AWE AND ITS INFLUENCE
ON WILLINGNESS TO BUY
VIA THE SMALL SELF
MSc Thesis Charlotte van Zuthem S2186500
Problem statement
Awe inducing stimuli in
advertising all around us
E.g. Vichy, Milka & Almhof
Little research on downstream
effects on consumer behavior
(Rudd et al., 2011)
Does awe lead the consumer in
the desired direction?
What is awe?
Awe is characterized by (Keltner & Haidt, 2003): Vastness
Need for accommodation Experiences of awe:
Awesome nature
Wonder at childbirth
Admiration for person with exceptional ability
Awe has the power to transform (Keltner & Haidt, 2003)
The Self
Self-concept
Products/ brands relevant for the self concept: Range Rover, Chanel bag
Self symbolization (Grubb & Grathwohl, 1967) = relationship consumption of
goods and enhancing of the self-concept
Part of the self-enhancement concept
Self transcendence is the opposite of self-enhancement (Schwartz, 1994):
Self-enhancement: social superiority & self-centered satisfaction
Self-transcendence: enhancement of others & transcendence of selfish interest
Self transcendence
Self transcendence: (Koltko-Rivera, 2006; Schwartz et al. 2001):
Universalism Benevolence
The small self & materialism
Self transcendence can be elicited by awe (Cappellen & Saroglou, 2012)
Joye and Bolderdijk (2015) label this self-transcendent state, triggered by
awe, as the small self
One’s own being and goals feel less important One feels small and humble
Thus awe leads to a shift in values, how does it influence the values consumers hold?
Values consumers hold regarding material goods = materialism Increase in materialism
Awe influencing consumer values
Self-symbolization is part of self-enhancement Awe triggers self-transcendence/ small self
Self-transcendence and self-enhancement are not able to co-exist self-enhancement urge to buy symbolic goods
Lower willingness to buy of material goods Lower materialism
Existing literature about possible link between awe and materialism:
Moderator: product involvement
Involvement = an unobservable state reflecting the amount of interest, arousal, or
emotional attachment a consumer has with a product (Bloch, 1986).
Can also be applied to brands (Hoyer et al. 2012)
Enduring product involvement:
High levels of involvement Stable across time and place Sign dimension
High involvement extended decision making, thorough information seeking
less room for emotional judgement
Hypotheses
H1: Inducing awe-related stimuli leads to the small self
H2: The Small Self leads to (a) lower willingness to buy of material goods and thus to (b) lower level of materialism.
H3: The relationship between awe and (a) WTB of material goods and (b) materialism is mediated by the small self.
Methods (1) – Design and participants
Qualtrics N = 56 44, Mage = 27.98, SD = 11.02 12, Mage = 33.67, SD = 14.33 Snowball referencing Between-subjects design IV = awe DV’s = willingness to buy of material goods & materialism Mediator = the small self
Methods (2) – Materials
1. Materialistic Values Scale 1 (Richins & Dawson, 1992)
6 items
E.g. “I admire people who own expensive homes, cars, and clothes”
2. Manipulation
awe versus pride scenarios (Shiota et al., 2007; Piff et al., 2015)
3. Emotion measurement (Piff et al. 2015)
Amusement, awe, disgust, anger, fear, pride, sadness and happiness
4. Smallness index (Shiota et al., 2007; Huta & Ryan, 2010; Piff et al., 2015)
4 items
Methods (2) – materials
5. Willingness to buy
luxury vs non-luxury
Laptops, mobile phones, watches, sunglasses and shower
foam
6. Materialistic Values Scale 2
9 items
8. Enduring product involvement scale (Zaichkowsky, 1985)
20 items
E.g. Important : Unimportant, Irrelevant : Relevant
Results (1)
Relationship Test Significant Hypothesis
Scenario writing test One-Way ANOVA Yes (p < .001) Direct effect of awe on
WTB
One-Way ANOVA No Direct effect of awe on
materialism
One-Way ANCOVA No
Awe leads to small self One-Way ANOVA Yes (p < .001) H1: accepted Direct relationship between
the small self and WTB
Correlation No H2a: could not be
confirmed Direct relationship between
the small self and materialism
Partial correlation Yes (p =.02 r = .31), thus moderate positive
Results (2) – mediation & moderation
Mediation analysis (small self) for WTB
Model 4 of PROCESS tool by A.F. Hayes (2013)
No H3a: could not be
confirmed Mediation analysis (small
self) for materialism
Model 4 of PROCESS tool by A.F. Hayes (2013)
Yes (LLCI: 0.0150 to ULCI: 0.2260)
H3b: could not be
confirmed (because small self leads to higher
materialism) Moderation analysis (EI) for
WTB
Model 1 of PROCESS tool by A.F. Hayes (2013)
No H4a: could not be
confirmed Moderation analysis (EI) for
materialism
Model 1 of PROCESS tool by A.F. Hayes (2013)
Yes, only for watches p = .03 (LLCI: .3980 to ULCI: -.0717)
H4b: accepted only for watches
Results (3)
Discussion – Connection and relevance to
existing literature
Established evidence:
Awe leads to the small self, confirms findings Joye & Bolderdijk (2015) and Piff et al. (2015)
New evidence:
Small self leads to higher materialism Mediation effect
Awe leads to higher materialism via the small self
Moderation effect
EI in watches
Coincidence, gift-giving, self symbolization
Inconsistency with existing literature:
Discussion – limitations and suggestions
Limitations: Small sample (N = 56), drop-out rate of 63,4%
Homogeneous sample: young Dutch females in possession of bachelors degree Recall condition
Suggestions for the future:
Generate a measurement scale for self-transcendence
Self-transcendence might be something different as the small self
More easy manipulation, through VR glasses (Chirico et al., 2017) More heterogenous and larger sample
Distribute survey in national language Looking at other product categories
Practical implications
Awe leads to the small self:
When advertising symbolic goods: NO
When advertising goods that benefit society: YES
Awe leads to higher materialism via the small self
If a company want to increase materialism amongst consumer they could expose
them to awe. Note however, that this positive relation between the small self and materialism was moderate.
No direct and indirect relationship could be confirmed between awe and
WTB.
Means that still no downstream effects on actual buying behavior of consumers are