• No results found

Author: Boogaard, T.L. van den

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Author: Boogaard, T.L. van den "

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Cover Page

The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/60938 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

Author: Boogaard, T.L. van den

Title: Expanding the mutation spectrum in FSHD and ICF syndrome

Issue Date: 2018-02-13

(2)

U I T N O D I G I N G

Voor het bijwonen van de openbare verdediging van het proefschrift

EXPANDING THE

IN FSHD AND ICF SYNDROME

Door

Marlinde van den Boogaard

Op dinsdag 13 februari 2018 om 15.00 uur in het Groot Auditorium, Academiegebouw,

Rapenburg 73 te Leiden

Na afloop van de verdediging bent u van harte welkom op de receptie in het

Academiegebouw

Marlinde van den Boogaard marlindevdboogaard@gmail.com

06-20553022

Paranimfen Amanda Mason agmason11@gmail.com

Maartje Huijbers M.G.M.Huijbers@lumc.nl

Expanding th e mutation spec trum in FSHD and ICF syndr ome ▲ Marlinde v an den Boogaard

E X PA N D I N G T H E

I N F S H D A N D I C F S Y N D R O M E

MARLINDE VAN DEN BOOGAARD

mutation

spectrum mutation spectrum

15127-vandenboogaard-cover.indd 1 08/01/2018 18:06

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

This decision-making mechanism is based on the preference homogeneity pathway, which holds that party group unity results from the fact that an individual is likely to join the poli

The responsible party model holds that the polit- ical party ought to be the main actor in the representa onal rela onship, “[i]ndividual poli cians play a second fiddle, at

If the MP does not subscribe to the norm of party group loyalty, or the MP does sub- scribe to the norm but his disagreement with the party group’s posi on is so intense that

The more inclusive and decentralized the selectorate, however, the more compe ng principals there are within the poli cal party to whom an MP may owe his allegiance, and thus the

In line with our hypothesis, the percentage of representa ves who infrequently dis- agree with their party’s posi on on a vote in parliament is quite a bit higher in our re-

We may s ll see an increase in party group preference heterogeneity and MPs’ disagreement with the party group’s posi on, and a decrease in party group loyalty among MPs, but the

Given that the percentage of representa ves who completely agree that they feel involved in the decision making in their party group is much higher at the lower levels of govern-

Koole (Eds.), Parliamentary Party Groups in European Democracies: Poli cal Par es Behind Closed Doors, pp.. The Netherlands: The Sanc ty of