iFLUX 1
Studiedag Innovatieve onderzoekstechnieken
iFLUX Technology
Mass flux and mass discharge measurement in groundwater
Goedele Verreydt, Tim Op ‘t Eyndt
Founders of iFLUX
OVAM, 10 Maart 2020 Tijd: 14:30–15.15h
iFLUX
Dynamics of soil and groundwater
pollution often is underestimated
iFLUX
Mass flux concept
https://www.itrcweb.org/GuidanceDocuments/MASSFLUX1.pdf
iFLUX
Mass flux concept
https://www.itrcweb.org/GuidanceDocuments/MASSFLUX1.pdf Other ITRC guidance
In Situ Bioremediation of Chlorinated Ethene: DNAPL Source Zones (BioDNAPL-3, 2008)
Integrated DNAPL Site
Strategy (IDSS-1, 2011)
Integrated DNAPL Site
Characterization and Tools
Selection (ISC-1, 2015)
iFLUX
Transect A
Flux JBi,j
MdA
MdB
Flux JAi,j
Source
Mass Discharge (Md) = Sum of Mass Flux
Estimates
JAi,j= Individual mass flux measurment at Transect A
MdA= Mass discharge at Transect A (Total of all JAi,jestimates)
Transect B Transect A
Flux JBi,j
MdA
MdB
Flux JAi,j
Source
Mass Discharge (Md) = Sum of Mass Flux
Estimates
JAi,j= Individual mass flux measurment at Transect A
MdA= Mass discharge at Transect A (Total of all JAi,jestimates)
Transect B
• Contaminant mass flux (J)
• The rate of solute mass moving across a specific
defined area, usually a portion of the plume cross-section
• Mass flux is a vector quantity, expressed as mass/time/area
[M/L
2/T]
JAij= Individual mass flux measurement at Transect A
(ITRC MASSFLUX-1, 2010)
Transect B Source
Mass Flux Through Transects
Flow Transect A
Definitions
iFLUX
• Contaminant Mass discharge (M d )
• The total mass of any solute conveyed by a plume at a given location
• Md is a scalar quantity, expressed as mass/time [M/T]
• Source or plume strength
Transect A
Flux JBi,j
MdA
MdB
Flux JAi,j
Source
Mass Discharge (Md) = Sum of Mass Flux
Estimates
JAi,j= Individual mass flux measurment at Transect A
MdA= Mass discharge at Transect A (Total of all JAi,jestimates)
Transect B Transect A
Flux JBi,j
MdA
MdB
Flux JAi,j
Source
Mass Discharge (Md) = Sum of Mass Flux
Estimates
JAi,j= Individual mass flux measurment at Transect A
MdA= Mass discharge at Transect A (Total of all JAi,jestimates)
Transect B
Transect A
J
Aij= Individual mass flux measurement at Transect A
(ITRC MASSFLUX-1, 2010)
M
dA= Mass discharge at transect A
M dA =[J aij x A]
Transect B Source
Md = Sum of Mass Flux over a Transect
M
dB
Flow
Definitions
iFLUX
Mass fluxes can vary a lot
iFLUX
When to apply flux measurements?
The applicability of the iFLUX technology is versatile
FIELD CHARACTERISATION - Preferential groundwater flow paths
- Optimize CSM - Spreading risk
- 3D groundwater flow map REMEDIATION DESIGN
- Optimize in-situ remediation - Control remediation efficiency
- Monitor plume stability or natural attenuation DATA MANAGEMENT
- Big ‘groundwater’ data - Manage resource integrity - Site liability management
01
03
02
05
04
REMOTE MONITORING - Online groundwater flux sensing- Real-time monitoring & data visualization SMART LAND MANAGEMENT
- Groundwater resilience management - Drought prevention - Groundwater usage and migration - Predictive modelling
iFLUX
1. Water flux: q = K x i [L/T] or [L 3 /L 2 /T]
3. Contaminant mass flux: J = q x C avg [M/L 2 /T]
2. Average contaminant concentration: C avg [M/L 3 ]
C avg q = K i
Mass flux concept
iFLUX
iFLUX technology
We are able to perform a direct flux measurement
Patented and validated
Captures 90% of all pollution
types
Accurate measurement of
speed and direction
Potential cost reduction up to
30%
iFLUX
PRINCIPLES
Tracer eluted to the right
Sorbed contaminant
Mass flux calculation
K
0K>>K
0Groundwater Flowlines
t 1 t 2
t 3
Photo: Dye
intercepted in a cartridge
2. Contaminant adsorbed onto passive flux meter over time to get Mass flux (J)
1. Tracer desorbs from passive flux
meter over time to get Flow (Q)
iFLUX
Flux results
End report with interpreted and analyzed flux results.
Each sampler location delivers accurate flux results for each depth
Well depth graph
Interpolation technique to calculate and visualize spreading of groundwater and pollution
Control plane
PFM-02
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
0 40 80 120
Flux (mg/m2/day)
Depth below top of casing (ft)
0 5 10 15
Darcy velocity (cm/day)
iFLUX
4 – Data analysis and reporting
Validated flow field distortion calculations deliver detailed and reliable flux data in the aquifer. Our end report contains
comprehensible graphs and maps of the designated field.
3 – Retrieval and lab analysis
After retrieval, dedicated transport from site to our partner laboratory is taken care of. A certified lab analysis will provide us the raw flux data measured.
2 – Sampler installation on site
An authorized field team will guarantee a precise installation of the selected iFLUX samplers on site.
1 – Field design
Based on preliminary site investigation and customer input, a detailed monitoring campaign is developed.
iFLUX Project
iFLUX offers an integrated solution in close cooperation with the Environmental Consultant to guarantee accurate flux results.
A typical project includes 4 milestones.
iFLUX
1 - Field design
iFLUX
iFLUX
4 – Data analysis and reporting
Validated flow field distortion calculations deliver detailed and reliable flux data in the aquifer. Our end report contains
comprehensible graphs and maps of the designated field.
3 – Retrieval and lab analysis
After retrieval, dedicated transport from site to our partner laboratory is taken care of. A certified lab analysis will provide us the raw flux data measured.
2 – Sampler installation on site
An authorized field team will guarantee a precise installation of the selected iFLUX samplers on site.
1 – Field design
Based on preliminary site investigation and customer input, a detailed monitoring campaign is developed.
iFLUX Project
iFLUX offers an integrated solution in close cooperation with the Environmental Consultant to guarantee accurate flux results.
A typical project includes 4 milestones.
iFLUX
iFLUX
iFLUX case studies
iFLUX
iFLUX case studies
Chemical plant Restored tidal wetland Outskirts of town
iFLUX 20
Chemical Plant
Topic: contaminant migration risk
• Industrial chemical plant active since the 1970s
• Refinement and distillation of petroleum hydrocarbons, production of solvents and additives
• Located in an industrial harbour area
• Subsurface: heterogeneous sediments, with drainage ditches and mechanical dewatering
Site : Chemical plant
Location : Harbour area
iFLUX
Case: Chemical plant
Situation
• Source area 1: BTEX, TPH, (MTBE)
• Source area 2: MTBE, (TPH, BTEX)
• No current human health risk
• Migration risk towards a down gradient located
drainage ditch, which is discharged via pumping in the nearby river
• Ongoing source remediation – pilot scale:
• Source area 1: In-situ Chemical Oxidation (ISCO)
• Source area 2: Vapor Enhanced Recovery (VER)
• Plume control: traditional monitoring
• Geology: heterogeneous alluvial deposits with large variations in permeability and composition (coarse sand, fine sands, clay, peat, …)
Source Area 1
Source Area 2
Monochloorbenzene Benzene
Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylene MTBE TPH (C10-C40)
Groundwater contamination
iFLUX
Case: Chemical plant
Problem
2. Contaminant mass
How much contamination is migrating? Is this a relevant
mass to be considered a migration risk?
4. Optimized mitigation
If remedial actions are required, how can they be optimized and become highly
efficient?
3. Migration rate
How fast is the contamination migrating? Will this be impacted by other effects (sorption, degradation, back-
diffusion, …)?
1. Preferential pathways
Are there preferential pathways driving contaminant
migration? If so, where are they located?
iFLUX
Case: Chemical plant
Monitoring plan
Available infrastructure/data:
• 9 monitoring wells with detailed borehole
description at the
downgradient site border
• 5 MIPs downgradient of source area 1
iFlux sampling setup:
• Installation of 5 iFlux
samplers (5 X groundwater flux + VOC flux sampler) in 6 selected monitoring wells (screens at different depth intervals)
• Exposure time: 4 weeks
Source Area 1
Source Area 2
iFlux measurement locations MIPs
Sampling locations
iFLUX
Case: Chemical plant
Contaminant flux (extrapolated contours) at the down gradient site border
Parameter Calculated mass load from flux measurements for total site border cross-section
Groundwater 836 m³/day (305.000 m³/y) BTEX 210 g/day (77 kg/y)
MTBE 86 g/day (31 kg/y)
MCB 38 g/day (14 kg/y)
BTEX MTBE
MCB
Conclusion 1:
Preferential pathways in the highly permeable layers
Conclusion 2:
Relevant contaminant fluxes at site border
(in total almost 340 g/day, at an average concentration of 407 µg/l)
Conclusion 3:
Large masses of
contamination present in low permeable layers, potential sources for back-diffusion
iFLUX
Case: Chemical plant
Contaminant flux and mass distribution (MIP) at the down gradient site border
Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylene
MIP results show elevated
contaminant mass
mostly in the low
permeable layers
iFLUX
Case: Chemical plant
iFlux added value
Hydraulic barrier
Without flux information:
• Focus on layers with high contaminant mass
• Abstraction from long screens
• Result: high pumping rate, low yield, limited effect on migration
Hydraulic barrier Hydraulic barrier
With flux information:
• Focus on layers with high contaminant flux
• Abstraction from short well placed screens
• Result: low pumping rate, high yield, strong effect on migration
Numbers:
• Duration: 3 +2 years
• 50 m³/h
• 780.000 euro
Numbers:
• Duration: 3 + 1 year
• 20 m³/h
• 485.000 euro
iFLUX
Tidal marsh restoration
river restored marsh
marsh
dike
Lippenbroek, Belgium
Lippenbroek, Belgium
iFLUX
Restored freshwater marsh Lippenbroek, Hamme
LB C
LB B LB A
iFLUX
Field set-up
Newly deposited sediment
Compact polder soil
Near creek zone Marsh interior
iFLUX
Groundwater drainage
iFLUX
Winner of the NICOLE innovation award 2017
Passive flux measurements
iFLUX
Real time flux measurements
Newly deposited sediment
Compact polder soil
Seepage meters
Near creek zone Marsh interior
iFLUX sensor
iFLUX
Toepassing?
iFLUX
iFLUX sensor
Direct horizontal sensor
•V5.0
•2 Flow sensors
•Temperature sensor
•Pressure sensor
•Moisture sensor
Vertical sensor
•Treewell V1.0
•River bed V2.0
In well sensor
•Concept phase
•Magnetometer - gyroscope
•Well diameters >110 mm
iFLUX
iFLUX sensor
Characteristic Parameter Value/description
Measurement Range 0,5 – 500 cm/ day
Dimensions Length of sensor probe
diameter
30 cm 110 mm
Sensors amount
length type
1-3 4 cm
calorimetric microsensor
Material sensor capillary probe housing outer mesh installations rods
glass
nylon PA12
100% polypropylene stainless steel
Communication Type
Data platform
3G mobile network FLUXeye
Energy Source Battery
Solar panel
iFLUX
First results
iFLUX
Vertical flux
RESANAT PROJECT: DE LIEVE
iFLUX 39
Heersende
grondwaterstromingsrichting Doorlaatbaarheid: 5m/d
Doorlaatbaarheid: 0,6m/d
?-b
?-c
?-h
?-i
?-g
?-d
?-f
?-e De Lieve: actuele situatie
?-f
?-i
?-a
iFLUX
?-l
?-m
Heersende
grondwaterstromingsrichting
De Lieve na ontgraving van het sediment
?-j
?-k
?-n
iFLUX
Heersende
grondwaterstromingsrichting
?-p
De Lieve: reactieve matten
?-o
Remediation of Residual contamination with Nature Based
Techniques
RESANAT PROJECT
Remediation of Residual contamination with Nature Based Techniques
Subscribe to newsletter via
https://www.ovam.be/resanat
iFLUX
Discussie
- Interpretatiekader ontbreekt nog:
- Hoe moet er omgegaan worden met fluxdata?
- Wat is het vergelijkingskader met concentratie metingen?
- Hoe gaat de klant er mee om en wil die er mee om gaan?
- Noodzaak voor Code van Goede Praktijk?
- Een bodemsaneringsproject wordt opgedeeld in kleine deelprojecten, gedreven door budget. Grondige en kwalitatieve karakterisatie heeft pas veel later een meerwaarde en is investeren in de toekomst!
- Hoe kunnen real-time fluxmetingen toegevoegde waarde bieden:
- Online verspreidingsrisico – richting en snelheid?
- Continue dimensionering in-situ sanering?
- Na-monitoring beperken tot max. 3j?
iFLUX
Bedankt! vragen?
www.ifluxsampling.com
Goedele@ifluxsampling.com +32 473 83 64 62