• No results found

University of Groningen Planning for flood resilient cities Restemeyer, Britta

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "University of Groningen Planning for flood resilient cities Restemeyer, Britta"

Copied!
8
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

University of Groningen

Planning for flood resilient cities

Restemeyer, Britta

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from

it. Please check the document version below.

Document Version

Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date:

2018

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA):

Restemeyer, B. (2018). Planning for flood resilient cities: From promise to practice?. Rijksuniversiteit

Groningen.

Copyright

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

(2)

PLANNING FOR

FLOOD RESILIENT CITIES

FROM PROMISE TO PRACTICE?

(3)

ISBN 978-94-034-0680-0 (printed) ISBN 978-94-034-0679-4 (digital)

Design & lay-out: Designdays / Nynke Visser Printed by: Gildeprint

© B. Restemeyer, 2018

All rights are reserved. No parts of this thesis may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission of the author.

(4)

Planning for Flood Resilient Cities

From Promise to Practice?

Proefschrift

ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de

Rijksuniversiteit Groningen

op gezag van de

rector magnificus prof. dr. E. Sterken

en volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties.

De openbare verdediging zal plaatsvinden op

donderdag 31 mei 2018 om 12.45 uur

door

Britta Restemeyer

geboren op 11 april 1986

te Oldenburg, Duitsland

(5)

Promotor Prof. J. Woltjer

Co-Promotor

Dr. M.A. van den Brink

Beoordelingscommissie Prof. E.J.M.M. Arts Prof. D. Huitema Prof. S. Davoudi

(6)

Contents

1. Introduction: Planning for flood resilient cities 8

1.1 Growing cities, growing flood risks 9

1.2 A paradigm shift in flood risk management 11

1.3 Introducing resilience to the field of flood risk management 14 1.4 Towards flood resilience? A strategy-making and implementation

challenge 17

1.5 A qualitative case study approach with cases from three cities 19

1.6 Research design and thesis outline 22

References 26

2. Resilience unpacked - Framing of ‘uncertainty’ and ‘adaptability’ in long-term flood risk management strategies in the regions of

London and Rotterdam 34

2.1 Introduction 35

2.2 Resilience and flood risk management: a paradigm shift or two

worlds colliding? 37

2.3 The importance of policy framing 40

2.4 Methodology: Analysis of policy frames 41

2.5 The TE2100 Plan: the ‘scientific pragmatism’ frame 44

2.6 The Dutch Delta Programme: the ‘joint fact-finding’ frame 49

2.7 Discussion 54

2.8 Conclusions 55

References 57

Appendix: Overview policy documents 60

3. Between adaptability and the urge to control: making long-term water

policies in the Netherlands 62

3.1 Introduction 63

3.2 Towards flood resilience: making long-term and adaptive water policies 65

3.3 Case introduction and methodology 69

3.4 The Dutch Delta Programme – an agile governance process? 73

3.5 ADM – making flexible strategies 76

3.6 Preventing lock-ins? 80

3.7 Reflections and conclusions 82

References 86

(7)

4. Decentralised implementation of flood resilience measures – a blessing or a curse? Lessons from the Thames Estuary 2100 Plan and the Royal

Docks regeneration 92

4.1 Introduction 93

4.2 Flood resilience – an implementation challenge 94

4.3 The English context – enabling the implementation of flood

resilience measures? 97

4.4 Analysing the implementation of the TE2100 Plan in Newham

and the Royal Docks 99

4.5 The TE2100 Plan and Newham’s Royal Docks development 102

4.6 Reflection and conclusions 111

References 114

Appendix: Overview of policy documents 117

5. A strategy-based framework for assessing the flood resilience of cities –

a Hamburg case study 118

5.1 Introduction 119

5.2 A more holistic perspective on flood resilience strategies 121 5.3 A strategy-based framework for assessing the flood resilience of cities 123

5.4 Methodology 128

5.5 Case study: Hamburg – A flood resilient city? 129

5.6 Conclusions 139

References 142

6. Conclusions: Planning for flood resilient cities – from promise to practice? 146

6.1 Introduction 147

6.2 Resilience – more talk than action? 149

6.3 ‘Adaptive strategies’ – a technical-rational interpretation prevails 154

6.4 ‘Stickiness’ and path-dependency 158

6.5 The growing importance of the local level 162

6.6 Final remarks and suggestions for further research 165

References 169

Samenvatting 174

(8)

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

I : Jij had het over die natte voeten kaart, dat is echt wel zo’n beetje een technische dingetje waar mensen kunnen melden van hier en hier, zie je daar ook nog toekomst in dat

In this section the main question of the research will be answered: ‘To what extent do existing Flood Risk Governance Arrangements enable the transition to flood resilience in

What becomes clear from all the reviewed Multi-Layer Safety measures in Dordrecht and the IJssel-Vecht Delta, is that many – if not all of them – could be categorized under multiple

The first observation is that resilience thinking has left its mark on the policy language of long-term flood risk management strategies, but that this does not yet translate

Verder wordt er vooral ingezet op het verbeteren van het bestaande systeem, door middel van dijkversterking en (optioneel) het vernieuwen van bestaande stormvloedkeringen. In

I also would like to thank all my respondents in Hamburg, London and Rotterdam for their time and incredibly useful input during the interviews. Special thanks to the

Yet, there is less clarity about how flood resilience can be achieved, often referred to as the ‘governance challenge’ of flood resilience (Dieperink et al., 2016; Driessen et al.,

Different places lead to different resilience challenges: while English flood risk management risks to overburden the local level, Dutch flood risk management risks to ignore