• No results found

The influence of contrast media on serum osmolality, haematocrit and cardiac output : a comparative study in dogs

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "The influence of contrast media on serum osmolality, haematocrit and cardiac output : a comparative study in dogs"

Copied!
3
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

468 SAMJ VOLUME 67 23 MARCH 1985

of contrast media on

haematocrit and

The influence

serum osmolality,

cardiac output

A comparative study in dogs

P. L. VAN DER MERWE,

A.

BASSET,

D. ELS

Summary

Thirty-two mongrel dogs were used in a comparative study to assess the effect of normal saline solution, metrizamide and Cardioconray on serum osmolality, haematocrit and cardiac output The study demon-strated that the higher the osmolality of the test substance, the greater the reduction in haematocrit and the higher the increase in cardiac output SAtr MedJ 1985; 61: 468-410.

Cardio-angiographic ionic contrast media are usually of high osmolality. Thus Cardioconray (iothamalate sodium/ iothamalate meglumine 2:1), which is used in neonates and children, has an osmolality of more than 2000 mOsmlkg water (vapour pressure method). The toxicity of ionic contrast media is usually anributed to the agent's hypertonicity.l Ac-cording to Gavalaki er al.2the use of these agents in neonates is limited by the significant toxic effects. They also demon-strated that hypertonic media give rise to a compartmental fluid shift which could be dangerous.

Ton-toxic contrast agents, of which metrizamide was the first to be employed, are used more widely now for neurological diagnosis.) The osmolality of metrizamide with iodine con-centrations of 190 mg/ml and 370 mg/ml is 261 mOsm and 600 mOsmlkg water respectively. In comparison with Cardio-conray, therefore, it has a lower osmolality and thus theo-retically should be less toxic.

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of normal saline solution, Cardioconray and metrizamide on the serum osmolality, haematocrit and cardiac output in mongrel dogs.

Materials and methods

Thirty-two mongrel dogs were divided into four groups: group 1 (control group) - 7 dogs given saline solution (osmolality 292 mOsm/kg H20); group 2 - 10 dogs to whom Cardioconray (osmolality 2000 mOsmlkgHP) was administered; group 3

- 10 dogs to whom metrizamide (osmolality 261 mOsmlkg H20)was given; and group4 - 5dogs in whom metrizamide with an osmolality of 600 mOsmlkg H20 was employed. One

dog in group 2 could not be used because of an anaphylactic reaction to the administration of Cardioconray.

The animals were given a general anaesthetic (sodium pheno-barbitone). Four catheters (two arterial and two venous) were then introduced via a femoral cut-down and positioned in the pulmonary artery (No. 6 multipurpose balloon catheter), right atrium (No. 6Goodale-Lubin catheter), left ventricle (No. 6

Cordis pigtail catheter), and right femoral artery (Teflon catheter). A bolus of the test agent (1,5 ml/kg) was injected into the right atrium and was repeated after 40 minutes. Blood samples were taken and the cardiac output (thermodilution method) was estimated at 1,3, 5, 10,20, 30,41,45,50, 60 and

80minutes. Serum osmolality (vapour pressure method with a Wescon 5100 Vaporpressure osmometer) and haematocrit values were estimated from the blood samples.

Statistical analysis

The r-test (two-sample test) was used to compare groups 2, 3 and 4 with group 1 (control groUp).4

Results

The osmolality, haematocrit and cardiac output values were expressed as a fraction of the baseline values before adminis-tration of the bolus of the test substance.

In all four groups the haematocrit decreased and the cardiac output increased 1minute after administration of the bolus, while the osmolality changed only fractionally. The changes were very noticeable when the test agent administered had a high osmolality (Figs 1 and 2). The haematocrit reached a low level 5 minutes after administration of the first bolus in all four groups of animals. Thirty minutes after administration of the first bolus of test substance the haematocrit had not returned to the baseline value, but 40 minutes after the administration of the second bolus it did SO, and even rose above the baseline value in groups I and 3 (Fig. 2). Inallfour groups the cardiac output fell below the baseline values. Figs 3 - 6 show the changes in cardiac output and haematocrit.

Discussion

Departments of Paediatrics and Chemical Pathology, and

Cardiac Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Univer-sity of Stellenbosch and Tygerberg Hospital, Parowvallei, CP

P.L.VAN DER MERWE,M.B. CH.B., M.MED. (pAED.), F.c.P. (S.A.)

A.BASSET,NAT. DIP. MED. TECH. (CARDIOLOGY)

D. ELS,NAT. DIP. MED. TECH., NAT. DrP. CHEM. PATH., NAT. DIP. CLIN. PATH.

When the effects of the various diagnostic agents are compared, it is noticeable that the substances with a high osmolality (groups 2 and 4) caused a statistically significant increase in cardiac output (Fig. 1), while the haematocrit decreased accordingly (Fig. 2). The change in osmolality was not statistically significant in any of the groups. The laner fmding is at variance with the fmdings of Gavalaki er al.,2 who found

(2)

SAMT DEEL 67 23 MAART 1985 469 80 70 60 50 30 Q8~_..J..-_...J...._...L.._...L_--J'--_..L.-_...J...._....J

V

10 20 Cardiac outpul ... Haematocrit Q . . - - - O 1,2 ~

..

+----..

...

--

---...

Group 4 -'0 \ \

•...

' ) \

..

~~..

\

... , \ " \ " \~

••

'~

:'>.

.

.

Kev: Gt·oup 1 Group 2 Group 3 ...

1'.

.;~

-.1 ,

'I \ 'I \ '/

\

\ \ ~\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

\

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

....

---

...

\ \ \ \ 0,9 1,3 n 1\ 1 \ 1 1 • \

l •

1.21 \ 1 \ \ , "'~

.

...'r.

\ 1,1

1\\

~

....

\

!

\..

o I-~. 2 ndB~us 1 51 Bolus l,op----~~---__+----~-_=:::::="""'I TimeinMinutes

Fig. 3. Cardiac output and haematocrit in group 1 (normal saline). Fraction of control (pre-injection) levels 1 • 80 minutes after injection of the test drug. The mean ratio for cardiac output and haematocrit is shown at each point.

Kev: Cardiac output

Haematocrit o - - - - J 1.1 .~

-

'"

Cl: ~ Group

I. .

Group 2

+---.

Group 3 . . .u• • • • • • • • • Group 4 &- ...A 1,1 0.8~_~_~_"*_""":'.i:::--~=--~'=----=~~ , 10 20 30 4,0 50 60 70 80

IsI Bolus 2ndBolus

Time in Mmutes

...•...

1.0r-

...

-::-"""-"'?"""':'~

Fig. 1. Cardiac output in groups 1 - 4. Fraction of control (pre-injection) levels 1 - 80 minutes after injection of the test drug. The mean ratio for the appropriate group is shown at each point.

.~

'"

Cl: 0.8L...._.L..._...L-_-L-_--L._---=-.::---:'=----=~~

o

50 60 70 80 t 1stBolus

Fig. 2. Haematocrit in groups 1 - 4. Fraction of control (pre-injection) levels 1 - 80 minutes after injection of the test drug. The mean ratio for the appropriate group is shown at each point.

0.8':-_~_~-~=-__::-=-

,

4p

_ _==_--=':::--__::':_~

80

1st Bolus ZndBoIus

Time in Minutes

Fig. 4. Cardiac output and haematocrit in group 2 (Cardioconray). Fraction of control (pre-injection) levels 1 - 80 minutes after injection of the test drug. The mean ratio for cardiac output and haematocrit is shown at each point.

(3)

-=---470 SAMJ VOLUME 67 23 MARCH 1985 Cardiac oulpul - . . HaematO<.:.r-it 0---<:> Cardiac ou[po..t . . . - - . . . . . Haem-'!Iocrit e>----o 1.1 .2

i2

1,0 t---~---~ 1.1 1,2 0.9 0.9 80 70 60 50

4p

2 nd Bolus 30 20 0.8L...-_..._ - - L_ _J - _ - L . . _ - - I ._ _....L..._--'-_----l

o

10 t 1 SI Blllus 0.8L..._...l...-_...L-_----l_ _J - _ . . . J . . . . _ - ' - L - ~

o

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 t t I st Bolus 2 nd Bolus

Time in Minutes Time in Minutes

Fig. 5. Cardiac output and haematocrit in group 3 (metrizamide) (I 190/mg/ml). Fraction of control (pre-injection) levels 1 - 80 minutes after injection of the test drug. The mean ratio for cardiac output and haematocrit is shown at each point.

Fig. 6. Cardiac output and haematocrit in group 4 (metrizamide) (I 370 mg/ml). Fraction of control (pre-injection) levels 1 - 80 minutes after injection of the test drug. The mean ratio for cardiac output and haematocrit is shown at each point.

a significant increase in osmolality after the administration of a bolus of Cardioconray to neonates. The insignificant change in osmolality in the dogs is due to a rapid shift in comparrmental fluid.

The increase in cardiac output after the first bolus of metrizamide in group 4 is probably not only due to the osmolality of the substance, because there was no increase after the second bolus (Fig. 6).

The fmdings of the present experiment confirm that hyper-osmolar fluid causes a companmental fluid shift,1 i.e.

intra-vascular overload and extraintra-vascular dehydration. It has been proved that hyperosmolar conditions can give rise to neuro-logical manifestations, including cerebral haemorrhage.5 A

further deduction is that this fluid shift must take place rapidly, since there was no statistically significant increase in osmolality in any of the four groups. Thus, a normal osmolality should not cause complacency as a severe fluid maldistribution could still be present.

In their study Gavalakiet al.2used furosemide to normalize

the haematocrit and osmolality more rapidly. Their results suggest that this was good practice. On the other hand, their results pose the question whether or not the use of furosemide corrects the intravascular parameters only by gening rid of excess fluid while giving rise to extravascular dehydration. The present study has shown that a rapid increase in the intravascular compartment increases the preload with a resul-tant increase in stroke volume, leading to increased cardiac output.

Conclusion

From this study it would appear that: (I) the toXICity of contrast media can be anributed to their hypenonicity; (il) a

normal serum osmolality during cardiac catheterization does not necessarily mean that there is normal distribution of body fluids; (iil) care must be taken during cardiac catheterization because the rapid fluid shift can give rise to acute cardiac failure in an already compromised patient; (iv) rapid cellular dehydration can cause fluid imbalance, leading to the possible danger of arrhythmias; (v)cardiac output increases because of acute volume expansion secondary to an osmotic fluid shift; and (VI) the non-ionic contrast media will be the contrast agents of the future in angiographic diagnosis.

We wish to thank Miss H. Weymar of the Cardiac Clinic, Tygerberg Hospital, for preparing the manuscript, as well asMr

M. C. de lough of the Department of Paediatrics for the preparation of the graphs. Thanks are also duetoMr G. Louw and the staff of the experimental theatre at the University of Stellenbosch for their assistance. Dr }. P. van der Westhuyzen, Chief Medical Superintendent of Tygerberg Hospital, is thanked for permission

topublish.

REFERENCES

I. Ekeland A, Uflacker R. Effect of meglumine metrozoate and metrizamide on microcirculation. Aaa Radiol Diagn 1978; 19: 969-976.

2. Gavalaki E, Preston TD, Newman CGH. Effect of furosemide on hematocrit and plasma osmolality changes following angiography in children. Cardiology 1973; 58: 298-305.

3. EngeI, Niner-Nauge S, Adrew E, Levorstadt K. Amipaque: a new contrast medium in coranary angiography. Radiology 1977; 125: 317-322.

4. Swinscow TDV. Statistics at square one. Br Med] 1976; 2: 291-292. 5. Ktavath RE, Aharan AS, Abal G, FinbergL.Clinically significant

physio-logic changes from rapidly administered hypertonic solutions: acute osmol poisoning. PediarrUs 1970; 46: 267-275.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

The results show that the proposed seed extraction mechanism derive random seed from sensor data and the seed is capable of passing 12 out of 15 NIST statistical tests.. The results

The Employee H&amp;W Framework provides for 'policies, systems, programmes, compliance measures, monitoring and evaluation of occupational health interventions on

Molar Incisor Hypomineralisation (MIH) and Hypomineralised Second Primary Molars (HSPM) involve prevalent qualitative structural developmental anomalies of tooth enamel affecting

The chapter is outlined as follows: paragraph 2.2 presents the gradient based FP assisted RESURF optimization model, paragraph 2.3 treats device breakdown and how to determine

− Indien waardevolle archeologische vindplaatsen die bedreigd worden door de geplande ruimtelijke ontwikkeling niet in situ bewaard kunnen blijven:. Wat is de ruimtelijke

The popularity of the coverage of actual Sochi problems is also obvious from the fact that the account posted 86% of the Tweets in these three tone-classes in the first five days,

De open antwoorden op de vraag welke redenen men heeft het Julianakanaal te bevaren laten zien, in aanvulling op de resultaten hierboven beschreven, dat deze route als kortst en

We used four temperature-dependent functions, with starting parame- ters estimated from fits to published data for pupal and adult mortality, larviposition, and pupal emergence rates