• No results found

Which characteristics do you value most in Cargill’s products? 3

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Which characteristics do you value most in Cargill’s products? 3"

Copied!
5
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Appendix 1: Customer requirements survey

Aim: To investigate what Cargill’s customers experience as value added to the products and services they purchase from Cargill.

1. What is your impression of Cargill?

2. Which characteristics do you value most in Cargill’s products?

3. What characteristics do you value most in Cargill’s services?

4. Are there specific points of the products or services Cargill is offering that could be improved in your point of view?

5. Why do you order that specific quality of soybean meal?

6. Are you aware of all soybean meal qualities Cargill is offering?

7. Are you satisfied with the current qualities of the soybean meal or would a different specification, when available, suit you better?

8. Do you purchase more products of Cargill besides soybean meal? Which ones/

Why not?

9. Are there more products you need that Cargill offers, which you don’t currently purchase of Cargill? Why?

10. Do you order the soybean meal FOT/FOB or CIF and why?

11. Have you ever tried another kind of transportation? How did you experience this change?

12. How long upfront can you decide how many tons you need at what time on which day?

13. In what frequency do you change this planning?

14. What are possible reasons for you to change this planning?

15. Would it be interesting for you to collect the meal on a more structured basis?

16. What would make buying CIF more attractive for you?

17. Are you satisfied with the current service given by Cargill or would a different kind of service, when available, suit you better?

18. Are you satisfied with the current relationship with Cargill? Why (not)?

19. How can we improve or expedite our administrative activities?

(2)

20. Would you be interested in more integration within your relationship with Cargill? And in what area?

21. What is your opinion about Supply Chain Management within the compound feed industry?

22. What makes you decide to do business with Cargill?

23. How does Cargill perform compared to its competitors?

24. What do you expect of the cooperation with Cargill in the coming two years?

Thank you very much for your cooperation!

Appendix 2: Cost structure

Positive release: Positive release means a batch has been tested on salmonella and results are available before the batch it is loaded. This could save Cargill the costs of batches send back because salmonella has been detected afterwards. This bacterium is found on a more regular basis at this moment, which is not acceptable. Nowadays, when customers purchase meal and find salmonella later it costs U$ 10,000 per instance. Direct costs attached for Cargill because of salmonella are U$ 30,000 per year.

Demurrage: At this moment extra costs for paying waiting times, barges and demurrage are rising. Especially since ships are getting bigger and bigger. Demurrage costs about U$ 3,500- 4,000 a day, with an average of U$ 11,880 a month, making U$ 142,560 a year.

Loading 3500 ton ships: Smaller vessels (<1,500mt), that can be loaded without demurrage, are relatively costing U$ 2-2.50 more per ton soybean meal transported than larger vessels and are in short supply. Cargill estimates that they can get 75% of the supply chain costs reduction for loading larger coasters as additional margin in the books, which is U$ 506,250 per year. Meaning they make it more attractive for transporters to come to Cargill, who in turn lower the prices for their customers booking the

(3)

loading of more expensive SIP and 20 S products for lower prices because of limited storage (for further explanation, see paragraph 6.4).

This comes down to 1500 ton product at U$ 15 costs is U$ 270,000 per year.

Sunday labour costs: Additional Sunday costs in the form of labour comes down to U$ 45,000 per year. Employees need to be paid more on Sunday.

Sunday controlling costs: Customers and transporters do not have to agree with loading on Sunday. Control firms, hired by the customers, ask higher fees on Sunday. In order to get customers to load then despite of this Cargill pays the extra costs concerning the control. Canceling loading on Sunday can save about U$ 3,500 per month, U$ 42,000 per year.

Faster turnaround DDSG: Additional savings, not mentioned in the involved costs for Cargill before are savings made by a shortened turnaround with DDSG.

DDSG is a transporter company contracted by customers of Cargill from Eastern Europe to arrange transportation to and from the Amsterdam Cargill site. By providing a shorter turnaround an additional 10,000 tons could be shipped via DDSG, saving up to an additional U$ 11.88 per ton, counting up to U$ 118,800 per month. This is plausible for the months September to March. Presuming an average of U$ 5 per ton this would generate an additional saving of U$ 350,000 per year.

(4)

Appendix 3: Ground-plan of the soybean crush location

(5)

Appendix 5: Investments- Savings

Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Alternative 4 Alternative 5

Tank € 291.750 € 379.000 € 440.950 € 440.950

Foundation € 65.000 € 85.000 € 125.000 € 125.000

Discharging € 305.000 € 305.000 € 305.000 € 305.000

Circulation € 152.000 € 152.000 € 152.000 € 152.000

Valve € 20.000 € 20.000 € 20.000 € 20.000

Retler € 110.000 € 110.000 € 110.000 € 110.000

Assembly retl. € 38.000 € 38.000 € 38.000 € 38.000

Remaining mat. Retl. € 5.000 € 5.000 € 5.000 € 5.000

Electronic connection € 90.000 € 90.000 € 90.000 € 90.000

Building permit € 10.000 € 10.000 € 10.000 € 10.000

Design costs € 5.000 € 5.000 € 5.000 € 5.000

Isolation € 20.000 € 20.000 € 30.000 € 30.000

Dust collector € 50.000 € 50.000 € 50.000 € 50.000

Grout

Weight scale € 50.000 € 50.000

Assembly W. € 50.000 € 50.000

Truck load-out upgrade € 1.000.000 € 1.000.000

Discharge ground € 5.000 € 5.000 € 5.000 € 5.000

Vence extension € 2.000 € 2.000 € 2.000 € 2.000

Discharge between 4 & 5 € 5.000 € 5.000 € 5.000 € 5.000

Pavement/sewerage € 7.000 € 7.000 € 7.000 € 7.000

Cleaning € 2.500 € 2.500 € 2.500 € 2.500

Reroute road € 50.000 € 50.000 € 50.000 € 50.000

Investment € 1.100.000 € 1.233.250 € 1.340.500 € 1.452.450 € 2.552.450

$1.452.000 $1.627.890 $1.769.460 $1.917.234 $3.369.234 10 % mis on investm. $145.200 $162.789 $176.946 $191.723 $336.923 10 % contingencies $145.200 $162.789 $176.946 $191.723 $336.923 Total investment $1.742.400 $1.953.468 $2.123.352 $2.300.681 $4.043.080

Savings Savings Savings Savings Savings

Positive Release $15.000 $30.000 $30.000

Demurrage $26.400 $66.000 $92.400 $142.560 $142.560

Loading 3500 T coasters $506.000 $506.000 $506.000 $506.000 Barges & Transhipment $50.000 $50.000 $70.000 $120.000 $120.000

SIP for NIP $50.000 $100.000 $150.000 $270.000 $270.000

Sunday labor costs $45.000 $45.000 $45.000

Sunday control costs $42.000 $42.000 $42.000

Faster turnaround DDSG $175.000 $350.000 $350.000

Total savings $126.400 $722.000 $1.095.400 $1.505.560 $1.505.560

Investment - savings $1.616.000 $1.231.468 $1.027.952 $795.121 $2.537.520

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

The output of your code is saved into the file provided as the second optional argument of \iexec (the default value is iexec.tmp ):. 6 Today is \iexec[date.txt]{date +\%e-\%b-\%Y |

Typesetting your document produces a file named example doctest.sage containing all the doctest-like examples, and you can have Sage check them for you with:.. $ sage

We’re on the same curve, just on opposite ends.. You don’t get sick,

The enumerate environment starts with an optional argument ‘1.’ so that the item counter will be suffixed by a period.. You can use ‘(a)’ for alphabetical counter and ’(i)’

Thus the benefits of VCON are best exploited, when the importance (value) of a meeting is weighted on the basis of a total effective work time (cost savings) calculation.. In

fort.7: contains the bifurcation diagram (solution components versus parameter).. fort.8: contains the full solutions at the labeled points fort.9: contains information on

It is not likely that introduction of mediation always results in a workload reduction for the courts because many mediated cases would otherwise not have gone to court anyway

Men thought women would be impressed by pointless gambles, 6 women in fact preferred cautious men.. Reckless thrill-seekers might be trying a more subtle