• No results found

Uncertainty in social dilemmas Kwaadsteniet, E.W. de

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Uncertainty in social dilemmas Kwaadsteniet, E.W. de"

Copied!
6
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Citation

Kwaadsteniet, E. W. de. (2007, October 9). Uncertainty in social dilemmas. Kurt Lewin

Institute Dissertation Series. Ridderprint. Retrieved from

https://hdl.handle.net/1887/12369

Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown)

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the

Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden

Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/12369

Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable).

(2)

Uncertainty in

Social Dilemmas

Proefschrift

ter verkrijging van

de graad van Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden,

op gezag van Rector Magnifi cus prof.mr. P.F. van der Heijden,

volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties

te verdedigen op dinsdag 9 oktober 2007

klokke 15.00 uur

door

Erik Willem de Kwaadsteniet

geboren te Groningen

in 1977

(3)

Overige leden: Prof. Dr. C. K. W. de Dreu (Universiteit van Amsterdam) Prof. Dr. K. van den Bos (Universiteit Utrecht)

Lay-out en vormgeving Saskia de Been

Illustraties Mirjam Ouwehand

proefschrift_def.indd 2

proefschrift_def.indd 2 07-08-2007 16:01:2607-08-2007 16:01:26

(4)

“The moral force of fairness is greatly reinforced by the power of a

fair result to focus attention, if it fi lls the vacuum of indeterminacy

that would otherwise exist.”

Thomas C. Schelling (1960, p.73)

(5)

proefschrift_def.indd 4

proefschrift_def.indd 4 07-08-2007 16:01:2607-08-2007 16:01:26

(6)

Contents

Chapter 1 Introduction ... 7

Chapter 2 Social dilemmas as strong versus weak situations ... 15

Study 2.1 ... 19

Discussion ... 25

Chapter 3 Group size uncertainty ... 29

Study 3.1 ... 33

Discussion ... 38

Chapter 4 Justifying decisions in social dilemmas ... 43

Study 4.1 ... 45

Study 4.2 ... 49

General discussion ... 59

Chapter 5 Emotional reactions after overuse ... 67

Study 5.1 ... 70

Study 5.2 ... 75

Study 5.3 ... 82

General discussion ... 85

Chapter 6 General discussion ... 91

Summary of the main fi ndings ... 91

General implications ... 92

Is uncertainty always detrimental? ... 94

Limitations and suggestions for future research ... 97

References ... 101

Nederlandse samenvatting (Dutch summary) ... 109

Dankwoord ... 113

Curriculum Vitae ... 115

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Whereas earlier research has primarily investigated how uncertainty infl uences harvesting decisions, this dissertation also focuses on how environmental uncertainty

In the above, it was argued that the equal division rule infl uences three key aspects of interpersonal processes, namely: (a) how people tacitly coordinate their decisions, (b)

We showed that under resource size certainty (i.e., in a “strong” social dilemma), people anchor their decisions on the equal division rule, 8 whereas they base their decisions

When we generalize this fi nding to group size uncertainty, we can expect group size estimates also to be affected by social value orientations: Prosocials will give higher

In line with our hypotheses, the interaction effect between Uncertainty and Harvest indicated that whereas under No Uncertainty participants indicated that harvesting an equal

The main effect of Feedback about Individual Harvests indicated that participants showed stronger retributive reactions to a fellow group member who had harvested 150 coins (M =

research should not only focus on how environmental uncertainty affects harvesting decisions in multiple-trial social dilemmas, but also on how repeated interactions between

Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing.. When prosocials act like proselfs in a