• No results found

ON WILLINGNESS TO BUY

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "ON WILLINGNESS TO BUY"

Copied!
21
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

AWE AND ITS INFLUENCE

ON WILLINGNESS TO BUY

VIA THE SMALL SELF

MSc Thesis Charlotte van Zuthem S2186500

(2)
(3)

Problem statement

 Awe inducing stimuli in

advertising all around us

 E.g. Vichy, Milka & Almhof

 Little research on downstream

effects on consumer behavior

(Rudd et al., 2011)

 Does awe lead the consumer in

the desired direction?

(4)

What is awe?

 Awe is characterized by (Keltner & Haidt, 2003):  Vastness

 Need for accommodation  Experiences of awe:

 Awesome nature

 Wonder at childbirth

 Admiration for person with exceptional ability

 Awe has the power to transform (Keltner & Haidt, 2003) 

(5)

The Self

 Self-concept

 Products/ brands relevant for the self concept: Range Rover, Chanel bag

Self symbolization (Grubb & Grathwohl, 1967) = relationship consumption of

goods and enhancing of the self-concept

Part of the self-enhancement concept

Self transcendence is the opposite of self-enhancement (Schwartz, 1994):

 Self-enhancement: social superiority & self-centered satisfaction

 Self-transcendence: enhancement of others & transcendence of selfish interest

(6)

Self transcendence

 Self transcendence: (Koltko-Rivera, 2006; Schwartz et al. 2001):

 Universalism  Benevolence

(7)

The small self & materialism

 Self transcendence can be elicited by awe (Cappellen & Saroglou, 2012)

 Joye and Bolderdijk (2015) label this self-transcendent state, triggered by

awe, as the small self

 One’s own being and goals feel less important  One feels small and humble

Thus awe leads to a shift in values, how does it influence the values consumers hold?

Values consumers hold regarding material goods = materialism  Increase in materialism

(8)

Awe influencing consumer values

 Self-symbolization is part of self-enhancement  Awe triggers self-transcendence/ small self

 Self-transcendence and self-enhancement are not able to co-exist  self-enhancement  urge to buy symbolic goods

 Lower willingness to buy of material goods  Lower materialism

 Existing literature about possible link between awe and materialism:

(9)

Moderator: product involvement

 Involvement = an unobservable state reflecting the amount of interest, arousal, or

emotional attachment a consumer has with a product (Bloch, 1986).

 Can also be applied to brands (Hoyer et al. 2012)

 Enduring product involvement:

 High levels of involvement  Stable across time and place  Sign dimension

 High involvement  extended decision making, thorough information seeking 

less room for emotional judgement

(10)
(11)

Hypotheses

H1: Inducing awe-related stimuli leads to the small self

H2: The Small Self leads to (a) lower willingness to buy of material goods and thus to (b) lower level of materialism.

H3: The relationship between awe and (a) WTB of material goods and (b) materialism is mediated by the small self.

(12)

Methods (1) – Design and participants

 Qualtrics  N = 56 44, Mage = 27.98, SD = 11.02 12, Mage = 33.67, SD = 14.33  Snowball referencing  Between-subjects design  IV = awe

 DV’s = willingness to buy of material goods & materialism  Mediator = the small self

(13)

Methods (2) – Materials

1. Materialistic Values Scale 1 (Richins & Dawson, 1992)

 6 items

 E.g. “I admire people who own expensive homes, cars, and clothes”

2. Manipulation

 awe versus pride scenarios (Shiota et al., 2007; Piff et al., 2015)

3. Emotion measurement (Piff et al. 2015)

 Amusement, awe, disgust, anger, fear, pride, sadness and happiness

4. Smallness index (Shiota et al., 2007; Huta & Ryan, 2010; Piff et al., 2015)

 4 items

(14)

Methods (2) – materials

5. Willingness to buy

 luxury vs non-luxury

 Laptops, mobile phones, watches, sunglasses and shower

foam

6. Materialistic Values Scale 2

 9 items

8. Enduring product involvement scale (Zaichkowsky, 1985)

 20 items

 E.g. Important : Unimportant, Irrelevant : Relevant

(15)

Results (1)

Relationship Test Significant Hypothesis

Scenario writing test One-Way ANOVA Yes (p < .001) Direct effect of awe on

WTB

One-Way ANOVA No Direct effect of awe on

materialism

One-Way ANCOVA No

Awe leads to small self One-Way ANOVA Yes (p < .001) H1: accepted Direct relationship between

the small self and WTB

Correlation No H2a: could not be

confirmed Direct relationship between

the small self and materialism

Partial correlation Yes (p =.02 r = .31), thus moderate positive

(16)

Results (2) – mediation & moderation

Mediation analysis (small self) for WTB

Model 4 of PROCESS tool by A.F. Hayes (2013)

No H3a: could not be

confirmed Mediation analysis (small

self) for materialism

Model 4 of PROCESS tool by A.F. Hayes (2013)

Yes (LLCI: 0.0150 to ULCI: 0.2260)

H3b: could not be

confirmed (because small self leads to higher

materialism) Moderation analysis (EI) for

WTB

Model 1 of PROCESS tool by A.F. Hayes (2013)

No H4a: could not be

confirmed Moderation analysis (EI) for

materialism

Model 1 of PROCESS tool by A.F. Hayes (2013)

Yes, only for watches p = .03 (LLCI: .3980 to ULCI: -.0717)

H4b: accepted only for watches

(17)

Results (3)

(18)

Discussion – Connection and relevance to

existing literature

 Established evidence:

 Awe leads to the small self, confirms findings Joye & Bolderdijk (2015) and Piff et al. (2015)

 New evidence:

 Small self leads to higher materialism  Mediation effect

 Awe leads to higher materialism via the small self

 Moderation effect

 EI in watches

 Coincidence, gift-giving, self symbolization

 Inconsistency with existing literature:

(19)

Discussion – limitations and suggestions

Limitations:

 Small sample (N = 56), drop-out rate of 63,4%

 Homogeneous sample: young Dutch females in possession of bachelors degree  Recall condition

Suggestions for the future:

 Generate a measurement scale for self-transcendence

 Self-transcendence might be something different as the small self

 More easy manipulation, through VR glasses (Chirico et al., 2017)  More heterogenous and larger sample

 Distribute survey in national language  Looking at other product categories

(20)

Practical implications

 Awe leads to the small self:

 When advertising symbolic goods: NO

 When advertising goods that benefit society: YES

 Awe leads to higher materialism via the small self

 If a company want to increase materialism amongst consumer they could expose

them to awe. Note however, that this positive relation between the small self and materialism was moderate.

 No direct and indirect relationship could be confirmed between awe and

WTB.

 Means that still no downstream effects on actual buying behavior of consumers are

(21)

Thank you for

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

It demonstrates how trade oriented food security discourse benefitted the interests of developed countries and facilitated their dominance over the global agricultural market..

POPAI (Point of Purchase Advertising Institute) also does regular research on this topic and has found 65% of all supermarket purchases to be decided upon in-store. About

Although the direct effect of price gap on market share is negative, this should not necessarily mean that a large price gap will automatically result in a lower market share of

This research will conduct therefore an empirical analysis of the global pharmaceutical industry, in order to investigate how the innovativeness of these acquiring

Also for the total influence of COO on the willingness to buy domestic cosmetics, it seems that Chinese consumers find their perception on local products of

Hypothesis 2: A notable purchase situation for a product results in higher perceived salience than a less notable purchase situation...

“To what extent do health claims influence consumers’ willingness to buy soft drinks and how is this relationship influenced by product familiarity and brand trust?”... Hayes

“To what extent do health claims influence consumers’ willingness to buy soft drinks and how is this relationship influenced by product familiarity and brand trust?”. Based on