• No results found

Studies in the syntax of Targum Jonathan to Samuel Kuty, R.J.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Studies in the syntax of Targum Jonathan to Samuel Kuty, R.J."

Copied!
10
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Studies in the syntax of Targum Jonathan to Samuel

Kuty, R.J.

Citation

Kuty, R. J. (2008, January 30). Studies in the syntax of Targum Jonathan to Samuel. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/12588

Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown)

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden

Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/12588

Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable).

(2)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

P REFACE

I NTRODUCTION

1

1. PROLEGOMENA 1

2. THE PHASES OF THE ARAMAIC LANGUAGE 3 3. THE LANGUAGE OF TARGUM JONATHAN: Status Quaestionis 6

3.1. Relationship of the Aramaic of Targum Jonathan to the Aramaic of Targum Onqelos 6 3.2. Classification of the Aramaic of Targum Jonathan 7 3.3. Previous Studies on the Syntax of Targum Onqelos

and Targum Jonathan 15

4. THE PRESENT STUDY 17

4.1. Object of this Study 17

4.2. Methodology 19

4.3. Corpus 20

5. PRACTICAL OBSERVATIONS 21

C HAPTER O NE: D ETERMINATION

The Use of the Emphatic and Absolute States

23

1. INTRODUCTION 23

1.1. Determination in Aramaic: An Overview 23

1.2. Status Quaestionis 25

1.3. The Notion of Determination Adopted in this Study 28 1.4. The Position Adopted in this Study 29

(3)

2. STATUS EMPHATICUS AND STATUS ABSOLUTUS IN

TARGUM JONATHAN TO SAMUEL 30

2.1. Nouns in the Plural 30

2.2. Nouns in the Singular 34

2.2.1. Type A and Type B 34

2.2.2. Formally Feminine Nouns 35

2.2.3. Formally Masculine Nouns 37

3. FACTORS 42

3.1. Morphological Factors 42

3.1.1. Adjectives and Participles Used Substantivally 42 3.1.2. Infinitives Used Substantivally 44 3.1.3. Nouns of Foreign Provenance 45 3.2. Syntactic and Morphosyntactic Factors 45 3.2.1. Adjectives/Participles and Determination 46 3.2.1.1. Adjectives/Participles in Predicative Function 46 3.2.1.2. Nouns Modified by Adjectives/Participles in

Attributive Function 47

3.2.1.2.1. Introduction: Determination Agreement

in Noun Phrases 47

3.2.1.2.2. Influence of Attributive Adjectives / Participles on the Determination

of the Noun Phrase 47

3.2.1.2.3. Adjectival/Participial Phrases 49 3.2.2. Genitive Constructions and Determination 51 3.2.2.1. D-Relation and Determination 51 3.2.2.2. Construct Relation and Determination 53 3.2.3. Repetitive constructions 54

3.3. Lexical factors 54

3.3.1. Word Pairs and Enumerations 55 3.3.2. Prepositional phrases with adverbial character 55 3.3.3. Prepositional Phrase-ywy µdq ˜m ‘from before

the Lord’ 56

3.3.4. Miscellaneous Expressions 57

3.4. Other factors 58

4. SPECIAL CASE: THE NOUN rbg ‘man’ 61

(4)

5. CONCLUSIONS 63

5.1. Summary 63

5.2. Wider Perspective 64

5.3. Determination and the Aramaic of Targum

Jonathan to Samuel 66

C HAPTER T WO: N UMERALS

68

1. INTRODUCTION 68

1.1. Numerals in Aramaic: An Overview 68

1.2. Status Quaestionis 69

2. MORPHOSYNTAX OF THE NUMERALS IN TARGUM

JONATHAN TO SAMUEL 69

2.1. The Numeral ‘one’ 70

2.1.1. Modifying a Simple Noun 70

2.1.2. Modifying a Complex Noun Phrase 71

2.2. The Numerals ‘two’ and Higher 73

2.2.1. Modifying a Simple Noun 73

2.2.2. Special Cases 75

3. SPECIAL CASE: THE NOUN rbg ‘man’ 77

4. CONCLUSIONS 78

4.1. Summary 78

4.2. Wider Perspective 79

4.2.1. Grammatical Number of the Noun Modified 80 4.2.2. Formal Determination of the Noun Modified 81 4.2.3. Placement of and Grammatical Relation

between Noun and Numeral 82

4.2.4. Other Features 84

4.3. The Numerals and the Aramaic of Targum

Jonathan to Samuel 84

(5)

C HAPTER T HREE: G ENITIVE C ONSTRUCTIONS

87

1. INTRODUCTION 87

1.1. Genitive Constructions in Aramaic: An Overview 87

1.2. Status Quaestionis 88

1.3. Methodology 89

1.3.1. Proleptic d-Relation 90

1.3.2. Construct and Bare d-Relations 90

1.3.3. Outline of the Method 91

2. THE PARAMETERS 93

2.1. Introduction 93

2.2. Anthroponyms: B-Terms referring to Human

Entities 94

2.2.1. Anthroponyms and the d-Relation 94 2.2.2. Parameters in Favour of the Construct Relation 95

2.2.2.1. Semantic Parameters 95

2.2.2.2. Morphosyntactic Parameter: Grammatical

Number 99

2.2.2.2.1. Grammatical Number of the A-Term 99 2.2.2.2.2. Grammatical Number of the B-Term 100 2.3. Hieronyms: B-Terms referring to God 103 2.4. Toponyms and Ethnonyms: B-Terms referring to

Geographic Locations and Ethnic Groups 105

2.4.1. Introduction 105

2.4.2. Bare Topo-/Ethnonyms 106

2.4.2.1. Bare Topo-/Ethnonyms and the d-Relation 107 2.4.2.1.1. A-Term in Favour of the d-Relation 107 2.4.2.1.2. Bare Topo-/Ethnonyms in Favour

of the d-Relation 108

2.4.2.2. Bare Topo-/Ethnonyms and the Construct

Relation 110

2.4.2.2.1. Parameters in Favour of the Construct

Relation with Anthroponymic B-Terms 110 2.4.2.2.2. Terms of Topography as A-Terms 111 2.4.2.3. Other Bare Topo-/Ethnonyms 112 2.4.2.4. Bare Topo-/Ethnonyms: Conclusions 114

(6)

2.4.3. Ethnonyms Compounded with the Name ynb

‘sons of’ 114

2.4.4. Ethnonyms Compounded with the Name tyb

‘house of’ 116

2.5. Genitive of Matter 117

2.5.1. Genitive of Matter and the d-Relation 117 2.5.2. Parameters in Favour of the Construct Relation 119 2.6. Special Cases: The Nouns dy ‘hand’ and çyr ‘head’

Used as A-Terms 121

3. PROLEPTIC d-RELATION 123

4. MORPHOSYNTACTIC OBSERVATIONS 124

4.1. Genitive Relation and Participle 124 4.2. Genitive Relation and Determination 125 4.3. Genitive Relation and Structural Complexity 126

5. UNSOLVED CASES 128

6. CONCLUSIONS 129

6.1. Summary 129

6.2. Inalienability and Individuation 134

6.3. Wider Perspective 138

6.4. Genitive Constructions and the Aramaic of Targum

Jonathan to Samuel 149

C HAPTER F OUR: C ONJUGATIONS

155

1. INTRODUCTION 155

1.1. Conjugations in Aramaic: An Overview 155

1.2. Status Quaestionis 156

1.3. Methodological Framework 160

1.3.1. States of Affairs 161

1.3.2. Fientivity and Stativity 162

1.3.3. Temporality 163

(7)

1.3.4. Aspectuality 164 1.3.4.1. Perfectivity, Imperfectivity and the Internal

Constituency of the SoAs 164

1.3.4.1.1. Perfectivity and Imperfectivity 164 1.3.4.1.2. Instantaneous and Durative as

Aspectual Categories ? 165

1.3.4.2. Phasal Aspects 166

1.3.4.3. Perspectival Aspects 167

1.3.4.4. Quantificational Aspects 168 1.3.4.5. Remarks on Aspectuality 169

1.3.5. Modality 171

1.3.6. Discourse Parameters 172

2. THE CONJUGATIONS IN TARGUM JONATHAN TO SAMUEL 174

2.1. Qtal 174

2.1.1. Fientive SoAs 175

2.1.1.1. Narrative discourse 175

2.1.1.2. Direct Speech 178

2.1.2. Stative SoAs 182

2.2. Yiqtol 186

2.2.1. Posteriority 186

2.2.2. Modality 189

2.2.3. Imperfectivity 192

2.3. Qâtel 194

2.3.1. Introduction 194

2.3.2. Fientive SoAs 194

2.3.3. Stative SoAs 199

2.3.4. Intentional Prospective: ‘Qâtel of Intention’ 201 2.4. Volitionals yiqtol and qtol 202

2.5. Qtil 205

2.6. The Infinitive Forms: Miqtal and Miqtâl 208 2.6.1. Miqtal: the Construct Infinitive 208 2.6.2. Miqtâl: the Absolute Infinitive 214

2.6.2.1. Paranomastic Use of the Infinitive Absolute

in Biblical Hebrew 214

2.6.2.2. Non-Paranomastic Use of the Infinitive

Absolute in Biblical Hebrew 217

(8)

3. REMARKS ON THE USE OF THE CONJUGATIONS 218 3.1. Deviations in Number Agreement 218 3.2. Periphrastics: hwh + qâtel/qtil 220

3.3. Periphrasis with dyt[ 221

3.4. Imperfectivity and Perfectivity in the Vorlage and

Targum Jonathan to Samuel 222

3.4.1. Restoration of Discourse Consistency 223

3.4.2. Background Demotion 226

4. CONCLUSIONS 228

4.1. Summary 228

4.2. Wider Perspective 230

4.3. The Conjugations and the Aramaic of Targum

Jonathan to Samuel 238

C HAPTER F IVE: W ORD O RDER

The Verbal Clause

242

1. INTRODUCTION 242

1.1. Word Order and the Verbal Clause 242

1.2. Status Quaestionis 243

1.3. Word Order: Masoretic Text and Targum Jonathan

to Samuel 243

1.4. Approach Adopted in this Study 246

1.4.1. Corpus of this Study 246

1.4.2. Method 246

1.4.2.1. Scope of the Investigation 246 1.4.2.2. Word Order and Functional Grammar 248 2. PRINCIPLE n°1: ‘FREE WORD ORDER’ LANGUAGES 249

(9)

3. PRINCIPLE n°2: PRINCIPLE OF FUNCTIONAL STABILITY 250

3.1. Definition 250

3.2. Principle of Functional Stability and Targum

Jonathan to Samuel 251

3.2.1. Relative Placement of the Verb and its Object(s) 251 3.2.2. Relative Placement of Subject, Verb and

Object(s) 255

4. PRINCIPLE n°3: PRINCIPLE OF PRAGMATIC HIGHLIGHTING 257

4.1. Definition 257

4.2. Principle of Pragmatic Highlighting and Targum

Jonathan to Samuel 257

4.2.1. The Initial Position (P1) 257

4.2.1.1. Topic and Topicality 259

4.2.1.1.1. Definitions 259

4.2.1.1.2. New Topic 260

4.2.1.1.3. Given Topic 260

4.2.1.1.4. SubTopic 261

4.2.1.2. Focus and Focality 262

4.2.1.2.1. Interaction-Internal Focus 262

4.2.1.2.1.1. Definition 262

4.2.1.2.1.2. Interaction-Internal: Contrastive

Focus 264

4.2.1.2.2. Discourse-Internal: Contrastive Focus 265 4.2.1.3. Setting and Contextualization 266 4.2.2. Extra-Clausal Special Positions 271

4.2.2.1. Introduction 271

4.2.2.2. Theme and Extraposition (P0) 272 4.2.2.3. Discourse Particles (Pdp) 275 4.2.2.4. Vocative and Attention-Getting (PVoc) 278 5. PRINCIPLE n°4: PRINCIPLE OF INCREASING COMPLEXITY 280

5.1. Definition 280

5.2. Principle of Increasing Complexity and Targum

Jonathan to Samuel 281

5.2.1. Cliticizing: the Object Pronominal Suffix 282 5.2.2. Anticipating Light Constituents 282 5.2.3. Delaying Heavy Constituents 283

(10)

6. SPECIAL CASES 285 6.1. Participles and Pronominal Subject 286

6.1.1. Basic Functional Pattern 286

6.1.2. Use of P1 287

6.1.2.1. Interaction-Internal: 'Information Gap' Focus 287

6.1.2.2. Setting 288

6.2. Insertion of a Verb in a Nominal Clause of

the Vorlage 289

7. CONCLUSIONS 291

7.1. Summary 291

7.2. Wider Perspective 293

7.3. Word Order and the Aramaic of Targum Jonathan

to Samuel 300

G ENERAL C ONCLUSIONS

302

1. INTRODUCTION 302

2. CLASSIFICATION OF THE ARAMAIC OF TARGUM JONATHAN

TO SAMUEL 303

2.1. Syntactic Features Relevant to the Classification 303

2.2. Final Discussion 307

A BBREVIATIONS

313

B IBLIOGRAPHY

316

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Peripheral blood cells were stained with HLA-A2.1 tetramers containing the tyrosinase368–376 peptide followed by staining with a panel of lineage antibodies, as described in

Blades and blade fragments seem to have been especially used for longitudinal motions, mainly on plant material (7/12). Flake and flake fragments are used in different motions on

This shape also occurs in the combination artefacts (see below). The shape is the result of intensive use in a repetitive abrasive motion, carried out from different angles. In

181 Cf. On periphrastics in Hebrew, cf. In a few cases TJS inserts after an already existing in the Vorlage, e.g. non-periphrastic) conjugation in the Vorlage with a

The Aramaic of TJS knows only one intra-clausal special position, P 1 , which, as we have seen, is open to constituents with the pragmatic functions of Topic, Focus and Setting.

If the state of affairs witnessed in the Aramaic of TO as regards determination should be seen as an immanent development within Western Aramaic (from a type of Aramaic in which

Detection of amyloid plaques in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease by magnetic resonance imaging.. Apostolova

Since expression of Serpins may facilitate the immune escape of HLA positive tumors, we next analysed the effect of Serpin expression on survival in cases with normal/partial