• No results found

Homo empathicus

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Homo empathicus"

Copied!
1
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

R

ecent media coverage has high-lighted interesting issues in our society. Two in particular caught the attention: one was the obvi-ous and inevitable conflict of egoistic needs of those for and against nationalisation, and the other the celebration of the birthday of a be-loved member of our society, past president Nelson Mandela. The former has to do with the colliding worlds of those promoting and those dealing with ‘white guilt’. In the case of the latter, most of us came together across creed, race and gender and celebrated this in-dividual in a way that we celebrate no other.

What is it in the behaviour and conduct of especially leaders – political, business, academic, etc. – that either brings people to-gether or splits and keeps them apart? Upon reflection, these matters remind me of Pas-cal’s cautionary note: ‘The heart has its reasons

which reason knows not of ’.

Stepping back and considering for a mo-ment the scientific label given to human be-ings, Homo sapiens (wise man/ape), and then juxtaposing this to the reported observations in our society, this label is rather ironic. At the same time, we, as thinking beings, know deep within our social nature lies our affec-tive, loving ability, which we observe and experience in our daily lives through small acts of kindness – offered to or by us. It is here where empathy, or empaThicus, enters the stage.

EmpaThicus is a word with a creative ‘T’,

a letter that offers a vertical and horizontal view of our identity. Vertically, we develop, from infancy, a distinct personality and we become aware of ourselves as a discrete and separate person from others. However, this

vertical development on its own brings with Frik LaNdMaNuSB executive Development ltd.is the Ceo of

Homo

empa

Thicus?

AFR

www.usb.ac.za/agenda

it the potential danger of the individual threatening the social collective of which we all are part. The developed individuality really only offers meaning in the context of horizontal development: viz. being able to live and move among others; being able to see and think differently from others, yet able to engage in a meaningful dialogue with others, understanding that our individuality has significance only among others.

Empathy respects own individuality and that of the others with whom we form a so-ciety. In that sense it has a joining, bonding quality but it does not absorb our individual-ity, forcing us into agreement or approval. In the confidence of who we are, what we value, what our rights are, we allow others’ opinions and beliefs to enter our world and still main-tain our identity and what we represent.

So what exactly is empathy? In very sim-ple terms it is our understanding of how it is for that other person, being able to feel the emotions of another person based on our willingness to understand the other’s posi-tion and situaposi-tion. The neuroscientists speak of ‘mirror neurons’ in our brains. The same neurons light up in our brain as in those of another person whom we observe experien-cing a particular situation. The association of someone’s pains with our own past experi-ence or even just imagining how we would have felt had we been in that person’s shoes makes the same neurons fire in our brain as in the other person’s actual experience.

What value does empathy offer us? It is the saving grace of any society. No society is sustainable without empathy. A society can-not survive if everyone is only caring for him- or herself. The ability and the willingness to feel for others to the extent of the other ‘feel-ing felt’ is in fact the key to the survival of

Homo sapiens as Homo empaThicus.

Our society still needs to heal. Empathy is an essential need if we, all of us, want to process the consequences of our past, and if we want to build up the necessary social cap-ital and trust that a healthy society thrives on. Healing and sustaining a healthy socie-ty requires empathy. It allows us to learn in a collaborative way, listening to others and their opinions in a way that not only makes them feel felt or heard, but in a way that of-fers us the possibility to make our paradigms more porous and considerate of conflicting ideas and opinions. This ability transforms a politician into a statesman and a statesman into someone that serves with wisdom and courage, and empathically draws disparate individuals into a cohesive and productive society.

A society is built on relationships and the quality thereof hinges on the presence of em-pathy. Without it, we may still stay together but then merely as Homo averiticus – only aware of each other’s bodies, consumed by self-interest and greed, and with no sense of the inner life of others, no sense of that which makes us human. Homo empaThicus.

F r i k L a N d M a N W r i T E s

‘What is it in the

conduct of leaders

that either brings

people together or

keeps them apart?’

COMMENT

www.usb.ac.za

/

agenda | agenda@usb.ac.za

dirECT TO yOu

regular

7

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Hoewel er nog maar minimaal gebruik gemaakt is van de theorieën van Trauma Studies om Kanes werk te bestuderen, zal uit dit onderzoek blijken dat de ervaringen van Kanes

The growth of the number of family migrants from Eastern Europe, but also the increased family migration from the countries of origin of many asylum and knowledge migrants, has

This thesis contributes to the existing IB literature on innovation performance of emerging market firms and their use of external knowledge sources, by

Exploring and describing the experience of poverty-stricken people living with HIV in the informal settlements in the Potchefstroom district and exploring and describing

Pressure ulcers can initiate either at the skin layer (superficial ulcers) or within deeper tissues (deep tissue injury). The underlying mechanisms of deep tissue injury are

We carried out a post hoc analysis of data for patients in the prospective IMMC-38 (chemotherapy) and COU-AA-301 (abiraterone) trials with baseline CTC 5 cells/7.5 ml, evaluating

Cases were determined to have likely causative variant(s) when the affected gene matched the described phenotype, no segregation was performed and when a novel missense variant

In this regard, brie# y coming back to the issue of cognitive closure – the thesis that some aspects and properties of the world must in principle elude us given the