University of Groningen
Understanding the evolution of infidelity using the Seychelles warbler system
Raj Pant, Sara
DOI:
10.33612/diss.108086950
IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from
it. Please check the document version below.
Document Version
Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record
Publication date:
2019
Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database
Citation for published version (APA):
Raj Pant, S. (2019). Understanding the evolution of infidelity using the Seychelles warbler system.
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. https://doi.org/10.33612/diss.108086950
Copyright
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).
Take-down policy
If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.
References
Ackay E, Roughgarden J. 2007. Extra-pair reproductive activity in birds: review of the genetic benefits. Evol. Ecol. Res. 9:855–868.
Aguirre JD, Marshall DJ. 2012. Does genetic diversity reduce sibling competition? Evolution 66:94–102. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01413.x.
Albrecht T, Schnitzer J, Kreisinger J, Exnerova A, Bryja J, Munclinger P. 2007. Extrapair paternity and the opportunity for sexual selection in long-distant migratory passerines. Behav. Ecol. 18:477–486. doi:10.1093/beheco/arm001.
Alexander RD. 1974. The Evolution of Social Behaviour. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5:325–383. Andersson M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Annavi G. 2012. Genetic, Socio-ecological and Fitness Correlates of Extra-Group Paternity in the European Badger (Meles meles). Oxford (UK): University of Oxford.
Annavi G, Newman C, Dugdale HL, Buesching CD, Sin YW, Burke T, Macdonald DW. 2014. Neighbouring-group composition and within-group relatedness drive extra-group paternity rate in the European badger (Meles meles). J. Evol. Biol. 27:2191–2203. doi:10.1111/jeb.12473.
Arct A, Drobniak SM, Cichon M. 2015. Genetic similarity between mates predicts extrapair paternity-a meta-analysis of bird studies. Behav. Ecol. 26:959–968. doi:10.1093/beheco/arv004.
Arlt D, Hansson B, Bensch S, von Schantz T, Hasselquist D, von Schantz T, Bensch S, Arlt D, Hansson B. 2004. Breeding synchrony does not affect extra-pair paternity in great reed warblers. Behaviour 141:863–880. doi:10.1163/1568539042265699.
Arnold SJ, Wade MJ. 1984. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution (N. Y). 38:709–719. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb00344.x.
Arnqvist G, Kirkpatrick M. 2005. The evolution of infidelity in socially monogamous passerines: the strength of direct and indirect selection on extrapair copulation behavior in females. Am. Nat. 165:S26– S37. doi:10.1086/429350.
Arnqvist G, Nilsson T. 2000. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim. Behav. 60:145–164. doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1446.
Arnqvist G, Rowe L. 2005. Sexual conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Baer B, Schmid-Hempel P. 1999. Experimental variation in polyandry affects parasite loads and fitness in a bumble-bee. Nature 397:151–154. doi:10.1038/16451.
Barati A, Andrew RL, Gorrell JC, Mcdonald PG. 2018. Extra-pair paternity is not driven by inbreeding avoidance and does not affect provisioning rates in a cooperatively breeding bird, the noisy miner (Manorina melanocephala). Behav. Ecol. 29:244–252. doi:10.1093/beheco/arx158.
Barber CA, Robertson RJ, Boag PT. 1996. The high frequency of extra-pair paternity in tree swallows is not an artifact of nestboxes. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 38:425–430. doi:10.1007/s002650050260. Barton K. 2017. MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R package version 1.40.6. Available from: https:// cran.r-project.org/package=MuMIn.
Bateman. 1948. Intra-sexual selection in drosophila. Heredity (Edinb). 2:349–368. doi:10.1038/ hdy.1948.21.
Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67:1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
Bebbington K, Kingma SA, Fairfield EA, Dugdale HL, Komdeur J, Spurgin LG, Richardson DS, Strassmann JE. 2017. Kinship and familiarity mitigate costs of social conflict between Seychelles warbler neighbors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114:E9036–E9045. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704350114. Bebbington K, Spurgin LG, Fairfield EA, Dugdale HL, Komdeur J, Burke T, Richardson DS. 2016. Telomere length reveals cumulative individual and transgenerational inbreeding effects in a passerine bird. Mol. Ecol. 25:2949–2960. doi:10.1111/mec.13670.
Bell AM, Hankison SJ, Laskowski KL. 2009. The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis. Anim. Behav. 77:771–783. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.12.022.
Bernoulli D. 1954. Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk. Econom. J. Econom. Soc. 22:23–36.
Birkhead TR. 1978. Behavioural adaptations to high density nesting in the common guillemot Uria aalge. Anim. Behav. 26:321–331. doi:10.1016/0003-3472(78)90050-7.
Birkhead TR. 1995. Sperm competition: evolutionary causes and consequences. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 7:755–775. doi:10.1071/RD9950755.
Birkhead TR, Biggins JD. 1987. Reproductive synchrony and extra-pair copulation in birds. Ethology 74:320–334. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1987.tb00942.x.
Blanckenhorn WU, Hosken DJ, Martin OY, Reim C, Teuschl Y, Ward PI. 2002. The costs of copulating in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Behav. Ecol. 13:353–358. doi:10.1093/beheco/13.3.359.
Blomqvist D, Andersson M, Küpper C, Cuthill IC, Kis J, Lanctot RB, Sandercock BK, Székely T, Wallander J, Kempenaers B. 2002. Genetic similarity between mates and extra-pair parentage in three
species of shorebirds. Nature 419:613–615. doi:10.1038/nature01104.
van Boheemen LA, Hammers M, Kingma SA, Richardson DS, Burke T, Komdeur J, Dugdale HL. 2019. Compensatory and additive helper effects in the cooperatively breeding Seychelles warbler (Acrocephalus sechellensis). Ecol. Evol. 9:2986–2995. doi:10.1002/ece3.4982.
Bose APH, Zimmermann H, Henshaw JM, Fritzsche K, Sefc KM. 2018. Brood-tending males in a biparental fish suffer high paternity losses but rarely cuckold. Mol. Ecol. 27:4309–4321. doi:10.1111/ mec.14857.
Boulton RA, Shuker DM, Boulton RA. 2015. A sex allocation cost to polyandry in a parasitoid wasp. Biol. Lett. 11:1–4. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2015.0205.
Bouwhuis S, Sheldon BC, Verhulst S, Charmantier A. 2009. Great tits growing old: selective disappearance and the partitioning of senescence to stages within the breeding cycle. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 276:2769–2777. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.0457.
Bouwman K, Komdeur J. 2005. Old female reed buntings (Emberiza schoeniclus) increase extra-pair paternity in their broods when mated to young males Karen. Behaviour 142:1449–1463. doi:10.1163/156853905774831819.
Bowers EK, Smith RA, Hodges CJ, Zimmerman LM, Thompson CF, Sakaluk SK. 2012. Sex-biased terminal investment in offspring induced by maternal immune challenge in the house wren (Troglodytes aedon). Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 279:2891–2898. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.0443.
Brekke P, Ewen JG, Clucas G, Santure AW. 2015. Determinants of male floating behaviour and floater reproduction in a threatened population of the hihi (Notiomystis cincta). Evol. Appl. 8:796–806. doi:10.1111/eva.12287.
Brommer JE, Merila J, Kokko H. 2002. Reproductive timing and individual fitness. Ecol. Lett. 5:802–810.
Brooker MG, Rowley I, Adams M, Baverstock PR. 1990. Promiscuity: an inbreeding avoidance mechanism in a socially monogamous species? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26:191–199. doi:10.1007/ BF00172086.
Brooks R, Kemp DJ. 2001. Can older males deliver the good genes? Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:308–313. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02147-4.
Brouwer L, Barr I, Van De Pol M, Burke T, Komdeur J, Richardson DS. 2010. MHC-dependent survival in a wild population: evidence for hidden genetic benefits gained through extra-pair fertilizations. Mol. Ecol. 19:3444–3455. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04750.x.
physiologically suppress subordinate males? An experiment in a cooperatively breeding passerine. Ethology 115:576–587. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01643.x.
Brouwer L, van de Pol M, Hidalgo Aranzamendi N, Bain G, Baldassarre DT, Brooker LC, Brooker MG, Colombelli-Négrel D, Enbody E, Gielow K, et al. 2017. Multiple hypotheses explain variation in extra-pair paternity at different levels in a single bird family. Mol. Ecol. 26:6717–6729. doi:10.1111/ mec.14385.
Brouwer L, Richardson DS, Eikenaar C, Komdeur J. 2006. The role of group size and environmental factors on survival in a cooperatively breeding tropical passerine. J. Anim. Ecol. 75:1321–1329. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01155.x.
Brouwer L, Richardson DS, Komdeur J. 2012. Helpers at the nest improve Late-life offspring performance: evidence from a long-term study and a cross-foster experiment. PLoS One 7:e33167. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033167.
Brouwer L, Tinbergen JM, Both C, Bristol R, Richardson DS, Komdeur J, Sauer JR. 2009. Experimental evidence for density-dependent reproduction in a cooperatively breeding passerine. Ecology 90:729–741. doi:10.1890/07-1437.1.
Brown JL. 1997. A theory of mate choice based on heterozygosity. Behav. Ecol. 8:60–65. doi:10.1093/ beheco/8.1.60.
Bruintjes R, Bonfils D, Heg D, Taborsky M. 2011. Paternity of subordinates raises cooperative effort in cichlids. Chaline N, editor. PLoS One 6:e25673. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025673.
Bruintjes R, Heg-Bachar Z, Heg D. 2013. Subordinate removal affects parental investment, but not offspring survival in a cooperative cichlid. Funct. Ecol. 27:730–738. doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12088. Bull CM, Cooper SJB, Baghurst BC. 1998. Social monogamy and extra-pair fertilization in an Australian lizard, Tiliqua rugosa. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 44:63–72. doi:10.1007/s002650050515. Burnham KP, Anderson DR, Huyvaert KP. 2011. AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: Some background, observations, and comparisons. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65:23–35. doi:10.1007/s00265-010-1029-6.
Charmantier A, Blondel J. 2003. A contrast in extra-pair paternity levels on mainland and island populations of mediterranean blue tits. Ethology 109:351–363. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.2003.00880.x. Charmantier A, Blondel J, Perret P, Lambrechts MM. 2004. Do extra-pair paternities provide genetic benefits for female blue tits Parus caeruleus? J. Avian Biol. 35:524–532. doi:10.1111/j.0908-8857.2004.03296.x.
a population of blue tits (Parus caeruleus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 56:360–365. doi:10.1007/ s00265-004-0794-5.
Choe JC, Crespi BJ. 1997. The evolution of social behaviour in insects and arachnids. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cleasby IR, Nakagawa S. 2012. The influence of male age on within-pair and extra-pair paternity in passerines. Ibis (Lond. 1859). 154:318–324. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2011.01209.x.
Clutton-Brock TH. 1988. Reproductive success. Studies of individual variation in contrasting breeding systems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Clutton-Brock TH, Russell AF, Sharpe LL. 2004. Behavioural tactics of breeders in cooperative meerkats. Anim. Behav. 68:1029–1040. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.10.024.
Clutton-Brock TH, Vincent AC. 1991. Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature 351:58–60. doi:10.1038/351058a0.
Cohas A, Allainé D. 2009. Social structure influences extra-pair paternity in socially monogamous mammals. Biol. Lett. 5:313–316. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2008.0760.
Cohas A, Yoccoz NG, Da Silva A, Goossens B, Allainé D. 2006. Extra-pair paternity in the monogamous alpine marmot (Marmota marmota): the roles of social setting and female mate choice. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 59:597–605. doi:10.1007/s00265-005-0086-8.
Cordero PJ, Veiga JP, Moreno J, Parkin DT. 2003. Extra-pair paternity in the facultatively polygynous spotless starling, Sturnus unicolor. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 54:1–6. doi:10.1007/s00265-003-0603-6. Cordero PJ, Wetton JH, Parkin DT. 1999. Extra-pair paternity and male badge size in the house sparrow. J. Avian Biol. 30:97. doi:10.2307/3677248.
Coulson JC, Fairweather JA. 2001. Reduced reproductive performance prior to death in the Black-legged Kittiwake: senescence or terminal illness? J. Avian Biol. 32:146–152. doi:10.1034/ j.1600-048X.2001.320207.x.
van de Crommenacker J, Richardson DS, Groothuis TG, Eising CM, Dekker AL, Komdeur J. 2004. Testosterone, cuckoldry risk and extra-pair opportunities in the Seychelles warbler. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 271:1023–1031. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2697.
Curio E. 1983. Why do young birds reproduce less well? Ibis (Lond. 1859). 125:400–404. doi:10.1111/ j.1474-919X.1983.tb03130.x.
Daly M. 1978. The Cost of Mating. Am. Nat. 112:771–774.
Davies NB, Hartley IR, Hatchwell BJ, Langmore NE. 1996. Female control of copulations to maximize male help: a comparison of polygynandrous alpine accentors, Prunella collaris, and dunnocks, P. modularis. Anim. Behav. 51:27–47. doi:10.1006/ANBE.1996.0003.
Dearborn DC, Anders AD, Parker PG. 2001. Sexual dimorphism, extrapair fertilizations, and operational sex ratio in great frigatebirds (Fregata minor). Behav. Ecol. 12:746–752. doi:10.1093/beheco/12.6.746. Dietrich V, Schmoll T, Winkel W, Epplen JT, Lubjuhn T. 2004a. Cuckoldry and recapture probability of adult males are not related in the socially monogamous coal tit (Parus ater). J. Ornithol. 145:327–333. doi:10.1007/s10336-004-0047-4.
Dietrich V, Schmoll T, Winkel W, Epplen J, Lubjuhn T. 2004b. Pair identity — an important factor concerning variation in extra-pair paternity in the coal tit (Parus ater). Behaviour 141:817–835. doi:10.1163/1568539042265644.
Dillard JR. 2017. High rates of extra-pair paternity in a socially monogamous beetle with biparental care. Ecol. Entomol. 42:1–10. doi:10.1111/een.12346.
Dixon A, Ross D, O’Malley SLC, Burke T. 1994. Paternal investment inversely related to degree of extra-pair paternity in the reed bunting. Nature 371:698–700. doi:10.1038/371698a0.
Dochtermann NA, Schwab T, Anderson Berdal M, Dalos J, Royauté R. 2019. The heritability of behavior: a meta-analysis. J. Hered.:1–8. doi:10.1093/jhered/esz023.
van Dongen WFD, Mulder RA. 2009. Multiple ornamentation, female breeding synchrony, and extra-pair mating success of golden whistlers (Pachycephala pectoralis). J. Ornithol. 150:607–620. doi:10.1007/s10336-009-0371-9.
Drullion D, Dubois F. 2011. Neighbours’ breeding success and the sex ratio of their offspring affect the mate preferences of female zebra finches. PLoS One 6:e29737. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029737. Dunn PO, Whittingham LA, Lifjeld JT, Robertson RJ, Boag PT. 1994. Effects of breeding density, synchrony, and experience on extrapair paternity in tree swallows. Behav. Ecol. 5:123–129. doi:10.1093/ beheco/5.2.123.
Durrant KL, Hughes JM. 2005. Differing rates of extra-group paternity between two populations of the Australian magpie (Gymnorhina tibicen). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:536–545. doi:10.1007/ s00265-004-0883-5.
E M, Gong Y, Yu J, Zhang S, Fan Q, Jiang Y, Wang H. 2017. Low level of extra-pair paternity between nearest neighbors results from female preference for high-quality males in the yellow-rumped flycatcher (Ficedula zanthopygia). PLoS One 12:e0172713. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0172713.
Sherman PW, editors. Rodent societies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 267–269.
Eberhard WG. 1996. Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Edly-Wright C, Schwagmeyer PL, Parker PG, Mock DW. 2007. Genetic similarity of mates, offspring health and extrapair fertilization in house sparrows. Anim. Behav. 73:367–378. doi:10.1016/j. anbehav.2006.08.008.
Edme A, Munclinger P, Krist M. 2016. Female collared flycatchers choose neighbouring and older extra-pair partners from the pool of males around their nests. J. Avian Biol. 47:552–562. doi:10.1111/ jav.00839.
Edwards HA, Burke T, Dugdale HL. 2017. Repeatable and heritable behavioural variation in a wild cooperative breeder. Behav. Ecol. 28:668–676. doi:10.1093/beheco/arx013.
Edwards HA, Dugdale HL, Richardson DS, Komdeur J, Burke T. 2018. Extra-pair parentage and personality in a cooperatively breeding bird. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 72:37. doi:10.1007/ s00265-018-2448-z.
Eikenaar C. 2006. Should I stay or should I go? Natal dispersal in the Seychelles warbler. Groningen: University of Groningen.
Eikenaar C, Komdeur J, Richardson DS. 2008. Natal dispersal patterns are not associated with inbreeding avoidance in the Seychelles warbler. J. Evol. Biol. 21:1106–1116. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01528.x.
Eimes JA, Parker PG, Brown JL, Brown ER. 2005. Extrapair fertilization and genetic similarity of social mates in the Mexican jay. Behav. Ecol. 16:456–460. doi:10.1093/beheco/ari010.
Engen S, Lande R, Saether B-E. 2005. Effective size of a fluctuating age-structured population. Genetics 170:941–54. doi:10.1534/genetics.104.028233.
Evans JP, Simmons LW. 2008. The genetic basis of traits regulating sperm competition and polyandry: can selection favour the evolution of good- and sexy-sperm? Genetica 134:5–19. doi:10.1007/ s10709-007-9162-5.
Fisher RF. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection: a complete variorum edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Foerster K, Delhey K, Johnsen A, Lifjeld JT, Kempenaers B. 2003. Females increase offspring heterozygosity and fitness through extra-pair matings. Nature 425:714–717. doi:10.1038/nature01969. Forstmeier W. 2007. Do individual females differ intrinsically in their propensity to engage in extra-pair
copulations? PLoS One 2:e952. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000952.
Forstmeier W, Kempenaers B, Meyer A, Leisler B. 2002. A novel song parameter correlates with extra-pair paternity and reflects male longevity. Procedings R. Soc. B 269:1497–1485. doi:10.1098/ rspb.2002.2039.
Forstmeier W, Martin K, Bolund E, Schielzeth H, Kempenaers B. 2011. Female extrapair mating behavior can evolve via indirect selection on males. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108:10608–10613. doi:10.1073/pnas.1103195108.
Forstmeier W, Nakagawa S, Griffith SC, Kempenaers B. 2014. Female extra-pair mating: adaptation or genetic constraint? Trends Ecol. Evol. 29:456–464. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2014.05.005.
Fox CW, Rauter CM. 2003. Bet-hedging and the evolution of multiple mating. Evol. Ecol. Res. 5:273–286.
Freeman-Gallant CR, Wheelwaright NT, Meiklejohn KE, States SL, Sollecito S V. 2005. Little effect of extrapair paternity on the opportunity for sexual selection in Savannah Sparrows (Passerculus sandwichensis). Evolution (N. Y). 59:422–430. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01000.x.
Freeman-Gallant CR, Wheelwright NT, Meiklejohn KE, Sollecito S V. 2006. Genetic similarity, extrapair paternity, and offspring quality in Savannah sparrows (Passerculus sandwichensis). Behav. Ecol. 17:952–958. doi:10.1093/beheco/arl031.
Garcia-Gonzalez F, Yasui Y, Evans JP. 2015. Mating portfolios: bet-hedging, sexual selection and female multiple mating. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 282:20141525. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.1525. Gillespie JH. 1974. Nautural selection for within-generation variance in offspring number. Genetics 76:601–6. doi:1975.
Girndt A, Chng CWT, Burke T, Schroeder J. 2018. Male age is associated with extra-pair paternity, but not with extra-pair mating behaviour. Sci. Rep. 8:8378. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-26649-1.
Gladstone DE. 1979. Promiscuity in monogamous colonial birds. Am. Nat. 114:545–558. doi:10.1086/283501.
Gowaty PA. 1996. Parental care: evolution, mechanisms, and adaptive significance. In: Slater P, Milinski M, editors. Advances in the Study of Behavior. Vol. 25. 1st ed. San Diego: Academic Press. (Advances in the Study of Behavior). p. 477–531.
Gowaty PA, Bridges WC. 1991. Nestbox availability affects extra-pair fertilizations and conspecific nest parasitism in eastern bluebirds, Sialia sialis. Anim. Behav. 41:661–675. doi:10.1016/ S0003-3472(05)80904-2.
Gray EM. 1997. Female red-winged blackbirds accrue material benefits from copulating with extra-pair males. Anim. Behav. 53:625–639. doi:10.1006/ANBE.1996.0336.
Griffith SC. 2000. High fidelity on islands: A comparative study of extrapair paternity in passerine birds. Behav. Ecol. 11:265–273. doi:10.1093/beheco/11.3.265.
Griffith SC. 2015. Genetic similarity is broadly associated with genetic polyandry in birds: A comment on Arct et al. Behav. Ecol. 26:970–971. doi:10.1093/beheco/arv031.
Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Thuman KA. 2002. Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific. Mol. Ecol. 11:2195–2212.
Griffiths R, Double MC, Orr K, Dawson RJ. 1998. A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol. Ecol. 7:1071–5. Groenewoud F, Kingma SA, Hammers M, Dugdale HL, Burke T, Richardson DS, Komdeur J. 2018. Subordinate females in the cooperatively breeding Seychelles warbler obtain direct benefits by joining unrelated groups. J. Anim. Ecol.:1–13. doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12849.
Gromko M, Newport M, Kortier M. 1984. Sperm dependence of female receptivity to remating in drosophila melanogaster. Evolution (N. Y). 38:1273–1282.
Grunst AS, Grunst ML, Korody ML, Forrette LM, Gonser RA, Tuttle EM. 2019. Extrapair mating and the strength of sexual selection: insights from a polymorphic species. Behav. Ecol. 30:278–290. doi:10.1093/beheco/ary160.
Hadfield JD. 2010. MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J. Stat. Softw. 33:1–22. doi:10.18637/jss.v033.i02.
Hadfield JD. 2019. MCMCglmm course notes. Available from: ftp://cran.r-project.org/pub/R/web/ packages/MCMCglmm/vignettes/CourseNotes.pdf.
Hadfield JD, Richardson DS, Burke T. 2006. Towards unbiased parentage assignment: combining genetic, behavioural and spatial data in a Bayesian framework. Mol. Ecol. 15:3715–3730. doi:10.1111/ j.1365-294X.2006.03050.x.
Hajduk GK, Cockburn A, Margraf N, Osmond HL, Walling CA, Kruuk LEB. 2018. Inbreeding, inbreeding depression, and infidelity in a cooperatively breeding bird. Evolution (N. Y). 72:1500–1514. doi:10.1111/evo.13496.
Halliday T, Arnold SJ. 1987. Multiple mating by females : a perspective from quantitative genetics. Anim. Behav. 35:939–941.
Hamilton WD. 1964. The genetical evolution of Social Behaviour I-II. J. Theor. Biol. 7:1–52. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4.
Hamilton WD. 1980. Sex versus non-sex versus parasite. Oikos 35:282–290. doi:10.2307/3544435. Hamilton WD, Zuk M. 1982. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science (80-. ). 218:384–387. doi:10.1126/science.7123238.
Hammers M, Brouwer L. 2017. Rescue behaviour in a social bird: removal of sticky ‘bird-catcher tree’ seeds by group members. Behaviour 154:403–411. doi:10.1163/1568539X-00003428.
Hammers M, Kingma SA, Bebbington K, van de Crommenacker J, Spurgin LG, Richardson DS, Burke T, Dugdale HL, Komdeur J. 2015. Senescence in the wild: insights from a long-term study on Seychelles warblers. Exp. Gerontol. 71:69–79. doi:10.1016/j.exger.2015.08.019.
Hammers M, Kingma SA, Spurgin LG, Bebbington K, Dugdale HL, Burke T, Komdeur J, Richardson DS. 2019. Breeders that receive help age more slowly in a cooperatively breeding bird. Nat. Commun. 10:1301. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09229-3.
Hammers M, Richardson DS, Burke T, Komdeur J. 2012. Age-dependent terminal declines in reproductive output in a wild bird. PLoS One 7:e40413. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040413.
Hammers M, Richardson DS, Burke T, Komdeur J. 2013. The impact of reproductive investment and early-life environmental conditions on senescence: support for the disposable soma hypothesis. J. Evol. Biol. 26:1999–2007. doi:10.1111/jeb.12204.
Hasselquist D, Bensch S, von Schantz T. 1996. Correlation between male song repertoire, extra-pair paternity and offspring survival in the great reed warbler. Nature 381:229–232. doi:10.1038/381229a0. Hasson O, Stone L. 2009. Male infertility, female fertility and extrapair copulations. Biol. Rev. 84:225–244. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00068.x.
Hellmann JK, Ligocki IY, O’Connor CM, Reddon AR, Garvy KA, Marsh-Rollo SE, Gibbs HL, Balshine S, Hamilton IM. 2015. Reproductive sharing in relation to group and colony-level attributes in a cooperative breeding fish. Proceedings. Biol. Sci. 282:20150954. doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.0954. Herényi M, Gergely H, László H, Garamszegi Z, Hargitai R, Michl G, Rosivall B, Török J. 2012. Lifetime offspring production in relation to breeding lifespan, attractiveness, and mating status in male collared flycatchers. Oecologia 170:935–942. doi:10.1007/s00442-012-2362-4.
Hoi-Leitner M, Hoi H, Romero-Pujante M, Valera F. 1999. Female extra-pair behaviour and environmental quality in the serin (Serinus serinus): a test of the “constrained female hypothesis.” Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 266:1021–1026. doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0738.
Holman L. 2015. Bet hedging via multiple mating: A meta-analysis. Evolution (N. Y). 70:62–71. doi:10.1111/evo.12822.
Hsu YH, Schroeder J, Winney I, Burke T, Nakagawa S. 2014. Costly infidelity: low lifetime fitness of extra-pair offspring in a passerine bird. Evolution (N. Y). 68:2873–2884. doi:10.1111/evo.12475. Hsu YH, Schroeder J, Winney I, Burke T, Nakagawa S. 2015. Are extra-pair males different from cuckolded males? A case study and a meta-analytic examination. Mol. Ecol. 24:1558–1571. doi:10.1111/ mec.13124.
Hsu YH, Simons MJP, Schroeder J, Girndt A, Winney IS, Burke T, Nakagawa S. 2017. Age-dependent trajectories differ between within-pair and extra-pair paternity success. J. Evol. Biol. 30:951–959. doi:10.1111/jeb.13058.
Hunter FM, Petrie M, Otronen M, Birkhead T, Pape Muller A. 1993. Why do females copulate repeatedly with one male? Trends Ecol. Evol. 8:21–26. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(93)90126-A.
Hurst G, Sharpe R. 1995. Sexually transmitted disease in a promiscuous insect, Adalia bipunctata. Ecol. Entomol. 20:230–236.
Ihle M, Kempenaers B, Forstmeier W. 2013. Does hatching failure breed infidelity? Behav. Ecol. 24:119–127. doi:10.1093/beheco/ars142.
Isvaran K, Clutton-Brock T. 2007. Ecological correlates of extra-group paternity in mammals. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 274:219–24. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3723.
Janowitz SA, Fischer K. 2012. Polyandry in Bicyclus anynana Butterflies Results from Sexual Conflict over Mating. Ethology 118:1140–1148. doi:10.1111/eth.12017.
Jennions MD, Petrie M. 2000. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 75:21–64. doi:10.1017/S0006323199005423.
Johnson AE, Pruett-Jones S. 2018. Reproductive promiscuity in the variegated fairy-wren: an alternative reproductive strategy in the absence of helpers? Anim. Behav. 139:171–180. doi:10.1016/j. anbehav.2018.03.015.
Johnson SL, Gemmell NJ. 2012. Are old males still good males and can females tell the difference? BioEssays 34:609–619. doi:10.1002/bies.201100157.
Jones AG, Ratterman NL. 2009. Mate choice and sexual selection: what have we learned since Darwin? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106:10001–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.0901129106.
Keller L. 1995. Social life: the paradox of multiple-queen colonies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:355–360. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89133-8.
Keller L, Reeve HK. 1995. Why do females mate with multiple males? The sexually selected sperm hypothesis. Adv. Study Behav. 24:291–315. doi:10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60397-6.
Kempenaers B. 2007. Mate choice and genetic quality: a review of the heterozygosity theory. Adv. Study Behav. 37:189–278. doi:10.1016/S0065-3454(07)37005-8.
Kempenaers B, Congdon B, Boag P, Robertson RJ. 1999. Extrapair paternity and egg hatchability in tree swallows: evidence for the genetic compatibility hypothesis? Behav. Ecol. 10:304–311. doi:10.1093/ beheco/10.3.304.
Kempenaers B, Everding S, Bishop C, Boag P, Robertson RJ. 2001. Extra-pair paternity and the reproductive role of male floaters in the tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolor). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49:251–259. doi:10.1007/s002650000305.
Kempenaers B, Verheyen GR, Dhondi A. 1997. Extrapair paternity in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus): female choice, male charateristics, and offspring quality. Behav. Ecol. 8:481–492. doi:10.1093/ beheco/8.5.481.
Kingma SA, Bebbington K, Hammers M, Richardson DS, Komdeur J. 2016. Delayed dispersal and the costs and benefits of different routes to independent breeding in a cooperatively breeding bird. Evolution (N. Y). 70:2595–2610. doi:10.1111/evo.13071.
Kirkpatrick M, Price T, Arnold SJ. 1990. The Darwin-Fisher theory of sexual selection in monogamous birds. Evolution (N. Y). 44:180–193.
Kitchen AM, Gese EM, Waits LP, Karki SM, Schauster ER. 2006. Multiple breeding strategies in the swift fox, Vulpes velox. Anim. Behav. 71:1029–1038. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.06.015.
Klemme I, Ylönen H. 2010. Polyandry enhances offspring survival in an infanticidal species. Biol. Lett. 6:24–6. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.0500.
Kleven O, Jacobsen F, Izadnegahdar R, Robertson RJ, Lifjeld JT. 2006a. No evidence of paternal genetic contribution to nestling cell-mediated immunity in the North American barn swallow. Anim. Behav. 71:839–845. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.06.019.
Kleven O, Jacobsen F, Izadnegahdar R, Robertson RJ, Lifjeld JT. 2006b. Male tail streamer length predicts fertilization success in the North American barn swallow (Hirundo rustica erythrogaster). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 59:412–418. doi:10.1007/s00265-005-0065-0.
Kleven O, Jacobsen F, Robertson RJ, Lifjeld JT. 2005. Extrapair mating between relatives in the barn swallow: a role for kin selection? Biol. Lett. 1:389–92. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2005.0376.
Koenig WD, Albano SS. 1987. Lifetime reproductive success, selection and the opportunity for selection in the White-tailed skimmer Plathemis lydia (Odonata: Libellulidae). Evolution (N. Y). 41:22–36. Koenig WD, Albano SS, Dickinson JL. 1991. A comparison of methods to partition selection acting via components of fitness: do larger male bullfrogs have greater hatching success? J. Evol. Biol. 4:309–320.
doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.1991.4020309.x.
Kokko H. 1998. Good genes, old age and life-history trade-offs. Evol. Ecol. 12:739–750. doi:10.1023/A:1006541701002.
Kokko H, Ots I. 2006. When not to avoid inbreeding. Evolution 60:467–475. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01128.x.
Kokko H, Rankin DJ. 2006. Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density-dependent effects in mating systems. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 361:319–334. doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1784. Komdeur J. 1991. Cooperative breeding in the Seychelles warbler. Cambridge: University of Cambridge. Komdeur J. 1992. Importance of habitat saturation and territory quality for evolution of cooperative breeding in the Seychelles warbler. Nature 358:493–495. doi:10.1038/355242a0.
Komdeur J. 1994. Experimental evidence for helping and hindering by previous offspring in the cooperative-breeding Seychelles warbler Acrocephalus sechellensis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 34:175–186. doi:10.2307/4600929.
Komdeur J. 1996a. Seasonal timing of reproduction in a tropical bird, the seychelles warbler: a field experiment using translocation. J. Biol. Rhythms 11:333–346. doi:10.1177/074873049601100407. Komdeur J. 1996b. Influence of helping and breeding experience on reproductive performance in the Seychelles warbler: a translocation experiment. Behav. Ecol. 7:326–333.
Komdeur J. 2001. Mate guarding in the Seychelles warbler is energetically costly and adjusted to paternity risk. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 268:2103–2111. doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1750.
Komdeur J, Burke T, Dugdale HL, Richardson DS. 2016. Seychelles warblers: the complexities of the helping paradox. In: Koenig WD, Dickinson JL, editors. Cooperative Breeding in Vertebrates: Studies of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 197–217.
Komdeur J, Burke T, Richardson DS. 2007. Explicit experimental evidence for the effectiveness of proximity as mate-guarding behaviour in reducing extra-pair fertilization in the Seychelles warbler. Mol. Ecol. 16:3679–3688. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03420.x.
Komdeur J, Edelaar P. 2001. Male Seychelles warblers use territory budding to maximize lifetime fitness in a saturated environment. Behav. Ecol. 12:706–715. doi:10.1093/beheco/12.6.706.
Komdeur J, Kraaijeveld-Smit F, Kraaijeveld K, Edelaar P. 1999. Explicit experimental evidence for the role of mate guarding in minimizing loss of paternity in the Seychelles warbler. Proc. R. Soc. B 266:2075–2081.
Warblers fail to recolonize nearby islands: unwilling or unable to fly there? Ibis (Lond. 1859). 146:298–302. doi:10.1046/j.1474-919X.2004.00255.x.
Krokene C. 1998. The function of extrapair paternity in blue tits and great tits: good genes or fertility insurance? Behav. Ecol. 9:649–656. doi:10.1093/beheco/9.6.649.
Kruuk LEB, Hadfield JD. 2007. How to separate genetic and environmental causes of similarity between relatives. J. Evol. Biol. 20:1890–1903. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01377.x.
Lebigre C, Arcese P, Reid JM. 2013. Decomposing variation in male reproductive success: age-specific variances and covariances through extra-pair and within-pair reproduction. Jones J, editor. J. Anim. Ecol. 82:872–883. doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12063.
Lebigre C, Arcese P, Sardell RJ, Keller LF, Reid JM. 2012. Extra-pair paternity and the variance in male fitness in song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Evolution (N. Y). 66:3111–3129. doi:10.1111/j. Leclaire S, Nielsen JF, Sharp SP, Clutton-Brock TH. 2013. Mating strategies in dominant meerkats: evidence for extra-pair paternity in relation to genetic relatedness between pair mates. J. Evol. Biol. 26:1499–1507. doi:10.1111/jeb.12151.
Lee-Jenkins SSY, Smith ML, Wisenden BD, Wong A, Godin J-GJ. 2015. Genetic evidence for mixed broods and extra-pair matings in a socially monogamous biparental cichlid fish. Behaviour 152:1507–1526. doi:10.1163/1568539X-00003289.
Lee HJ, Heim V, Meyer A. 2016. Genetic evidence for prevalence of alloparental care in a socially monogamous biparental cichlid fish, Perissodus microlepis , from Lake Tanganyika supports the “selfish shepherd effect” hypothesis. Ecol. Evol. 6:2843–2853. doi:10.1002/ece3.2089.
Lee PLM, Hays GC. 2004. Polyandry in a marine turtle: females make the best of a bad job. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101:6530–5. doi:10.1073/pnas.0307982101.
Lemaître J-F, Gaillard J-M. 2017. Reproductive senescence: new perspectives in the wild. Biol. Rev. 92:2182–2199. doi:10.1111/brv.12328.
Li S-H, Brown JL. 2000. High frequency of extrapair fertilization in a plural breeding bird, the Mexican jay, revealed by DNA microsatellites. Anim. Behav. 60:867–877. doi:10.1006/ANBE.2000.1554. Liersch S, Schmid-Hempel P. 1998. Genetic variation within social insect colonies reduces parasite load. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 265:221–225. doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0285.
Lombardo MP, Thorpe P a. 2000. Microbes in tree swallow semen. J. Wildl. Dis. 36:460–468. doi:10.7589/0090-3558-36.3.460.
strongly from cuckoldry than older males. Zoology 110:387–97. doi:10.1016/j.zool.2007.07.005. Lumley AJ, Michalczyk Ł, Kitson JJN, Spurgin LG, Morrison C a., Godwin JL, Dickinson ME, Martin OY, Emerson BC, Chapman T, et al. 2015. Sexual selection protects against extinction. Nature 522:470–473. doi:10.1038/nature14419.
MacColl ADC, Hatchwell BJ. 2003. Sharing of caring: nestling provisioning behaviour of long-tailed tit, Aegithalos caudatus, parents and helpers. Anim. Behav. 66:955–964. doi:10.1006/anbe.2003.2268. Mayer C, Pasinelli G. 2013. New support for an old hypothesis: density affects extra-pair paternity. Ecol. Evol. 3:694–705. doi:10.1002/ece3.489.
McDonald GC, Spurgin LG, Fairfield EA, Richardson DS, Pizzari T. 2017. Pre- and postcopulatory sexual selection favor aggressive, young males in polyandrous groups of red junglefowl. Evolution (N. Y). 71:1653–1669. doi:10.1111/evo.13242.
McFarlane SE, Lane JE, Taylor RW, Gorrell JC, Coltman DW, Humphries MM, Boutin S, McAdam AG. 2011. The heritability of multiple male mating in a promiscuous mammal. Biol. Lett. 7:368–71. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2010.1003.
McLeod L, Marshall DJ. 2009. Do genetic diversity effects drive the benefits associated with multiple mating? A test in a marine invertebrate. PLoS One 4. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006347.
Medawar PB. 1952. An unsolved problem of biology. Evol. Heal. Dis. doi:10.1016/ S0140-6736(00)99799-X.
Merilä J, Sheldon BC. 2000. Lifetime reproductive success and heritability in nature. Source Am. Nat. 155:301–310. doi:10.1086/303330.
Michalczyk L, Millard a. L, Martin OY, Lumley a. J, Emerson BC, Chapman T, Gage MJG. 2011. Inbreeding promotes female promiscuity. Science. 333:1739–1742. doi:10.1126/science.1207314. Milinski M. 2006. The major histocompatibility complex, sexual selection, and mate choice. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37:159–186. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110242.
Moller AP. 1991. Density-dependent extra-pair copulations in the swallow Hirundo rustica. Ethology 87:316–329. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1991.tb00255.x.
Moller AP, Birkhead TR. 1993. Cuckoldry and sociality : a comparative study of birds. Am. Nat. 142:118–140.
Moore OR, Stutchbury BJM, Quinn JS. 1999. Extrapair mating system of an asynchronously breeding tropical songbird: The Mangrove Swallow. Auk 116:1039–1046. doi:10.2307/4089683.
López-Arrabé J. 2015. Extra-pair paternity declines with female age and wing length in the pied flycatcher. Wright J, editor. Ethology 121:501–512. doi:10.1111/eth.12364.
Morrisey MB, Wilson AJ. 2009. Pedantics: an R package for pedigree-based genetic simulation and pedigree manipulation, characterization and viewing. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 10:711–719. doi:10.1111/ j.1755-0998.2009.02817.x.
Morton ES, Derrickson KC. 1990. The biological significance of age-specific return schedules in breeding purple martins. Condor 92:1040–1050. doi:10.2307/1368740.
Morton ES, Forman L, Braun M. 1990. Extrapair fertilizations and the evolution of colonial breeding in purple martins. Auk 107:275–283. doi:10.2307/4087610.
Mulder RA, Dunn PO, Cockburn A, Lazenby-Cohen KA, Howell MJ. 1994. Helpers liberate female fairy-wrens from constraints on extra-pair mate choice. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 255:223–229. doi:10.1098/rspb.1994.0032.
Muller HJ. 1932. Some genetic aspects of sex. Am. Nat. 66:118–138. doi:10.1086/280418.
Muller HJ. 1964. The relation of recombination to mutational advance. Mutat. Res. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 1:2–9. doi:10.1016/0027-5107(64)90047-8.
Munshi-South J. 2007. Extra-pair paternity and the evolution of testis size in a behaviorally monogamous tropical mammal, the large treeshrew (Tupaia tana). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62:201–212. doi:10.1007/ s00265-007-0454-7.
Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H. 2010. Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists. Biol. Rev. 85:no-no. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00141.x.
Nakagawa S, Schroeder J, Burke T. 2015. Sugar-free extrapair mating: a comment on Arct et al. Behav. Ecol. 26:971–972. doi:10.1093/beheco/arv041.
Nichols HJ, Cant MA, Sanderson JL. 2015. Adjustment of costly extra-group paternity according to inbreeding risk in a cooperative mammal. Behav. Ecol. 26:1486–1494. doi:10.1093/beheco/arv095. Van Noordwijk M, Van Schaik C. 2004. Sexual Selection in Primates: New and Comparative Perspectives. In: Kappeler P, Van Schaik C, editors. Evolutionary Anthropology. Vol. 11. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 173–175.
Nussey DH, Froy H, Lemaitre J-F, Gaillard J-M, Austad SN. 2013. Senescence in natural populations of animals: widespread evidence and its implications for bio-gerontology. Ageing Res. Rev. 12:214–225. doi:10.1016/J.ARR.2012.07.004.
Tephritidae) in relation to mating status. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 79:705–710. Otto SP. 2008. Sexual Reproduction and the Evolution of Sex. Nat. Educ. 1:182.
Otto SP, Lenormand T. 2002. Evolution of sexresolving the paradox of sex and recombination. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3:252–261. doi:10.1038/nrg761.
Otto SPP. 2009. The Evolutionary Enigma of Sex. Am. Nat. 174:S1–S14. doi:10.1086/599084. Parker G. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: Blum M, Blum N, editors. Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. New York: Academic Press. p. 123–163.
Pärt T, Arlt D, Doligez B, Low M, Qvarnström A. 2011. Prospectors combine social and environmental information to improve habitat selection and breeding success in the subsequent year. J. Anim. Ecol. 8080:1227–1235. doi:10.1.
Patrick SC, Chapman JR, Dugdale HL, Quinn JL, Sheldon BC. 2012. Promiscuity, paternity and personality in the great tit. Proc. Biol. Sci. 279:1724–30. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1820.
Petrie M, Kempenaers B. 1998. Extra-pair paternity in birds: Explaining variation between species and populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:52–57. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01232-9.
Pew J, Muir PH, Wang J, Frasier TR. 2015. related: an R package for analysing pairwise relatedness from codominant molecular markers. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 15:557–561. doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12323. van de Pol M, Verhulst S. 2006. Age‐dependent traits: a new statistical model to separate within‐ and between‐individual effects. Am. Nat. 167:766–773. doi:10.1086/503331.
Powell MJD. 2009. The BOBYQA algorithm for bound constrained optimization without derivatives. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
Price TD. 1984. Sexual selection on body size, territory and plumage variables in a population of Darwin’s finches. Evolution (N. Y). 38:327–341. doi:10.2307/2408491.
Queller DC, Goodnight KF. 1989. Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution (N. Y). 43:258–275. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04226.x.
Raj Pant S, Komdeur J, Burke TA, Dugdale HL, Richardson DS. 2019. Socio-ecological conditions and female infidelity in the Seychelles warbler. Behav. Ecol. 30:1254–1264. doi:10.1093/beheco/arz072. Ramos AG, Nunziata SO, Lance SL, Rodríguez C, Faircloth BC, Gowaty PA, Drummond H. 2014. Interactive effects of male and female age on extra-pair paternity in a socially monogamous seabird. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 68:1603–1609. doi:10.1007/s00265-014-1769-9.
and male removal on extrapair paternity in the pied flycatcher. Auk 118:147–155. doi:10.1093/ auk/118.1.147.
Reid JM. 2012. Predicting evolutionary responses to selection on polyandry in the wild: additive genetic covariances with female extra-pair reproduction. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 279:4652–4660. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.1835.
Reid JM. 2015. What can we really say about relatedness and extrapair paternity: a comment on Arct et al. Behav. Ecol. 26:969–970. doi:10.1093/beheco/arv027.
Reid JM, Arcese P, Keller LF, Losdat S. 2014. Female and male genetic effects on offspring paternity: additive genetic (co)variances in female extra-pair reproduction and male paternity success in song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Evolution 68:2357–70. doi:10.1111/evo.12424.
Reid JM, Arcese P, Losdat S. 2014. Genetic covariance between components of male reproductive success: within-pair vs. extra-pair paternity in song sparrows. J. Evol. Biol. 27:2046–56. doi:10.1111/ jeb.12445.
Reid JM, Arcese P, Sardell RJ, Keller LF. 2011a. Additive genetic variance, heritability, and inbreeding depression in male extra-pair reproductive success. Am. Nat. 177:177–187. doi:10.1086/657977. Reid JM, Arcese P, Sardell RJ, Keller LF. 2011b. Heritability of female extra-pair paternity rate in song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 278:1114–20. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1704. Reid JM, Sardell RJ. 2012. Indirect selection on female extra-pair reproduction? Comparing the additive genetic value of maternal half-sib extra-pair and within-pair offspring. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 279:1700–1708. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.2230.
Reid JM, Wolak ME. 2018. Is there indirect selection on female extra-pair reproduction through cross-sex genetic correlations with male reproductive fitness? Evol. Lett. 2:159–168. doi:10.1002/ evl3.56.
Richardson DS, Bristol R, Shah NJ. 2006. Translocation of Seychelles warbler Acrocephalus sechellensis to establish a new population on Denis Island, Seychelles. Conserv. Evid. 3:54–57. Richardson DS, Burke T. 1999. Extra-pair paternity in relation to male age in Bullock’s orioles. Mol. Ecol. 8:2115–2126. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.1999.00832.x.
Richardson DS, Burke T. 2001. Extrapair paternity and variance in reproductive success related to breeding density in Bullock’s orioles. Anim. Behav. 62:519–525. doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1778. Richardson DS, Burke T, Komdeur J. 2002. Direct benefits and the evolutionof female-biased cooperative breeding in Seychelles warblers. Evolution (N. Y). 56:2313–2321. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00154.x.
Richardson DS, Burke T, Komdeur J. 2007. Grandparent helpers: the adaptive significance of older, post-dominant helpers in the Seychelles warbler. Evolution (N. Y). 61:2790–2800. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00222.x.
Richardson DS, Jury FL, Blaakmeer K, Komdeur J, Burke T. 2001. Parentage assignment and extra-group paternity in a cooperative breeder: the Seychelles warbler (Acrocephalus sechellensis). Mol. Ecol. 10:2263–2273. doi:10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01355.x.
Richardson DS, Komdeur J, Brouwer L, Eikenaar C. 2010. Sex biased natal dispersal is not a fixed trait in a stable population of Seychelles warblers. Behaviour 147:1577–1590. doi:10.1163/000579510X510511. Richardson DS, Komdeur J, Burke T. 2003. Avian behaviour: altruism and infidelity among warblers. Nature 422:580. doi:10.1038/422580a.
Richardson DS, Komdeur J, Burke T. 2004. Inbreeding in the Seychelles Warbler : environment-dependent maternal effects. Evolution (N. Y). 58:2037–2048. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00488.x.
Richardson DS, Komdeur J, Burke T, von Schantz T. 2005. MHC-based patterns of social and extra-pair mate choice in the Seychelles warbler. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 272:759–67. doi:10.1098/ rspb.2004.3028.
Ridley M. 1993. Clutch size and mating frequency in parasitic hymenoptera. Am. Nat. 142:893–910. doi:10.1086/285579.
Robertson RJ, Stutchbury BJM. 1988. Experimental evidence for sexually selected infanticide in tree swallows. Anim. Behav. 36:749–753. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(88)80158-1.
Rowe L. 1992. Convenience polyandry in a water strider: foraging conflicts and female control of copulation frequency and guarding duration. Anim. Behav. 44:189–202. doi:10.1016/0003-3472(92)90025-5.
Rowe L, Arnqvist G, Sih a, J Krupa J. 1994. Sexual conflict and the evolutionary ecology of mating patterns: water striders as a model system. Trends Ecol. Evol. (Personal Ed. 9:289–293. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(94)90032-9.
Rubenstein DR. 2007. Territory quality drives intraspecific patterns of extrapair paternity. Behav. Ecol. 18:1058–1064. doi:10.1093/beheco/arm077.
Ruiz-Lambides A V., Weiß BM, Kulik L, Stephens C, Mundry R, Widdig A. 2017. Long-term analysis on the variance of extra-group paternities in rhesus macaques. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 71:208–229. doi:10.1007/s00265-017-2291-7.
Ruiz-Lambides A V., Weiß BM, Kulik L, Widdig A. 2018. Which male and female characteristics influence the probability of extragroup paternities in rhesus macaques, Macaca mulatta? Anim. Behav.
140:119–127. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.04.018.
Russell AF, Langmore NE, Gardner JL, Kilner RM. 2008. Maternal investment tactics in superb fairy-wrens. Proc. Biol. Sci. 275:29–36. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0821.
Saino N, Primmer CR, Ellegren H, Moller AP. 1999. Breeding synchrony and paternity in the barn swallow (Hirundo rustica). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 45:211–218. doi:10.1007/s002650050555. Sakurai G, Kasuya E. 2008. The costs of harassment in the adzuki bean beetle. Anim. Behav. 75:1367–1373. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.09.010.
Sardell RJ, Arcese P, Keller LF, Reid JM. 2012. Are there indirect fitness benefits of female extra-pair reproduction? Lifetime reproductive success of within-pair and extra-pair offspring. Am. Nat. 179:779–93. doi:10.1086/665665.
Sarhan A, Kokko H. 2007. Multiple mating in the glanville fritillary butterfly: A case of within-generation bet hedging? Evolution (N. Y). 61:606–616. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00053.x.
Schlicht E, Kempenaers B. 2013. Effects of social and extra-pair mating on sexual selection in Blue Tits (Cyanistes caeruleus). Evolution (N. Y). 67:1420–1434. doi:10.1111/evo.12073.
Schmid-Hempel P. 1994. Infection and colony variability in social insects. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 346:313–321. doi:10.1098/rstb.1994.0148.
Schmoll T, Dietrich V, Winkel W, Epplen JT, Schurr F, Lubjuhn T. 2005. Paternal genetic effects on offspring fitness are context dependent within the extrapair mating system of a socially monogamous passerine. Evolution (N. Y). 59:645–657. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01023.x.
Schmoll T, Quellmalz A, Dietrich V, Winkel W, Epplen JT, Lubjuhn T. 2005. Genetic similarity between pair mates is not related to extrapair paternity in the socially monogamous coal tit. Anim. Behav. 69:1013–1022. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.08.010.
Schmoll T, Schurr FM, Winkel W, Epplen JT, Lubjuhn T. 2009. Lifespan, lifetime reproductive performance and paternity loss of within-pair and extra-pair offspring in the coal tit Periparus ater. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 276:337–45. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.1116.
Schroeder J, Hsu Y-H, Winney I, Simons M, Nakagawa S, Burke T. 2016. Predictably philandering females prompt poor paternal provisioning. Am. Nat. 188:219–230. doi:10.1086/687243.
Schulke O, Kappeler PM, Zischler H. 2004. Small testes size despite high extra-pair paternity in the pair-living nocturnal primate Phaner furcifer. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 55:293–301. doi:10.1007/ s00265-003-0709-x.
Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 257:25–30. doi:10.1098/rspb.1994.0089.
Sheldon BC, Ellegren H. 1999. Sexual selection resulting from extrapair paternity in collared flycatchers. Anim. Behav. 57:285–298. doi:10.1006/anbe.1998.0968.
Sheldon BC, Merila J, Qvarnstrom A, Gustafsson L, Ellegren H. 1997. Paternal genetic contribution to offspring condition predicted by size of male secondary sexual character. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 264:297–302. doi:10.1098/rspb.1997.0042.
Sherman PW, Seeley TD, Reeve HK. 1998. Parasites, pathogens, and polyandry in honey bees. Am. Nat. 151:392–396. doi:10.1086/286127.
Shuker DM, Phillimore AJ, Burton-Chellew MN, Hodge SE, West SA. 2007. The quantitative genetic basis of polyandry in the parasitoid wasp, Nasonia vitripennis. Heredity (Edinb). 98:69–73. doi:10.1038/ sj.hdy.6800897.
Simmons LW. 2003. The evolution of polyandry: patterns of genotypic variation in female mating frequency, male fertilization success and a test of the sexy-sperm hypothesis. J. Evol. Biol. 16:624–634. doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00572.x.
Slatyer RA, Mautz BS, Backwell PRY, Jennions MD. 2012. Estimating genetic benefits of polyandry from experimental studies: a meta-analysis. Biol. Rev. 87:1–33. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00182.x. Smuts BB, Smuts RW. 1993. Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in nonhuman primates and other mammals: evidence and theoretical implications. Adv. Study Behav. 22:1–63. doi:10.1016/ S0065-3454(08)60404-0.
Soucy S, Travis J. 2003. Multiple paternity and population genetic structure in natural populations of the poeciliid fish, Heterandria formosa. J. Evol. Biol. 16:1328–1336. doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00608.x.
Sousa BF, Westneat DF. 2013. Positive association between social and extra-pair mating in a polygynous songbird, the dickcissel (Spiza americana). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 67:243–255. doi:10.1007/ s00265-012-1444-y.
Spurgin LG, Wright DJ, van der Velde M, Collar NJ, Komdeur J, Burke T, Richardson DS. 2014. Museum DNA reveals the demographic history of the endangered Seychelles warbler. Evol. Appl. 7:1134–1143. doi:10.1111/eva.12191.
Stewart SLM, Westneat DF, Ritchison G. 2010. Extra-pair paternity in eastern bluebirds: effects of manipulated density and natural patterns of breeding synchrony. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 64:463–473. doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0862-y.
songbirds. Behaviour 132:675–690. doi:10.1163/156853995X00081.
Stutchbury BJM, Morton ES, Piper WH. 1998. Extra-pair mating system of a synchronously breeding tropical songbird. J. Avian Biol. 29:72–78. doi:10.2307/3677343.
Stutchbury BJM, Piper WH, Neudorf DL, Tarof SA, Rhymer JM, Fuller G, Fleischer RC. 1997. Correlates of extra-pair fertilization success in hooded warblers. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 40:119–126. doi:10.1007/s002650050324.
Tarof SA, Stutchbury B. 1998. Does breeding density covary with extra-pair fertilizations in Hooded Warblers? J. Avian Biol. 29:145–154. doi:10.2307/3677192.
Taylor ML, Price TAR, Wedell N. 2014. Polyandry in nature: a global analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 29:376–383. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2014.04.005.
Thornhill NW. 1993. The Natural History of Inbreeding and Outbreeding: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. University of Chicago Press.
Thornhill R, Alcock J. 1983. The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press. Tregenza T, Wedell N. 1998. Benefits of multiple mates in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Evolution (N. Y). 52:1726–1730. doi:10.2307/2411345.
Tregenza T, Wedell N. 2000. Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: invited review. Mol. Ecol. 9:1013–1027. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2000.00964.x.
Trivers RL. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B, editor. Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871-1971. Chicago, US: Aldine. p. 136–179.
Uller T, Olsson M. 2008. Multiple paternity in reptiles: Patterns and processes. Mol. Ecol. 17:2566–2580. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03772.x.
Václav R, Hoi H. 2002. Importance of colony size and breeding synchrony on behaviour, reproductive success and paternity in house sparrows Passer domesticus. Folia Zool. 51:35–48.
Vaclav R, Hoi H, Blomqvist D. 2003. Food supplementation affects extrapair paternity in house sparrows (Passer domesticus). Behav. Ecol. 14:730–735. doi:10.1093/beheco/arg059.
Veiga JP, Boto L. 2000. Low frequency of extra-pair fertilisations in House Sparrows breeding at high density. J. Avian Biol. 31:237–244. doi:10.1034/j.1600-048X.2000.310215.x.
Verboven N, Mateman a C. 1997. Low frequency of extra-pair fertilizations in the Great Tit Parus major revealed by DNA fingerprinting. J. Avian Biol. 28:231–239. doi:10.2307/3676974.
by purple martins. Anim. Behav. 52:123–132. doi:10.1006/anbe.1996.0158.
Wagner RH, Schug MD, Morton ES. 1996b. Condition-dependent control of paternity by female purple martins: implications for coloniality. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 38:379–389. doi:10.1007/s002650050255. Wang C, Lu X. 2011. Female ground tits prefer relatives as extra-pair partners: Driven by kin-selection? Mol. Ecol. 20:2851–2863. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05070.x.
Wang J. 2014. Marker-based estimates of relatedness and inbreeding coefficients: an assessment of current methods. J. Evol. Biol. 27:518–30. doi:10.1111/jeb.12315.
Watson PJ. 1991. Multiple paternity as genetic bet-hedging in female sierra dome spiders, Linyphia litigiosa (Linyphiidae). Anim. Behav. 41:343–360. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80486-5.
Webster MS, Chuang-Dobbs HC, Holmes RT. 2001. Microsatellite identification of extrapair sires in a socially monogamous warbler. Behav. Ecol. 12:439–446. doi:10.1093/beheco/12.4.439.
Webster MS, Pruett-Jones S, Westneat DF, Arnold SJ. 1995. Measuring the effects of pairing success, extra-pair copulations and mate quality on the opportunity for sexual selection. Evolution (N. Y). 49:1147–1157.
Webster MS, Tarvin KA, Tuttle EM, Pruett-Jones S. 2004. Reproductive promiscuity in the splendid fairy-wren: effects of group size and auxiliary reproduction. Behav. Ecol. 15:907–915. doi:10.1093/ beheco/arh093.
Webster MS, Tarvin KA, Tuttle EM, Pruett-Jones S. 2007. Promiscuity drives sexual selection in a social monogamous bird. Evolution (N. Y). 61:2205–2211. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00208.x. Wedell N. 1997. Ejaculate size in bushcrickets: the importance of being large. J. Evol. Biol. 10:315–325. doi:10.1007/s000360050025.
Weismann A. 1889. The significance of sexual reproduction in the theory of natural selection. In: Poulton EB, Schonland S, Shipley AE, editors. Essays upon heredity and kindred biological problems. Clarendon: Oxford University Press. p. 251–332.
Westneat DF. 1990. Genetic parentage in the indigo bunting: a study using DNA fingerprinting. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 27:67–76. doi:10.1007/BF00183315.
Westneat DF. 1994. To guard mates or go forage - conflicting demands affect the paternity of male red-winged blackbirds. Am. Nat. 144:343–354. doi:10.2307/2678832.
Westneat DF, Sherman PW. 1997. Density and extra-pair fertilization in birds: a comparative analysis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41:205–215.
Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34:365–396. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132439.
Wetzel DP, Westneat DF. 2009. Heterozygosity and extra-pair paternity: biased tests result from the use of shared markers. Mol. Ecol. 18:2010–2021. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04114.x.
While Geoffrey M, Sinn DL, Wapstra E. 2009. Female aggression predicts mode of paternity acquisition in a social lizard. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 276:2021–9. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.1926.
While Geoffrey M., Uller T, WAPSTRA E. 2009. Within-population variation in social strategies characterize the social and mating system of an Australian lizard, Egernia whitii. Austral Ecol. 34:938–949. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2009.02002.x.
Whittingham L a, Dunn PO, Wittingham L a. 2001. Survival of extrapair and within-pair young in tree swallows. Behav. Ecol. 12:496–500. doi:10.1093/beheco/12.4.496.
Wigby S, Chapman T. 2005. Sex peptide causes mating costs in female Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 15:316–321. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.051.
Williams GC. 1957. Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution (N. Y). 11:398. doi:10.2307/2406060.
Wing S. 1988. Cost of mating for female insects: risk of predation in Photinus collustrans (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Am. Nat. 131:139–142.
Wolff JO, MacDonald DW. 2004. Promiscuous females protect their offspring. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:127–134. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2003.12.009.
Wright DJ, Brouwer L, Mannarelli M-E, Burke T, Komdeur J, Richardson DS. 2015. Social pairing of Seychelles warblers under reduced constraints: MHC, neutral heterozygosity, and age. Behav. Ecol. 27:295–303. doi:10.1093/beheco/arv150.
Wright DJ, Shah NJ, Richardson DS. 2014. Translocation of the Seychelles warbler Acrocephalus sechellensis to establish a new population on Frégate Island, Seychelles. Conserv. Evid. 11:20–24. Wright DJ, Spurgin LG, Collar NJ, Komdeur J, Burke T, Richardson DS. 2014. The impact of translocations on neutral and functional genetic diversity within and among populations of the Seychelles warbler. Mol. Ecol. 23:2165–2177. doi:10.1111/mec.12740.
Wright LI, Fuller WJ, Godley BJ, McGowan A, Tregenza T, Broderick AC. 2013. No benefits of polyandry to female green turtles. Behav. Ecol. 24:1022–1029. doi:10.1093/beheco/art003.
Wu J-S, Chiang P-J, Lin L-K. 2012. Monogamous system in the Taiwan vole Microtus kikuchii inferred from microsatellite DNA and home ranges. Zool. Stud. 51:204–212.
13:246–250. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01383-4.
Yasui Y. 2001. Female multiple mating as a genetic bet-hedging strategy when mate choice criteria are unreliable. Ecol. Res. 16:605–616. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1703.2001.00423.x.
Yezerinac Stephen M., Weatherhead PJ, Boag Peter T., Weatherhead J, Boag Peter T, Yezerinac S M, Weatherhead -P J, Boag P T. 1995. Extra-pair paternity and the opportunity for sexual selection in a socially monogamous bird (Dendroica petechia). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37:179–188.
Zeh J a., Zeh DW. 1996. The evolution of polyandry I: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 263:1711–1717. doi:10.1098/rspb.1996.0250.
Zeh JA, Zeh DW. 2001. Reproductive mode and the genetic benefits of polyandry. Anim. Behav. 61:1051–1063. doi:10.1006.
Zietsch BP, Westberg L, Santtila P, Jern P. 2015. Genetic analysis of human extrapair mating: heritability, between-sex correlation, and receptor genes for vasopressin and oxytocin. Evol. Hum. Behav. 36:130–136. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.10.001.
Zöttl M, Fischer S, Taborsky M. 2013. Partial brood care compensation by female breeders in response to experimental manipulation of alloparental care. Anim. Behav. 85:1471–1478. doi:10.1016/j. anbehav.2013.03.045.
