• No results found

Visualisation of articular motion in orthopaedics Krekel, P.R.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Visualisation of articular motion in orthopaedics Krekel, P.R."

Copied!
9
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Krekel, P.R.

Citation

Krekel, P. R. (2011, February 10). Visualisation of articular motion in orthopaedics. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/16455

Version: Corrected Publisher’s Version

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden

Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/16455

Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if

applicable).

(2)

Visualisation of Articular

Motion in Orthopaedics

(3)

Dutch Arthritis Association and was carried out in the ASCI graduate school (disserta- tion series nr. 227).

ISBN/EAN 978-94-6169-018-0

Financial support was provided by:

Annafonds Biomet Nederland Clinical Graphics

DePuy JTE Johnson & Johnson Dutch Arthritis Association Litos/

Motek Medical Tornier

Copyright c 2011 by Peter Krekel, Den Haag.

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recor- ding, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright owner.

(4)

Visualisation of Articular Motion in Orthopaedics

Proefschrift

ter verkrijging van de graad Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. mr. P.F. van der Heijden,

volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties te verdedigen op donderdag 10 februari 2011

klokke 15:00 uur

door

Peter Roelof Krekel

geboren te Den Haag in 1982

(5)

Promotores: Prof. dr. R.G.H.H. Nelissen

Co-promotores: Dr. C.P. Botha (Technische Universiteit, Delft) Dr. ir. E.R. Valstar

Overige leden: Prof. dr. P.M. Rozing

Prof. dr. R.J. Emery (Imperial College, Londen)

Prof. dr. ir. W.J. Niessen (Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam) Prof. dr. ir. J.H.C. Reiber

Prof. dr. J.L. Bloem

(6)

v

Voor mijn opa.

(7)
(8)

Contents

1 Introduction 1

1.1 Motivation . . . 1

1.2 Medical quick guide . . . 3

1.3 Goal . . . 6

1.4 Contributions . . . 7

1.5 Structure of this thesis . . . 7

2 Fused joint segmentation 11 2.1 Introduction . . . 13

2.2 Method description . . . 17

2.3 Results . . . 25

2.4 Discussion . . . 27

3 Simulation and visualisation of shoulder range of motion 31 3.1 Introduction . . . 33

3.2 Related Work . . . 34

3.3 ROM simulation . . . 35

3.4 Visualisation . . . 37

3.5 Optimisation . . . 40

3.6 Results . . . 42

3.7 Conclusions and Future Work . . . 44

4 Evaluation of bone impingement prediction 47 4.1 Introduction . . . 49

4.2 Methods . . . 49

4.3 Results . . . 57

4.4 Discussion . . . 61 vii

(9)

5 Range of motion of proximal humerus fractures 63

5.1 Introduction . . . 65

5.2 Methods . . . 66

5.3 Results . . . 70

5.4 Discussion . . . 72

5.5 Conclusion . . . 75

6 Visual analysis of multi-joint kinematic data 77 6.1 Introduction . . . 79

6.2 Related Work . . . 81

6.3 Methods . . . 82

6.4 Evaluation . . . 94

6.5 Conclusions and Future Work . . . 97

7 Clinical applications 99 7.1 Case report 1: Proximal humerus fracture . . . 101

7.2 Case report 2: Hip prosthesis luxation analysis . . . 104

7.3 Case report 3: Femoroacetabular impingement . . . 107

7.4 Discussion . . . 110

8 General discussion 113 8.1 Image processing . . . 113

8.2 Diagnosis & pre-operative planning . . . 114

8.3 Evaluation . . . 115

8.4 Conclusion . . . 116

8.5 Future Work . . . 116

Bibliography 119

Summary 133

Samenvatting (Dutch summary) 137

List of publications 141

Curriculum Vitae 143

Acknowledgements 145

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

In our prototype pre-operative planning system for shoulder replacement, we cre- ate patient-specific bone-determined range of motion predictions based on collision detection

Our pre-operative planning system simulates patient-specific bone-determined range of motion, meant to reduce the risk of impingement complications and to im- prove the range of

Each model underwent a process of endosteal and periosteal morphological assessment (see Fi- gure 5.2). Proximal ellipse fitting defines a distal major and minor axis whilst

The system currently supports six visualisation techniques that are collectively used to filter motion data and inspect relationships between the various DOFs. Although designed for

Pre-operative simulation of ROM, assuming the fracture would have healed in post-traumatic configuration, indicated that the available range of external rotation in 0 ◦ of

This principle can be used to guide the development of visual analysis applications that deal with large amounts of data.. The challenge of these visualisation tasks lies in

Evaluation of bone impingement prediction in preoperative planning for shoulder arthroplasty.. Engineering in Medicine

For the speci- fic case of the shoulder joint, existing segmentation techniques often fail and lead to poor results.. Our approach enables users to quickly and accurately segment