• No results found

Relationships between grammatical encoding and decoding: an experimental psycholinguistic study

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Relationships between grammatical encoding and decoding: an experimental psycholinguistic study"

Copied!
9
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Relationships between grammatical encoding and decoding: an

experimental psycholinguistic study

Olsthoorn, N.M.

Citation

Olsthoorn, N. M. (2007, November 29). Relationships between grammatical encoding and decoding: an experimental psycholinguistic study. Retrieved from

https://hdl.handle.net/1887/12470

Version: Corrected Publisher’s Version

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden

Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/12470

Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable).

(2)

Relationships between grammatical

encoding and decoding

An experimental psycholinguistic study

Nomi Olsthoorn

(3)
(4)

Relationships between grammatical encoding and decoding An experimental psycholinguistic study

Proefschrift

ter verkrijging van

de graad van Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden

op gezag van Rector Magnificus prof. mr. P.F. van der Heijden, volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties

te verdedigen op donderdag 29 november 2007 klokke 13:45 uur

door

Nomi Maria Olsthoorn geboren te Delft

in 1974

(5)

Promotor

prof. dr. Gerard Kempen Referent

dr. Robert Hartsuiker (Universiteit Gent) Overige leden van de promotiecommissie

prof. dr. Annette de Groot (Universiteit van Amsterdam) dr. Wido la Heij

prof. dr. Patrick Hudson

prof. dr. Jan Hulstijn (Universiteit van Amsterdam)

(6)

1 Contents

Introduction 3

Chapter 1 The architecture of grammatical processing 5 Chapter 2 Testing the independent-resources model of the

language system

19

Chapter 3 Syntactic Priming: a survey 41

Chapter 4 Reaction time priming in cued picture description 59 Chapter 5 Reaction time priming in sentence completion 85

Chapter 6 General Discussion and summary 107

Appendices 114

References 125

Samenvatting 135

Epilogue 145

Curriculum Vitae 148

(7)

2 A note on the experimental set-up

All experiments reported in this thesis were conducted, that is prepared and executed, by means of the Nijmegen Experimental Set-Up (NESU) software and hardware, developed at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics in Nijmegen.

(8)

3 Introduction

Language is central to our behaviour. We use language all the time, but although speaking and understanding language seem so easy, automatic and effortless, the processes involved are by no means entirely clear and continue to be the subject of many studies. This thesis is no exception. It concerns sentences: how we build them, how we comprehend them. With words being the building stones of sentences, grammar is the mortar that glues together these bricks of meaning and ideas into firm and (usually) well-formed sentences. The bricks are important, but the mortar is essential. Without mortar the bricks are just a pile, but by means of the cement the meaningless pile can become a wall, a house, a church. Grammatical processing is the topic of this thesis. In particular, I will explore some relationships between grammatical production and comprehension processes, thus focussing on two aspects: the overlap between production and comprehension, and the mechanics of syntactic priming from comprehension to production.

Plan of this thesis

In Chapter 1, I will first introduce a widely accepted architecture of the language system. This architecture is based on the presumably distinct tasks of language production on the one hand, and language comprehension on the other. However, as far as grammatical processing is concerned, this duality is mainly motivated by theoretical arguments, rather than empirical data. In Chapter 2 some of the empirical implications of such a dual-processor model will be tested and alternative models will be discussed. I will report two experiments that aim to investigate the overlap between grammatical encoding

(9)

4

and decoding by means of two versions of a new paradigm, the Edited- Reading-Aloud (ERA) task: Pluralising and paraphrasing. At the end of Chapter 2, I will present preliminary comclusions about the relationship between syntactic comprehension and production.

Chapters 3 through 5 will subsequently consider another aspect of the relationship between grammatical encoding and decoding: syntactic priming.

This phenomenon, the structural repetition of syntactic constructions, can offer more insight in the interplay between production and comprehension of sentences, and in the workings of grammatical processing in general, as it concerns representations that are shared between syntactic production and comprehension. In Chapter 3, I will therefore start out by giving an overview of syntactic priming studies, to be followed by two chapters in which the online dynamics of syntactic priming are investigated by means of experiments. More specifically, I was interested in studying reaction time effects of syntactic priming effects that are predicted to occur by one of the dominant theories of syntactic priming. In order to rule out non-syntactic (lexical and conceptual) priming effects, we concentrated on word order as a possible target of syntactic priming mechanisms. However, the research took a special turn, because, although we did manage to replicate response tendency priming, we failed to find any reaction time effects of word order priming. This thesis ends with a concluding chapter in which I hope to integrate the results of all of the above.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Condition PARA-CHANGE consists of grammatical input sentences, like (3a) (The headmaster complained “I have seen a nasty cartoon of myself in the hall”), and contains the

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden Downloaded.

On the other hand, if grammatical encoding and decoding are not as separate as often assumed, a shared-resources model would predict that reaction times are not affected by

Effects of syntactic repetition on language comprehension, poster presented at Architectures and Mechanisms of Language Processing (AMLaP)?. Head-Driven Phrase

In particular I would like to express my gratitude to Marlies van Beek and Laurine Ruijten at the Erasmus University Rotterdam; at the University of Amsterdam, Bregje van

Sinds augustus is zij werkzaam als postdoc onderzoeker bij het Amsterdam Centre for Language and Communication aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam, waar zij onderzoek doet

Het is niet mogelijk om tegelijkertijd twee aparte syntactische structuren voor encoderen en decoderen actief te houden en te bewerken.. Het is niet uit te sluiten dat beperkingen

Combining a picture-word interference task (thought to tap selective inhibition) with a stop-signal task (nonselective inhibition), we found longer naming latencies for pictures