• No results found

(2) The listed firms must publish the financial status and operations results according to the laws and regulations. The listed firms must publish the financial reports semi- annually.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "(2) The listed firms must publish the financial status and operations results according to the laws and regulations. The listed firms must publish the financial reports semi- annually. "

Copied!
4
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Firm Performance and Board Composition: An Empirical Study of Chinese Listed Firms

Appendix A

Legal and listing requirements imposed on Chinese firms

(1). The firms applying to be listed must submit relevant documents to the security management department of the State Council for approval. The security management department of the State Council will approve the firms that are in compliance with the listed requirement. After the firms are approved by the security management department of the State Council, the listed firms must publish their shares and related reports. The application documents of the firms must be put in the assigned place for access by the public.

(2) The listed firms must publish the financial status and operations results according to the laws and regulations. The listed firms must publish the financial reports semi- annually.

Source Shenzhen Stock Exchange Standard Operational Guide of Chinese listed Firms

(June 1998).

(2)

Appendix I

Table 1. Results of regression analysis

DV: ROA 2000 DV: ROA 2001

Independent variables Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Control variables:

Firm age –.09 –.11 –.13 –.08 –.12 –.13

Firm size –.23** –.17

–.19

–.39** –.36* –.37*

State share ownership –.06 –.19

–.20

–.07 –.11 –.13 Board size .03 –.05 –.03 .07 .02 .03

Dependent variables:

Proportion of fully independent directors .06 –.11 .05 –.13 Proportion of affiliated directors .37** .51* .27

.28

Curvilinear effect of board composition

Proportion of fully independent directors

2

.17 .16 Proportion of affiliated directors

2

–.21 –.05 F value 3.59 4.42** 3.58

**

5.70** 4.45

**

3.45**

R square .13 .25 .26 .21 .26 .26

Adjusted R square .09 .20 .19 .17 .20 .19

R square change .12** .01 .05

.00

Values shown are the standardized regression coefficients. N = 126

p < .10

*p < .05

**p < .01

(3)

Appendix II

Table 2. Results of regression analysis

DV: ROE 2000 DV: ROE 2001

Independent variables Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Control variables:

Firm age –.11 –.16 –.14 .08 .07 .08

Firm size –.07 –.03 –.02 –.30** –.25* –.26*

State share ownership .04 –.05 –.07 –.12 –.13 –.16

Board size .01 –.07 –.06 .10 .06 .07

Dependent variables:

Proportion of fully independent directors .07 –.02 .10 –.09 Proportion of affiliated directors .32* .43 .29* .08

Curvilinear effect of board composition

Proportion of fully independent directors

2

.12 .19 Proportion of affiliated directors

2

–.11 .01 F value 1.59 2.38* 1.90

2.43* 1.74

1.48

R square .07 .16 .16 .10 .12 .12

Adjusted R square .03 .09 .07 .06 .07 .04

R square change .09* .00 .05 .00

Values shown are the standardized regression coefficients N = 126

p < .10

*p < .05

**p < .01

(4)

Appendix III

Table 3. Results of regression analysis

DV: Shareholders’ Right Ratio 2000

DV: Shareholders’ Right Ratio 2001

Independent variables Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Control variables:

Firm age .03 –.01 –.001 .03 –.02 –.02 Firm size –.49** –.41** –.44** –.39** –.31* –.34*

State share ownership –.17

–.22* –.23* –.05 –.13 –.13

Board size –.03 –.09 –.07 .03 –.03 –.01

Dependent variables:

Proportion of fully independent directors .06 –.18 –.01 –.36 Proportion of affiliated directors .25* .54* .30* .54*

Curvilinear effect of board composition

Proportion of fully independent directors

2

.23 .34 Proportion of affiliated directors

2

–.32 –.29 F value 8.91** 6.62* 5.49

**

4.12** 4.1** 3.53**

R square .29 .34 .35 .16 .24 .26

Adjusted R square .26 .29 .29 .12 .18 .18

R square change .04

.01 .08* .02

Values shown are the standardized regression coefficients N = 126

p < .10

*p < .05

**p < .01

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

On the other hand, the two-tier board represents a clearer, formal separation between the function of supervision and the executive roles (Krivogorsky, 2006). Furthermore, the

To give an answer to the research question: “To what extent does the capital structure of listed firms in Germany influence the performance during the

This thesis investigates the influence diversification on firm value of publicly listed firms in Germany and the Netherlands. This influence is investigated by examining the

Voluntary disclosure can have an effect on the capital share of institutional owners in a firm, as it is more attractive for institutional owners to invest in firms which disclose

Keywords: corporate social responsibility (CSR), financial performance, ROA, ROE, Tobin’s Q, RET, corporate governance, board characteristics, board size, board independence,

The positive impact of business risk on Tobin’s Q suggests that firms that are more risky have a higher Tobin’s Q, this results are significant at the 0.01 level when using

Volatility doesn’t seem to influence the level of debt in a firm although it shows a significant relationship with leverage for the period of the current

What is the impact of the financial crisis on the influence of the firm-specific determinants of the capital structure of Dutch listed firms.. The recent financial crisis