• No results found

Uncertainty in social dilemmas Kwaadsteniet, E.W. de

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Uncertainty in social dilemmas Kwaadsteniet, E.W. de"

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Uncertainty in social dilemmas

Kwaadsteniet, E.W. de

Citation

Kwaadsteniet, E. W. de. (2007, October 9). Uncertainty in social dilemmas. Kurt Lewin Institute Dissertation Series. Ridderprint. Retrieved

from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/12369

Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown)

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden

Downloaded

from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/12369

Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable).

(2)

Self-interest is often at odds with the interest of the collective. This occurs, for in- stance, when a group of people share a scarce or limited resource, such as fi sh, electricity, oil or water. Whereas individuals may be tempted to further their self- interest by harvesting excessively from such common resources, excessive harvesting jeopardizes the collective interest by increasing the chance that these resources be- come depleted. Such situations are called social dilemmas.

This dissertation focuses on such social dilemmas, and more specifi cally, on environmental uncertainty in these dilemmas. Real-life social dilemma situations are often characterized by uncertainty. For example, fi shermen mostly do not know the exact size of the fi sh population (i.e., resource size uncertainty) or how many fi shermen are fi shing from the same fi shing stock (i.e., group size uncertainty). Se- veral researchers have therefore asked themselves the question as to how such uncertainty infl uences people’s choice behavior. These researchers have repea- tedly concluded that uncertainty is detrimental to the collective because it induces defection and over-harvesting.

The present dissertation aims to provide a more comprehensive view on uncer- tainty in social dilemmas. Whereas earlier research has primarily investigated how uncertainty infl uences harvesting decisions, this dissertation also focuses on how environmental uncertainty affects interpersonal processes. This dissertation in- troduces a perspective that argues that environmental uncertainty hampers the appli- cation of the equal division rule, which in turn infl uences how group members interact with one another. In six chapters, I elaborate on numerous implications of this notion.

By focusing on three key aspects of interpersonal processes (i.e., tacit coordination, justifi cation pressures and interpersonal emotions), and by testing my ideas in seven empirical studies, I demonstrate that the effects of uncertainty are much more differen- tiated than is portrayed in earlier research.

E r i k W. d e K w a a d s t e n i e t

Dissertatiereeks

Kurt Lewin Instituut

2007-9

UNCER T AINTY IN SOCIAL DILEMMAS Erik W . de Kwaadsteniet

UITNODIGING

voor het bijwonen

van de promotie van

Erik W. de Kwaadsteniet

UNCERTAINTY

IN SOCIAL DILEMMAS

Op dinsdag 9 oktober 2007

om 15.00 uur

In de Lokhorstkerk,

Pieterskerkstraat 1, Leiden

Receptie na afl oop

Paranimfen:

Marijke Leliveld

06 2474 6148

Frank Haaksman

06 4323 2862

U N C E R TA I N T Y

I N S O C I A L

D I L E M M A S

proefschrift_omslag_CY.indd 1

proefschrift_omslag_CY.indd 1 07-08-2007 09:23:3007-08-2007 09:23:30

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

In the above, it was argued that the equal division rule infl uences three key aspects of interpersonal processes, namely: (a) how people tacitly coordinate their decisions, (b)

We showed that under resource size certainty (i.e., in a “strong” social dilemma), people anchor their decisions on the equal division rule, 8 whereas they base their decisions

When we generalize this fi nding to group size uncertainty, we can expect group size estimates also to be affected by social value orientations: Prosocials will give higher

In line with our hypotheses, the interaction effect between Uncertainty and Harvest indicated that whereas under No Uncertainty participants indicated that harvesting an equal

The main effect of Feedback about Individual Harvests indicated that participants showed stronger retributive reactions to a fellow group member who had harvested 150 coins (M =

research should not only focus on how environmental uncertainty affects harvesting decisions in multiple-trial social dilemmas, but also on how repeated interactions between

Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing.. When prosocials act like proselfs in a

Bij zekerheid weten de groepsleden immers precies wat ze moeten doen om hun keuzes te coördineren, en zullen de meeste mensen dan ook een gelijk deel uit de bron nemen..