• No results found

Origins of Empangeni: rev. Aldin Grout's mission station Inkanyesi on the Mpangeni river May 1984 - 25 July 1842.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Origins of Empangeni: rev. Aldin Grout's mission station Inkanyesi on the Mpangeni river May 1984 - 25 July 1842."

Copied!
6
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

A.E. Cubbin

Department of History

University of Zululand

and a scl1ool in Natal subjoct to the important provision that Grout first "teadl my poople to read and wrlte."4 In August. along with Champioo. he founded Ginani missions station (see map). Ginani from "I am with yoo". Matthew 28:30),5 but as a result of the death of his wife. Grout had to take his daughte'. Oriana. back to the United States in December 1836. Groot returned to sooth east Africa with his secood wife. Charlotte Bailey. in June

1840 to find a dlanged Natal.

Introduction

This is a micr<>-regional study. Dr. Tooy Minnaar's second editioo of his Empangeni: A Historical Review to 19891 devotes two paragraphs to Aldin Grout's rnissioo statioo, Inkanyesi, ~ be spread the Christian gospel to the Zulus from May 1841 to 25 July 1842. As this represents the first attempt by a white persoo to settle near Ernpangeni, and because May 1991 was the 15Oth anniver-sary of this irnP<X"tant event, it is coosidered worthy of focusing a historical microscope 00 the subject.

Grout's Negotiations to Enter ZuIuIand

Aft~ the struggle for hegemony betweu1 the Voortrekkers and the Zulus, Mpande, the new Zulu king, following the death of Dingane in March 1840, was clearly und~ the control of the V <XX1rekk~ government in Pietennaritzburg. The Arnoocans co-operatoo with the new government and Grout, on 6 August 1840, t~ an oath of loyalty to the Volksraad 6 Mpande had invited missionaries to Zululand and Daniel Lindley saw Grout's return at this time as providential: "The call is so direct and loud. that we think Rev. Aldin Grout was appointed a missionary of the

American Boord of C<Xnmissionecs foc Foreign Missions to the South African field in January 1834. Specifically, he was designated to the "Maritime Zulus in the region of Port Natal".2 He aIrlved on the "Dove" at Port Natal on 21 Decem~ 1835 and was roceived by Dingane at Umgungundhlovu (see map) on 18 January 1836 "with the utmost kindness and attention"} Dingane, aft~ consulting his izinduna, granted ~ission to found a missioo statioo

(2)

it best dlat Mr. Grout and one other memOOr" of dIe missioo should make Umpanda a visit and if dlings appear at dIe capital as we hear, see what can be done."? This accorded widl his Society's wishes8 and he began his preparation at Umlazi.9 Relatioos betwea1 Mpande and dIe V oc.'trekk~ had been strained when two ambassadm had been "roguish" and stoloo Zulu cattle in Zululand. The Volksraad, in an attempt to establish the truth, ~t "two trusty moo" who invited Groot to join 1hem 00 their journey to Mpande. Grout left 00 6 Octoba" 1840 and sadly passed the "burned" shell of Ginani, his first missioo

station.

accepted Mpande's apparent invitation to found a mission station and he "...moved into Zululand and located at Empangeni just beyond the Umhlatuze" i.e. a short distance n<X"dl of the Mhlatuze at the mission station he proudly called Inkanyesi -"Star"19 These are vitally

important w<X"ds because this is peri1aps the earliest indication cL the exact location of the site which, regret-tably, cannot 00 JX'Ccisely pin-pointed. On 13 June 1856, when Grout delivered his paper to the annual meeting of the American Mission Society, he called the location of the site" Empangeni" which is the anglicised version of Mpangeni. From these details it may 00 deduced that th~ is a strong possibility that Groot's Empangeni might have ~ on oc near the present river of that name because he said it was "just ooyond the Mhlatuze" i.e. ref~g to the river.20 This is supported by oral tradition!1 and particularly by Lewis Grout's clear references to Empangeni in 1862 as ooing a river i.e. "he

commenced ~tions anew, at Empangeni, an eastern

branch of the Umhlatusi"22 and Mr. Ofteoco "has now a station at Em~gooi, a lx"anch of the Umhlatuzi."23 We also know that Grout could hear the "grum (sic) tones of the hippopotami" from lnkanyesi.24 These hippopotami could well have ~ in the lake 00 the lower Empangmi riv~ before it enters the Mhlatuze.

Grout found Mpande "perfectly accessible, free and familiar". Mpanoo 'was glad that I had come, and without hesitatioo gave me pennissioo to come when I pleased into his country, and to stop at his place, or at any place in his country ~ I chose," and even off~ to provide labour for "a large house"}O Grout was optimistic and 00 5 December 1840 waited ooIy for pamissioo fr<Xn "the Dutch authorities" to entel" Zululand and begin his missioo statiOO."ll On 15 January 1841 Grout was at last given pemlissioo by 1he VoJksrdad to entel' Zululand and to negotiate with Mpanoo in ordel" to establish a missioo statioo in Zulu territory}2

On 6 May 1841 Aldin Grout began a three week journey!3 (one week of which was spent waiting foc the Thukela to subside) to Mpande'S umuzi Mlanbongwenya -d1e crocodile riv~ (refer map) situated near the JX"CSOOt Eshowe show groonds 00 the edge of the Dlinza forest which was bigger then}4 On his joomey from Pro Natal Grout passed d1e solitary bumt and looted shells of d1e American mission stations at Ginani and Hlangezwa!5 which were remind~ to him of die uncmainty of his second mission to the Zulu poople.

All this leads me to believe diat die name Empangeni was already in use between 1856 and 1862 to identify 1he JX"e8mt Empangeni riva- and diis would lata- provide 1he name fcr die village, rail and mill components of die

JX"e8mt town ct" Empangeni which all drew dieir water from this cornrnoo riva-.

Delegorgue's Visit

The first independmt source of informatioo 00 Inkanyesi comes from dIe French naturalist Adulphe Delegorgue, who visited dIe missioo statioo widl its "very fine dwelling 00 dIe banks of the lake of dIe Orn-Schlatousse"25 (Mhlatuze) 00 dIe aftemooo of 3 Novemre-1841. He anived widl David Stella', Dick King and Douglas, who had boon cornmissiooed to iring him goods. They did not meet but Groot sent him a curt letter complaining to Delegorgoo that d1e oxoo had eaten dIe recently planted wheat in his garden. Grout p-esumed to lecture d1e p'OUd Frenchman and did not take into account that his wheat was unlX"otected, or that the oxen were not d1e responsibility of Delegorgue who was affrooted by Groot's abrupt approach. Delegorgoo verbally retorted dlat "Panda alooe is master of all dIose who are in dlis country, woodIer they be white (X" black. All, including d1e OJl1phandiss (missiooary), must obey his orda-s".26 In the light of subsequent evoots dlis was to be important advice. Delegorgue left that aftOO1<>On.27 Rev. Aldin and Charlotte Grout (KiI1ie Campbell Lit."ary).

Inkanyesi Prospers

Rev. Aldin Grout had great ho~s for Inkanyesi. He selected this name ~use he favently hoped that it would be "the day star of gospel light to thern".28 He was enthusiastic about the site whim he had selected so carefully. "The circumstances which induced me to select this as the place of my residence and field labour are, that

Mpande offers Grout a Free Site: Inkanyesi -the First Use of the Place Name "Empangeni"

Grout was cordially received and he found Mpande "~, frank and social"16 and was fed ripe bananas (re~ed foc the King)17 and beef. It is possible that at this meeting th~ was a misunda"Standing in Mpande's mind as to the intention and implications of Grout's mission ~use Mpande "yet regarded me (Grout) as a hunter."18 Grout

(3)

it is desirable to have a station in the Zulu country on this side of Umpandis, and this appears to me (to be) decidedly the most advantageous that 1 have seen <r heard of." The great potential f<r oonvens to Christianity from the large numbers of Zulus living in the seven nearby villages made up foc his isolation and f<r the fact that he lived only "in a native hut".29 He was so excited and full of faith that on 14 June 1841 he cried, "Now is our time. The dooc to them (Zulus) is fully open. Send orne help as much and as soon as you can"}O His oongregation numbered some ZOO -300 Zulus in the wintEX" but he expected a great assembly "in the warmer weather". His cattle Wtre doing "well" in "healthy country" and he enthused that "I had nevEX" felt bettEX" and stIOOgEX", since1

have been here, than 1 have been foc many years"}l

Kaart: Inkanyez'; May 1841-25 July 1842

The Site of Inkanyesi

Grout must have felt vay satisfied after severdl hard years in southern Africa. Afta- travelling aroond and examining the area he selected a site foc Inkanyesi. Evw today it is a most idyllic setting of greuI undulating hills separated by numerous fertile valleys. The Mpangeni riva-, Which is substantial and clean, flows into the Mpangeni lake (from Whidt Grout heard the Hippopotami) whidt in turn flows into the Mhlatuze river. In the south the beautiful Ongoye mountains are majestically silhouetted against the Zululand sky. While ooe can ooly sunnise the actual site of Inkanyesi tha-e are severdl suitable places that suggest themselves.

banana productioo}7 The Zulus requestoo Groot to P'3y for rain during a drought and because rain fell bef<X"e

sunset they thought Grout possessed special pow~. Wc.-d of this gift evm got to Mpande who sent "a

principal d1ief" to request rain for the country and again rain fell before nightfall. Th«eaft« Groot became, in the eyes of the Zulus "the auth<X' of the rains" somehow

associated with his large black coat.38

While at Inkanyesi Grout seems to have been one of the ooginal propagators of the modem harboor at Richards Bay. On 21 Octo~ 1841 he wrote Jacalically that "tha-e is in probability a bett« port th«e (the bay at the mouth of the Mh1atuze) than at Pro Natal, and it will soon be surveyed!9

The Missionary Work Begun

.

Grout soon got dte help of an Englishman from Natal, an 18 year old interpreter and two Khoi to help build his fine house which by 25 OctoW' was "nearly done" and he considered himself "very well off." The missioo school,33 the first in the Empangmi district, was lXised in a native hut and Mrs. Grout had up to a 'hundred' pupils a day,34 The pupils wa-e keel and talented and some quickly learned to write the alphabet. Grout spoke favourably of the Zulus, who treated him well and helped him}5 They were neidter drunkards, licentious, nor thieves, dtOUgh he had his reservations about their polygamy and headtenism and this caused him to call "loodly for a reinforcement of

our mission".36 Grout ploughed dte fertile land and planted rye, wheat and barley seeds that he had brOOght with him. The local Zulu planted Indian corn (mealies), pumpkins, melons, beans, imfe (an indigenous sugar reed) and sorghum. The chiefs monopolised sugar cane and

The Clash of Interests between Grout and

Mpande

Rev. Aldin Grout, a Olristian with an internatiooai backgroond and I'eCa1tly arrived in Zululand, seemed to have misread the situatioo in Zululand wid1 regard to d1e aud1ority of the King and his (Grout's) own influence over the local Zulu population. He said pattmaiistically that: "From the king downward the poople stand in perfect fear of the white poople.".o Disa1chanted Zulus saw d1e missioo statioo as a havoo from Mpande's cruelty just as Port Natal had boon frcm Dingane.

"I '-r die ~~ saymg plblicly and btt"oce me an«M, dlat if Mpi1Ilde ~ not treat diem well, they will jlL9t walk off, <r move dleir village upoo my p~, takmg it foc ganted if they are upoo die statim, diey are M of die way of 1A1lu audi<rity."41

Grout mistakenly believed that Mpande would not remain in powa- long. The Zulu king could not countenance soch provocative and rebellious bcllaviour from the white Amoocan Missionary even if only expressed in his lett~ to Boston. Grout interpreted this attitude as indicative of his Zulu neighbour's "confidence in me".42 There seems to be an element of truth that Groot encouraged these seditioos ideas among the Zulus. Delegcrgue had reason to believe that the Zulus in the vicinity of lnkanyesi were already acaxoding him (Grout) the respect due to a dlief.

CONTREEJ1

/1992 27

A month aft~ his alrival Grout again requested help from the American Boord of C<xnmissioners in Boston, America, fCY his wCYk at Inkanyesi.

"I couki tell you, and dIrough yoo die clIurches. ct' the miseri~. suffering and degl"adatXxt ct' dlese poI:X" ~le, (the Zul~) ~ing ~ their ttmf)(X"al and et(mal in~ and plead foc help in my lab<x- foc tl1er good as widI a tlwnJx1t-toogue. but I will ooly say dlat Me I am, singJe-han~ aboot me h\U1drOO miles fnxn a felk>w lalxx-«. and die same ~ce fr<m anybody dlat I call civilizOO. in the mi~ of a natioo. which if it <k>es not ask foc teachers. will not throw die l~ obstacle in their way."32

(4)

Panda discovered this and said: "The country of the Amazoulous is not made ffX' two kings."43 But we must remem~ that DelegfX'gue was no friend of the American. Trusting in the distant authcrity of the Volksraad in Pietennaritzburg, he foolishly maintained that "Umpande now (00 3 August 1841) dares not, and cannot hinder missionaries ccming and locating wha"e they please."44

But Grout was isolated in Zululand and at l'-:Ipande's m~y 00 the n<X'them bank of the Mhlatuze. He was a foreign parvenu enjoying the pitrooage of a sovereign king and until he established himself and gained the support of the Zulu hielardly he had to tread warily.

seeking atoo all too end1usiastically to {ropagate d1e Christian gospel. Probably all shared Groot's resa-vations whid1 he, being d1e only White in d1e area, kept to himself and hopefully only communicated in his C<XresponOOnce wid1 Boston. He recognised and indicated d1e need to be cautious "about meddling wid1 their gOVEmment" and that basically he had "n<Xhing to complain of and m~ to be grateful ffX' ."48

Grout did ~ iocreasingly aware of the reality of the situatioo at Inkanyesi. He knew that "the chief men are suspicious of a white strang« that gets infl~ among the people, lest he weakm their power and influmce. "49 Grout believed that Olristian missiooaries w~ not understood or appreciated and in fact Mpande "did not want them".50 The bottom line fC6: the local Zulus was that: "So far as we can protect them C6: affC6:d them any To even think about an imperium in imperio while be was

seeking to establish his mission station was to misread Mpande's IX>wer and authcrity as established Zulu king,

Mpangeni Lake .Angoye HillY in background

tern~ good they are glad of our p-esence, but when preaching crosses their inclination and cherished ~ctices, they do not like US".51 To show his rea~iation and respect to the King, Grout travelled to M~de's umuzi at Mlanboogwenya on the last Sunday in February 1842. He was anxious to talk to M~de aboot the state of his mission. On his return to Inkanyesi neighbouring Zulus were curious as to why Grout had not held a Sunday sefVice at M~de's umuzi. The local Zulus ~ extremely afraid because they infmed that Mpande was not friendly towards Groot and tha-efCl'e did n<X suppcr1 the missioo and, being loyal to Mpande, they had no wish to offend him. Indeed, they had only supported the mission work because they believed that the king supported Grout's efforts.52 They believed that they wa-e "caught" and "deceived" and that, having offended Mpande, their lives were no longer safe. They wa-e so and seriously jeopardise his own mission. Grout

patronisingly dismissed Mpande with a condescending "He is a simple man" and regarded the Zulus as "hopeful subjects to ~te on".45 Grout was increasingly involved in disturbingly seditioos thoughts which, SO<X1a- or lata-, were going to re noticed by Mpande.

" At ~ his (MpmfR,' s) ~le are l~ving him in C(XISi<k!rable ntUJlbers. and I know dJat they talk of l~ving him by thousands. Talk ~ heard also of assaMinating him, and (XItting a lx-oth« into authaity.046

Norman Ed1eringtoo goes too far when he claims dJat Grout was responsible fcx: "irreparable damage to d1e cause of evangelism".? in Natal. Many missionaries before and after this event had ~ fcx:ced to fire Zululand due to the ambivalent attitude and behavioor of d1e 19d1 century Zulu monarcl1s towards dIe OIristian missionaries

(5)

scared that they now refused to go to the King's umuzi because they believed he would surely kill them.53 This reaction increased Mpande's suspicions as to the influence of Grout's mission on his people. Their fear was justified when Mpande soon accused them of disloyalty by apparently accepting Grout as their chief. The situation was immediately exploited by ambitious Zulus who desired promotion and/CX' cattle fCX' their ~er-zealous loyalty towards Mpande. In their enthusiasm to do the apparent will of the Zulu king, they even sentenced some of the local people to death because Grout's people had forsaken Umpande and had attached themselves to Grout.54

Shocked. Grout realised that Mpande had deliberately "butcha"ed" his Zulu friends "because they were our friends".56 As he forlornly surveyed the devastation of those he sought to help, Grout, although his family had obviously been spared, soon, but sadly, came to the inevitable decisioo that Mpande's attack on Inkanyesi "put an end to my usefulness there, and rendered it unsafe for me to remain, and I left immediately, July 1842, after a residence of little more than a year".57

Mpande's message to the Zulus at Inkanyesi was dramatically effective among the local Zulu population. Grout counted the cost: "... it would be long at least before any would dare again show me friendship, or to show an interest upon religious subjects".58 Later he was not entirely despondent but like other missionaries in Natal he did hope that the "English authorities"59 would soon control Mpande so that the Christian missionaries could continue their work under their protection. Despite the harrowing experience, Grout remained optimistic that "the Zulus are decidedly favourable subject for our work."60 It was not until 1851 that Rev. Hans Schreuder of the Norwegian Mission Society was to bring the gospel of Christ to the Zulus at Empangeni again.

The Denouement

At daybreak on 25 July 1842 the Grouts were infonned that the surrounding Zulus were being attacked by Mpande's impis who came to assoo the king's authority. Aldin Grout described the horrific experience:

.We knew not wheth« it (the impi) had rome fa-us, or the pe<1Jle, or both, and to prepare fa- the event we OOIIU11ended WE spirits to God befa-e leaving the room ...An attack was made upon the six p1ac~ nearest our house, the people of which had been most friendly to us and had furnished our school with children. with orders to put to death every man, WOO1aD and child belonging to three (homesteads -~ -family huts) of

them. .55

(6)

35 36 37 1 38 2 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 3 4 5 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 6 7

Ibid., pp. 339-340; MIl xxxvm. 4, April 1842. p.132. Ibid.

M.W. Tyler Gray, Stories of, p.39; MH LXXXll, 4, April 1886, p.135.

MH XXXVlIL 8, Aug. 1842. p.340. R. Gwna in his Groutville Mission Station Centenary, p.2 ~ this and other sources without acknowledgement.

MH XXXCm. 8, Aug. 1842. p.339. Reporting news frOO1 a "Dutclunan". MH XXXCm. 4. April 1842. p.132. Ibid. Ibid. A. Delegorgue. Tra~ls. p.40. MH XXXVlIL 4, April 1842. p.132. Ibid. MH XXXIX, 2. Feb. 1843, p.79.

A. Duminy and W.R. Guest, Natal and Zululand (pitter-marit:lburg, 1989). p.278. MH XXXVlIL 4. April 1842. p.338. MH XXXVlIL 8, August 1842. p.338. Ibid., p.339. Ibid.. p.340. MH XXXIX, 2. Feb. 1843, p.78. A. Groot, '.4 Narrati~', p.9.

Ibid., p.10; MH XXXIX, 2. Feb. 1843, p.78. Ibid. Ibid. A. Groot, '.4 Narrative', p.10. MH XXXIX, 2. Feb. 1843, p.78. Ibid., p.79. Ibid. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34

Endnotes

A. de V. Minnaar, Empangeni: .a Historical Review to 1989 (Empangeni, 1989), W.3-4; A. de V. Minnaar, "J1Ie &tab-lislunent and Growdl d Empangeni', Contree, 15, 1984, pp.

6-7.

H. Newoombe, Cyclopedia of Missions (New Yak, 1855), p.50 and J. Tracey, History of the American Boord of Commissioners (New Yak. 1842), p.300.

Aldin Grout, 'A Narrative of die &tablW1ment of die American MisskJll in Natal' (l7Je Natal Star, 25.6.1856), p.2. Missionary Herald (MH), xxxn. 9, September 1836. p.340. L«ter from Groot dated 12.2.1836.

Ginani, accading to H.C. Lugg. Historic Natal and Zu/uland (Pieterrnaritzburg. 1949), p.136, i9 situatoo above die jlD1ction of die Msunduze and Winya streams on the rood to N<hIlinde and aboot half a mile fr(ID die point where this road leaves die (old) main Zululand road. a shcrt di9tance na1h of Mandini. Thi9 was die socond mission statioo in dii9 area. Captain Allen Gardiner founded Culoola a Ku/ula (to sa free/redernptioo) nearby on the 00nks of die Msunduze on 2.6.1835. Ibid., p.180.

J.H. Breytenbach (ed.), Notule mn die NataLre Vo/ksraad 1838-1845, Bylaag 24, 1840, p.347; E.W. Smith, The Life and Times of Daniel Lindley (London, 1949), W. 219-221. MH XXXvn. 6, Jan. 1841, p.219. Letter fr(ID Lindley and

Adams, 14.7.1840. Qudoo in M. Williamson, Grout's Missionary years in Natal 1835-70, p.ll.

A. Groot, 'A Narrative', p.9; MH V11 6 Jun. 1841, p.248. J. Tracey, History, p.420; J.H. Breytenbach, Notu/e, p.72. MH XXVII. 6. JlD1e 1841. Lett« from Grout, 22.10.1840. p.246.

Ibid., p.247.

J.H. Breytenbach, Notu/e, p.72. resolutions 1 and 2; Natal Archives: Republic of Natalia, i:.-anddrost, Pietermarilzburg. No. 1/202: Resolutions of 8.1.1840 and 5.8.1840. QIKJted in E.W. Smith, The Life, pp. 219-220.

MH XXXVllL 4, April 1842, p.131.

G.A. Chadwick, Research on Historical Places of Importance to Kwazu/u, pp. rn2 -mIl. Fa cmfimlatioo of dii9 point refer to MH xxxvm. 8, AJrilI842, p.131. "I arrivoo at

Urnlanbooguenye, Umpandi's capital."

L. Grout, Zu/ula~ Life among the Zu/u-Kaffirs of Natal and Zu/uland (Philadelphia, 1862), p.210.

MH XXXVllL 4, April 1842, p.131.

M. W. Tyler Gray, Stories of the Early American Missionaries in South Africa (Johannesburg, 1933), p.39; MH LXXXII. 4, April 1886, p.135.

MH XXXVllL 4, April 1842, pp. 131-132.

A. Grout, 'A Narratire', p.9; J\:fH XXXVllL 4, April 1842, p.131.

A. Groot, 'A Narrative', p.9.

A. Bozas, Empangeni. 77Ie Origin of its Street Names (Empangeni, 1970), p.viii.

L. Grout, Zu/u/and, p.210. Ibid., p.241.

MH XXXVllL 4, April 1842, p.131.

A. Delegorgue. TrareLr in Southern Africa, Vol. I, p.40. We must rerntmber diat ISO years ago die Umhlatuze lake coold possibly have been ooe continuous lake i.e. not like die present Richards Bay, Cubhu. Mageza and Empangmi lakes. However, we do know diat, in any case, Inkanyesi was situated on die present Empangeni river.

Ibid., pp. 170-172. Ibid., p.174. MH XXXVllL 4, April 1842, p.131. Ibid. Ibid., p.132. Ibid. Ibid., p.131. MH XXXVllL 8, Aug. 1842, p.337. Ibid., W. 337-338. CY)NIREE 31/1.9.92 30

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Beide ouders staan volledig achter het gevoerde beleid, maar zien toch mogelijkheden voor wat maatwerk.. Ik heb ze gevraagd om een brief te schrijven aan de

bevindingen-nl.pdf, p. Decision of the CBP, the legal predecessor of the Dutch Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens. 33 Letter from the defendant to the Inspection Service dated 14 June

(3 sec pauze, kleuters laten antwoorden met duim). Omdat er dit keer geen zuivere klank-tekenkoppeling is, bieden we het geschreven woord niet aan. Wijs naar de prent, nadruk op /t/.

Bij easy kan je nog praten, bij pick-up raak je buiten adem, bij goal pace loop je op gevoel het tempo dat je tijdens je 15km hoopt te lopen.. Je loopt deze minutenblokjes aan een

The combined results of OSC2015 ’s five indica- tors of reproducibility suggest that, even if true, most effects are likely to be smaller than the original results suggest.. Gilbert

 Uses the reading strategies taught in the Home Language to make sense and monitor self when reading (phonics, context clues, structural analysis, sight words).  Reads

Lijst van ingekomen stukken voor de Algemene Raadscommissie van 8 september 2009 Informatie van derden.. Informatie aangeboden door

Memo inzake Museaal Centrum Bergen plus bijlage: voorontwerp BP Museaal Centrum Kranenburgh (de memo en bijlage zijn verstuurd naar de fractievoorzitters en ligt ter inzage in