• No results found

University of Groningen Legal Dilemmas and Regime-Building in the East Asia Maritime Conflicts Xu, Qi

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "University of Groningen Legal Dilemmas and Regime-Building in the East Asia Maritime Conflicts Xu, Qi"

Copied!
53
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Legal Dilemmas and Regime-Building in the East Asia Maritime Conflicts Xu, Qi

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.

Document Version

Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date: 2019

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA):

Xu, Q. (2019). Legal Dilemmas and Regime-Building in the East Asia Maritime Conflicts: From the Third State Perspective. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.

Copyright

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

(2)

Bibliography

Abad, Jr, M. C. “The ASEAN Regional Forum.” The Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, April 27, 2017. Accessed July 22, 2018. http://www.kas.de/wf/doc/23552-1442-2-30.pd f.

Abass, Ademola. “The International Criminal Court and Universal Jurisdiction.”

International Criminal Law Review 6, Issue 3 (2006): 349-85.

African Union Peace and Security. “African Union Border Programme (AUBP) - Uniting and integrating Africa through Peaceful, Open and Prosperous Borders.” Accessed October 16, 2018. http://www.peaceau.org/en/page/27-au-border-progr amme-aubp.

African Union Border Programme. “Political and Legal Instruments Guiding the AUBP.” Accessed October 20, 2018. http://www.peaceau.org/en/page/27-au-border-progr amme-aubp.

African Union Border Programme. “Call for Applications: Border Experts (African Union/AUBP).” Accessed October 20, 2018. http://www.peaceau.org/uploads/201 8-08-02-border-expert-pool-call-for-applications-xxx.pdf.

Ahdiba, Nouvarah. “Indonesia, Vietnam Discuss Cooperation in Fisheries and Maritime Affairs.” Voice of Indonesia, April 18, 2018. Accessed July 14, 2018. http://voine ws.id/index.php/component/k2/item/1239-2018-0417-news-indonesia-vietnam-discuss-cooperation-in-fisheries-and-maritime-affairs.

Ahmadov, Farid. The Right of Actio Popularis before International Court and Tribunal.

Leiden, Netherlands: Brill Nijhoff, 2018.

Ajibola, Bola A. “The International Court of Justice and Absent Third Parties.” African

Yearbook of International Law 4, Issue 1 (1996): 83-102.

Akaha, Tsuneo. “From Conflict to Cooperation: Fisheries Relations in the Sea of Japan.”

Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal 1, no. 2 (1992): 225-80.

Akande, Dapo, and Antonios Tzanakopoulos. “Can the International Court of Justice Decide on the Chagos Islands Advisory Proceedings without the UK’s Consent?” EJIL: Talk!. June 27, 2017. https://www.ejiltalk.org/can-the-international-court-of -justice-decide-on-the-chagos-islands-advisory-proceedings-without-the-uks-consent/.

Akopian, Regina. “The Great Powers and the Establishment of Security Regimes: The Formation of the Concert Of Europe, 1792-1815.” Ph.D., State University of New Jersey, 2008. https://ru core.libraries.rutgers.edu/rutgers-lib/24500/PDF/1/play/. Alexander, Lewis. “Marine Regionalism in Southeast Asian Seas.” East West

(3)

manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/handle/10125/21700/EAPIResRep011MarineRegion alismInTheSoutheastAsianSeas1982%5Bpdfa%5D.PDF?sequence=1.

Ali, Idrees. “U.S. Destroyer Challenges China’s Claims in South China Sea.” Reuters, August 10, 2017. Accessed December 26 2018. https://www.reuters.com/article/u s-usa-china-southchinasea-exclusive-idUSKBN1AQ0YK.

Ali, Idrees, And Ben Blanchard. “Exclusive: U.S. Warship Sails Near Disputed South China Sea Island, Officials Say.” U.S. News, March 23, 2018. Accessed December 26, 2018. https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2018-03-23/ex clusive-us-warship-sails-near-disputed-islands-in-south-china-sea-officials-say. Ali, Mazalina, Mahyam Mohd Isa, Masaya Katoh, Abdul Razak Latun, Mohd Tamimi

Ali Ahmad, Hajime Kawamura, and Somboon Siriraksophon. “ASEAN Guidelines for Preventing the Entry of Fish and Fishery Products from IUU Fishing Activities into the Supply Chain.” Southeast Asian Fisheries Development

Center, 2015. Accessed July 24, 2018, http://www.seafdec.org/download/asean-g

uidelines-for-preventing-the-entry-of-fish-and-fishery-products-from-iuu-fishing-activities-into-the-supply-chain/.

Allee, Todd L., and Paul K Huth. “The Pursuit of Legal Settlements to Territorial Disputes.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 23, Issue 4 (2006): 285-307. Anderson, D.H. “Denmark-Federal Republic of Germany, Report Number 9-8.” In

International Maritime Boundaries, edited by J.I. Charney and L.M. Alexander,

1801-14. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1993.

Anderson, D.H. “Federal Republic of Germany-Netherlands, Report Number 9-11.” In

International Maritime Boundaries, edited by J.I. Charney and L.M. Alexander,

1835-50. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1993.

Arase, David. “Non-Traditional Security in China-ASEAN Cooperation: The Institutionalization of Regional Security Cooperation and the Evolution of East Asian Regionalism.” Asian Survey 50, no. 4 (2010): 808-33.

Arase, David. “China’s Two Silk Roads Initiative: What It Means for Southeast Asia.”

Southeast Asian Affairs, (2015): 25-45.

Arctic Council. “Agreements.” Accessed October 20, 2018. https://arctic-council.org/in dex.ph p/en/our-work/agreements.

Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative. “Philippines v. China: Arbitration Outcomes.” Accessed July 8, 2018. https://amti.csis.org/arbitration-map/.

Asia-Pacific Fishery Commission. “Membership.” Accessed December 28, 2018. http://www.fao.org/apfic/background/about-asia-pacific-fishery-commission/mem bership/en/.

(4)

Ásgeirsdóttir, Áslaug, and Martin Steinwand. “Dispute Settlement Mechanisms and Maritime Boundary Settlements.” Review of International Organizations 10, Issue 2 (2015): 119-43.

Ásgeirsdóttir, Áslaug, and Martin C. Steinwand. “Distributive Outcomes in Contested Maritime Areas: The Role of Inside Options in Settling Competing Claims.”

Journal of Conflict Resolution 62, Issue 6 (2016): 1284-313.

Association of Caribbean States. “Caribbean Sea Commission.” Accessed October 20, 2018. http://www.acs-aec.org/index.php?q=csc.

Association of Southeast Asian Nations. “Memorandum of Understanding Between the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the Government of the People’s Republic of China on Cooperation in the Field of Non-traditional Security Issues.” January 10, 2004. Accessed July 23, 2018. http://www.asean.or g/storage/images/archive/documents/ASEAN-ChinaMOUo nNTS.pdf.

Association of Southeast Asian Nations. “Joint Declaration of The Heads of State/Government of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and The People’s Republic of China On Strategic Partnership for Peace and Prosperity.” May 11, 2012. Accessed July 22, 2018. http://asean.org/?static_post=external-rela tions-china-joint-declaration-of-the-heads-of-stategovernment-of-the-association-of-southeast-asian-nations-and-the-people-s-republic-of-china-on-strategic-partner ship-for-peace-and-prosp.

Association of Southeast Asian Nations. “ASEAN Regional Forum Senior Officials’ Meeting, Hanoi Plan of Action to Implement the ASEAN Regional Forum Vision Statement.” May 20 2010. Accessed July 22, 2018. http://aseanregionalforum.asea n.org/files/library/Plan%20of%20Action%20and%20Work%20Plans/Hanoi%20P lan%20of%20Action%20to%20Implement%20ARF%20Vision%20Statement%2 0(2010).pdf.

Association of Southeast Asian Nations. “Joint Declaration of The Heads of State/Government of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and The People’s Republic of China On Strategic Partnership for Peace and Prosperity.” May 11, 2012. Accessed July 22, 2018. http://asean.org/?static_post=external-relations-china-joint-declaration-of-the-heads-of-stategovernment-of-the-associati on-of-southeast-asian-nations-and-the-people-s-republic-of-china-on-strategic-pa rtnership-for-peace-and-prosp.

Association of Southeast Asian Nations. “Plan of Action for The Memorandum of Understanding between The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and The Government of the People’s Republic of China on Cooperation in the Field of Non-Traditional Security Issues.” June 30, 2012. Accessed July 23, 2018. https://asean.org/?static_post=plan-of-action-for-the-memorandum-of-understandi

(5)

ng-between-the-association-of-southeast-asian-nations-asean-and-the-government -of-the-people-s-republic-of-china-on-cooperation-in-the-field-of-non-trad.

Association of Southeast Asian Nations. “Plan of Action to Implement the Joint Declaration on ASEAN-China Strategic Partnership for Peace and Prosperity (2016-2020).” November 2015. Accessed July 22, 2018. https://www.asean.org/ storage/images/2015/November/27th-summit/bASEAN-China%20POA%20%202 016-2020.pdf.

Association of Southeast Asian Nations. “Joint Statement of the 19th ASEAN-China Summit to Commemorate the 25th Anniversary of ASEAN-China Dialogue Relations: Towards a Closer ASEAN-China Strategic Partnership.” September 7, 2016. Accessed June 6, 2018. http://asean.org/storage/2016/09/Joint-Statement-o f-ASEAN-China-Commemorative-Summit-Final.pdf.

Association of Southeast Asian Nations 2017. “ASEAN Regional Forum Statement on Cooperation To Prevent, Deter, and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing.” August 7, 2017. Accessed July 24, 2018. http://www.asean 2017.ph/wp-content/uploads/8.ARF-State ment-on-Cooperation-to-Prevent-Deter-and-Eliminate-IUU-Fishing-_Adopted.pdf.

Association of Southeast Asian Nations. “Declaration for A Decade of Coastal and Marine Environmental Protection in the South China Sea (2017-2027).” November 13, 2017. Accessed July 21, 2018. http://asean.org/asean/external-relati ons/china/.

Association of Southeast Asian Nations. “Joint Statement between ASEAN and China on Further Deepening the Cooperation on Infrastructure Connectivity.” November 13, 2017. Accessed July 25, 2018. http://asean.org/storage/2017/11/China-and-ASEAN-on-Cooperation-Connecti vity-CN-ASEAN_adopted.pdf.

Association of Southeast Asian Nations. “Manila Plan of Action to advance the Phnom Penh Declaration on the East Asia Summit Development Initiative (2018-2022).” December 13, 2017. Accessed July 22, 2018. http://asean.org/?static_post=plan-of-action-to-implement-the-joint-declaration-on-asean-china-strategic-partnership -for-peace-and-prosperity.

Association of Southeast Asian Nations. “Premier Li Keqiang Reaffirms China’s Commitment to Strengthen Strategic Partnership with ASEAN.” Secretariat News, May 8, 2018. Accessed July 22, 2018. http://asean.org/premier-li-keqiang-reaffir ms-chinas-commitment-strengthen-strateg ic-partnership-asean/.

Association of Southeast Asian Nations. “Overview of ASEAN-China Dialogue Relations.” Secretariat Information Paper, August 2018. Accessed July 22, 2018, http://asean.org/

(6)

storage/2012/05/Overview-of-ASEAN-China-Relations-October-Association of Southeast Asian Nations. “ASEAN-China Strategic Partnership Vision 2030.“ November 14, 2018. Accessed July 22, 2018. https://asean.org/storage/20 18/11/ASEAN-China-Strategic-Partnership-Vision-2030.pdf.

Association of Southeast Asian Nations. “ASEAN Plus Three Cooperation Work Plan 2018-2022.” August 7, 2017. Accessed July 22, 2018. http://asean.org/storage/20 17/08/APT-Corp-WorkPlan-2018-2022-Final.pdf.

Associated Press. “Chinese Fishermen Seized by North Koreans Freed.” The Guardian, May 21, 2013. Accessed June 8, 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/ may/21/chinese-fishermen-north-koreans-freed.

Bai Jiayu and Hu Huijun. “Transcending Divisions and Harmonizing Interests: How the Arctic Council Experience can Inform Regional Cooperation on Environmental Protection in the South China Sea.” Chinese Journal of International Law 15, Issue 4 (2016): 925-45.

Bankes, Nigel. “The Regime for Transboundary Hydrocarbon Deposits in the Maritime Delimitation Treaties and Other Related Agreements of Arctic Coastal States.”

Ocean Development & International Law 47, Issue 2 (2016): 141-64.

Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission. “About Us.” Accessed October 20, 2018. http://www.helcom.fi/about-us.

Barnett, Michael. “Social Constructivism.” In The Globalization of World Politics: An

Introduction to International Relations, edited by John Baylis, Steve Smith, and

Patricia Owens, 7th edition., 144-58. (Oxford, United Kingdom, Oxford University Press, 2017).

Bastmeijer, Kees., and Timo Koivurova. eds. Theory and Practice of Transboundary

Environmental Impact Assessment. Leiden, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008.

Bateman, Sam. “Maritime Boundary Delimitation, Excessive Claims and Effective Regime Building in the South China Sea.” In Major Law and Policy Issues in the

South China Sea: European and American Perspectives, edited by Yann-huei

Song and Keyuan Zou, 119-36. Farnham, United Kingdom: Ashgate, 2014.

Bateman, Sam. “The Impact of the Arbitration Case on Regional Maritime Security.” In

Arbitration Concerning the South China Sea: Philippines versus China, edited by

Shicun Wu and Keyuan Zou, 227-39. London, United Kingdom: Routledge, 2016. Bateman, Sam. “Good Fences or Good Neighbours: Implications for Maritime

Boundaries.” In The South China Sea Disputes: Flashpoints, Turning Points and

Trajectories, edited by Yang Razali Kassim, 419-22. Singapore: World Scientific,

2017.

Bautista, Lowell. “The South China Sea Arbitral Award amidst Shifting Philippine Foreign Policy.” Korean Journal of International and Comparative Law 6, (2018): 47-65.

(7)

Bautista, Lowell. “The South China Sea Arbitral Award: Evolving Post‐Arbitration Strategies, Implications and Challenges.” Asian Politics & Policy 10, Issue 2 (2018): 178-89.

Bautista, Lowell, ed. “Special Issue on the South China Sea Arbitral Award.” Asian

Politics & Policy 10, Issue 2 (2018): 173-401.

Becker-Weinberg, Vasco. “The South China Sea Arbitration and the China–Philippines Relations Beyond the Award.” In Stress Testing the Law of the Sea: Dispute

Resolution, Disasters & Emerging Challenges, edited by Stephen Minas and

Jordan Diamond, 190-222. Leiden: Netherlands, Brill Nijhoff, 2018.

Beckman, Robert C., and Clive H. Schofield. “Defining EEZ Claims from Islands: A Potential South China Sea Change.” International Journal of Marine and Coastal

Law 29, Issue 2 (2014): 193-243.

Beckman, Robert C. “Game Changer in the South China Sea Disputes.” In The South

China Sea Disputes: Flashpoints, Turning Points and Trajectories, edited by

Yang Razali Kassim, 383-90. Singapore: World Scientific, 2017.

Beckman, Robert, and Tara Davenport. “Non-Living Resources in Disputed Areas in the East China Sea: Law and Policy Issues Concerning Provisional Arrangements under the UNCLOS.” In Sustainable Development and the Law of the Sea, edited by Keyuan Zou, 118-57. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill Nijhoff, 2017.

Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation. “Joint Communique of the Leaders Roundtable of the Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation.” May 16, 2017. Accessed July 24, 2018. http://www.beltandroadforum.org/english/n100/ 2017/0516/c22-423.html.

Belt and Road Portal. “Vision for Maritime Cooperation under the Belt and Road Initiative.” June 20, 2017. Accessed July 24, 2018. https://www.yidaiyilu.gov.cn/ wcm.files/upload/CMSydylgw/201706/201706200153032.pdf.

Bernárdez, Santiago Torres. “The New Theory of ‘Indispensable Parties’ under the Statute of the International Court of Justice.” In International Law: Theory and

Practice: Essays in Honour of Eric Suy, edited by Karel Wellens, 737-50. Hague,

Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1998.

Bianchi, Andrea. International Law Theories: An Inquiry into Different Ways of

Thinking. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2016.

Billé, Raphaël, Lucien Chabason, Petra Drankier, Erik J. Molenaar, Julien Rochette,

Regional Oceans Governance: Making Regional Seas Programmes, Regional Fishery Bodies and Large Marine Ecosystem Mechanisms Work Better Together.

(8)

Blanchard, Ben, and Ju-min Park. “China Rebuffs South Korea over Sinking of Coast Guard Vessel.” Reuters, October 12, 2016. Accessed June 8, 2018. https://www. reuters.com/article/us-china-southkorea-fishermen-idUSKCN12C12L.

Blanchard, Jean-Marc F. “China’s Twenty-First Century Maritime Silk Road Initiative and South Asia: Political and Economic Contours, Challenges, and Conundrums.” In China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative and South Asia: A Political Economic

Analysis of Its Purposes, Perils, and Promise, edited by Jean-Marc F. Blanchard,

1-31. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.

Bonafé, Beatrice I. “Discretional Intervention (Article 62, Statute of the Court).” In

Latin America and the International Court of Justice: Contributions to International Law, edited by Paula Wojcikiewicz Almeida and Jean-Marc Sorel,

98-108. London, United Kingdom: Routledge, 2017.

BONUS. “Bonus Projects.” Accessed October 20, 2018. https://www.bonusprojects.or g/bonusprojects/the_projects.

Bordin, Fernando Lusa. Procedural Developments at the International Court of Justice.”

The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals: A Practitioners’ Journal 16, Issue 2 (2012): 307-53.

Boyle, Alan E. “Dispute Settlement and the Law of the Sea Convention: Problems of Fragmentation and Jurisdiction.” The International and Comparative Law

Quarterly 46, Issue 1 (1997): 37-54.

Brownlie, Ian. “The Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes.” Chinese Journal of

International Law 8, Issue 2 (2009): 267-83.

Brunnée, Jutta, and Stephen J. Toope. “Constructivism and International Law.” In

Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, edited by Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack, 119-143.

Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

Buckley, Chris. “North Korea Releases Chinese Fishing Crew.” The New York Times, May 20, 2013. Accessed June 8, 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/21/wo rld/asia/north-korea-china-fishing-crew-boat.html.

Busch, Signe Veierud. “Opposite or Adjacent – Does it Make a Difference? Delimiting the Continental Shelf beyond 200 nm.” The JCLOS Blog. December 1, 2017. http://site.uit.no/jclos/files/2017/12/JCLOS-Blog-011217_Blogpost-ghana-cote-di voire.pdf.

Caribbean Regional Fisheries Mechanism. “Agreement Establishing the CRFM.” Accessed October 20, 2018. http://www.crfm.int/~uwohxjxf/index.php?option=co m_k2&view=item&layout=ite m&id=2&Itemid=116.

(9)

Caribbean Regional Fisheries Mechanism. “About CRFM.” Accessed October 20, 2018. http://www.crfm.int/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&layout=item&id=1 &Itemid=114.

Caribbean Regional Fisheries Mechanism. “Compositions and Functions.” Accessed October 20, 2018. http://www.crfm.int/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item& layout=item&id=520&Ite mid=457.

Caribbean Sea Commission. “Structure and Participants of the CSC.” Accessed October 20, 2018. http://www.acs-aec.org/ index.php?q=csc/structure-and-participants-of-the-csc.

Casarini, Nicola. “When All Roads lead to Beijing. Assessing China’s New Silk Road and Its Implications for Europe. The International Spector/Italian Journal of

International Affairs 51, Issue 4 (2016): 95-108.

Center for Strategic & International Studies. “Defusing the South China Sea Disputes: A Regional Blueprint.” Accessed January 14, 2019. https://csis-prod.s3.amazon aws.com/s3fspublic/publication/181011_The_South_China_Sea.pdf?9XnyG7pgG FZp2roiOV2veUwZC57csKeb.

Chang, Yen-Chiang. “How Does the Amicus Curiae Submission Affect a Tribunal Decision?” Leiden Journal of International Law 30, Issue 3 (2017): 647-60. Chen, Chen-Ju. “The Ecosystem Approach to International Marine Management under

International Law: A Case Study of the East China Sea.” In Sustainable

Development and the Law of the Sea, edited by Keyuan Zou, 207-39. Leiden,

Netherlands, Brill Nijhoff, 2017.

Chinese Society of International Law. “The South China Sea Arbitration Awards: A Critical Study.” Chinese Journal of International Law 17, Issue 2 (2018): 207-748. Chen Dongxiao. “The Constructivist Challenge to the Debate on East Asian Security in

the New Century.” In Asia-Pacific Security: Policy Challenges, edited by David W. Lovell. 166-84. California, United States: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies/Asia Pacific Press 2003.

Chen Shaofeng. “Regional Responses to China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative in Southeast Asia.” Journal of Contemporary China 27, Issue 111 (2018): 344-61. China-Korea Joint Ocean Research Center. “About CKJORC.” Accessed December 12,

2018. http://www.ckjorc.org/en/about.jsp?id=1474.

Chinkin, Christine. “East Timor Moves into the World Court.” European Journal of

International Law 4, Issue 2 (1993): 206-22.

Chinkin, Christine. Third Parties in International Law, Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 1993.

(10)

Tomuschat, and Christian J. Tams, 1529-72. (Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2012).

Chinkin, Christine. “Article 63.” in The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A

Commentary, 2nd ed. edited by Andreas Zimmermann, Karin Oellers-Frahm,

Christian Tomuschat, and Christian J. Tams, 1573-97. (Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2012).

Chircop, Aldo. “Regional Cooperation in Marine Environmental Protection in the South China Sea: A Reflection on New Directions for Marine Conservation.” Ocean

Development & International Law 41, Issue 4 (2010): 334-56.

Cho, Kyung-Keun. “Building an Environmental Regime in the Yellow Sea Sphere.”

The Korean Journal of International Relations 43, no. 5 (2003): 203-26.

Choi, Jong Kun, and Yong-Soo Eun. “What does International Relations Theory Tell us about Territorial Disputes And Their Resolution?” International Politics 55, Issue 2 (2018): 141-59.

Chung, Suh-Yong. “Strengthening Regional Governance to Protect the Marine Environment in Northeast Asia: From a Fragmented to an Integrated Approach.”

Marine Policy 34, Issue 3 (2010): 549-56.

Cigaral, Ian Nicolas. “Cayetano: Philippines, China in Talks about Joint Development in South China Sea.” Philstar, June 2, 2018. Accessed 7 June 2018. https://ww w.philstar.com/headlines/2018/06/02/1820974/cayetano-philippines-china-talks-about-joint-development-south-china-sea.

Ciorciari, John D., and Jessica Chen Weiss. “Nationalist Protests, Government Responses, and the Risk of Escalation in Interstate Disputes.” Security Studies 25, Issue 3 (2016): 546-83.

Clements, Kevin P. “Trust, Identity and Conflict in Northeast Asia – Barriers to Positive Relationships.” In Identity, Trust, and Reconciliation in East Asia: Dealing with

Painful History to Create a Peaceful Present, edited by Kevin P. Clements, 1-27.

Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.

Clinton, Hillary. “America’s Pacific Century.” Foreign Policy, October 11, 2011. Accessed December 23, 2018. https://foreignpolicy.com/2011/10/11/americas-pacific-century/.

Contreras, Carlos López. “Honduras-Mexico, Report Number 2-28.” In International

Maritime Boundaries, edited by D.A. Colson and R.W. Smith, 4202-12. Leiden,

Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 2011.

Contreras, Carlos López. “Cuba-Honduras, Report Number 2-33.” In International

Maritime Boundaries, edited by Coalter Lathrop, 4735-43. Leiden, Netherlands:

(11)

Collier, John, and Vaughan Lowe. The Settlement of Disputes in International Law:

Institutions and Procedures. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press,

1999.

Colson, David A. “Saudi Arabia-Yemen, Report Number 6-16.” In International

Maritime Boundaries, edited by J.I. Charney and R.W. Smith, 2797-807. Hague,

Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 2002.

Colson, David A. “Bahrain-Qatar, Report Number 7-13.” In International Maritime

Boundaries, edited by J.I. Charney and R.W. Smith, 2841-60. Hague, Netherlands:

Martinus Nijhoff, 2002.

Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf. “Brunei Darussalam’s Preliminary Submission concerning the Outer Limits of its Continental Shelf.” May 12, 2009. Accessed May 3, 2018. http://www.un.org/depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/p relimi nary/brn2009preliminaryinfor mation.pdf.

Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf. “Joint Submission by Malaysia and Viet Nam to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf Made on 6 May 2009 in the Southern Part of the South China Sea.” May 6, 2009. Accessed May 3, 2018. https://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/mysvn m33_09/mys_vnm2009excutivesummary.pdf.

Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf. “Communications received with regard to the joint submission made by Malaysia and Viet Nam: China.” CML/8/2011. April 4, 2011. Accessed July, 14 2018. http://www.un.org/depts/los/ clcs_new/submissions_files/mysvnm33_09/chn_2011_re_phl_e.pdf.

Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf. “Submission by the People’s Republic of China Concerning the Outer Limits of the Continental Shelf beyond 200 Nautical Miles in Part of the East China Sea.” December 14, 2012. Accessed May 3, 2018. http://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/chn63_12/ executive%20summary_EN.pdf.

Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf. “Partial Submission to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf Pursuant to Article 76 Paragraph 8 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.” December 14, 2012. Accessed May 3, 2018, https://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submi ssions_files/kor65_12/executive_summary.pdf.

Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf. “Communications received with regard to the submission made by China: Japan.” December 28, 2012. SC/12/372. Accessed May 3, 2018. https://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_fi les/chn63_12/jpn_re_chn_28_12 _2012.pdf.

(12)

SC/13/019. Accessed May 3, 2018. https://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submi ssions_files/kor65_12/jpn_re_ko r_11_01_2013.pdf

Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf. “New Zealand Submission to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf pursuant to Article 76(8) of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.” April 19, 2006. Accessed October 20, 2018. http://www.un.org/depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/nzl06 /nzl_exec_sum.pdf.

Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf. “Note Verbale from the Permanent Mission of Japan to the Secretary-General of the United Nations.” June, 2006, SC/06/45928. Accessed October 20, 2018. http://www.un.org/depts/los/clcs_new/ submissions_files/nzl06/japan_e.pdf.

Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf. “Note Verbale from the Permanent Mission of Japan to the Secretary-General of the United Nations.” DJZ-IR 178/2006, December 19, 2006. Accessed October 20, 2018. http://www.un.org/ depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/nzl06/clcs_07_2006_nld.pdf.

Convention on Biological Diversity. “Text of the Convention.” Accessed October 16, 2018. https://www.cbd.int/convention/text/.

Coordinating Body on the Seas of East Asia. “COBSEA Member Countries.” Accessed December 13, 2018. https://www.cobsea.org/aboutcobsea/membercountries.html. Coordinating Unit for the Mediterranean Action Plan Secretariat to the Barcelona

Convention and its Protocols. “The Mediterranean Action Plan.” Accessed October 16, 2018. http://web.unep.org/unepmap/who-we-are/mediterranean-action-plan.

Corben, Tom. “Iranian Oil Tanker Disaster Highlights Northeast Asia’s Faultlines.” The

Diplomat, January 26, 2018. Accessed December 13, 2018. https://thediplomat.co

m/2018/01/iranian-oil-tanker-disaster-highlights-northeast-asias-faultlines/.

Corr, Anders, ed. Great Powers, Grand Strategies: The New Game in the South China

Sea. Annapolis. Maryland: United States: Naval Institute Press, 2018.

Cottier, Thomas. Equitable Principles of Maritime Boundary Delimitation: The Quest

for Distributive Justice in International Law. Cambridge, United Kingdom:

Cambridge University Press, 2015.

Courmont, Barthelemy, Frederic Lasserre, and Eric Mottet. “Introduction: Old Problems and New Paradigms in East-Asian Maritime Disputes.” In Assessing Maritime

Disputes in East Asia: Political and Legal Perspectives, edited by Barthelemy

Courmont, Frederic Lasserre, and Eric Mottet, 1-14. London, United Kingdom: Routledge, 2017.

(13)

Courmont, Barthelemy, Frédéric Lasserre, and Éric Mottet, eds. Assessing Maritime

Disputes in East Asia: Political and Legal Perspectives (London, United

Kingdom: Routledge).

Court of Arbitration, Delimitation of Maritime Areas between Canada and France: Decision in Case Concerning Delimitation Of Maritime Areas (St. Pierre and Miquelon), Canada/France. International Legal Materials 31, no. 5 (1992): 1145-1219.

Crawford, James. Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law, 8th ed. (Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2012).

Crawford, James. State Responsibility: The General Part. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

Crawford, James, and Amelia Keene. “Editorial.” Journal of International Dispute

Settlement 7, Issue 2 (2016): 225-30.

Dahl, Irene. “Maritime Delimitation in the Arctic: Implications for Fisheries Jurisdiction and Cooperation in the Barents Sea.” International Journal of Marine

and Costal Law 30, Issue 1 (2015): 120-47.

Damrosch, Lori Fisler. “Multilateral Disputes.” In The International Court of Justice at

a Crossroads, edited by Lori F. Damrosch, 376-400. New York, United States of

America: Transnational Publishers, 1987.

Dannenbaum, Tom. “Politics, the Rule of Law, and the Role of the Crime of Aggression: A Response to Koh and Buchwald.” American Journal of International Law

Unbound 109, (2016): 235-39.

Davenport, Tara. “The China-Japan Dispute over Entitlement in the East China Sea: Legal Issues and Prospects for Resolution.” In The Limits of Maritime Jurisdiction, edited by Clive H. Schofield, Seokwoo Lee and Moon-Sang Kwon, 297-324. Leiden, Netherlands, Brill Nijhoff, 2014.

Davenport, Tara. “Island-Building in the South China Sea: Legality and Limits.” Asian

Journal of International Law 8, Issue 1 (2018): 76-90.

De Aréchaga, Eduardo Jiménez. “Colombia-Costa Rica, Report Number 3-6.” In

International Maritime Boundaries, edited by J.I. Charney and L.M. Alexander,

801-8. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1993.

De Castro, Renato Cruz. “The Philippines Confronts China in the South China Sea: Power Politics vs. Liberalism-Legalism.” Asian Perspective, 39, Issue 1 (2015): 71-100.

De Castro, Renato Cruz. “Facing Up to China’s Realpolitik Approach in the South China Sea Dispute: The Case of the 2012 Scarborough Shoal Stand-off and Its Aftermath.” Journal of Asian Security 3, Issue 2 (2016): 157-82.

(14)

De Castro, Renato Cruz. “Twenty-First Century Philippines’ Policy Toward an Emergent China: From Equi-Balancing to Strategic Balancing.” Asian Politics &

Policy 8, no. 2 (2016): 305-28.

De Castro, Renato Cruz. “The Challenge of Conflict Resolution in the South China Sea Dispute: Examining the Prospect of a Stable Peace in East Asia,” International

Journal of China Studies 7, no. 1 (2016): 23-52.

De Castro, Renato Cruz. “China’s Realpolitik Approach in the South China Sea Dispute: The Case of the 2012 Scarborough Shoal Stand-off.” In Assessing Maritime

Disputes in East Asia: Political and Legal Perspectives, edited by Barthelemy

Courmont, Frederic Lasserre, and Eric Mottet, 190-210. London, United Kingdom: Routledge, 2017.

De Chazournes, Laurence Boisson ed. “Symposium on the South China Sea Arbitration.”

American Journal of International Law Unbound 110, (2016): 263-95.

De Hoogh, André. “Jurisdictional Qualms about the Philippines v. China Arbitration Awards.” EJIL Talk!. August 11, 2016. Accessed September 18, 2018. . http://www.ejiltalk.org/jurisdictional-qualms-about-the-philippines-v-china-arbitr ation-awards/.

DeLisle, Jacques. “Political-Legal Implications of the July 2016 Arbitration Decision in the Philippines-PRC Case Concerning the South China Sea: The United States, China and International Law.” Asian Yearbook of International Law (2015) 21, (2017): 49-82.

Department of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of the Philippines. “Note Verbale No. 13-0211 of the Philippines.” January 22, 2013. Accessed May 3, 2018. http://www.dfa.gov.ph/index.php/downloads/doc_download/523-notification-and-statement-of-claim-on-west-philippine-sea.

Dixon, William J. “Democracy and the Management of International Conflict.” Journal

of Conflict Resolution 37, Issue 1 (1993): 42-68.

Draudt, Darcie, and John K. Warden. “The Strategic Rationale for Maritime Tension Reduction in the Yellow Sea.” The Washington Quarterly 40, Issue 4 (2017): 183-97.

Du, Michael M. “China’s ‘One Belt, One Road’ Initiative: Context, Focus, Institutions, and Implications.” Chinese Journal of Global Governance 2, Issue 1 (2016): 30-43.

Dundas, Carl W. “Barbados-Guyana, Report Number 2-27.” In International Maritime

Boundaries, edited by D.A. Colson and R.W. Smith, 3578-97. Dordrecht,

Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff 2005.

Dunne Tim, and Brian C. Schmidt. “Realism.” In The Globalization of World Politics:

(15)

and Patricia Owens, 7th edition, 101-15. (Oxford, United Kingdom, Oxford University Press, 2017).

Dunoff, Jeffrey L., and Mark A. Pollack. “Reviewing Two Decades of IL/IR Scholarship: What We’ve Learned, What’s Next.” In Interdisciplinary

Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, edited by Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack, 626-61. Cambridge, United

Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

East Asia Marine Cooperation Platform. “Background Introduction.” Accessed December 12, 2018. http://www.eamc p.org/Home/AboutInfo/ index/id/1.html. Elliott, Lorraine. “Environmental Regionalism: Moving in from the Policy Margins.”

The Pacific Review 30, Issue 6 (2017): 952-65.

Engström, Viljam. Complexities of the Baltic Sea Regulatory Framework, Marine

Policy: 98, (2018): 191-200.

European Commission. “The Barcelona Convention.” Accessed October 16, 2018. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/marine/international-cooperation/regional-sea-conventions/barcelona-conven tion/index_en.htm.

European Commission. “The Common Fisheries Policy.” Accessed October 16, 2018. https: //ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp_en.

European Commission. “The Common Fisheries Policy: Bilateral Agreements with countries outside the EU.” Accessed October 20, 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/fish eries/cfp/international/agreements/norway.

European Commission. “Horizon 2020.” Accessed October 16, 2018. http://ec.europa. eu/envi ronment/enlarg/med/horizon_2020_en.htm.

European Commission. “Mediterranean Neighbours.” Accessed October 16, 2018. http://ec.eu ropa.eu/environment/enlarg/med_neighbours.htm.

European Council. “Joint Statement of the 20th EU-China Summit.” July 17, 2018. Accessed July 25, 2018. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/ 2018/07/16/joint-statement-of-the-20th-eu-china-summit/.

European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. “EUSBSR in a Nutshell.” Accessed October 20, 2018. https://www.balticsea-region-strategy.eu/about.

Evans, Malcolm D. “Maritime Boundary Delimitation: Where do We Go from Here?” In The Law of the Sea: Progress and Prospects, edited by David Freestone, Richard Barnes, and David Ong, 137-60. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press 2006.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. “FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries in 1995.” Accessed October 16, 2018. http://www.fao.or g/3/a-v9878e.htm.

(16)

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. “Report of the Second APFIC Regional Consultative Forum Meeting: ‘Adapting to Emerging Challenges – Promotion of Arrangements for the Management Of Fisheries And Aquaculture in Asia-Pacific’.” August 6-9, 2008. Accessed December 28, 2018. http://www. fao.org/3/a-i0393e.pdf.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. “Agreement to Promote Compliance with International Conservation and Management Measures by Fishing Vessels on the High Seas in 1995.” Accessed October 16, 2018. http://www.fao.org/3/x3130m/x3130m00.htm.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. “FAO Builds Support for DPR Korea Forestry, Fisheries Sectors.” August 3, 2015. Accessed June 9, 2018. http://www.fao.org/democratic-peoples-republic-of-korea/news/detail-events/en/c/ 340089/.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. “International Plan of Action to Prevent Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing (IUU Fishing) in 2001.” 2001. Accessed October 16, 2018. http://www.fao.org/3/a-y1224e.pdf.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. “Agreement on Port State Measures to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing.” Accessed October 16, 2018. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/ legal/docs/037t-e.pdf.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. “Review of Current Fisheries Management Performance and Conservation Measures in the WECAFC Area.” Accessed October 20, 2018. http://www.fao. org/3/a-i4255e.pdf.

Feng Huiyun and Kai He. “China’s Institutional Challenges to the International Order.”

Strategic Studies Quarterly 11, no. 4 (2017): 23-49.

Feng Huiyun and Kai He, eds. US–China Competition and the South China Sea

Disputes. London, United Kingdom: Routledge, 2018.

Fietta, Stephen, and Robin Cleverly. A Practitioner’s Guide to Maritime Boundary

Delimitation. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2016.

Fontanelli, Filippo. Jurisdiction and Admissibility in Investment Arbitration: The

Practice and the Theory. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill Nijhoff, 2018.

Fontanelli, Filippo. “Reflections on the Indispensable Party Principle in the Wake of the Judgment on Preliminary Objections in the Norstar Case.” Rivista di Diritto

Internazionale 100, Issue 1 (2017): 112-32.

Forlati, Serena. The International Court of Justice: An Arbitral Tribunal or a Judicial

(17)

Franckx, Erik. “Estonia-Latvia-Sweden, Report Number 10-17.” in International

Maritime Boundaries, edited J.I. Charney and R.W. Smith, 3041-56. Hague,

Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 2002.

Franckx, Erik. “Estonia-Sweden, Report Number 10-19.” In International Maritime

Boundaries, edited by J.I. Charney and R.W. Smith, 3089-106. Hague,

Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 2002.

Franckx, Erik. “Estonia-Finland-Sweden, Report Number 10-21.” In International

Maritime Boundaries, edited by J.I. Charney and R.W. Smith, 3129-39. Hague,

Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 2002.

Franckx, Erik, and Marco Benatar, eds. “Special Issue: The South China Sea, An International Law Perspective.” International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 32, Issue 2 (2017): 193–372.

Fravel, M. Taylor. Strong Borders, Secure Nation Cooperation and Conflict in China’s

Territorial Disputes. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.

Fravel, M. Taylor. “International Relations Theory and China’s Rise: Assessing China’s Potential for Territorial Expansion.” International Studies Review 12, Issue 4 (2010): 505-32.

Gänzle, Stefan, and Jörg Mirtl. “Experimentalist Governance in a Multi-level Environment: The EU’s Macro-regional strategies for the Baltic Sea and Danube Regions.” In The Rise of Common Political Order: Institutions, Public

Administration and Transnational Space, edited by Jarle Trondal, 154-76.

Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017.

Gagliano, Joseph A. Alliance Decision-Making in the South China Sea: Between Allied

and Alone. London, United Kingdom: Routledge, 2019.

Gamage, Rajni Nayanthara. “Blue Economy in Southeast Asia: Oceans as the New Frontier of Economic Development.” Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National

Maritime Foundation of India 12, Issue 2 (2016): 1-15.

Gao Jianjun. “A Note on the 2008 Cooperation Consensus Between China and Japan in the East China Sea.” Ocean Development & International Law 40, Issue 3 (2009): 291-303.

Gao Jianjun. “The Okinawa Trough Issue in the Continental Shelf Delimitation Disputes within the East China Sea.” Chinese Journal of International Law 9, Issue 1 (2010): 143-77.

Gao Zhiguo and Jia Bingbing. “The Nine-Dash Line in the South China Sea: History, Status, and Implications.” American Journal of International Law 107, Issue 1 (2013): 98-123.

(18)

Gao Zhiguo. ”Review and Prospect of the Security Cooperation Mechanisms in the South China Sea (in Chinese).” Journal of Boundary and Ocean Studies, 1, no. 2 (2016): 5-12.

García, Luis González. “Intervention by Third Parties under Article 63 of the Statute.” In Latin America and the International Court of Justice: Contributions to

International Law, , edited by Paula Wojcikiewicz Almeida and Jean-Marc Sorel,

109-19. London, United Kingdom: Routledge, 2016.

Gau, Michael Sheng-ti. “The Prospects for the Sino-Philippine Arbitration on the South China Sea (U-Shaped Line) Dispute.” Chinese (Taiwan) Yearbook of

International Law Affairs (2013) 31, (2015): 195-230.

Gau, Michael Sheng-ti. “The Sino-Philippine Arbitration on South China Sea Disputes: Admissibility and Jurisdiction Issues.” China Oceans Law Review 2015, no. 1 (2015): 166-293

Gau, Michael Sheng-ti. “The Sino-Philippine Arbitration on the South China Sea Disputes: Ineffectiveness of the Award, Inadmissibility of the Claims, and Lack of Jurisdiction, with Special Reference to the Legal Arguments Made by the Philippines in the Hearing on 7-13 July 2015.” China Oceans Law Review 2015, no. 2 (2015): 1-207.

Gau, Michael Sheng-ti. “The Jurisdictional Rulings of the South China Sea Arbitration: Possible Errors in Fact and in Law.” Ocean Yearbook 31, Issue 1 (2017): 197-249. Gau, Michael Sheng-ti. “The 2015 Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility of the South China Sea Arbitration and the Insurmountable Thresholds.” Chinese

(Taiwan) Yearbook of International Law and Affairs (2015) 33, (2017): 62-108.

Gau, Michael Sheng-ti. “The Sino-Philippine Arbitration on the South China Sea Disputes: A Preliminary Assessment of the Merits Award.” In Maritime Order

and the Law in East Asia, edited by Nong Hong and Gordon Houlden, 193-215.

London, United Kingdom: Routledge, 2018.

Global Environment Facility-United Nations Development Programme Project Development Facility. Yellow Sea Large Marine Ecosystem Preliminary Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis. February, 2000. Accessed December 12, 2018. https://iwlearn.net/resolveuid/d066663c6e3935d55e93d15b1061e7ca. Goh Sui Noi. “South China Sea Code ‘should be Binding’, Says Chinese Scholar.” The

Strait Times, April 11, 2018. Accessed July 21, 2018. https://www.straitstimes.

com/asia/east-asia/south-china-sea-code-should-be-binding-says-chinese-scholar. Gou, Andrew. “Delimitation as an Exception to the UNCLOS Compulsory Dispute

Settlement Procedures.” 8, para. 13. Accessed September 18, 2018. https://papers. ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id= 2661700.

(19)

Greig, Donald W. “Third Party Rights and Intervention Before the International Court.”

Virginia Journal of International Law 32, Issue 2 (1991-92): 285-376.

Griffiths, Ryan D. “States, Nations, and Territorial Stability: Why Chinese Hegemony Would Be Better for International Order, Security Studies.” Security Studies 25, Issue 3 (2016): 519-45.

Guo Ran. “China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative and the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage.” International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 32, Issue 3 (2017): 510-43.

Haas, Ernst. “Why Collaborate? Issue-Linkage and International Regimes.” World

Politics 32, no. 3, (1980): 357-405.

Haas, Peter M. “Epistemic Communities and the Dynamics of International Environmental Co-operation.” In Regime Theory and International Relations, edited by Volker Rittberger and Peter Mayer, 168-201. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 1995.

Hai, Do Thanh. Vietnam and the South China Sea: Politics, Security and Legality. London, United Kingdom: Routledge, 2017.

Hai, Do Thanh. “Vietnam: Riding the Chinese Tide.” The Pacific Review 31, Issue 2 (2017): 205-20.

Han, David Guo Xiong. “China’s Normative Power in Managing South China Sea Disputes,” Chinese Journal of International Politics 10, Issue 3 (2017): 269-97. Hansen, Holley, Sara McLaughlin Mitchell, and Stephen C. Nemeth. “IO Mediation of

Interstate Conflicts: Moving beyond the Global vs. Regional Dichotomy.” Journal

of Conflict Resolution 52, Issue 2 (2008): 295-325.

Harris, David, and Sandesh Sivakumaran, eds. Cases and Materials on International

Law. London, United Kingdom: Sweet & Maxwell, 2015.

Hayashi, Moritaka. “The 2008 Japan-China Agreement on Cooperation for the Development of East China Sea Resources.” In Maritime Border Diplomacy, edited by Myron H. Nordquist and John Norton Moore, 35-46. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill Nijhoff, 2012.

Heijer, Maarten Den. “Procedural Aspects of Shared Responsibility in the European Court of Human Rights.” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 4, Issue 2 (2013): 361-83.

Hensel, Paul R and Sara McLaughlin Mitchell. “Issue Indivisibility and Territorial Claims.” GeoJournal 64, Issue 4 (2005): 275-85.

Heydarian, Richard Javad. “Mare Liberum: Aquino, Duterte, and The Philippines’ Evolving Lawfare Strategy in the South China Sea.” Asian Politics & Policy 10, no. 2 (2018): 283-99.

(20)

Hong Nong. “Exploring Maritime Dispute Management in the South China Sea: A Practical Approach.” In Assessing Maritime Disputes in East Asia: Political and

Legal Perspectives, edited by Barthelemy Courmont, Frederic Lasserre, and Eric

Mottet, 141-67 (London, United Kingdom: Routledge, 2017).

Hong Nong. “The South China Sea Arbitration: A Test for the Efficacy of Compulsory Mechanism of UNCLOS and Implications for Dispute Management in the Region.” Asian Politics & Policy 10, Issue 2 (2018): 219-46.

Hong Nong. “Historic Concepts vs Contemporary Maritime Regimes in UNCLOS: China’s Claims in UNCLOS.” In Maritime Order and the Law in East Asia, edited by Nong Hong and Gordon Houlden, 53-68. London, United Kingdom: Routledge, 2018.

Hong Nong and Gordon Houlden, eds. Maritime Order and the Law in East Asia. London, United Kingdom: Routledge, 2018.

Hsiao, Anne Hsiu-An. “The South China Sea Arbitration and Taiwan’s Claim: Legal and Political Implications.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 22, Issue 2 (2017): 211-28.

Hsieh, Tsu-sung. “Issue of Non-Participation in the South China Sea Arbitration.” In

The South China Seas Disputes: Historic, Geopolitical and Legal Studies, edited

by Tsu-sung Hsieh, 193-209. Singapore: World Scientific, 2018.

Hsieh, Tsu-Sung ed. The South China Sea Disputes Historical, Geopolitical and Legal

Studies. Singapore: World Scientific, 2018.

Hsiung, James C. The South China Sea Disputes and the US-China Contest:

International Law and Geopolitics. Singapore: World Scientific, 2018.

Huang Yao and Pham Tran Vuong. “Fisheries Cooperation and Management Mechanisms in the South China Sea: Context, Limitations, and Prospects for the Future.” Chinese Journal of Comparative Law 4, Issue 1 (2016): 128-48.

Huth, Paul K., Sarah E. Croco, and Benjamin J. Appel. “Does International Law Promote the Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes? Evidence from the Study of Territorial Conflicts since 1945.” American Political Science Review 105, no. 2 (2011): 428-34.

International Arctic Science Committee. “About IASC.” Accessed October 20, 2018. https:// iasc.info/iasc/about-iasc.

Institut de Droit International. “Projet de règlement pour la procédure arbitrale international.” 1875. Accessed October 16, 2018. http://www.justitiaetpace.org/ idiF/resolutionsF/1875_haye _03_fr.pdf.

International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. “About Us.” Accessed October 20, 2018, https://www.iccat.int/en/organization.html.

(21)

International Court of Justice. “The Statute of the International Court of Justice.” April 18, 1946. Accessed October 16, 2018. https://www.icj-cij.org/en/statute.

International Court of Justice. “The General Assembly of the United Nations Requests an Advisory Opinion from the Court on the Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965.” June 29, 2017. Accessed September 14, 2018. https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/169/169-20170629-PRE-01-00-E N.pdf.

International Court of Justice. “Rules of Court.” July 1, 1978. Accessed October 16, 2018. https://www.icj-cij.org/en/rules.

International Court of Justice. “The State of Palestine Institutes Proceedings against the United States of America.” Accessed October 16, 2018. https://www.icj-cij.org/ files/case-related /176/176-20180928-PRE-01-00-EN.pdf.

International Maritime Organization. “International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL).” Accessed October 16, 2018. http://www.imo. org/en/About/Conventions/ListOfConventions/Pages/International-Convention-for-the-Prevention-of-Pollution-from-Ships-(MARPOL).aspx.

International Maritime Organization. “MARPOL-Annex V-Wider Caribbean Region Special Area.” Accessed October 20, 2018. https://www.westpandi.com/Publi cations/News/Archive/MARPOL---Annex-V---Wider-Caribbean-Region-Special-Area/.

International Maritime Organization. “Adoption of an International Code of Safety for Ships Operating in Polar Waters (Polar Code).” Accessed October 20, 2018. http://www.imo.org/en/ mediacentre/hottopics/polar/pages/default. aspx.

International Studies Encyclopedia. “Regime Theory” by Meiches Benjamin, and

Raymond Hopkins. Accessed October 16, 2018. http://internationalstudies.oxfor dre.com/abstract/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.001.0001/acrefore-978019084 6626-e-472?rskey=Pfywi5&re sult=9.

International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. “Statute of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea.” December 10, 1982. 1833 UNTS 561. Accessed April 7, 2018. https://www. itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/basic_texts/statute_en.pdf. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. “Who We Are.” Accessed October

20, 2018. http://www. helcom.fi/about-us/partners/ices/.

Jackson Robert., and Georg Sørensen. Introduction to International Relations: Theories

and Approaches, 4th ed. (Oxford, United Nations: Oxford University Press, 2010).

Jang, Heeyong Daniel. “Diminishing Role of Islands in Maritime Boundary Delimitation: Case Studies of Dokdo/Takeshima Island and the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands.” University of Hawaiʻi Law Review 35, Issue 1 (2013): 139-96.

(22)

Jayakumar, S., Tommy Koh, Robert Beckman, Tara Davenport, and Hao D. Phan, eds.

The South China Sea Arbitration: The Legal Dimension. Cheltenham, United

Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018.

Jenner C.J., and Tran Truong Thuy, eds. The South China Sea: A Crucible of Regional

Cooperation or Conflict-making Sovereignty Claims? Cambridge, United

Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2016.

Jho, Whasun., and Soo A. Chae. “Hegemonic Disputes and the Limits of the ASEAN Regional Forum.” Pacific Focus: Inha Journal of International Studies 29, no. 2 (2014): 237-59.

Ji Guoxing. “Maritime Jurisdiction in the Three China Seas: Options for Equitable Settlement.” UC San Diego Policy Papers 19, (1995): 3-29. Accessed May 3, 2018. https://escholarship. org/content/qt7rq2b069/qt7rq2b069.pdf.

Jung, Sung Chul, and Kihyun Lee. “The Offensive Realists are Not Wrong: China’s Growth and Aggression, 1976–2001.” Pacific Focus: Inha Journal of

International Studies 32, no. 1 (2017): 86-108.

Jung, Woosuk. “Environmental Challenges and Cooperation in Northeast Asia.” Focus

Asia: Perspectives & Analysis. Institute for Security & Development Policy. 8.

Accessed December 9, 2018. http://isdp.eu/content/uploads/2016/05/2016-jung-environmental-challenges-coopera tion-northeast-asia.pdf.

Kammerhofer, Jörg., and André de Hoogh. “All Things to All People? The International Court of Justice and its Commentators.” European Journal of International Law 18, Issue 5 (2007): 971-84.

Kaye, Stuart. “Jurisdiction in the South China Sea Arbitration: Application of the Monetary Gold Principle.” In The South China Sea Arbitration: The Legal

Dimension, edited by S. Jayakumar, Tommy Koh, Robert Beckman, Tara

Davenport, and Hao Duy Phan, 45-64. Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018.

Keohane, Robert O., and Lisa Martin. “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory.”

International Security 20, no. 1 (1995): 39-51.

Kim, Chan-woo. “Northeast Asian Environmental Cooperation: From a TEMM’s Perspective.” Korea Review of International Studies. 26. Accessed June 10, 2018. https://gsis.korea.ac.kr/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/12-1-02-Chan-woo-Kim.pdf. Kim, Chang-Ran, Kaori Kaneko, and Hyonhee Shin. “Japanese, South Korean Trawlers

Collide in Sea of Japan, 13 Rescued.” Reuters, November 15, 2018. Accessed November 16, 2018. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-southkorea-japan-colli sion/japanese-south-korean-trawlers-collide-in-sea-of-japan-13-rescued-idUSKC N1NK08J.

(23)

Kim, Cheol-hee. “NEASPEC as a Bridge between Science and Policy: Transboundary Pollutant Issue in East Asia.” North East Asia Sub-regional Programme for

Environment Cooperation. June 2016. Accessed December 10, 2018.

http://www.neaspec.org/sites/default/files/TAP_%20Annex%20IV.%20NEASP EC%20as%20a%20Bridge%20between%20Science%20and%20Policy.pdf. Kim, Heejin. Regime Accommodation in International Law: Human rights in

International Economic Law and Policy, (Leiden, Netherlands: Brill Nijhoff,

2016).

Kim, Hyun Jung. “Governing Fishing Stocks in Northeast Asia’s Disputed Waters: Preventing a ‘Tragedy of the Commons’?” International Journal of Marine and

Coastal Law 33, Issue 3 (2018): 495-527.

Kim, Inkyoung. “Environmental Cooperation of Northeast Asia: Transboundary Air Pollution.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 7, Issue 3 (2007): 439-62. Kim, Jihyun, “Possible Future of the Contest in the South China Sea,” Chinese Journal

of International Politics 9, Issue 1 (2016): 27-57.

Kim, Sun Pyo. Maritime Delimitation and Interim Arrangements in North East Asia. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 2004.

Kim, Suk Kyoon. Understanding Maritime Disputes in Northeast Asia: Issues and Nature, International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 23, Issue 2 (2008): 213-47.

Kim, Suk Kyoon. “Marine Pollution Response in Northeast Asia and the NOWPAP Regime.” Ocean Development & International Law 46, Issue 1 (2015): 17-32. Kirk, Elizabeth A. “The Ecosystem Approach and the Search for An Objective and

Content for the Concept of Holistic Ocean Governance.” Ocean Development &

International Law 46, Issue 1(2015): 33-49.

Kivimäki, Timo. “Legalism, Developmentalism and Securitization: The Case of Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea.” In Power Politics in Asia’s

Contested Waters: Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea, edited by Enrico

Fels and Truong-Minh Vu, 57-76. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2016.

Klein, Natalie S. “Multilateral Disputes and the Doctrine of Necessary Parties in the

East Timor Case.” Yale Journal of International Law 21, Issue 2 (1996): 305-47.

Klein, Natalie. “The Vicissitudes of Dispute Settlement under the Law of the Sea Convention.” International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 32, Issue 2 (2017): 332-63.

Klein, Natalie. “Resolving Disputes under UNCLOS When the Coastal and User States are disputed.” In Maritime Order and the Law in East Asia, edited by Nong Hong and Gordon Houlden, 253-70. London, United Kingdom: Routledge, 2018.

(24)

Koga, Kei. “ASEAN’s Evolving Institutional Strategy: Managing Great Power Politics in South China Sea Disputes.” Chinese Journal of International Politics 11, Issue 1 (2018): 49-80.

Kohen, Marcelo G., and Mamadou Hébié. “Territorial Conflicts and Their International Legal Framework.” In Research Handbook on Territorial Disputes in

International Law, edited by Marcelo G. Kohen and Mamadou Hébié, 5-34.

Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018.

Kojima, Chie. “South China Sea Arbitration and the Protection of the Marine Environment: Evolution of UNCLOS Part XII Through Interpretation and the Duty to Cooperate.” Asian Yearbook of International Law 21, (2017): 166-80. Kolb, Robert. The International Court of Justice. Oxford, United Kingdom: Hart

Publishing, 2013.

Komori, Yasumasa. “Evaluating Regional Environmental Governance in Northeast Asia.” Asian Affairs: An American Review 37, Issue 1 (2010): 1-25.

Koo, Min Gyo. “East Asian Maritime Disputes and South Korea’s Middle Power Diplomacy.” In Transforming Global Governance with Middle Power Diplomacy:

South Korea's Role in the 21st Century, edited by Sook Jong Lee, 87-108. Cham,

Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.

Koo, Min Gyo. “Belling the Chinese Dragon at Sea: Western Theories and Asian Realities.” Ocean Development & International Law 48, Issue 1 (2017): 52-68. Krasner, Stephen D. “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as

Intervening Variables.” In International Regimes, edited by Stephen D. Krasner, 1-21. New York, United States: Cornell University Press, 1982.

Krasner, Stefan D. “Regimes and the Limits of Realism: Regimes as Autonomous Variables.” In International Regimes, edited by Stephen D. Krasner, 355-68. New York, United States: Cornell University Press, 1982.

Krasner, Stephen D. “Realist Views of International Law.” American Society of

International Law Proceedings of the Annual Meeting 96, (2002): 265-8.

Kwiatkowska, Barbara, and Alfred H.A. Soons. “Entitlement to Maritime Areas of Rocks Which Cannot Sustain Human Habitation or Economic Life of Their Own.”

Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 21, (1990): 139-81.

Kwiatkowska, Barbara. Decisions of the World Court Relevant to the UN Convention

on the Law of the Sea, 2nd ed. (Leiden, Netherlands, Brill, 2010).

Kwiatkowska, Barbara, and Alfred H.A. Soons. “Some Reflections on the Ever Puzzling Rocks-Principle under UNCLOS Article 121(3).” The Global

Community—Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2011, Issue

(25)

Laksmana, Evan A., and Ristian A. Supriyanto. “Abandoned at Sea: The Tribunal Ruling and Indonesia's Missing Archipelagic Foreign Policy”, Asian Politics &

Policy 10, Issue 2 (2018): 300-21.

Lamy, Steven L. “Contemporary Mainstream Approaches: Realism and Neo-Liberalism.” In The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to

International Relations, edited by John Baylis, Steve Smith, and Patricia Owens,

3rd ed, 205-44. (Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2005).

Lathrop, Coalter G. “Tripoint Issues in Maritime Boundary Delimitation.” In

International Maritime Boundaries, edited by David A. Colson and Robert W.

Smith, 3305-75. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 2005.

Lauterpacht, Elihu. “Principles of Procedure in International Litigation.” In Collected

Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law 345, 387-530. Leiden,

Netherlands: Brill Nijhoff, 2009.

Lavalle, Roberto. “The Rights over States over Low-tide Elevations: A Legal Analysis”.

International Journal of Marine & Coastal Law 29, Issue 3 (2014): 457-79.

Lee, Geun. “Identity, Threat Perception, and Trust-Building in Northeast Asia.” In

Identity, Trust, and Reconciliation in East Asia: Dealing with Painful History to Create a Peaceful Present, edited by Kevin P. Clements, 29-46. Cham,

Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.

Lee, Seokwoo, and Lee Hee Eun. The Making of International Law in Korea: From

Colony to Asian Power. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill Nijhoff, 2016.

Lee, Seokwoo. “Experiences in Dealing with Maritime Disputes South Korea’s Bilateral Agreements with Japan and China.” Korean Journal of International and

Comparative Law 4, Issue 1 (2016): 85-98.

Lee, Seokwoo, and Leonardo Bernard. “South China Sea Arbitration and Its Application to Dokdo.” Asian Journal of International Law 8, Issue 1 (2018): 24-35.

Lee, Seokwoo, and Hee Eun Lee, eds., Asian Yearbook of International Law (2015) 21, (2018): 3-180.

Lee, Wei-chin. “Taiwan, the South China Sea Dispute, and the 2016 Arbitration Decision.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 22, Issue 2 (2017): 229-50.

League of Nations. “Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice.” December 16, 1920. Accessed October 16, 2018. https://www.refworld.org/docid/40421d5 e4.html.

Li Feng and Xianwu Zheng. “Indonesia and the Construction of Maritime Security Regimes in the South China Sea (in Chinese).” Southeast Asian Studies 3, no. 3 (2015): 52-61.

(26)

Li, Rex. “China’s Sea Power Aspirations and Strategic Behaviour in the South China Sea: From the Theoretical Perspective of Identity Construction.” In Power

Politics in Asia’s Contested Waters: Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea,

edited by Enrico Fels and Truong-Minh Vu, 117-37. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2016.

Liang Yu. “China, ASEAN Conclude Maritime Drill.” Xin Hua News, October 27, 2018. Accessed October 28, 2018. http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2018-10/27/c_13 7562672.htm.

Licari, Tania. “Intervention under Article 62 of the Statute of the ICJ.” Brooklyn

Journal of International Law 8, Issue 2 (1982): 267-87.

Li Jinming and Li Dexia. “The Dotted Line on the Chinese Map of the South China Sea: A Note.” Ocean Development & International Law 34, Issue 3-4 (2003): 287-95. Li Lingqun. China’s Policy towards the South China Sea: When Geopolitics Meets the

Law of the Sea. London, United Kingdom: Routledge, 2018.

Lim, Michelle, and Nengye Liu, “Condominium Arrangements as a Legal Mechanism for the Conservation of the South China Sea Large Marine Ecosystem,”

Asia-Pacific Journal of Ocean Law And Policy 2, Issue 1 (2017): 52-87.

Lindgren, Wrenn Yennie, and Petter Y. Lindgren. “Identity Politics and the East China Sea: China as Japan’s ‘Other’.” Asian Politics & Policy 9, Issue 3 (2017): 378-401.

Little, Richard. “International Regimes.” In The Globalization of World Politics: An

Introduction to International Relations, edited by John Baylis, Steve Smith, and

Patricia Owens, 5th ed, 294-309. (Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2011).

Liu Nengye, Elizabeth A. Kirk, and Tore Henriksen. “Introduction.” In The European

Union and the Arctic, edited by Nengye Liu, Elizabeth A. Kirk, and Tore

Henriksen, 1-7. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill Nijhoff, 2017.

Liu Nengye and Saiful Karim, eds. “Special Issue: South China Sea after Philippines v.

China Arbitration: Conflict and Cooperation in Troubled Waters.” Asia Pacific Journal of Ocean Law and Policy 2, Issue 1 (2017): 3-166.

Liu Nengye and Cassandra M. Brooks. “China’s Changing Position towards Marine Protected Areas in the Southern Ocean: Implications for Future Antarctic Governance.” Marine Policy 94, (2018): 189-95.

Liu Nengye. “EU and China Agree Ocean Partnership,” China Dialogue Ocean, July 23, 2018. Accessed July 25, 2018. https://chinadialogueocean.net/3925-can-the-eu-and-china-work-together-in-antarctica/.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Xiaoyi Zhang, “Problematic Expansion on Jurisdiction: Some Observation on the South China Sea Arbitration,” Journal of East Asia & International Law 9, Issue 2 (2016):

The previous chapter illustrates that the application of the Monetary Gold principle represents an approach adopted by international courts and tribunals to identify

Regarding how to address the presence of third States in a multistate-disputed maritime zone, one can examine state practices via a multivariate mode of regime formation

Given the non-encroachment upon third States and that the boundaries of two provisional zones set up by the China-South Korea and China-Japan’s fishery agreements do not extend

They are confirmed in the Declaration for a Decade of Coastal and Marine Environmental Protection in the South China Sea (2017- 2027). 934 In addition to these channels, some

By way of transboundary marine cooperation, to what extent will the establishment of a multivariate maritime regime assist the SCS bordering countries in taking

Second, given the fact that legal means cannot sufficiently deal with the presence of third States, to what extent can regime theory in international relations assist States

Om dergelijke onderliggende juridische dilemma's aan te pakken, verwoordt hoofdstuk 4 dat vanwege de nadruk op de regels, normen, principes en het besluitvormingsproces,