nepal Togo

Cameroon Honduras Netherlands Tonga

Canada Hong Kong SAR New Zealand Trinidad and Tobago

Cape Verde Hungary Nicaragua Tunisia

Central African Republic Iceland Niger Uganda

Chad India Nigeria Ukraine

Chile Indonesia Norway United Arab Emirates

China Iran, Islamic Republic of Oman United Kingdom

Colombia Ireland Pakistan United States

Comoros Italy Panama Uruguay

Congo, Democratic Republic of Jamaica Papua New Guinea Uzbekistan

Congo, Republic of Japan Paraguay Vanuatu

Costa Rica Jordan Peru Venezuela

Côte d'Ivoire Kazakhstan Philippines Vietnam

Croatia Kenya Poland Yemen, Republic of

Cyprus Korea Portugal Zambia

(6)

36 Included countries, All countries, 2002 ~ 2006

Albania Djibouti Lebanon Romania

Algeria Egypt Lesotho Rwanda

Argentina El Salvador Lithuania Saudi Arabia

Armenia Eritrea Luxembourg Senegal

Australia Estonia Madagascar Sierra Leone

Austria Finland Malawi Slovak Republic

Azerbaijan France Malaysia Slovenia

Bahrain Gambia, The Mali South Africa

Bangladesh Georgia Malta Spain

Belarus Ghana Mauritania Swaziland

Belgium Greece Mauritius Sweden

Bolivia Honduras Mexico Switzerland

Botswana Hong Kong SAR Moldova Tajikistan

Brazil Hungary Mongolia Tanzania

Bulgaria Iceland Morocco Thailand

Burkina Faso India Mozambique Tonga

Burundi Indonesia Namibia Trinidad and Tobago

Cambodia Iran, Islamic Republic of Nepal Tunisia

Cameroon Ireland Netherlands Uganda

Canada Italy New Zealand Ukraine

Cape Verde Jamaica Nicaragua United Arab Emirates

Chile Japan Nigeria United Kingdom

China Jordan Norway United States

Colombia Kazakhstan Oman Uruguay

Comoros Kenya Panama Vanuatu

Costa Rica Korea Paraguay Venezuela

Croatia Kuwait Peru Vietnam

Cyprus Kyrgyz Republic Philippines Yemen, Republic of

Czech Republic Lao People's Democratic Republic Poland Zimbabwe

Denmark Latvia Portugal

Descriptives, All countries, 2002 ~ 2006

Variable Obs Mean Std. Dev. Min Max

(7)

37 Included countries Service-based Economies dataset

Albania Estonia Lithuania Senegal

Australia Fiji Luxembourg Slovak Republic

Austria Finland Madagascar Slovenia

Bahrain France Malta South Africa

Barbados Georgia Mauritius Spain

Belgium Greece Mexico St. Lucia

Belize Guatemala Morocco Suriname

Bulgaria Honduras Namibia Sweden

Canada Hong Kong SAR Netherlands Switzerland

Cape Verde Hungary New Zealand Tonga

Costa Rica Iceland Nicaragua Tunisia

Côte d'Ivoire Ireland Norway Ukraine

Croatia Italy Panama United Kingdom

Cyprus Jamaica Peru United States

Czech Republic Japan Poland Uruguay

Denmark Jordan Portugal Vanuatu

Djibouti Korea Romania Zambia

Dominican Republic Latvia Russia

El Salvador Lebanon Samoa

Included countries, Economies with a high level of manufacturing activities dataset

Argentina Egypt Lithuania Serbia

Armenia El Salvador Madagascar Slovak Republic

Austria Estonia Malaysia Slovenia

Bahrain Fiji Malta South Africa

Bangladesh Finland Mauritius Spain

Belarus Georgia Mexico Swaziland

Belgium Honduras Moldova Sweden

Bolivia Hungary Morocco Switzerland

Bulgaria India Mozambique Tajikistan

Cambodia Indonesia New Zealand Thailand

Canada Ireland Nicaragua Tunisia

Chile Italy Pakistan Ukraine

China Japan Peru United Kingdom

Colombia Jordan Philippines Uruguay

Costa Rica Kazakhstan Poland Venezuela

Côte d'Ivoire Korea Portugal Vietnam

Croatia Kyrgyz Republic Romania Zimbabwe

Czech Republic Lao People's Democratic Republic Russia

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

The demand structure for organic products in the Czech Republic is, according to the Ministry of Agriculture, relatively stable in time.. The graph below characterizes the shares

“But in this case also the service is significantly understaffed, one curator deals with several hundred cases, therefore s/he doesn’t have time to focus on an

D’abord, ce pays est fondé dans un contexte de l’immigration et a été un pays d’immigration sur le plan international tandis que sur le plan interne, les

The Secretariat of Public Health and Social Welfare chairs the National Health Council, the National Social Security Council, the National Health Insurance Council, the

Similarly, we used the median of the 10 reported national population figures and the average of the crude mortality rates reported in our 2004 and 2007 surveys to estimate the

Both are rural areas offering the local youth few opportunities related to work or education, and were selected to represent typical areas from where young migrants leave in search

Information about commissions charged by foreign exchange and remittance agents, and about currency transfers abroad, is reported both to the Superintendency of Banks and the

A UNICEF report on child prostitution in the Dominican Republic published in 1994 concludes that poverty, lack of alternative earning opportunities and the lack of a stable family