Effects of freshwater flux (FWF) forcing on interannual climate variability
in the tropical Pacific
Rong-Hua Zhang
2
Effects of freshwater flux (FWF) forcing on interannual climate variability
in the tropical Pacific
Rong-Hua Zhang
mixed layer
Processes involved in ENSO: Forcings & feedbacks
Thermocline
SST wind
Heat Flux
4
mixed layer
Thermocline
Processes involved in ENSO: Forcings & feedbacks
Thermocline
SST wind
Pre
Eve
Heat Flux Freshwater Flux
El Nino La Nina
El Nino and La Nina Precipitation Anomaly Patterns Warm Pacific Cold Pacific
Red: positive precipitation anomalies Blue: negative precipitation anomalies (normalized [by mean] anomalies, i.e., σ/μ)
6
Roles of freshwater flux (FWF) forcing &
related salinity effect
in the Tropical Pacific Ocean• Climate
9 One atmos forcing component;
9 Large FWF anomalies induced by ENSO;
9 Some unique FWF/salinity related phenomena;
9 Significant modulating effects;
9 Positive feedback
….
• Water/hydrological cycles ….
• Data assimilation ….
• Global warming ….
Challenge in freshwater forcing & ocean salinity issues
¾ Studies mostly on wind/heat flux, less on FWF;
¾ Studies mostly on ocean modeling, less on coupled ocean-atmos modeling;
¾ FWF forcing not adequately represented in models;
¾ Uncertainty in observations & data products;
¾ Intermodel differences
Intermediate ocean models level OGCMs
layer OGCMs
¾ Systematic biases & errors in SSS simulations:
8
10
Some approaches to improving SSS & SST simulations & predictions
1. Continue to improve parameterizations:
Great focus on We & Kv, (but Te & Se equally important !!)
2. Different ocean & coupled models:
Intermediate ocean model:
Layer models: isopycnal coordinate, …
Level models: z-coordinate (e.g., GFDL MOM) (Te & Se depiction in different models !!)
3. Flux/bias corrections in ocean & coupled models
(better mean climatology!!)
4. MOS (model output statistics) corrections
(get SSTAs first and then try to correct them regardless of reasons!!)
5. Ocean data assimilation
Taking into account
freshwater flux (FWF) forcing
¾ Identify bias sources for SSS simulation;
¾ Understanding basic processes involved;
¾ Improving model simulations of salinity;
¾ Improving ENSO simulations & prediction
;¾ Support for
satellite mission to measure SSS.This work
12
Outline
• Introduction
• A hybrid coupled model (HCMOGCM )
Ocean: The Cane-Gent OGCM Atmosphere: Wind stress: SVD-based;
Heat flux: Seager et al.;
FWF: SVD-based:
FWF = (P-E)clim+ αFWF • (P-E)inter
• The standard HCMOGCM simulation
• Sensitivity experiments:
• A FWF-induced positive feedback
• Summary
αFWF=1.0
αFWF=0.0 αFWF=2.0
Pre Pre
14
A SVD-based Empirical Model for (P-E)
interFWF = (P-E)clim+ αFWF • Svd ( SSTinter )
• P, E : ECHAM 4.5 AMIP run
• SST: Reynolds &
Smith
S
vd( SST
inter) = (P-E)
inter16
Hybrid Coupled Model at ESSIC/UMD
• The Gent-Cane ocean model
A sigma-layer, reduced-gravity OGCM with
(1) A hybrid mixing scheme
Chen, Rothstein & Busalacchi (1995)
(2) Coupling to an advective atmos mixed layer model (Murtugudde, Seager & Busalacchi 1995)
(3) Model specifications:
Tropical Pacific domain: 25N-25S; 31-layers;
Resolution: 1 deg in longitude and 0.5 deg in latitude
• An empirical atmospheric wind stress anomaly model (SVD-based)
σσσ
OGCM
SSTinter=SST-SSTclim
τ=τ
clim+
τinterA hybrid coupled ocean-atmosphere model
(P-E)clim+ (P-E)inter
Heat Flux (HF)
SSS Buoyancy Flux (QB)
Freshwater Flux (FWF)
Atmosphere Ocean
18
OGCM
SSTinter=SST-SSTclim
τ=τ
clim+
τinterA hybrid coupled ocean-atmosphere model
(P-E)clim and/or relaxation
Heat Flux (HF)
SSS Buoyancy Flux (QB)
Freshwater Flux (FWF)
Atmosphere Ocean
(P-E)clim and/or relaxation
Data & Model experiments
0 . 0 1 . 0 2 . 0
⎧⎪
⎨⎪
⎩
SSTinter=SST-SSTclim
τ=τclim+ τinter
(P-E)clim+ (P-E)inter
Heat Flux (HF)
SSS Buoyancy Flux (QB)
Freshwater Flux (FWF)
αFWF(P-E)inter
αFWF=
=> -1.0
=> 5.0
• Wind stress, P, E : ECHAM 4.5 AMIP run 1950-1997
• SST: Reynolds & Smith
20
Effects of freshwater flux (in general):
FWF = (P-E)clim+ (P-E)inter
Sea surface sailinty (SSS):
=> density => stratification & stability => mixing Buoyancy flux (Q
B):
QB = α•HF/(ρCp)+β•S0• FWF = QT + QS
Gaining (+) => more bouyant (lighter) =>
stable => shallow mixed layer => less entrainment
Effects of anomalous FWF during ENSO:
+ +
-
+-
+La Nina
- -
- +
+ -
El Nino
MLD SST QB
SSS QS
QT SST
SSS & Q
B=α•HF/(ρCp)+β•S0• FWF =QT+QS(as represented at Nino4 site)
22
Effects of anomalous FWF during ENSO:
+ +
-
+-
+La Nina
?
- -
- +
+ -
El Nino
MLD SST QB
SSS QS
QT SST
?
SSS & Q
B=α•HF/(ρCp)+β•S0• FWF =QT+QS(as represented at Nino4 site)
Effects of anomalous FWF during ENSO:
+ +
-
+-
+La Nina
- -
- +
+ -
El Nino
MLD SST QB
SSS QS
QT SST
Less entrainment More
stable
Less Less negative
More warming More
positive
Freshening
more Salty
shallow
deepening
SSS & Q
B=α•HF/(ρCp)+β•S0• FWF =QT+QS(as represented at Nino4 site)
24
αFWF=1
αFWF=0
26
αFWF=2
28
30
mixed layer
thermocline
Processes involved
Depth
Precip
Evap SST
P-E
mixed layer
thermocline
Processes involved
Depth
Precip
Evap SST
SSS P-E
Density/Mixing /Entrainment
32
mixed layer
thermocline
Processes involved
Depth
Precip
Evap SST
MLD QB P-E
Density/Mixing /Entrainment
mixed layer
thermocline
Processes involved
Depth
Precip
Evap SST
SSS MLD
QB P-E
Density/Mixing /Entrainment
SST
34
Buoyancy flux (Q
B) and its relation with Q
T& Q
SFWF = (P-E)clim+ αFWF • (P-E)inter
α•HF/(ρCp)+β•S0• FWF =QT+QS=QB Less
negative
Less positive
36
αFWF=2 QT + QS = QB
SST P-E SSSDiff SSTDiff
MLDDiff
A FWF-induced positive feedback
El Nino La Nina
38
SST P-E SSSDiff SSTDiff
MLDDiff
Reinforce FWF
-induced Origin
al anomaly
A FWF-induced positive feedback
El Nino La Nina
( a ) SSS
( b ) SST
αFWF=0.0 αFWF=1.0
αFWF=2.0
40
The std of selected anomaly fields
for αFWF =0.0, αFWF =1.0 and αFWF =2.0.
α
FWF= 2.0(Enhanced run)
α
FWF= 1.0(Standard run)
α
FWF= 0.0(Clim run) Niño4 region
0.92 0.76
0.67
Niño3 SST
0.64 0.57
0.53
Niño12 SST
1.08 1.24
1.49 QB
1.58 0.65
0.0 QS
1.95 1.72
1.49 QT
0.23 0.19
0.16 τx
9.0 6.7
5.6 MLD
0.97 0.85
0.76 SST
0.28 0.16
0.11 SSS
Summary
• Demonstrate
a positive feedback
induced by FWF;
• FWF: compensating effect on Q
Tfor Q
B;
• Different role of FWF vs. heat flux;
• Significant effects on interannual variability
> 10% differences in SST
> 20% differences in SSS
• FWF is a clear source for model biases
• Taking into account this
atmos forcingcomponent for better ENSO simulation & prediction
42
El Nino La Nina
El Nino and La Nina Precipitation Anomaly Patterns Warm Pacific Cold Pacific
Red: positive precipitation anomalies Blue: negative precipitation anomalies (normalized [by mean] anomalies, i.e., σ/μ)
44