• No results found

University of Groningen The ripple effect in family networks Bel ,de, Vera

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "University of Groningen The ripple effect in family networks Bel ,de, Vera"

Copied!
11
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

University of Groningen

The ripple effect in family networks

Bel ,de, Vera

DOI:

10.33612/diss.126812050

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from

it. Please check the document version below.

Document Version

Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date:

2020

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA):

Bel ,de, V. (2020). The ripple effect in family networks: Relational structures and well-being in divorced and

non-divorced families. University of Groningen. https://doi.org/10.33612/diss.126812050

Copyright

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

(2)

THE RIPPLE EFFECT IN FAMILY NETWORKS

Relational structures and well-being in divorced and non-divorced families

(3)

Colophon

The ripple effect in family networks

ISBN (print) 978-94-034-2725-6 ISBN (digital) 978-94-034-2726-3 © 2020 Vera de Bel

All rights reserved. No part of this thesis may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any way or by any means without the prior permission of the author, or when applicable, of the publishers of the scientific papers.

Printing Ridderprint | www.ridderprint.nl

Layout and design Vera van Ommeren, persoonlijkproefschrift.nl Cover illustration Lize Prins (http://lizeprins.com/)

Funding This work is part of the research programme ‘The co- evolution of well-being and the kinship network after parental divorce’ with project number 406-15-191, which is financed by the Dutch Research Council (NWO).

(4)

The ripple effect in family networks

Relational structures and well-being in divorced and

non-divorced families

PhD thesis

to obtain the degree of PhD at the University of Groningen

on the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. C. Wijmenga

and in accordance with the decision by the College of Deans. This thesis will be defended in public on

Thursday 25 June 2020 at 16.15 hours

by

Vera de Bel

born on 14 February 1991 in Winschoten

(5)

Supervisors

Dr. M.A.J. van Duijn Prof. T.A.B. Snijders

Assessment committee

Prof. M.I. Broese Van Groenou Prof. D. Mortelmans

(6)
(7)
(8)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Introduction - Knotting the Safety Net

A Multi-Actor Family Network Approach (MAFNA) in Divorce Research

1.1 Theory

1.1.1 Family Systems Theory 1.1.2 The Configurational Approach 1.1.3 Families as a Sharing Group 1.2 The Multi-Actor Family Network Approach

1.2.1 The Delineation of Family Networks 1.3 Overview

1.3.1 Outline of the thesis

2. Balance in Sibling-Parent-Sibling Triads

2.1 Introduction 2.2 Theory 2.3 Method 2.3.1 Sample 2.3.2 Relationship Variables 2.3.3 Control Variables 2.3.4 Plan of Analysis 2.4 Results 2.4.1 Support Exchange 2.4.2 Contact 2.4.3 Conflict

2.4.4 Covariates and Explained Variance 2.5 Discussion and Conclusion

Appendix 2.A: Full models

3. Ambivalent Family Triads and Well-being

3.1 Introduction

3.2 The derivation of the ambivalent triad census 3.2.1 The ambivalent dyad census

3.2.2 The ambivalent triad census

3.2.3 Ambivalent triad census and individual-level outcomes 3.2.4 Use of the ambivalent triad census for multiple networks 3.3 Application to family processes

3.3.1 Operationalization 3.3.2 Descriptives 3.3.3 Plan of analysis 3.4 Results 11 12 12 14 15 17 18 18 19 21 22 23 25 25 27 29 30 32 32 32 33 34 34 37 41 42 42 43 43 45 48 49 50 52 55 55

(9)

3.4.1 Social self-esteem 3.4.2 Performance self-esteem 3.5 Conclusion and discussion 3.A Appendix: Self-esteem

3.B Appendix: Descriptive statistics divorced/non-divorced

4. Substitution of Grandparental Ties

4.1 Background 4.2 Method 4.2.1 Data 4.2.2 Measures 4.2.3 Analytical sample 4.2.4 Statistical Analysis 4.2.5 Hypothesis testing 4.3 Results 4.3.1 Separated network 4.3.1 Substitution 4.4 Conclusion and discussion

4.A Appendix: Recode contact variable reported by the parents

4.B Appendix: Full model including random part (as presented in manuscript) 4.C Appendix: Control models with interactions - interpretation

5. Collecting Multi-Actor Family Network Data

5.1 Introduction 5.2 Design

5.2.1 Getting access to the Lifelines sample 5.2.2 Questionnaire

5.2.3 Protocol: approaching parents and their family members 5.3 Implementation

Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 5.4 Discussion

6. Multi-functional relationships and family members’ well-being

6.1 Background 6.2 Data & methods

6.2.1 Measurements

6.2.2 Description of the analytical sample 6.2.2 Plan of analysis 6.3 Results 55 56 59 61 62 65 67 68 68 69 70 75 76 77 77 78 80 82 83 87 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 95 98 98 102 105 106 107 107 109 114 115

(10)

6.4 Conclusion and discussion

7. Conclusion and Discussion

7.1 Family relationships are interdependent 7.2 Family relationships affect well-being 7.3 The effect of parental divorce 7.4 The ripple effect

7.5 Compensation versus substitution 7.6 Defining family well-being 7.7 (Future) data collection

References

8. Nederlandse samenvatting Acknowledgements

About the author ICS dissertation series

Online supplementary material: https://hdl.handle.net/10411/AKCASZ

119 122 123 124 124 125 126 126 129 139 145 149 153 121

(11)

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

The ambivalent triad census which is proposed here differs from the triad census developed by Holland & Leinhardt (1976) in that 1) it has a fixed position for actor F, 2)

We first investigate whether the family networks of divorced families are more disjoint than the family networks of non-divorced families by comparing cross-lineage contact,

The Dutch Netherlands Kinship Panel Study (NKPS) (Dykstra et al., 2005), the German Panel Analysis of Intimate Relationships and Family Dynamics (PAIRFAM) (Huinink et al., 2011),

Sub questions are about whether the strength of this effect on well-being changes after parental divorce, whether multi-functional relationships from nuclear or extended

Chapter 6 showed that family members’ well-being increased actually a bit more after parental divorce compared to family members’ well-being in non-divorced families and that

Conflict structures in family networks of older adults and their relationship with health-related quality of life. Ambivalence in mother- adult child relations: A

De bijdrage van multifunctionele steun verschilde niet voor de drie generaties, wel was het welbevinden van kinderen in alle families duidelijk hoger dan van de andere

I thank my colleagues in the Social Network Analysis (SNA) cluster, the Family Life course and Aging (FLAG) cluster, the Work-Family (WF) seminar in Utrecht, the colleagues at