• No results found

Influencers of store preference and the willingness to pay for national brands in hard discounters.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Influencers of store preference and the willingness to pay for national brands in hard discounters."

Copied!
10
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

2nd Semester 2016/2017

Cecile Steunebrink

S2703165

c.steunebrink@student.rug.nl

13-07-2017

(2)

Research question

What is the effect of store preference on the willingness to

pay for national brands in hard discounters, to what

extent is this moderated by brand loyalty for national

brands and what effect do store characteristics have on

(3)

Why this topic?

• 

Nowadays, many hard discounters have added national brand to their

assortment.

• 

Hard discounters want to differentiate themselves from other hard

discounters and to build a stronger and more sustainable relationship

with their consumers (Deleersnyder et al., 2007).

• 

National brands are known as major traffic builders (Ailawadi &

Harlam, 2004).

• 

Hard discounters want to move beyond a pure price-based competition

(Deleersnyder et al., 2007).

• 

Some researchers have investigated store preference and willingness to

pay, but they didn’t take into account the supermarket type.

• 

Bearden (1977); drivers of store preference

(4)
(5)
(6)

Research method

• 

Choice-based conjoint with two categories; food and non-food.

(7)

Results

Data

• 

Choice-based conjoints in My Preference Lab.

• 

21 April till 28 April 2017 among Dutch consumers via social media.

• 

201 respondents (74,1% females and 25,9% males).

Latent Class Segmentation

Cola category

Detergent category

1. Brand ambassadors (41%)

1. Cherry pickers (33,6%)

2. Drivers (26,6%)

2. Brand addicts (28,5%)

3. Average shoppers (22,2%)

3. Travel avoiders (28,1%)

4. National brand lovers (10,2%)

4. Likers (9,8%)

(8)

Conclusion/Discussion

Store preference

•  Consumers who prefer assortment, quality of merchandise, atmosphere and friendly salespeople as more important prefer service supermarkets (in line with literature). •  Consumers who prefer price as more important prefer hard discounters (in line with

literature).

•  No evidence for an effect of price promotions and parking facilities on store preference (not in line with literature). Reverse effect for the location of the supermarket (not in line with literature).

Willingness to pay for national brands in hard discounters

•  Importance of price significantly decrease the willingness to pay for national brands in hard discounters (only for the detergent category).

•  Store preference for the hard discounter positively influence the willingness to pay for national brands in hard discounters (Coca-Cola, Pepsi and Dubro).

•  Brand loyalty has a positive direct effect on the willingness to pay for Coca-Cola, Pepsi and Dubro in hard discounters. Opposite for Dreft.

•  Brand loyalty (store preference HD) as a moderator has a positive effect on the

(9)

Contribution

Theoretical

• 

Contributes to existing literature about store preference and the willingness to

pay.

• 

Identify the influencers of store preference and the willingness to pay for national

brands in hard discounters.

Managerial

• 

Store characteristics as assortment, quality of merchandise, atmosphere, friendly

salespeople, price and location influence the store preference of consumers.

• 

Importance of price and store preference for hard discounters/service

supermarkets influence the willingness to pay for national brands in hard

discounters.

• 

Brand loyalty as moderator influences the relationship between the store

preference for hard discounters/service supermarkets and the willingness to pay

for national brands in hard discounters.

• 

The effect of the influencers on the willingness to pay for national brands in hard

(10)

Limitations and further research

Limitations

• 

Conceptual model is only tested in two categories.

• 

Distribution of the age of the respondents (sample size doesn’t

contain a lot of 55 years and older respondents).

Further research

• 

More independent variables (influencers).

• 

More product categories.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

The ‘EFMI shopper monitor’ is available from January 2017. However, to calculate the distance from the consumer to the various supermarket formulas the six-digit zip code is

Furthermore, the higher consumers perceive the Aldi as hedonic (high quality products, high prices, high service level, large assortment) the less a consumer wants to pay a

The first objective is to find price gaps where buyers of store brands or national brands at service retailers switch to national brand buying at discounters.. Simultaneously,

The purpose of this study is to examine to what extend does the national brand’s brand equity (NBBE) change when being introduced in hard discounter, as well as the influencing

In the survey the participants were randomly distributed to three out of the four product categories used in this research (i.e. chocolate, cola, spaghetti and yogurt).

6.3.2 M EDIATION MODEL The mediation model of Hayes (2013) was used to measure the following hypotheses: • H5a: Compared to the situation where hard discounters only carry

The probability of counteractions by TGRs seems to be high if the market share of a NB is small, the brand equity of a NB is low, the growth in the product category is low, the

Furthermore, the attributes atmosphere, assortment, parking facilities, price, trip duration, price/quality ratio and accessibility are proven to be successful estimators