• No results found

University of Groningen Bringing Community and Environment Together Sloot, Daniel

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "University of Groningen Bringing Community and Environment Together Sloot, Daniel"

Copied!
15
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

University of Groningen

Bringing Community and Environment Together

Sloot, Daniel

DOI:

10.33612/diss.166147736

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.

Document Version

Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date: 2021

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA):

Sloot, D. (2021). Bringing Community and Environment Together: the role of community environmental initiatives in sustainability transitions. University of Groningen. https://doi.org/10.33612/diss.166147736

Copyright

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

(2)
(3)

Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2013). Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: A meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1773–1785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.029

Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of in-tervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of En-vironmental Psychology, 25, 273–291.

Afshartous, D., & Preston, R. A. (2011). Key Results of Interaction Models with Centering. Journal of Statistics Education, 19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1 0691898.2011.11889620

Ajzen, I., & Fischbein, M. (1970). The Prediction of Behavior From Attitudinal and Normative Variables. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 466–487. Asensio, O. I., & Delmas, M. A. (2015). Nonprice incentives and energy

conser-vation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United Sta-tes of America, 112, 510–515. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1401880112 Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1986). Psychology of intergroup relations.

Burnham Inc Pub.

Axsen, J., & Kurani, K. S. (2012). Social Influence, Consumer Behavior, and Low-Carbon Energy Transitions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37, 311–340. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-en-viron-062111-145049

Bailey, I., Hopkins, R., & Wilson, G. (2010). Some things old, some things new: The spatial representations and politics of change of the peak oil relo-calisation movement. Geoforum, 41, 595–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. geoforum.2009.08.007

Bamberg, S., Rees, J., & Seebauer, S. (2015). Collective climate action: De-terminants of participation intention in community-based pro-environ-mental initiatives. Journal of Environpro-environ-mental Psychology, 43, 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.006

Bartels, J., & Onwezen, M. C. (2014). Consumers’ willingness to buy products with environmental and ethical claims: The roles of social representati-ons and social identity. International Journal of Crepresentati-onsumer Studies, 38, 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12067

(4)

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for inter-personal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 Bicchieri, C. (1990). Norms of Cooperation. Ethics, 100, 838–861. https://doi.

org/10.1086/293237

Biddau, F., Armenti, A., & Cottone, P. (2016). Socio-psychological aspects of grassroots participation in the Transition Movement: An Italian case study. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4, 142–165. https://doi. org/10.5964/jspp.v4i1.518

Bolderdijk, J. W., Gorsira, M., Keizer, K., & Steg, L. (2013). Values Determi-ne the (In)EffectiveDetermi-ness of Informational Interventions in Promoting Pro--Environmental Behavior. PLoS ONE, 8, e83911. https://doi.org/10.1371/

journal.pone.0083911

Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2015). Promoting sustainable consumption: the risks of using financial incentives. In L. A. Reisch & J. Thøgersen (Eds.), Handbook of research on sustainable consumption (pp. 328–342). Chel-tenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Bolderdijk, J. W., Steg, L., Geller, E. S., Lehman, P. K., & Postmes, T. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of monetary versus moral motives in environ-mental campaigning. Nature Climate Change, 3, 413–416. https://doi. org/10.1038/nclimate1767

Bomberg, E., & McEwen, N. (2012). Mobilizing community energy. Energy Policy, 51, 435–444.

Bouman, T., & Steg, L. (2019). Motivating Society-wide Pro-environ-mental Change. One Earth, 1, 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ON-EEAR.2019.08.002

Brant, R. (1990). Assessing Proportionality in the Proportional Odds Mo-del for Ordinal Logistic Regression. Biometrics, 46, 1171. https://doi. org/10.2307/2532457

Brewer, M. B. (1991). The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482. htt-ps://doi.org/10.1177/0146167291175001

(5)

Buurkracht. (2018a). Buurkracht. Retrieved July 19, 2018, from https://buurkracht.nl/

Buurkracht. (2018b). Tips om direct energiewinst halen. Retrieved January 4, 2018, from https://buurkracht.nl/jouw-voordeel

Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. (1968). Group dynamics; research and theory. New York: Harper and Row.

Cesario, J., Grant, H., & Higgins, E. (2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from “feeling right.” Journal of Personality and Social Psycho-logy, 86, 388.

Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2009). Connected. The Surprising Power of Social Networks and How They Shape Our Lives. New York: Little, Brown and Company.

Cialdini, R., Reno, R., & Kallgren, C. (1990). A focus theory of normative con-duct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015.

Cialdini, R., & Trost, M. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The hand-book of social psychology (pp. 151–192). New York, NY, US: McGraw-Hill. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social capital. Cambridge: Belknap. Connors, P., & McDonald, P. (2011). Transitioning communities: community,

participation and the Transition Town movement. Community Develop-ment Journal, 46, 558–572. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsq014

Corner, A., Markowitz, E., & Pidgeon, N. (2014). Public engagement with cli-mate change: the role of human values. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5, 411–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.269

De Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: How to measure egoistic, al-truistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40, 330–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506297831

Deaux, K., & Martin, D. (2003). Interpersonal Networks and Social Catego-ries: Specifying Levels of Context in Identity Processes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 101–117. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519842

(6)

Delmas, M., Fischlein, M., & Asensio, O. (2013). Information strategies and energy conservation behavior: A meta-analysis of experimental studies from 1975 to 2012. Energy Policy, 61, 729–739.

Dietz, T. (2015a). Altruism, self-interest, and energy consumption. Procee-dings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 1654–1655.

Dietz, T. (2015b). Environmental value. In T. Brosch & D. Sander (Eds.), Ox-ford Handbook of Values (pp. 329–349). OxOx-ford: OxOx-ford University Press. Dietz, T., & Whitley, C. T. (2018). Environmentalism, norms, and identity.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, 12334–12336. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817487115 Dillard, J., Weber, K., & Vail, R. (2007). The relationship between the perceived and

actual effectiveness of persuasive messages: A meta-analysis with implications for formative campaign research. Journal of Communication, 57, 613–631. Dóci, G., & Vasileiadou, E. (2014). “Let’s do it ourselves” Individual

motivati-ons for investing renewables at community level. Renewable and Sustaina-ble Energy Reviews, 49, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.051 Dogan, E., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2014). Making Small Numbers Count:

Environmental and Financial Feedback in Promoting Eco-driving Beha-viours. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37, 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10603-014-9259-z

Dono, J., Webb, J., & Richardson, B. (2010). The relationship between en-vironmental activism, pro-enen-vironmental behaviour and social identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jenvp.2009.11.006

Dunlap, R. E., & Brulle, R. J. (2015). Climate Change and Society: Sociologi-cal Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.

Duurzaam Oss. (2019). Buurkracht: Besparen met eigen buurt. Retrieved Oc-tober 15, 2019, from https://www.duurzaamoss.nl/initiatieven/e530-be-sparen-met-eigen-buurt/

Dykstra, P. A., Kalmijn, M., Knijn, T., Komter, A. E., Liefbroer, A. C., & Mulder, C. H. (2005). Codebook of the Netherlands kinship panel study. Neder-lands Interdisciplinair Demografisch Instituut.

(7)

Easterbrook, M., & Vignoles, V. L. (2012). Different Groups, Different Mo-tives: Identity Motives Underlying Changes in Identification With Novel Groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1066–1080. htt-ps://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212444614

Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). Social identity: Context, com-mitment, content. Oxford, England: Blackwell.

Festinger, L. (1954). A Theory of Social Comparison Processes. Human Rela-tions, 7, 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202

Fielding, K. S., & Hornsey, M. J. (2016). A Social Identity Analysis of Cli-mate Change and Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors: Insights and Opportunities. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 121. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2016.00121

Frederiks, E. R., Stenner, K., & Hobman, E. V. (2015). Household energy use: Applying behavioural economics to understand consumer decision--making and behaviour. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41,

1385–1394. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2014.09.026

Fritsche, I., Barth, M., Jugert, P., Masson, T., & Reese, G. (2018). A Social Identity Model of Pro-Environmental Action (SIMPEA). Psychological Re-view, 125, 245–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000090

Gatersleben, B., Murtagh, N., & Abrahamse, W. (2014). Values, identity and pro-environmental behaviour. Contemporary Social Science, 9, 374–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2012.682086

Gifford, R., & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Jour-nal of Psychology, 49. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12034

Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510. https:// doi.org/10.1086/228311

Hargreaves, T., Hielscher, S., Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2013). Grassroots in-novations in community energy: The role of intermediaries in niche deve-lopment. Global Environmental Change, 23, 868–880.

(8)

Heiskanen, E., Johnson, M., Robinson, S., Vadovics, E., & Saastamoinen, M. (2010). Low-carbon communities as a context for individual behavioural change. Energy Policy, 38, 7586–7595. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EN-POL.2009.07.002

Hielscher, S., Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2013). Grassroots innovations for sus-tainable energy: exploring niche development processes among communi-ty energy initiatives. In M. J. Cohen, H. S. Brown, & P. J. Vergraft (Eds.), Innovations in Sustainable Consumption (pp. 133–158). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Hoffman, S. M., & High-Pippert, A. (2010). From private lives to collective action: Recruitment and participation incentives for a community energy program. Energy Policy, 38, 7567–7574.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2018). An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5° C Above Pre-industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty. In press. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2014). Climate change 2014:

synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (R.

K. Pachauri & L. Meyer, Eds.). Geneva: IPCC.

Jachimowicz, J. M., Hauser, O. P., O’Brien, J. D., Sherman, E., & Galinsky, A. D. (2018). The critical role of second-order normative beliefs in predicting energy conservation. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 757–764. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41562-018-0434-0

Jans, L., Bouman, T., & Fielding, K. (2018). A Part of the Energy “In Crowd”: Changing People’s Energy Behavior via Group-Based Approaches. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 16, 35–41.

Jans, L., & Fielding, K. (2018). The role of group processes in environmental issues, attitudes, and behaviours. In L. Steg & J. I. M. De Groot (Eds.), En-vironmental psychology: An introduction (pp. 228–237). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119241072.ch23

(9)

Jans, L., Leach, C. W., Garcia, R. L., & Postmes, T. (2015). The development of group influence on in-group identification: A multilevel approach. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18, 190–209. https://doi. org/10.1177/1368430214540757

Kalkbrenner, B. J., & Roosen, J. (2016). Citizens’ willingness to participate in local renewable energy projects: The role of community and trust in Germany. Energy Research and Social Science, 13, 60–70. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.006

Keizer, K., & Schultz, P. W. (2018). Social Norms and Pro-Environmental Be-haviour. In L. Steg & J. M. De Groot (Eds.), Environmental Psychology: An introduction (pp. 179–188). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119241072.ch18 Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why do people act

en-vironmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental beha-vior? Environmental Education Research, 8, 239–260. https://doi. org/10.1080/13504620220145401

Kurz, T., Prosser, A. M. B., Rabinovich, A., & O’Neill, S. (2020). Could Vegans and Lycra Cyclists be Bad for the Planet? Theorizing the Role of Moralized Minority Practice Identities in Processes of Societal-Level Change. Journal of Social Issues, 76, 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12366

Leach, C. W., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L. W., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., … Spears, R. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-in-vestment: a hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identificati-on. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 144–165. https:// doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144

Masson, T., & Fritsche, I. (2014). Adherence to climate change-related ingroup norms: Do dimensions of group identification matter? European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 455–465. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2036 Middlemiss, L. (2011). The effects of community-based action for

sustainabili-ty on participants’ lifessustainabili-tyles. Local Environment, 16, 265–280.

Middlemiss, L., & Parrish, B. D. (2010). Building capacity for low-carbon com-munities: The role of grassroots initiatives. Energy Policy, 38, 7559–7566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.003

(10)

Mignon, I., & Bergek, A. (2016). System- and actor-level challenges for dif-fusion of renewable electricity technologies: an international comparison. Journal of Cleaner Production, 128, 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/J. JCLEPRO.2015.09.048

Miller, D. T. (1999). The Norm of Self-Interest. American Psychologist, 54, 1053–1060.

Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2007). Mplus. Statistical Analysis with Latent Va-riables.

Nilsson, A., Hansla, A., Heiling, J., & Bergstad, C. (2016). Public acceptabili-ty towards environmental policy measures: value-matching appeals. En-vironmental Science and Policy, 61, 176–184.

Nolan, J. M., Schultz, P. W., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griske-vicius, V. (2008). Normative Social Influence is Underdetected. Per-sonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 913–923. https://doi. org/10.1177/0146167208316691

Noppers, E. H., Keizer, K., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2014). The adoption of sustainable innovations: Driven by symbolic and environmental moti-ves. Global Environmental Change, 25, 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. gloenvcha.2014.01.012

Peattie, K. (2010). Green Consumption: Behavior and Norms. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, 195–228. https://doi.org/10.1146/an-nurev-environ-032609-094328

Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Jans, L. (2013). A single-item measure of social identification: Reliability, validity, and utility. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 597–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12006

Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Swaab, R. I. (2005). Social influen-ce in small groups: An interactive model of social identity formati-on. European Review of Social Psychology, 16(1), 1–42. https://doi. org/10.1080/10463280440000062

Rabinovich, A., Morton, T., Postmes, T., & Verplanken, B. (2012). Collective self and individual choice: The effects of intergroup comparative context on environ-mental values and behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 551–569.

(11)

Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., … Foley, J. A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472–475. https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a

Rossiter, J. R. (2002). The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19, 305–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(02)00097-6

Ruepert, A., Keizer, K., Steg, L., Maricchiolo, F., Carrus, G., Dumitru, A., … Moza, D. (2016). Environmental considerations in the organizational con-text: A pathway to pro-environmental behaviour at work. Energy Research and Social Science, 17, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.04.004 Schultz, P. W. (2014). Strategies for Promoting Proenvironmental Behavior.

European Psychologist, 19, 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/ a000163

Schwartz, D., Bruine de Bruin, W., Fischhoff, B., & Lave, L. (2015). Adverti-sing energy saving programs: The potential environmental cost of emp-hasizing monetary savings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 21, 158–166. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000042

Seyfang, G. (2010). Community action for sustainable housing: Building a low--carbon future. Energy Policy, 38, 7624–7633. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.

ENPOL.2009.10.027

Seyfang, G., & Haxeltine, A. (2012). Growing grassroots innovations: Ex-ploring the role of community-based initiatives in governing sustainable energy transitions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30, 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1068/c10222

Seyfang, G., Hielscher, S., Hargreaves, T., Martiskainen, M., & Smith, A. (2014). A grassroots sustainable energy niche? Reflections on community energy in the UK. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 13, 21–44.

Seyfang, G., & Longhurst, N. (2013). Desperately seeking niches: Grassroots innovations and niche development in the community currency field. Glo-bal Environmental Change, 23, 881–891.

(12)

Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2007). Grassroots innovations for sustainable deve-lopment: Towards a new research and policy agenda. Environmental Poli-tics, 16, 584 – 603. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010701419121

Seyranian, V., Sinatra, G. M., & Polikoff, M. S. (2015). Comparing communi-cation strategies for reducing residential water consumption. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JEN-VP.2014.11.009

Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118.

Sloot, D., Jans, L., & Steg, L. (2017). The potential of environmental com-munity initiatives - a social psychological perspective. In A. Römpke, G. Reese, I. Fritsche, N. Wiersbinski, & A. Mues (Eds.), Outlooks on Applying Environmental Psychology Research (BfN-Script, pp. 27–34). Bonn: Bun-desamt für Naturschutz.

Sloot, D., Jans, L., & Steg, L. (2018). Can community energy initiatives moti-vate sustainable energy behaviours? The role of initiative involvement and personal pro-environmental motivation. Journal of Environmental Psy-chology, 57, 99-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.06.007

Sloot, D., Jans, L., & Steg, L. (2019). In it for the money, the environment, or the community? Motives for being involved in community energy initiati-ves. Global Environmental Change, 57, 101936.

Squazzoni, F. (2009). Local economic development initiatives from the bottom-up: the role of community development corporations. Community Development Journal, 44, 500–514.

Steg, L. (2016). Values, Norms, and Intrinsic Motivation to Act Proenviron-mentally. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41, 277–292. ht-tps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085947

Steg, L., Bolderdijk, J. W., Keizer, K., & Perlaviciute, G. (2014). An Integrated Framework for Encouraging Pro-environmental Behaviour: The role of va-lues, situational factors and goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.002

(13)

Steg, L., & de Groot, J. I. M. (2012). Environmental Values. In: The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology. https://doi. org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199733026.013.0005

Steg, L., Perlaviciute, G., & Van der Werff, E. (2015). Understanding the hu-man dimensions of a sustainable energy transition. Frontiers in Psycho-logy, 6, 805. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00805

Steg, L., Perlaviciute, G., Van der Werff, E., & Lurvink, J. (2014). The Signi-ficance of Hedonic Values for Environmentally Relevant Attitudes, Prefe-rences, and Actions. Environment and Behavior, 46, 163–192. https://doi. org/10.1177/0013916512454730

Stern, P. C. (2000). New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent The-ory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175

Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A Va-lue-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6, 81–97. https://doi. org/10.2307/24707060

Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory. So-cial Psychology Quarterly, 63, 224–237. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695870 Tajfel, H. (1978). Interindividual behaviour and intergroup behaviour. In H.

Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between groups: Studies in the social psycho-logy of intergroup relations (pp. 27–60). London: Academic Press. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict.

In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.

Taufik, D., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2015). Acting green elicits a literal warm glow. Nature Climate Change, 5, 37–40. https://doi.org/10.1038/ nclimate2449

Taufik, D., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2016). Going green? The relative im-portance of feelings over calculation in driving environmental intent in the Netherlands and the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 22, 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ERSS.2016.08.012

(14)

R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical compu-ting. Vienna: R Found. Stat. Comput.

Thøgersen, J. (2004). A cognitive dissonance interpretation of consistencies and inconsistencies in environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00039-2

Thøgersen, J., & Ölander, F. (2002). Human values and the emergence of a sustainable consumption pattern: A panel study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 605–630.

Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Mavor, K. (2016). Group interaction as the cru-cible of social identity formation: A glimpse at the foundations of social identities for collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19, 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215612217

Tindall, D. B. (2008). Social Networks, Identification and Participation in an Environmental Movement: Low-medium Cost Activism within the British Columbia Wilderness Preservation Movement. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie, 39, 413–452. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1755-618X.2002.tb00628.x

Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Milton Keynes: Open University Press. Van den Broek, K., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2017). Individual differences

in values determine the relative persuasiveness of biospheric, economic and combined appeals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 145– 156. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVP.2017.07.009

Van der Werff, E., & Steg, L. (2016). The psychology of participation and in-terest in smart energy systems: Comparing the value-belief-norm theory and the value-identity-personal norm model. Energy Research and Social Science, 22, 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.022

Van der Werff, E., Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2013a). It is a moral issue: The re-lationship between environmental self-identity, obligation-based intrin-sic motivation and pro-environmental behaviour. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1258–1265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.018

(15)

Van der Werff, E., Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2013b). The value of environmen-tal self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environ-mental self-identity and environenviron-mental preferences, intentions and be-haviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 55–63. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.12.006

Venhoeven, L. A., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2016). Why acting environ-mentally-friendly feels good: Exploring the role of self-image. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01846

Volker, B., Flap, H., & Lindenberg, S. (2006). When Are Neighbourhoods Communities? Community in Dutch Neighbourhoods. European Sociolo-gical Review, 23, 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcl022

Whitmarsh, L., & O’Neill, S. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003

Yee, T. W. (2010). The VGAM package for categorical data analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 32(10), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v032.i10 Yee, T. W. (2015). Vector generalized linear and additive models: with an

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome Critical Success Factors Competing Values Framework Cost-Volume-Profit Decision Support System Enterprise Information System Education

Resultate het aan die lig gebring dat tweedejaar-Wiskundeonderwysstudente kritiese denkingesteldhede en houdings soos onder andere veral nuuskierigheid, maar ook om

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright

that the relationship between the extent to which people perceive their community to be motivated to engage in pro-environmental behaviour and their

Lastly, we explore to what extent personal pro-environmental motivation and initiative involvement are uniquely related to pro-environmental intentions not explicitly

While people rated these motives as less important for their involvement in community energy initiatives, we found that, in line with our prediction, communal motives were in

Specifically, we tested the effects of the appeals on message persuasiveness, interest to join, perceived importance of the targeted motives as a reason for joining, and beliefs

De archeologische verwachtingskaart landbouw geeft in één zone een middelmatige archeologische verwachting voor vindplaatsen uit de Late Middeleeuwen, maar met een lage verwach- ting