• No results found

Genetics, autoantibodies and clinical features in understanding and predicting rheumatoid arthritis

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Genetics, autoantibodies and clinical features in understanding and predicting rheumatoid arthritis"

Copied!
13
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)Genetics, autoantibodies and clinical features in understanding and predicting rheumatoid arthritis Helm-van Mil, A.H.M. van der. Citation Helm-van Mil, A. H. M. van der. (2006, October 26). Genetics, autoantibodies and clinical features in understanding and predicting rheumatoid arthritis. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/4929 Version:. Corrected Publisher’s Version. License:. Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden. Downloaded from:. https://hdl.handle.net/1887/4929. Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable)..

(2) #HAPTER¬. 5NDERSTANDING¬THE¬GENETIC¬CONTRIBUTION TO¬RHEUMATOID¬ARTHRITIS. !(-¬VAN¬DER¬(ELM¬ ¬VAN¬-IL *:¬7ESOLY 47*¬(UIZINGA #URR¬/PIN¬2HEUMATOL¬  .

(3) !"342!#4. 0URPOSE¬OF¬REVIEW¬)DENTIl¬CATION¬OF¬THE¬GENETIC¬VARIANTS¬THAT¬MEDIATE¬RISK¬FOR¬SUSCEP TIBILITY¬ AND¬ SEVERITY¬ OF¬ 2HEUMATOID¬ !RTHRITIS¬ 2! ¬ WILL¬ ALLOW¬ DEVELOPMENT¬ OF¬ NEW¬ DRUG TARGETS¬AS¬WELL¬AS¬INCREASE¬THE¬ABILITY¬TO¬PREDICT¬DISEASE¬COURSE¬4ECHNICAL¬AND¬METHODOLOGI CAL¬PROGRESS¬HAS¬FUELLED¬THE¬PROGRESS¬IN¬THIS¬l¬ELD 2ECENT¬ l¬NDINGS 4HE¬ SECOND¬ RISK¬ FACTOR¬ FOR¬ 2!¬ WAS¬ IDENTIl¬ED

(4) ¬ THE¬ 040.¬ POLYMOR PHISM¬4HIS¬GENETIC¬VARIANT¬REGULATES¬THE¬THRESHOLD¬OF¬4 CELL¬ACTIVATION¬)NTRIGUINGLY¬THIS¬ VARIANT¬IS¬A¬RISK¬FACTOR¬FOR¬DIABETES¬AS¬WELL¬-OREOVER¬IT¬WAS¬SHOWN¬THAT¬MULTIPLE¬GENETIC¬ VARIANTS¬IN¬ONE¬PATHWAY¬BOTH¬IN¬A¬TRANSCRIPTION¬FACTOR

(5) ¬25.8 ¬AS¬IN¬THE¬TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR¬BINDING¬SITE¬OF¬25.8¬IN¬THE¬3,#!¬GENE ¬CAN¬EACH¬CONFER¬VERY¬SMALL¬RISKS¬BUT¬ BY¬GENE GENE¬INTERACTIONS¬CAN¬CONFER¬A¬ FOLD¬RISK¬TO¬2!¬0HENOTYPE GENOTYPE¬INTERACTIONS WERE¬ DESCRIBED¬ BY¬ THE¬ ENHANCED¬ PREVALENCE¬ OF¬ AN¬ 2! SPECIl¬C¬ AUTOANTIBODY¬ ANTI ##0¬ ANTIBODIES ¬IN¬2!¬PATIENTS¬THAT¬HARBOUR¬THE¬2! ASSOCIATED¬(,!¬CLASS¬))¬GENES

(6) ¬THE¬SHARED EPITOPE¬ALLELES¬!N¬ENVIRONMENTAL¬RISK¬FACTOR¬FOR¬2!

(7) ¬SMOKING¬WAS¬DEMONSTRATED¬TO¬CONFER ITS¬RISK¬ESPECIALLY¬IN¬2!¬PATIENTS¬THAT¬HAVE¬BOTH¬THE¬SHARED¬EPITOPE¬ALLELES¬AS¬THE¬2! SPE CIl¬C¬ANTI ##0¬ANTIBODIES #HAPTER¬. 3UMMARY¬4WO¬NEW¬PATHWAYS¬4 CELL¬2ECEPTOR¬SIGNALLING¬AND¬A¬HAEMATOPOIETIC SPECIl¬C¬. . SIGNAL¬ TRANSDUCTION¬ PATHWAY ¬ HAVE¬ BEEN¬ DISCOVERED¬ THAT¬ ALLOW¬ FUTURE¬ PHARMACOLOGICAL INTERVENTIONS¬4HE¬DESCRIPTION¬OF¬THE¬NEW¬GENETIC¬RISK¬FACTORS¬AND¬THE¬INTERACTION¬WITH¬EN VIRONMENTAL¬TRIGGERS¬AS¬WELL¬AS¬PHENOTYPIC¬FEATURES¬IS¬GRADUALLY¬EXPANDING¬OUR¬PROGNOSTIC¬ ABILITIES¬TO¬PREDICT¬DISEASE¬SUSCEPTIBILITY¬AND¬COURSE.

(8) 5NDERSTANDING¬THE¬GENETIC¬CONTRIBUTION¬TO¬2!. ).42/$5#4)/.. 4HE¬COMPLETION¬OF¬HUMAN¬GENOME¬SEQUENCING¬AND¬THE¬TECHNOLOGICAL¬REVOLUTION¬IN¬GE NOTYPING¬IS¬DRIVING¬PROJECTS¬THAT¬AIM¬TO¬UNDERSTAND¬THE¬GENETIC¬CONTRIBUTION¬TO¬VIRTUALLY¬ EVERY¬COMMON¬DISEASE¬BY¬IDENTIFYING¬SEQUENCE¬VARIANTS¬ASSOCIATED¬WITH¬THESE¬DISORDERS 4HE¬MOTIVATION¬TO¬STUDY¬THE¬GENETIC¬CONTRIBUTION¬IS¬TWO FOLD¬&IRST

(9) ¬IDENTIl¬CATION¬OF¬NEW CRITICAL¬PATHWAYS¬IN¬DISEASE¬PATHOGENESIS¬LEADS¬TO¬THE¬IDENTIl¬CATION¬OF¬NEW¬DRUG¬TARGETS¬ LEADING¬TO¬MORE¬OPTIMAL¬TREATMENTS¬3ECOND

(10) ¬THE¬INCREASED¬UNDERSTANDING¬OF¬PATHOGENESIS¬ WILL¬ LEAD¬ TO¬ BETTER¬ AND¬ MORE¬ FOCUSSED¬ TREATMENT¬ PROTOCOLS¬ 4HE¬ CURRENT¬ CLINICAL¬ PREDIC TION¬MODELS¬HAVE¬INSUFl¬CIENT¬POWER¬TO¬PROVIDE¬PATIENTS¬WITH¬INDIVIDUALIZED¬TREATMENTS 'IVEN¬THE¬FACT¬THAT¬THE¬EFl¬CACY¬OF¬TREATMENTS¬IS¬PROVEN¬AT¬THE¬GROUP¬LEVEL¬BY¬RANDOMIZED¬ CONTROLLED¬ CLINICAL¬ TRIALS

(11) ¬ MANY¬ PATIENTS¬ ARE¬ OVER ¬ OR¬ UNDER¬ TREATED¬ )T¬ IS¬ HOPED¬ FOR¬ THAT PREDICTION¬ OF¬ DISEASE¬ OUTCOME¬ BY¬ GENETIC¬ RISK¬ FACTORS¬ MAY¬ LEAD¬ TO¬ MORE¬ INDIVIDUALIZED¬ TREATMENT¬PROTOCOLS &OR¬RHEUMATOID¬ARTHRITIS¬2! ¬HISTORICALLY¬SOUND¬EPIDEMIOLOGICAL¬DATA¬THE¬DIFFERENT¬PREVA LENCE¬OF¬2!¬IN¬VARIOUS¬POPULATIONS

(12) ¬MIGRATION¬STUDIES

(13) ¬FAMILIAL¬CLUSTERING¬AND¬TWIN¬STUD IES ¬ DEMONSTRATED¬ THE¬ GENETIC¬ CONTRIBUTION¬ TO¬ SUSCEPTIBILITY¬ OF¬ 2!¬  ¬ 4HE¬ COMPARISON¬ BETWEEN¬THE¬CONCORDANCE¬RATES¬IN¬MONOZYGOTIC¬TWINS¬AND¬THE¬PREVALENCE¬IN¬THE¬RESPECTIVE POPULATIONS¬REVEALED¬THAT¬ABOUT¬¬OF¬THE¬VARIATION¬IN¬OCCURRENCE¬OF¬DISEASE¬IS¬CAUSED¬BY GENETIC¬FACTORS¬ ¬-OREOVER¬LARGE¬INITIATIVES¬FROM¬*APAN

(14) ¬%UROPE

(15) ¬5NITED¬+INGDOM¬AND¬ THE¬53!¬ARE¬PRESENT¬IN¬WHICH¬MULTICASE¬FAMILIES¬ARE¬AVAILABLE¬AND¬GENOME¬WIDE¬SEARCHES ARE¬BEING¬PERFORMED¬&INALLY

(16) ¬BOTH¬THE¬RESOURCES¬LARGE¬INCEPTION¬COHORTS ¬AND¬THE¬TOOLS¬ WELL¬DEVELOPED¬DISEASE¬ACTIVITY¬MEASUREMENTS¬AND¬OUTCOME¬MEASUREMENTS ¬ARE¬AVAILABLE IN¬THE¬l¬ELD¬OF¬ARTHRITIS¬TO¬TAKE¬MAXIMUM¬ADVANTAGE¬OF¬THE¬AUTOMATED¬GENOTYPING¬TECH NOLOGIES¬WHICH¬ENABLE¬THE¬SYSTEMATIC¬ASCERTAINMENT¬OF¬SEQUENCE¬VARIANTS

(17) ¬IN¬THE¬FORM¬OF¬ SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE¬POLYMORPHISMS¬3.0S

(18) ¬FOR¬THE¬GENOMES¬OF¬LARGE¬NUMBERS¬OF¬INDIVIDU ALS¬$URING¬THE¬LAST¬TWO¬YEARS¬THIS¬HAS¬LED¬TO¬REMARKABLE¬PROGRESS¬IN¬UNDERSTANDING¬THE¬ GENETIC¬CONTRIBUTION¬TO¬2!¬4HIS¬REVIEW¬IS¬DIVIDED¬IN¬FOUR¬SECTIONS s¬. 0ROGRESS¬FOLLOWING¬LINKAGE¬DATA. s¬. 0ROGRESS¬FROM¬CANDIDATE¬GENES¬FROM¬PREVIOUSLY¬IDENTIl¬ED¬LINKAGE¬REGIONS¬IN¬2!. s¬. 0ROGRESS¬FROM¬CANDIDATE¬GENES. s¬. 0ROGRESS¬ON¬PHENOTYPIC GENOTYPIC¬INTERACTIONS. 02/'2%33¬&/,,/7).'¬,).+!'%¬$!4!. &OR¬THE¬PAN %UROPEAN

(19) ¬THE¬*APANESE

(20) ¬THE¬.ORTH¬!MERICAN¬2HEUMATOID¬!RTHRITIS¬AND¬THE¬ 5+¬CONSORTIUM

(21) ¬GENOME¬SCANS¬HAVE¬PREVIOUSLY¬BEEN¬PERFORMED¬WITH¬AN¬AVERAGE¬MARKER¬. .

(22) SPACING¬RANGING¬FROM¬¬TO¬¬CENTIMORGANS¬C- ¬4HE¬&RENCH¬GROUP¬PUBLISHED¬LAST¬YEAR¬A¬ SCAN¬WITH¬A¬MEAN¬MARKER¬SPACING¬OF¬¬C-

(23) ¬RESULTING¬IN¬AN¬AVERAGE¬DISTANCE¬BETWEEN¬ANY 2!¬SUSCEPTIBILITY¬GENE¬AND¬ITS¬NEAREST¬MARKER¬OF¬¬C-¬ ¬¬NON (,!¬REGIONS¬SHOWED SUGGESTIVE¬ EVIDENCE¬ FOR¬ LINKAGE¬ 0 0 ¬  ¬ .INE¬ OF¬ THESE¬ OVERLAPPED¬ WITH¬ REGIONS¬ SUG GESTED¬IN¬OTHER¬PUBLISHED¬2!¬GENOME¬SCANS¬)N¬ORDER¬TO¬PROVIDE¬AN¬ESTIMATE¬WHAT¬THE¬ERROR¬ RATE¬OF¬THIS¬APPROACH¬IS

(24) ¬AN¬ASSESSMENT¬OF¬THE¬SIGNIl¬CANCE¬OF¬THE¬NUMBER¬OF¬REGIONS¬WITH¬ SUGGESTIVE¬EVIDENCE¬FOR¬LINKAGE¬WAS¬OBTAINED¬BY¬USING¬

(25) ¬COMPUTER¬SIMULATIONS¬WITH THE¬NULL¬HYPOTHESIS¬OF¬ABSENCE¬OF¬ANY¬TRUE¬2!¬GENE¬REGION¬4HE¬PROBABILITY¬OF¬OBSERVING¬ ¬NON (,!¬PEAKS¬BY¬CHANCE¬WAS¬

(26) ¬WHICH¬PROVIDED¬CONVINCING¬EVIDENCE¬THAT¬THESE PEAKS¬CONTAINED¬AT¬LEAST¬¬TRUE¬NON (,!¬2!¬GENE¬REGION¬3INCE¬A¬MEAN¬¢¬3$¬OF¬ABOUT¬¬¢¬ ¬FALSE POSITIVE¬PEAKS¬WERE¬EXPECTED

(27) ¬THE¬NUMBER¬OF¬TRUE¬2!¬LINKAGE¬PEAKS¬WAS¬ESTIMATED TO¬BE¬¬¢¬ 4HE¬5+¬GROUP¬EXPLORED¬THE¬UTILITY¬OF¬3.0S¬FOR¬LINKAGE¬ANALYSIS¬!¬WHOLE GENOME¬SCREEN OF¬¬FAMILIES¬WITH¬MULTIPLE¬CASES¬OF¬2!¬WAS¬PERFORMED¬USING¬

(28) ¬GENOMEWIDE¬3.0S¬  ¬4HE¬3.0¬ANALYSIS¬DETECTED¬(,! $2"

(29) ¬THE¬MAJOR¬2!¬SUSCEPTIBILITY¬LOCUS¬0 0¬¬

(30) WITH¬ A¬ LINKAGE¬ INTERVAL¬ OF¬ ¬ C-

(31) ¬ COMPARED¬ WITH¬ A¬  C-¬ LINKAGE¬ INTERVAL¬ DETECTED¬ BY THE¬ PREVIOUSLY¬ PUBLISHED¬  C-¬ MICROSATELLITE¬ SCAN¬ IN¬ THE¬ SAME¬ COHORT¬ -OREOVER

(32) ¬ FOUR #HAPTER¬. ADDITIONAL¬LOCI¬WERE¬DETECTED¬AT¬A¬NOMINAL¬SIGNIl¬CANCE¬LEVEL¬0 0¬¬ ¬IN¬THE¬3.0¬LINKAGE ANALYSIS¬4HE¬AUTHORS¬CONCLUDED¬THAT¬A¬DENSE¬3.0¬MAP¬WAS¬VERY¬SUITABLE¬FOR¬PERFORMING LINKAGE¬ANALYSIS¬IN¬2!¬4HIS¬APPROACH¬ALLOWED¬LOCI¬TO¬BE¬DEl¬NED¬MORE¬PRECISELY. . 02/'2%33¬&2/-¬#!.$)$!4%¬'%.%3¬&2/-¬02%6)/53,9¬)$%.4)&)%$ ,).+!'%¬2%')/.3¬).¬2!. 4HE¬ *APANESE¬ CONSORTIUM¬  ¬ SET¬ OUT¬ BY¬ DENSELY¬ MAPPING¬ CANDIDATE¬ REGIONS¬ THAT¬ WERE¬ ORIGINALLY¬DEl¬NED¬BY¬WHOLE¬GENOME¬SCANS¬&OR¬THE¬PREVIOUSLY¬DEl¬NED¬P¬REGION

(33) ¬THE¬ *APANESE¬INVESTIGATORS¬REASONED¬THAT¬THE¬UNIQUE¬SPECIl¬CITY¬OF¬ANTI ##0¬ANTIBODIES¬FOR¬2! MIGHT¬BE¬CAUSED¬BY¬DIFFERENTIAL¬CITRINULLATION¬CAUSED¬BY¬MUTATIONS¬IN¬ENZYMES¬INVOLVED¬ IN¬CITRINULLATION¬4HE¬P¬GENE¬REGION¬CONTAINED¬ALL¬THE¬KNOWN¬GENES¬THAT¬ENCODE¬PEP TIDYLARGININE¬ DEIMINASES¬ CITRULLINATING¬ 0!$ ¬ ENZYMES

(34) ¬ THE¬ 0!$¬ GENES¬ 0!$¬ TYPES¬ n IN¬A¬REGION¬OF¬¬MEGABASE¬-B ¬!¬CASE¬CONTROL¬STUDY¬USING¬IN¬¬2!¬PATIENTS¬AND¬ HEALTHY¬*APANESE¬CONTROLS¬IDENTIl¬ED¬AN¬ASSOCIATION¬BETWEEN¬HAPLOTYPES¬COMBINATIONS¬OF¬ 3.0S¬ON¬ONE¬CHROMOSOME¬THAT¬TEND¬TO¬INHERIT¬TOGETHER ¬OF¬THE¬GENE¬ENCODING¬0!$¬WITH INCREASED¬SUSCEPTIBILITY¬TO¬2!¬4HE¬DIFFERENCE¬BETWEEN¬TWO¬HAPLOTYPIC¬VARIANTS¬WAS¬FOUR 3.0S¬IN¬EXONS

(35) ¬WITH¬THREE¬SUBSEQUENT¬AMINO¬ACID¬SUBSTITUTIONS¬4HE¬2! SUSCEPTIBLE¬0!$¬ VARIANT¬WAS¬SHOWN¬TO¬PRODUCE¬A¬MORE¬STABLE¬TRANSCRIPT¬THAN¬THE¬NON SUSCEPTIBLE¬VARIANT

(36) ¬ IMPLYING¬AN¬INCREASED¬PRODUCTION¬OF¬0!$¬BY¬THE¬2! SUSCEPTIBLE¬VARIANT¬#IRCUMSTANTIAL¬ EVIDENCE¬FOR¬A¬ROLE¬OF¬0!$¬IN¬2!¬WAS¬THE¬DETECTION¬OF¬0!$¬IN¬SYNOVIAL¬TISSUE¬!LTHOUGH¬.

(37) 5NDERSTANDING¬THE¬GENETIC¬CONTRIBUTION¬TO¬2!. THIS¬OBSERVATION¬MAY¬PROVIDE¬INSIGHT¬IN¬THE¬GENERATION¬OF¬ANTI ##0¬ANTIBODIES¬WITH¬THE NOT¬YET¬PROVEN¬SUGGESTION ¬THAT¬ENHANCED¬PRODUCTION¬OF¬CITRINULLATED¬ANTIGENS¬LEADS¬TO¬A¬ HIGHER¬CHANCE¬OF¬DEVELOPING¬ANTI ##0¬ANTIBODIES

(38) ¬IT¬IS¬NOT¬KNOWN¬WHETHER¬THIS¬IS¬SPECIl¬C¬ FOR¬THE¬*APANESE¬POPULATION¬$ATA¬FROM¬BOTH¬&RANCE¬#AUCASIANS¬AS¬WELL¬AS¬#AUCASIANS¬FROM¬ THE¬ 5+¬ SHOWED¬ NO¬ ASSOCIATION¬ WITH¬ 0!$¬ HAPLOTYPES¬ AND¬ 2!¬ 

(39)  ¬ -ORE¬ SPECIl¬C¬ DATA ON¬THE¬0!$¬ ¬GENE¬REVEALED¬THAT¬THIS¬GENE¬IS¬EXTREMELY¬VARIABLE¬AT¬LEAST¬IN¬THE¬WHITE #AUCASIAN¬POPULATION¬4HEREFORE¬THE¬JURY¬IS¬STILL¬OUT¬WHETHER¬THE¬OBSERVED¬ASSOCIATION¬IN THE¬ *APANESE¬ POPULATION¬ IS¬ SPECIl¬C¬ FOR¬ THIS¬ POPULATION¬ OR¬ WHETHER¬ ASSOCIATIONS¬ EXIST¬ IN¬ OTHER¬POPULATIONS¬AS¬WELL¬4HIS¬LAST¬OPTION¬IS¬IMPORTANT¬BECAUSE¬THIS¬MAY¬INDICATE¬THAT¬THE¬ AMOUNT¬OF¬CITRINULLATED¬ANTIGENS¬CAN¬BE¬A¬NEW¬TARGET¬FOR¬THERAPY 7ITH¬RESPECT¬TO¬THE¬PROGRESS¬ON¬THE¬P¬REGION¬IT¬IS¬NOT¬YET¬KNOWN¬WHAT¬PROPORTION¬OF¬ THIS¬LINKAGE¬PEAK¬CAN¬BE¬EXPLAINED¬BY¬0!$¬GENE¬VARIANTS¬!NOTHER¬CANDIDATE¬GENE¬IN¬THIS¬ REGION¬IS¬THE¬4.& RECEPTOR¬TYPE¬))¬GENE¬THAT¬HAS¬A¬POLYMORPHISM¬CAUSING¬THE¬AMINO¬ACID SUBSTITUTION¬-¬TO¬2¬AT¬POSITION¬¬)NITIALLY¬THE¬5+¬GROUP¬REPORTED¬AN¬ASSOCIATION¬BUT¬IN¬ &RENCH¬FAMILIES¬THIS¬ASSOCIATION¬BETWEEN¬DIFFERENT¬VARIANTS¬OF¬THE¬4.& 2))¬GENE¬COULD¬ONLY BE¬REPLICATED¬IN¬A¬SUBSET¬OF¬MULTICASE¬2!¬FAMILIES¬

(40)  ¬&INALLY¬BY¬TAKING¬ADVANTAGE¬OF¬THE SPECTRUM¬OF¬PHENOTYPES¬IN¬A¬LARGE¬INCEPTION¬COHORT¬FROM¬4HE¬.ETHERLANDS

(41) ¬IT¬WAS¬FOUND THAT¬EITHER¬IN¬2!¬PATIENT¬THAT¬DEVELOPED¬COMPLETE¬REMISSION¬OR¬IN¬THOSE¬WITH¬THE¬WORST PROGRESSION¬TO¬DESTRUCTIVE¬DISEASE¬AND¬IN¬HEALTHY¬CONTROLS¬THE¬GENOTYPE¬DISTRIBUTION¬WAS¬ EQUAL¬ ¬4HUS¬IN¬CONCLUSION¬IT¬IS¬MOST¬LIKELY¬THAT¬VARIANTS¬IN¬THE¬4.& 2))¬GENE¬ARE¬NOT¬ RELEVANT¬FOR¬SUSCEPTIBILITY¬OR¬SEVERITY¬OF¬2! 4HE¬(,!¬#LASS¬))¬MOLECULES¬ARE¬THE¬MOST¬POWERFUL¬RECOGNIZED¬GENETIC¬FACTORS¬FOR¬2!¬THAT CONTRIBUTES¬TO¬AT¬LEAST¬¬OF¬THE¬TOTAL¬GENETIC¬EFFECT¬4HE¬(,! $2"¬ALLELES¬ 

(42) ¬ 

(43). 

(44) ¬ 

(45) ¬ 

(46) ¬ 

(47) ¬ 

(48) ¬ ¬SHARE¬A¬CONSERVED¬AMINO¬ACID¬SEQUENCE¬1+2!!

(49) 122!!¬OR¬222!! ¬AT¬POSITION¬ ¬IN¬THE¬THIRD¬HYPERVARIABLE¬REGION¬OF¬THE¬$2`¬CHAIN¬ 4HESE¬RESIDUES¬CONSTITUTE¬AN¬_ HELICAL¬DOMAIN¬FORMING¬ONE¬SIDE¬OF¬THE¬ANTIGEN¬PRESENTING¬ BINDING¬SITE¬4HE¬3HARED¬%PITOPE¬HYPOTHESIS¬POSTULATES¬THAT¬THE¬SHARED¬EPITOPE¬MOTIF¬ITSELF¬ IS¬DIRECTLY¬INVOLVED¬IN¬THE¬PATHOGENESIS¬OF¬2!¬BY¬ALLOWING¬THE¬PRESENTATION¬OF¬AN¬ARTHRITO GENIC¬PEPTIDE¬%XTENSIVE¬EVIDENCE¬EXISTS¬SHOWING¬ASSOCIATIONS¬BETWEEN¬THE¬SHARED¬EPITOPE ENCODING¬ALLELES¬AND¬SUSCEPTIBILITY¬TO¬2!¬AS¬WELL¬AS¬SEVERITY¬OF¬2!¬  ¬(OMOZYGOSITY FOR¬THE¬SHARED¬EPITOPE¬IS¬ASSOCIATED¬WITH¬A¬HIGHER¬RISK¬TO¬DEVELOP¬2!¬

(50) ¬AND¬WITH¬MORE SEVERE¬RADIOLOGICAL¬DESTRUCTION¬ ¬2EGIONAL¬DIFFERENCES¬IN¬(,!¬PREVALENCE¬AND¬ASSOCIA TION¬ WITH¬ 2!¬ EXIST¬ !SSOCIATIONS¬ BETWEEN¬ (,! $2" ¬ AND¬ ¬ AND¬ 2!¬ WERE¬ l¬RST DESCRIBED¬IN¬7ESTERN¬!MERICANS¬AND¬IN¬THE¬.ORTHERN¬%UROPE¬POPULATION¬(,! $2"  WAS¬ASSOCIATED¬WITH¬2!¬IN¬.ATIVE¬!MERICANS¬ ¬AND¬ASSOCIATIONS¬WITH¬(,! $2" ¬ AND¬ ¬ WERE¬ REPORTED¬ IN¬ )NDIAN¬ AND¬ -EDITERRANEAN¬ PATIENTS¬ 

(51)  ¬ /N¬ THE¬ OTHER¬ HAND¬NO¬ASSOCIATIONS¬WERE¬FOUND¬IN¬'REEKS¬ ¬%XTRA ARTICULAR¬MANIFESTATIONS¬OF¬2!¬SUCH¬ AS¬RHEUMATOID¬NODULES¬ARE¬DESCRIBED¬TO¬OCCUR¬MORE¬OFTEN¬IN¬SHARED¬EPITOPE¬POSITIVE¬PA. .

(52) TIENTS¬ ¬(OMOZYGOSITY¬FOR¬(,! $2" ¬AS¬WELL¬AS¬HOMOZYGOSITY¬FOR¬TWO¬DIFFERENT SHARED¬ EPITOPE¬ ENCODING¬ (,! $2"¬ ALLELES¬ CONFERRED¬ A¬ HIGHER¬ RISK¬ TO¬ DEVELOP¬ EXTRA AR TICULAR¬MANIFESTATIONS¬THAN¬HETEROZYGOSITY¬ ¬!¬RELATIONSHIP¬OF¬VASCULITIS¬WITH¬¬GENO TYPES¬CONTAINING¬A¬DOUBLE¬DOSE¬OF¬THE¬SHARED¬EPITOPE

(53) ¬SPECIl¬CALLY¬(,! $2"  

(54).  ¬AND¬  ¬HAS¬BEEN¬OBSERVED¬AS¬WELL¬  !LTHOUGH¬IT¬IS¬ACCEPTED¬THAT¬THE¬SHARED¬EPITOPE¬ENCODING¬(,! $2"¬ALLELES¬ARE¬ASSOCIATED WITH¬2!

(55) ¬A¬MORE¬CONTROVERSIAL¬ISSUE¬IS¬THE¬QUESTION¬WHETHER¬PREDISPOSITION¬TO¬2!¬IS¬ALSO¬ CONFERRED¬BY¬(,! $1¬ALLELES¬3UPPORT¬FOR¬A¬ROLE¬FOR¬(,! $1¬COMES¬FROM¬STUDIES¬IN¬MICE 

(56)  ¬AND¬HUMANS¬

(57)  ¬4HE¬CONCERNING¬(,! $1¬ALLELES¬ARE¬THE¬$1¬AND¬$1¬HET ERODIMERS¬!S¬THEY¬BOTH¬ARE¬IN¬STRONG¬LINKAGE¬WITH¬SOME¬SHARED¬EPITOPE¬ALLELES

(58) ¬THE¬INDI VIDUAL¬CONTRIBUTION¬OF¬THE¬(,! $1¬ALLELES¬IS¬DIFl¬CULT¬TO¬DISCERN¬2ECENTLY¬THE¬(,!¬REGION¬ HAS¬BEEN¬l¬NE MAPPED¬ ¬4HE¬HIGHEST¬LINKAGE¬PEAK¬WAS¬LOCATED¬EXACTLY¬AT¬THE¬$2"¬LOCUS

(59) ¬ HOWEVER¬CONSIDERING¬THE¬WIDENESS¬OF¬THE¬LINKAGE¬PEAK¬HAPLOTYPE¬ASSOCIATIONS¬CANNOT¬BE¬ EXCLUDED¬ ¬4HEREFORE

(60) ¬NO¬DEl¬NITE¬EVIDENCE¬IS¬AVAILABLE¬PINPOINTING¬2!¬SUSCEPTIBILITY¬TO¬ EITHER¬(,! $2¬OR¬(,! $1¬ALLELES "ESIDES¬ THE¬ ABOVE MENTIONED¬ PREDISPOSIVE¬ EFFECTS¬ OF¬ (,! $2"¬ ALLELES

(61) ¬ THERE¬ ARE¬ ALSO¬ #HAPTER¬. REPORTS¬ON¬PROTECTIVE¬EFFECTS¬BY¬CERTAIN¬(,! $2"¬HAPLOTYPES¬4HESE¬HAPLOTYPES¬CONTAIN

(62) ¬. . INSTEAD¬OF¬THE¬SHARED¬EPITOPE

(63) ¬ANOTHER¬COMMON¬ANCHOR REGION¬CONSISTING¬OF¬THE¬AMINO ACIDS¬ $%2!!¬ 4HE¬ (,! $2"¬ ALLELES¬ THAT¬ EXPRESS¬ THE¬ $%2!!¬ SEQUENCE¬ $2" 

(64) ¬. 

(65) ¬ 

(66) ¬ 

(67) ¬ 

(68) ¬ 

(69) ¬  ¬HAVE¬BEEN¬SHOWN¬TO¬PROTECT¬AGAINST¬2!¬   (OWEVER

(70) ¬THESE¬STUDIES¬HAVE¬BEEN¬PERFORMED¬WITH¬RELATIVELY¬FEW¬2!¬PATIENTS¬CARRYING¬THE¬ $%2!!¬ HAPLOTYPE¬ 

(71)  ¬ 4HERE¬ IS¬ ALSO¬ EVIDENCE¬ THAT¬ PATIENTS¬ CARRYING¬ THE¬ $%2!!¬ SE QUENCE¬HAVE¬LESS¬EROSIVE¬DISEASE¬

(72)  ¬)T¬IS¬NOT¬KNOWN¬WHETHER¬THE¬EFFECT¬OF¬THE¬$%2!!¬ ENCODING¬(,! $2"¬ALLELES¬IS¬TRULY¬PROTECTIVE¬OR¬IS¬DUE¬TO¬THE¬EFFECT¬OF¬THE¬CONCOMITANT ABSENCE¬OF¬SHARED¬EPITOPE¬ENCODING¬(,! $2"¬ALLELES¬NON PREDISPOSITION ¬-ORE¬CLARITY¬ WILL¬ COME¬ FROM¬ CURRENTLY¬ PERFORMED¬ STUDIES¬ IN¬ WHICH¬ A¬ LARGE¬ NUMBER¬ OF¬ PATIENTS¬ WITH¬ EARLY¬2!¬HAVE¬BEEN¬FOLLOWED¬FOR¬¬YEARS¬!S¬IN¬THIS¬STUDY¬SUBGROUPS¬OF¬PATIENTS¬WITH¬THE¬ SAME¬AMOUNT¬OF¬SHARED¬EPITOPE¬ALLELES¬WERE¬COMPARED

(73) ¬THE¬EFFECTS¬OF¬$%2!!¬COULD¬BE¬DIF FERENTIATED¬FROM¬NON PREDISPOSITION¬)T¬WAS¬OBSERVED¬THAT¬THE¬$%2!!¬HAPLOTYPE¬CONFERRED A¬LOWER¬RISK¬TO¬DEVELOP¬2!¬AND¬WAS¬ASSOCIATED¬WITH¬A¬LOWER¬RATE¬OF¬JOINT¬DESTRUCTION. 02/'2%33¬&2/-¬#!.$)$!4%¬'%.%3¬&2/-¬02%6)/53,9¬)$%.4)&)%$ ,).+!'%¬2%')/.3¬).¬!54/)--5.%¬$)3%!3%¬).¬'%.%2!,. ,INKAGE¬DATA¬TO¬SELECT¬CANDIDATE¬GENES¬CAN¬BE¬ALTERNATIVELY¬USED¬BY¬SEARCHING¬FOR¬GENOMIC REGIONS¬THAT¬OVERLAP¬IN¬THE¬SCANS¬REPORTED¬FOR¬SEVERAL¬DISEASES¬SUCH¬AS¬ARTHRITIS

(74) ¬DIABETES

(75) ASTHMA

(76) ¬ATOPIC¬DERMATITIS

(77) ¬OSTEOPOROSIS

(78) ¬AND¬INm¬AMMATORY¬BOWEL¬DISEASE¬ ¬/NE¬OF¬THE¬.

(79) 5NDERSTANDING¬THE¬GENETIC¬CONTRIBUTION¬TO¬2!. REGIONS¬IS¬THE¬QnQ¬REGION¬"Y¬VERY¬DENSE¬3.0¬MAPPING¬USING¬A¬SIMILAR¬STRATEGY¬ AS¬ THE¬ 0!$¬ IDENTIl¬CATION¬ IN¬ THE¬ *APANESE¬ POPULATION

(80) ¬ THE¬ *APANESE¬ GROUP¬ PERFORMED¬ LINKAGE¬DISEQUILIBRIUM¬,$ ¬MAPPING¬USING¬SINGLE¬NUCLEOTIDE¬POLYMORPHISMS¬3.0S ¬IN¬A CASE CONTROL¬APPROACH¬ ¬)N¬¬2!¬PATIENTS¬AND¬¬CONTROLS¬A¬RISK¬FOR¬2!¬OF¬¬WAS IDENTIl¬ED¬ FOR¬ A¬ RISK¬ ALLELE¬ IN¬ THE¬ ORGANIC¬ CATION¬ TRANSPORTER¬ GENE¬ 3,#!¬ 4HE¬ EXPRES SION¬OF¬3,#!¬IS¬SPECIl¬C¬TO¬HAEMATOLOGICAL¬AND¬IMMUNOLOGICAL¬TISSUES¬AND¬3,#!¬ IS¬ HIGHLY¬ EXPRESSED¬ IN¬ THE¬ INm¬AMMATORY¬ JOINTS¬ OF¬ MICE¬ WITH¬ COLLAGEN INDUCED¬ ARTHRITIS¬ )NTRIGUINGLY¬THE¬IDENTIl¬ED¬3.0¬AFFECTS¬THE¬TRANSCRIPTIONAL¬EFl¬CIENCY¬OF¬3,#!¬IN¬VITRO¬ BY¬ALTERING¬THE¬BINDING¬AFl¬NITY¬OF¬A¬HAEMATOPOIETIC¬TRANSCRIPTION¬FACTOR

(81) ¬CALLED¬25.8 .EXT¬3.0S¬IN¬THIS¬TRANSCRIPTION¬FACTOR¬WERE¬ANALYSED¬AS¬WELL¬!N¬ASSOCIATION¬WAS¬OBSERVED WITH¬THE¬MINOR¬ALLELE¬IN¬THE¬25.8 GENE¬CONFERRING¬A¬SMALL¬BUT¬SIGNIl¬CANT¬RISK¬ ¬IN¬ THE¬COMPARISON¬BETWEEN¬¬2!¬PATIENTS¬AND¬¬CONTROLS¬)NTRIGUINGLY

(82) ¬THE¬BIOLOGICAL DATA¬SUGGEST¬THAT¬THESE¬TWO¬3.0S¬WOULD¬HAVE¬A¬CUMULATIVE¬EFFECT¬GIVEN¬THAT¬A¬TRANSCRIPTION¬ FACTOR¬WITH¬LESS¬BINDING¬CAPACITY¬HAS¬TO¬BIND¬TO¬A¬DISRUPTED¬TRANSCRIPTION¬FACTOR¬BINDING¬ SITE

(83) ¬ THUS¬ RESULTING¬ IN¬ OVERALL¬ LOSS¬ OF¬ FUNCTION¬ )NDEED¬ IN¬ THE¬ ANALYSIS¬ OF¬ THE¬ DATA¬ FROM¬ INDIVIDUALS¬WHO¬WERE¬GENOTYPED¬FOR¬BOTH¬3.0S¬¬CASES¬AND¬¬CONTROLS

(84) ¬IT¬WAS¬OB SERVED¬THAT¬THE¬GENOTYPE¬THAT¬WAS¬HOMOZYGOUS¬WITH¬RESPECT¬TO¬THE¬SUSCEPTIBILITY¬ALLELES OF¬BOTH¬GENES¬SHOWED¬A¬HIGH¬ODDS¬RATIO¬OF¬¬¬CONl¬DENCE¬INTERVAL¬n

(85) ¬WHEREAS¬THE GENOTYPE¬THAT¬WAS¬HOMOZYGOUS¬WITH¬RESPECT¬TO¬THE¬SUSCEPTIBLE¬ALLELE¬OF¬3,#! AND¬HET EROZYGOUS¬WITH¬RESPECT¬TO¬25.8 SHOWED¬A¬MODERATELY¬HIGH¬ODDS¬RATIO¬OF¬¬FOR¬DISEASE¬ 4HE¬DATA¬HAVE¬BEEN¬REPLICATED¬IN¬TWO¬OTHER¬DISEASES¬PSORIASIS¬AND¬3,% ¬AND¬STUDIES¬ARE UNDERWAY¬IN¬COHORTS¬OF¬2!¬PATIENTS¬OF¬DIFFERENT¬ETHNIC¬BACKGROUND¬4HIS¬IS¬A¬NICE¬EXAMPLE¬ HOW¬GENE GENE¬INTERACTIONS¬MAY¬EXPLAIN¬COMPLEX¬TRAITS¬WHILE¬AT¬THE¬SAME¬TIME¬THE¬CRUDE¬ /2¬OF¬THE¬GENE¬VARIANT¬FOR¬THE¬DISEASE¬IS¬QUITE¬LOW. 02/'2%33¬&2/-¬#!.$)$!4%¬'%.%3. 4HE¬METHODOLOGY¬OF¬SEARCHING¬GENES¬CAN¬BE¬DIVIDED¬IN¬THE¬UNBIASED¬APPROACH¬OF¬LINKAGE¬ ANALYSIS¬AND¬SUBSEQUENT¬l¬NE¬MAPPING¬)N¬THIS¬METHOD¬A¬LINKAGE¬HOT¬SPOT¬IS¬COVERED¬WITH¬ A¬ GRID¬ OF¬ MARKERS¬ IN¬ ORDER¬ TO¬ SEARCH¬ SYSTEMATICALLY¬ FOR¬ LINKAGE¬ DISEQUILIBRIUM¬ ,$

(86) ¬ THE¬ NON RANDOM¬ASSOCIATION¬OF¬GENES¬ACROSS¬THE¬GENOME ¬AND¬HAPLOTYPES¬.EXT¬THE¬ORIGINAL¬ REGION¬IS¬NARROWED¬AND¬THE¬DISEASE¬GENE¬IS¬IDENTIl¬ED¬&OR¬MULTIFACTORIAL¬DISEASES¬LIKE¬2!¬ THE¬POWER¬TO¬DETECT¬A¬RISK¬GENE¬FOR¬A¬COMMON¬DISEASE¬WITH¬A¬RELATIVE¬RISK¬OF¬TWO¬BY¬,$ MAPPING¬NECESSITATES¬DATA¬ON¬TRANSMISSION¬IN¬¬AFFECTED¬AND¬¬NON AFFECTED¬'IVEN¬ THE¬FACT¬THAT¬THESE¬NUMBERS¬ARE¬NOT¬AVAILABLE¬THE¬CHOICE¬OF¬A¬CANDIDATE¬GENE¬HAS¬SUBJEC TIVE¬ELEMENTS¬BECAUSE¬THE¬GENES¬THAT¬ARE¬INTUITIVELY¬LOGICAL¬WILL¬BE¬TESTED¬l¬RST¬SEE¬ABOVE MENTIONED¬ EXAMPLES¬ OF¬ 0!$¬ AND¬ 4.& 2))¬ AS¬ CANDIDATE¬ GENES ¬ !¬ LESS¬ BIASED¬ APPROACH IS¬IN¬GENOME WIDE¬ASSOCIATION¬STUDIES¬0ATIENTS¬AND¬CONTROLS¬ARE¬UNRELATED¬AND¬THEREFORE. .

(87) MORE¬RECOMBINATIONS¬HAVE¬TAKEN¬PLACE

(88) ¬LEADING¬TOO¬MUCH¬SMALLER¬REGIONS¬IN¬WHICH¬NON RANDOM¬ASSOCIATION¬OF¬GENES¬IS¬PRESENT¬4HUS¬A¬POSITIVE¬RESULT¬IS¬LESS¬LIKELY¬TO¬BE¬CAUSED¬ BY¬LINKAGE¬OF¬RECOMBINING¬NEIGHBORING¬GENES¬THAT¬EXPLAIN¬THE¬OBSERVED¬LINKAGE¬PATTERN 4HE¬OBVIOUS¬CURSE¬IS¬THAT¬SELECTION¬OF¬CANDIDATE¬GENES¬IS¬BIASED¬BY¬LIMITED¬KNOWLEDGE¬!N INTERESTING¬ALTERNATIVE¬WAS¬EXPLORED¬BY¬"EGOVICH¬ET¬AL¬ ¬WHO¬TESTED¬THE¬ASSOCIATION¬OF¬ 3.0S¬WITH¬PUTATIVE¬FUNCTIONAL¬CONSEQUENCES¬IN¬DIFFERENT¬SETS¬OF¬PATIENTS¬AND¬CONTROLS¬4HIS¬ YIELDED¬A¬LARGE¬NUMBER¬OF¬PUTATIVE¬FUNCTIONAL¬POLYMORPHISMS¬DISTRIBUTED¬DIFFERENTLY¬IN¬ PATIENTS¬AND¬CONTROLS¬)N¬A¬SECOND¬SET¬OF¬¬PATIENTS¬AND¬¬CONTROLS

(89) ¬ALL¬FROM¬#AUCASIAN¬ ORIGIN

(90) ¬A¬RISK¬ALLELE¬OF¬A¬HAEMATOPOIETIC SPECIl¬C¬PROTEIN¬TYROSINE¬PHOSPHATASE

(91) ¬040.¬WAS¬ IDENTIl¬ED¬IN¬¬OF¬THE¬CONTROLS¬AND¬¬OF¬THE¬2!¬PATIENTS¬4HE¬RISK¬ALLELE¬CHANGED¬THE FUNCTION¬OF¬THE¬PROTEIN¬THAT¬FUNCTIONS¬AS¬NEGATIVE¬REGULATOR¬OF¬4 CELL¬ACTIVATION

(92) ¬LEADING¬TO¬ 4 CELLS¬WITH¬A¬LOWER¬THRESHOLD¬FOR¬4 CELL¬ACTIVATION¬4HIS¬MUTATION¬IS¬APPARENTLY¬LEADING¬TO¬ AUTOIMMUNE¬DISEASE¬IN¬GENERAL¬SINCE¬THIS¬MUTATION¬ALSO¬CONFERRED¬RISK¬FOR¬DIABETES¬IN¬BOTH¬ AN¬!MERICAN¬AND¬AN¬)TALIAN¬POPULATION¬ ¬4HESE¬DATA¬ARE¬A¬NICE¬EXAMPLE¬OF¬THE¬POWER¬OF¬ THE¬TECHNIQUE¬OF¬WHOLE¬GENOME¬3.0¬SCANNING¬BUT¬ALSO¬EMPHASIZE¬THE¬POWER¬OF¬REPLICATION TO¬DIMINISH¬THE¬NUMBER¬OF¬FALSE¬POSITIVES¬ ¬!LTHOUGH¬THIS¬APPROACH¬HAS¬CONSIDERABLE¬ POWER¬TO¬DETECT¬RISK¬GENES

(93) ¬REAL POSITIVES¬MAY¬BE¬FALSELY¬EXCLUDED¬IF¬RISK¬IS¬ONLY¬CONFERRED¬ #HAPTER¬. IN¬THE¬CONTEXT¬OF¬GENE GENE¬INTERACTIONS¬SUCH¬AS¬THE¬25.8¬PATHWAY¬GENES¬. . 0ROGRESS¬FROM¬OTHER¬CANDIDATE¬GENES¬THAT¬WERE¬SELECTED¬BY¬PRESUMED¬IMPORTANCE¬IS¬STILL PRELIMINARY¬/N¬THE¬TELOMERIC¬PORTION¬OF¬THE¬(,!¬REGION¬IS¬A¬GENE¬LOCATED¬WHICH¬IS¬CALLED hINHIBITOR¬OF¬.& KAPPA¬" LIKE¬GENEv¬OR¬) KAPPA ",¬)N¬SPITE¬OF¬INITIAL¬REPORTS¬OF¬A¬POSITIVE¬ ASSOCIATION¬OF¬A¬3.0¬LOCATED¬AT¬n

(94) ¬A¬LARGE¬3PANISH¬STUDY¬IN¬TWO¬COHORTS¬FAILED¬TO¬DETECT ANY¬ASSOCIATION¬  (APLOTYPES¬AS¬DEl¬NED¬BY¬MICROSATELLITES¬THE¬),2 #!¬REPEAT ¬OF¬THE¬),¬GENE¬HAS¬BEEN¬ PREVIOUSLY¬ASSOCIATED¬WITH¬2!¬IN¬SEVERAL¬ETHNIC¬POPULATIONS¬WITH¬SEVERE¬2!¬ ¬5SING¬A 3.0¬n!'¬THAT¬TAGS¬THIS¬HAPLOTYPE

(95) ¬,ARD¬ET¬AL¬WERE¬NOT¬ABLE¬TO¬l¬ND¬THIS¬ASSOCIATION¬IN¬ INCIDENT¬CASES¬OF¬2!

(96) ¬BUT¬OBSERVED¬THAT¬THIS¬HAPLOTYPE¬WAS¬ASSOCIATED¬WITH¬HIGHER¬RATES OF¬JOINT¬DESTRUCTION¬IN¬A¬COHORT FOLLOWED¬OVERTIME¬AS¬WELL¬AS¬WITH¬HIGHER¬TITERS¬OF¬AUTOAN TIBODIES¬ ¬2ECENT¬DATA¬INDICATE¬THE¬IMPORTANCE¬OF¬),¬PROMOTER¬HAPLOTYPES¬FOR¬THE OUTCOME¬ OF¬ TRANSPLANTATION¬ INDICATING¬ IT¬ RELEVANCE¬ FOR¬ IMMUNE MEDIATED¬ DISEASES¬   -OREOVER¬IT¬HAS¬BEEN¬DEMONSTRATED¬BY¬A¬ROBUST¬ASSAY¬THAT¬HAPLOTYPES¬OF¬THE¬),¬CAN¬BE¬ TRANSCRIBED¬ AT¬ A¬ DIFFERENT¬ RATE¬ IMPLYING¬ A¬ BIOLOGICAL¬ BASIS¬ FOR¬ THE¬ OBSERVED¬ ASSOCIATIONS¬  ¬(OWEVER

(97) ¬CURRENTLY¬THE¬RELATION¬BETWEEN¬THE¬DIFFERENT¬HAPLOTYPES¬AND¬SUSCEPTIBILITY TO¬2!¬IS¬STILL¬UNCLEAR¬&OR¬THE¬ASSOCIATION¬OF¬),¬HAPLOTYPES¬GENE GENE¬INTERACTIONS¬HAVE BEEN¬SUGGESTED¬BY¬THE¬OBSERVATION¬THAT¬THE¬ASSOCIATION¬OF¬),¬GENOTYPES¬IS¬ONLY¬PRESENT¬ IN¬FEMALE¬PATIENTS¬AND¬NOT¬IN¬MALE¬PATIENTS¬ ¬&INALLY¬),¬HAPLOTYPES¬WERE¬ASSOCIATED WITH¬TREATMENT¬RESPONSES¬TO¬4.& BLOCKING¬AGENTS¬ .

(98) 5NDERSTANDING¬THE¬GENETIC¬CONTRIBUTION¬TO¬2!. &OR¬ A¬ LARGE¬ NUMBER¬ OF¬ GENES¬ SUGGESTED¬ TO¬ BE¬ RELEVANT¬ IN¬ THE¬ PATHOPHYSIOLOGY¬ OF¬ 2! ASSOCIATION¬WAS¬OBSERVED¬IN¬ONLY¬ONE¬STUDY¬WITHOUT¬REPLICATION¬SUCH¬AS¬"ETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR¬GENE¬3.0S

(99) ¬2!.+,

(100) ¬)#!- 

(101) ¬6%'&

(102) ¬0$#$ ¬AND¬), 2!¬GENE¬OR¬DATA¬WERE¬PUB LISHED¬ OF¬ LACK¬ OF¬ ASSOCIATION¬ WITH¬ 2!¬ SUCH¬ AS¬ #4,! 

(103) ¬ ##2

(104) ¬ -ANNOSE "INDING ,ECTIN

(105) 4OLL LIKE¬RECEPTOR¬¬OR¬¬GENE¬VARIANTS¬  . 02/'2%33¬&2/-¬0(%./490)# '%./490)#¬).4%2!#4)/.3. !PART¬FROM¬THE¬RELEVANCE¬OF¬GENE GENE¬INTERACTIONS

(106) ¬PROGRESS¬HAS¬BEEN¬MADE¬WITH¬RESPECT TO¬IDENTIl¬CATION¬OF¬GENE ENVIRONMENT¬INTERACTIONS¬4HE¬RISK¬CONFERRED¬BY¬THE¬(,!¬REGION¬ HAS¬BEEN¬PUT¬IN¬A¬DIFFERENT¬PERSPECTIVE¬GIVEN¬THE¬SIGNIl¬CANT¬INTERACTION¬BETWEEN¬SMOKING¬ AND¬ PRESENCE¬ OF¬ THE¬ SHARED¬ EPITOPE¬ 3% ¬ OF¬ (,! $2¬ AS¬ RISK¬ FACTORS¬ FOR¬ SEROPOSITIVE¬ 2!

(107) BUT¬NOT¬AT¬ALL¬FOR¬SERONEGATIVE¬2!¬ ¬4HUS¬THE¬MAJOR¬GENETIC¬RISK¬FACTOR¬FOR¬2!¬IS¬ONLY¬ ACTIVE¬IN¬A¬CERTAIN¬SUBGROUP¬OF¬2!¬2&¬POSITIVE

(108) ¬AND¬THE¬MAGNITUDE¬OF¬THIS¬GENETIC¬RISK¬ FACTOR¬IS¬TO¬A¬LARGE¬EXTENT¬INm¬UENCED¬BY¬THE¬PRESENCE¬OF¬AN¬ENVIRONMENTAL¬RISK¬FACTOR¬HERE¬ SMOKING  !NOTHER¬CLEAR¬GENOTYPIC PHENOTYPIC¬ASSOCIATION¬WAS¬REPORTED¬FOR¬THE¬PRESENCE¬OF¬##0 ANTIBODIES¬AND¬3% (,!¬ALLELES¬ ¬4HIS¬HAS¬PUT¬INTO¬FUNCTIONAL¬PERSPECTIVE¬BY¬THE¬OBSER VATION¬THAT¬IMMUNITY¬TO¬CITRINULLATED¬ANTIGENS¬IS¬INm¬UENCED¬BY¬THE¬BETTER¬l¬T¬OF¬ANTIGENS AFTER¬CITRINULLATION¬IN¬THE¬(,!¬BINDING¬GROOVE¬OF¬THE¬(,! $2¬ALLELE¬ONE¬OF¬THE¬SHARED¬ EPITOPE¬ALLELES ¬ . #/.#,53)/.. 4HE¬l¬ELD¬OF¬GENETICS¬HAS¬SHOWN¬REMARKABLE¬PROGRESS¬&OR¬THE¬COMING¬YEARS¬IT¬IS¬EXPECTED¬ THAT¬THE¬TECHNICAL¬BREAKTHROUGHS¬WITH¬RESPECT¬TO¬RAPID¬AND¬MASSIVE¬GENOTYPING¬IN¬LARGE¬ COHORTS¬WILL¬LEAD¬TO¬THE¬FURTHER¬ELUCIDATION¬OF¬THE¬RISK¬GENES¬)T¬HAS¬BECOME¬CLEAR¬THAT¬REPLI CATION¬OF¬RESULTS

(109) ¬PREFERABLY¬IN¬INDEPENDENT¬COHORTS¬IS¬ESSENTIAL¬FOR¬RELIABLE¬DATA¬'IVEN¬THE¬ EXTENSIVE¬COLLABORATIONS¬THAT¬HAVE¬BEEN¬FORMED

(110) ¬THIS¬IS¬NOT¬FORESEEN¬TO¬BE¬A¬MAJOR¬PROB LEM¬4HE¬MAJOR¬CHALLENGES¬WILL¬BE¬TO¬IDENTIFY¬GENETIC¬VARIANTS¬THAT¬CONFER¬SMALL¬RISKS¬BY¬IT¬ SELVES¬BUT¬BY¬AFFECTING¬A¬PATHWAY¬BY¬A¬NUMBER¬OF¬GENETIC¬VARIANTS¬ARE¬OF¬GREAT¬RELEVANCE¬IN THE¬ELUCIDATION¬OF¬THE¬GENETIC¬CAUSES¬OF¬2!. .

(111) 2%&%2%.#%3 ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬. #HAPTER¬. ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬. . ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬. (UIZINGA¬47*¬'ENETICS¬IN¬2HEUMATOLOGY¬"EST¬0RACT¬2ES¬#LIN¬2HEUMATOL¬  ¬ -AC'REGOR¬!*

(112) ¬3NIEDER¬(

(113) ¬2IGBY¬!3

(114) ¬ET¬AL¬#HARACTERISING¬THE¬QUANTITATIVE¬GENETIC¬CONTRI BUTION¬TO¬RHEUMATOID¬ARTHRITIS¬USING¬DATA¬FROM¬TWINS¬!RTHRITIS¬2HEUM¬  /SORIO¬9

(115) ¬&ORTEA¬*

(116) ¬"UKULMEZ¬(

(117) ¬ET¬AL¬$ENSE¬GENOME WIDE¬LINKAGE¬ANALYSIS¬OF¬RHEUMATOID¬ ARTHRITIS

(118) ¬INCLUDING¬COVARIATES¬!RTHRITIS¬2HEUM¬   *OHN¬3

(119) ¬3HEPHARD¬.

(120) ¬,IU¬'

(121) ¬ET¬AL7HOLE GENOME¬SCAN

(122) ¬IN¬A¬COMPLEX¬DISEASE

(123) ¬USING¬

(124) ¬ SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE¬ POLYMORPHISMS¬ COMPARISON¬ WITH¬ MICROSATELLITES¬ !M¬ *¬ (UM¬ 'ENET    3UZUKI¬!

(125) ¬9AMADA¬2

(126) ¬#HANG¬8

(127) ¬ET¬AL¬&UNCTIONAL¬HAPLOTYPES¬OF¬0!$)

(128) ¬ENCODING¬CITRUL LINATING¬ENZYME¬PEPTIDYLARGININE¬DEIMINASE¬

(129) ¬ARE¬ASSOCIATED¬WITH¬RHEUMATOID¬ARTHRITIS¬ .AT¬'ENET¬   #APONI¬,

(130) ¬0ETIT 4EIXEIRA¬%

(131) ¬3EBBAG¬-

(132) ¬ET¬AL¬!¬FAMILY BASED¬STUDY¬SHOWS¬NO¬ASSOCIATION BETWEEN¬ RHEUMATOID¬ ARTHRITIS¬ AND¬ THE¬ 0!$)¬ GENE¬ IN¬ A¬ &RENCH¬ #AUCASIAN¬ POPULATION !NN¬2HEUM¬$IS¬ "ARTON¬!

(133) ¬"OWES¬*

(134) ¬%YRE¬3¬ET¬AL¬!¬FUNCTIONAL¬HAPLOTYPE¬OF¬THE¬0!$)¬GENE¬ASSOCIATED¬WITH¬ RHEUMATOID¬ ARTHRITIS¬ IN¬ A¬ *APANESE¬ POPULATION¬ IS¬ NOT¬ ASSOCIATED¬ IN¬ A¬ 5NITED¬ +INGDOM POPULATION¬!RTHRITIS¬2HEUM¬   (OPPE¬ "

(135) ¬ (EYMANN¬ '!

(136) ¬ 4OLOU¬ &

(137) ¬ ET¬ AL¬ !¬ (IGH¬ VARIABILITY¬ OF¬ PEPTIDYLARGININE¬ DEIMI NASE¬ ¬ 0!$) ¬ IN¬ A¬ HEALTHY¬ WHITE¬ POPULATION¬ CHARACTERIZATION¬ OF¬ SIX¬ NEW¬ VARIANTS¬ OF¬ 0!$)¬EXONS¬ ¬BY¬A¬NOVEL¬HAPLOTYPE SPECIl¬C¬SEQUENCING BASED¬APPROACH¬*¬-OL¬-ED¬   ¬ "ARTON¬!

(138) ¬*OHN¬3

(139) ¬/LLIER¬7%

(140) ¬ET¬AL¬!SSOCIATION¬BETWEEN¬RHEUMATOID¬ARTHRITIS¬AND¬POLY MORPHISM¬OF¬TUMOR¬NECROSIS¬FACTOR¬RECEPTOR¬))

(141) ¬BUT¬NOT¬TUMOR¬NECROSIS¬FACTOR¬RECEPTOR¬)

(142) IN¬#AUCASIANS¬!RTHRITIS¬2HEUM¬  $IEUDE¬0

(143) ¬0ETIT¬%

(144) ¬#AILLEAU -OINDRAULT¬3

(145) ¬ET¬AL¬!SSOCIATION¬BETWEEN¬TUMOR¬NECROSIS¬FACTOR RECEPTOR¬ ))¬ AND¬ FAMILIAL

(146) ¬ BUT¬ NOT¬ SPORADIC

(147) ¬ RHEUMATOID¬ ARTHRITIS¬ EVIDENCE¬ FOR¬ GENETIC¬ HETEROGENEITY¬!RTHRITIS¬2HEUM¬   6AN¬DER¬(ELM VAN¬-IL¬!(

(148) ¬$IEUDE¬0

(149) ¬3CHONKEREN¬**

(150) ¬ET¬AL.O¬ASSOCIATION¬BETWEEN¬TUMOUR¬ NECROSIS¬FACTOR¬RECEPTOR¬TYPE¬¬GENE¬POLYMORPHISM¬AND¬RHEUMATOID¬ARTHRITIS¬SEVERITY¬A¬ COMPARISON¬OF¬THE¬EXTREMES¬OF¬PHENOTYPES¬2HEUMATOLOGY¬   -AC'REGOR¬!¬/LLIER¬7

(151) ¬4HOMSON¬7

(152) ¬ET¬AL¬(,! $2" ¬GENOTYPE¬AND¬RHEU MATOID¬ARTHRITIS¬INCREASED¬ASSOCIATION¬IN¬MEN

(153) ¬YOUNG¬AGE¬AT¬ONSET

(154) ¬AND¬DISEASE¬SEVERITY¬ *¬2HEUMATOL¬  -ORENO¬)

(155) ¬6ALENZUELA¬!

(156) ¬'ARCIA¬!

(157) ¬ET¬AL¬!SSOCIATION¬OF¬THE¬SHARED¬EPITOPE¬WITH¬RADIOLOGI CAL¬SEVERITY¬OF¬RHEUMATOID¬ARTHRITIS¬*¬2HEUMATOL¬  +ALTENHËUSER¬3

(158) ¬7AGNER¬5

(159) ¬3CHUSTER¬%

(160) ¬ET¬AL¬)MMUNOGENETIC¬MARKERS¬AND¬SEROPOSITIV ITY¬PREDICT¬RADIOLOGICAL¬PROGRESSION¬IN¬EARLY¬RHEUMATOID¬ARTHRITIS¬INDEPENDENT¬OF¬DISEASE¬ ACTIVITY¬*¬2HEUMATOL¬  $E¬6RIES¬.

(161) ¬4IJSSEN¬(

(162) ¬VAN¬2IEL¬0,

(163) ¬VAN¬DE¬0UTTE¬,"¬2ESHAPING¬THE¬SHARED¬EPITOPE¬HY POTHESIS¬(,! ASSOCIATED¬RISK¬FOR¬RHEUMATOID¬ARTHRITIS¬IS¬ENCODED¬BY¬AMINO¬ACID¬SUBSTITU TIONS¬AT¬POSITION¬ ¬OF¬THE¬(,! $2"¬MOLECULE¬!RTHRITIS¬2HEUM¬  7ILKENS¬2&

(164) ¬.EPOM¬'4

(165) ¬-ARKS¬#2

(166) ¬ET¬AL¬!SSOCIATION¬OF¬(,! $W¬WITH¬RHEUMATOID¬AR THRITIS¬IN¬9AKIMA¬)NDIANS¬&URTHER¬EVIDENCE¬FOR¬THE¬hSHARED¬EPITOPEv¬HYPOTHESIS¬!RTHRITIS¬ 2HEUM¬  /LLIER¬7%

(167) ¬3TEPHENS¬#

(168) ¬!WAD¬*

(169) ¬ET¬AL¬)S¬RHEUMATOID¬ARTHRITIS¬IN¬)NDIANS¬ASSOCIATED¬WITH¬ (,!¬ANTIGENS¬SHARING¬A¬$2¬BETA¬¬EPITOPE¬!NN¬2HEUM¬$IS¬ .

(170) 5NDERSTANDING¬THE¬GENETIC¬CONTRIBUTION¬TO¬2!. ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬. /LLIER¬ 7

(171) ¬ 4HOMSON¬ 7¬ 0OPULATION¬ GENETICS¬ OF¬ RHEUMATOID¬ ARTHRITIS¬ 2HEUM¬ $IS¬ #LIN¬ .ORTH¬!M¬  'ORMAN¬*$

(172) ¬,UM¬2&

(173) ¬#HEN¬**

(174) ¬ET¬AL¬)MPACT¬OF¬SHARED¬EPITOPE¬GENOTYPE¬AND¬ETHNICITY¬ON¬ EROSIVE¬DISEASE¬A¬META ANALYSIS¬OF¬

(175) ¬RHEUMATOID¬ARTHRITIS¬PATIENTS¬!RTHRITIS¬2HEUM    7EYAND¬#-

(176) ¬8IE¬#

(177) ¬'ORONZY¬**¬(OMOZYGOSITY¬FOR¬THE¬(,! $2"¬ALLELE¬SELECTS¬FOR¬EX TRAARTICULAR¬MANIFESTATIONS¬IN¬RHEUMATOID¬ARTHRITIS¬*¬#LIN¬)NVEST¬   'ORMAN¬ *$

(178) ¬ $AVID 6AUDEY¬ %

(179) ¬ 0AI¬ -

(180) ¬ ET¬ AL¬ 0ARTICULAR¬ (,! $2"¬ SHARED¬ EPITOPE¬ GENO TYPES¬ARE¬STRONGLY¬ASSOCIATED¬WITH¬RHEUMATOID¬VASCULITIS¬!RTHRITIS¬2HEUM¬    'ONZALEZ 'AY¬-!

(181) ¬.ABOZNY¬'(

(182) ¬"ULL¬-*

(183) ¬ET¬AL¬0ROTECTIVE¬ROLE¬OF¬MAJOR¬HISTOCOMPAT IBILITY¬COMPLEX¬CLASS¬))¬%BD¬TRANSGENE¬ON¬COLLAGEN¬INDUCED¬ARTHRITIS¬*¬%XP¬-ED¬   :ANELLI¬ %

(184) ¬ 'ONZALEZ 'AY¬ -!

(185) ¬ $AVID¬ #3¬ #OULD¬ (,! $2"¬ BE¬ THE¬ PROTECTIVE¬ LOCUS¬ IN RHEUMATOID¬ARTHRITIS¬)MMUNOL¬4ODAY¬  6AN¬DER¬(ORST "RUINSMA¬)%

(186) ¬6ISSER¬*

(187) ¬(AZES¬*-

(188) ¬ET¬AL¬(,! $1 ASSOCIATED¬PREDISPOSITION TO¬AND¬DOMINANT¬(,! $2 ASSOCIATED¬PROTECTION¬AGAINST¬RHEUMATOID¬ARTHRITIS¬(UM¬)M MUNOL¬  6OS¬+

(189) ¬6AN¬DER¬(ORST "RUINSMA¬)%

(190) ¬(AZES¬*-7

(191) ¬ET¬AL¬%VIDENCE¬FOR¬A¬PROTECTIVE¬ROLE¬OF¬THE¬ HUMAN¬ LEUCOCYTE¬ ANTIGEN¬ CLASS¬ ))¬ REGION¬ IN¬ EARLY¬ RHEUMATOID¬ ARTHRITIS¬ 2HEUMATOLOGY   3EIDL¬#

(192) ¬+ÚRBIZER¬*

(193) ¬"ADENHOOP¬+

(194) ¬ET¬AL¬0ROTECTION¬AGAINST¬SEVERE¬DISEASE¬IS¬CONFERRED¬BY¬ $%2!! BEARING¬(,! $2"¬ALLELES¬AMONG¬(,! $1¬AND¬(,! $1¬POSITIVE¬RHEUMATOID¬ ARTHRITIS¬PATIENTS¬(UM¬)MMUNOL¬  6OS¬ +

(195) ¬ 6ISSER¬ (

(196) ¬ 3CHREUDER¬ '-4H

(197) ¬ ET¬ AL¬ (UMAN¬ LEUCOCYTE¬ ANTIGEN $1¬ AND¬ $2¬ POLY MORPHISM¬PREDICT¬RHEUMATOID¬ARTHRITIS¬OUTCOME¬BETTER¬THAN¬$2¬ALONE¬(UM¬)MMUNOL¬   7AGNER¬ 5

(198) ¬ +ALTENHËUSER¬ 3

(199) ¬ 0IERER¬ -

(200) ¬ ET¬ AL¬ 0ROSPECTIVE¬ ANALYSIS¬ OF¬ THE¬ IMPACT¬ OF¬ (,! $2¬AND¬n$1¬ON¬JOINT¬DESTRUCTION¬IN¬RECENT ONSET¬RHEUMATOID¬ARTHRITIS¬2HEUMATOLOGY   ,EE¬*+

(201) ¬0ARK¬#

(202) ¬+IMM¬+

(203) ¬2UTHERFORD¬-3¬'ENOME WIDE¬MULTILOCUS¬ANALYSIS¬FOR¬IMMUNE MEDIATED¬COMPLEX¬DISEASES¬"IOCHEM¬"IOPHYS¬2ES¬#OMMUN¬¬  4OKUHIRO¬ 3

(204) ¬ 9AMADA¬ 2

(205) ¬ #HANG¬ 8

(206) ¬ ET¬ AL¬ !N¬ INTRONIC¬ 3.0¬ IN¬ A¬ 25.8¬ BINDING¬ SITE¬ OF¬ 3,#!

(207) ¬ENCODING¬AN¬ORGANIC¬CATION¬TRANSPORTER

(208) ¬IS¬ASSOCIATED¬WITH¬RHEUMATOID¬ARTHRI TIS¬.AT¬'ENET¬   "EGOVICH¬!"

(209) ¬#ARLTON¬6%

(210) ¬(ONIGBERG¬,!

(211) ¬ET¬AL¬!¬-ISSENSE¬3INGLE .UCLEOTIDE¬0OLYMOR PHISM¬IN¬A¬'ENE¬%NCODING¬A¬0ROTEIN¬4YROSINE¬0HOSPHATASE¬040. ¬)S¬!SSOCIATED¬WITH¬ 2HEUMATOID¬!RTHRITIS¬!M¬*¬(UM¬'ENET¬   "OTTINI¬.

(212) ¬-USUMECI¬,

(213) ¬!LONSO¬!

(214) ¬ET¬AL¬!¬FUNCTIONAL¬VARIANT¬OF¬LYMPHOID¬TYROSINE¬PHOS PHATASE¬IS¬ASSOCIATED¬WITH¬TYPE¬)¬DIABETES¬.AT¬'ENET¬   (UIZINGA¬47

(215) ¬0ISETSKY¬$3

(216) ¬+IMBERLY¬20¬!SSOCIATIONS

(217) ¬POPULATIONS

(218) ¬AND¬THE¬TRUTH¬RECOM MENDATIONS¬FOR¬GENETIC¬ASSOCIATION¬STUDIES¬IN¬!RTHRITIS¬¬2HEUMATISM¬!RTHRITIS¬2HEUM¬   ¬ #OLLADO¬,

(219) ¬2UEDA¬"

(220) ¬#ALIZ¬2

(221) ¬ET¬AL¬,ACK¬OF¬ASSOCIATION¬BETWEEN¬THE¬)¬KAPPA¬",¬PROMOTER POLYMORPHISM¬AND¬RHEUMATOID¬ARTHRITIS¬!RTHRITIS¬2HEUM¬   %SKDALE¬*

(222) ¬-C.ICHOLL¬*

(223) ¬7ORDSWORTH¬0

(224) ¬ET¬AL¬)NTERLEUKIN ¬MICROSATELLITE¬POLYMORPHISMS¬ AND¬), ¬LOCUS¬ALLELES¬IN¬RHEUMATOID¬ARTHRITIS¬SUSCEPTIBILITY¬,ANCET¬  . .

(225) ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬. #HAPTER¬. ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬. . ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬. ¬ ¬. ,ARD¬,2

(226) ¬6AN¬'AALEN¬&

(227) ¬3CHONKEREN¬*

(228) ¬ET¬AL¬4HE¬n!'¬)L¬PROMOTER¬POLYMORPHISM¬IS ASSOCIATED¬WITH¬AUTOANTIBODY¬PRODUCTION¬AND¬JOINT¬DESTRUCTION¬IN¬2!¬!RTHRITIS¬2HEUM¬    ,IN¬-4

(229) ¬3TORER¬"

(230) ¬-ARTIN¬0*

(231) ¬ET¬AL¬2ELATION¬OF¬AN¬INTERLEUKIN ¬PROMOTER¬POLYMORPHISM¬ TO¬GRAFT VERSUS HOST¬DISEASE¬AND¬SURVIVAL¬AFTER¬HEMATOPOIETIC CELL¬TRANSPLANTATION¬.¬%NGL *¬-ED¬   +URREEMAN¬&!

(232) ¬3CHONKEREN¬**

(233) ¬(EIJMANS¬"4

(234) ¬ET¬AL¬4RANSCRIPTION¬OF¬THE¬),¬GENE¬REVEALS¬ ALLELE¬SPECIl¬C¬REGULATION¬AT¬THE¬M2.!¬LEVEL¬(UM¬-OL¬'ENET¬  ¬ 0ADYUKOV¬,

(235) ¬(YTONEN¬!-

(236) ¬3MOLNIKOVA¬-

(237) ¬ET¬AL¬0OLYMORPHISM¬IN¬PROMOTER¬REGION¬OF¬ ),¬GENE¬IS¬ASSOCIATED¬WITH¬RHEUMATOID¬ARTHRITIS¬IN¬WOMEN¬*¬2HEUMATOL¬ ¬   3CHOTTE¬(

(238) ¬3CHLUTER¬"

(239) ¬$RYNDA¬3

(240) ¬ET¬AL¬)NTERLEUKIN ¬PROMOTER¬MICROSATELLITE¬POLYMOR PHISMS¬ARE¬ASSOCIATED¬WITH¬RESPONSE¬TO¬LONG¬TERM¬TREATMENT¬WITH¬ETANERCEPT¬IN¬PATIENTS¬ WITH¬RHEUMATOID¬ARTHRITIS¬!NN¬2HEUM¬$IS¬¬3EP¬ 0ROKUNINA¬,

(241) ¬0ADYUKOV¬,

(242) ¬"ENNET¬!

(243) ¬ET¬AL¬!SSOCIATION¬OF¬THE¬0$ !¬ALLELE¬OF¬THE¬0$#$ GENE¬IN¬PATIENTS¬WITH¬RHEUMATOID¬ARTHRITIS¬NEGATIVE¬FOR¬RHEUMATOID¬FACTOR¬AND¬THE¬SHARED¬ EPITOPE¬!RTHRITIS¬2HEUM¬   "ARTON¬!

(244) ¬*URY¬&

(245) ¬%YRE¬3

(246) ¬ET¬AL¬(APLOTYPE¬ANALYSIS¬IN¬SIMPLEX¬FAMILIES¬AND¬NOVEL¬ANALYTIC APPROACHES¬ IN¬ A¬ CASE CONTROL¬ COHORT¬ REVEAL¬ NO¬ EVIDENCE¬ OF¬ ASSOCIATION¬ OF¬ THE¬ #4,!  GENE¬WITH¬RHEUMATOID¬ARTHRITIS¬!RTHRITIS¬2HEUM¬   8U¬"

(247) ¬!RLEHAG¬,

(248) ¬2ANTAPAA¬$AHLQVIST¬3

(249) ¬,EFVERT¬!+¬"ETA ADRENERGIC¬RECEPTOR¬GENE¬3.0S¬ ARE¬ASSOCIATED¬WITH¬RHEUMATOID¬ARTHRITIS¬IN¬.ORTHERN¬3WEDEN¬!NN¬2HEUM¬$IS¬¬/CT  7U¬(

(250) ¬+HANNA¬$

(251) ¬0ARK¬'

(252) ¬ET¬AL¬)NTERACTION¬BETWEEN¬2!.+,¬AND¬(,! $2"¬GENOTYPES MAY¬CONTRIBUTE¬TO¬YOUNGER¬AGE¬AT¬ONSET¬OF¬SEROPOSITIVE¬RHEUMATOID¬ARTHRITIS¬IN¬AN¬INCEP TION¬COHORT¬!RTHRITIS¬2HEUM¬   ,EE¬%"

(253) ¬+IM¬*9

(254) ¬+IM¬%(

(255) ¬ET¬AL¬)NTERCELLULAR¬ADHESION¬MOLECULE ¬POLYMORPHISMS¬IN¬+O REAN¬PATIENTS¬WITH¬RHEUMATOID¬ARTHRITIS¬4ISSUE¬!NTIGENS¬   0OKORNY¬6

(256) ¬-C1UEEN¬&

(257) ¬9EOMAN¬3

(258) ¬ET¬AL¬%VIDENCE¬FOR¬NEGATIVE¬ASSOCIATION¬OF¬THE¬CHEMO KINE¬RECEPTOR¬##2¬D¬POLYMORPHISM¬WITH¬RHEUMATOID¬ARTHRITIS¬!NN¬2HEUM¬$IS¬¬ !UG¬ (AN¬37

(259) ¬+IM¬'7

(260) ¬3EO¬*3

(261) ¬ET¬AL¬6%'&¬GENE¬POLYMORPHISMS¬AND¬SUSCEPTIBILITY¬TO¬RHEUMA TOID¬ARTHRITIS¬2HEUMATOLOGY¬  ¬ "ARTON¬!

(262) ¬0LATT¬(

(263) ¬3ALWAY¬&

(264) ¬ET¬AL¬0OLYMORPHISMS¬IN¬THE¬MANNOSE¬BINDING¬LECTIN¬-", ¬ GENE¬ARE¬NOT¬ASSOCIATED¬WITH¬RADIOGRAPHIC¬EROSIONS¬IN¬RHEUMATOID¬OR¬INm¬AMMATORY¬POLY ARTHRITIS¬*¬2HEUMATOL¬   ,EE¬9(

(265) ¬+IM¬(*

(266) ¬2HO¬9(

(267) ¬ET¬AL¬)NTERLEUKIN ¬RECEPTOR¬ANTAGONIST¬GENE¬POLYMORPHISM AND¬RHEUMATOID¬ARTHRITIS¬2HEUMATOL¬)NT¬   3ANCHEZ¬%

(268) ¬/ROZCO¬'

(269) ¬,OPEZ .EVOT¬-!

(270) ¬ET¬AL¬0OLYMORPHISMS¬OF¬TOLL LIKE¬RECEPTOR¬¬AND¬ ¬ GENES¬ IN¬ RHEUMATOID¬ ARTHRITIS¬ AND¬ SYSTEMIC¬ LUPUS¬ ERYTHEMATOSUS¬ 4ISSUE¬ !NTIGENS    0ADYUKOV¬ ,

(271) ¬ 3ILVA¬ #

(272) ¬ 3TOLT¬ 0

(273) ¬ ET¬ AL¬ !¬ GENE ENVIRONMENT¬ INTERACTION¬ BETWEEN¬ SMOKING AND¬ SHARED¬ EPITOPE¬ GENES¬ IN¬ (,! $2¬ PROVIDES¬ A¬ HIGH¬ RISK¬ OF¬ SEROPOSITIVE¬ RHEUMATOID¬ ARTHRITIS¬!RTHRITIS¬2HEUM¬   6AN¬'AALEN¬&!

(274) ¬VAN¬!KEN¬*

(275) ¬(UIZINGA¬47

(276) ¬ET¬AL¬!SSOCIATION¬BETWEEN¬(,!¬CLASS¬))¬GENES¬ AND¬ AUTOANTIBODIES¬ TO¬ CYCLIC¬ CITRULLINATED¬ PEPTIDES¬ ##0S ¬ INm¬UENCES¬ THE¬ SEVERITY¬ OF¬ RHEUMATOID¬ARTHRITIS¬!RTHRITIS¬2HEUM¬   (ILL¬*!

(277) ¬3OUTHWOOD¬3

(278) ¬3ETTE¬!

(279) ¬ET¬AL¬#UTTING¬EDGE¬THE¬CONVERSION¬OF¬ARGININE¬TO¬CITRULLINE ALLOWS¬ FOR¬ A¬ HIGH AFl¬NITY¬ PEPTIDE¬ INTERACTION¬ WITH¬ THE¬ RHEUMATOID¬ ARTHRITIS ASSOCIATED (,! $2" ¬-(#¬CLASS¬))¬MOLECULE¬*¬)MMUNOL¬  .

(280)

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

$2"¬ TYPING¬ WAS¬ PERFORMED¬ IN¬ ¬ 2!¬ PATIENTS¬ FROM¬ THE¬ ,EIDEN¬ %ARLY¬ !RTHRITIS¬ #LINIC¬ THE¬ ,EIDEN¬ %!#¬ A¬ $UTCH¬ POPULATION BASED¬ INCEPTION¬ COHORT¬

$2¬IS¬ASSOCIATED¬WITH¬ANTI ##0 NEGATIVE¬ARTHRITIS¬AND¬NOT¬WITH¬ANTI ##0 POSITIVE¬ ARTHRITIS¬ 4HESE¬ DATA¬ SHOW¬ THAT¬ DISTINCT¬ GENETIC¬ RISK¬ FACTORS¬ ARE¬

¬BUT¬ STRATIl¬CATION¬ REVEALED¬ THAT¬ THE¬ INTERACTION¬ PRIMARILY¬ ASSOCIATES¬ WITH¬ THE¬ ANTI ##0¬

¬IT¬WAS¬OBSERVED¬BY¬TWO¬DIFFERENT¬ METHODS¬ LINKAGE¬ AND¬ ASSOCIATION¬ ANALYSIS ¬ THAT¬ THE¬ 3% ALLELES¬ ARE¬ ONLY¬ A¬ RISK¬ FACTOR¬ FOR¬ 2!¬ THAT¬ IS¬

WERE¬ PROMPTLY¬ TREATED¬ WITH¬ EITHER¬ METHOTREXATE¬ OR¬ SALAZOPYRINE¬ EARLY¬ TREATMENT ¬ 4HE¬

DIFFERENT¬ SAMPLES¬ WERE¬ OBTAINED¬ FROM¬ TWO¬ DIFFERENT¬ JOINTS¬ 4HE¬ DIFFERENCES¬ IN¬ INVASIVE NESS¬ WITHIN¬ THE¬ DIFFERENT¬ SAMPLES¬ OF¬ INDIVIDUAL¬ PATIENTS¬

)N¬CONCLUSION ¬THE¬PRESENT¬STUDY¬OBSERVED¬AFTER¬CORRECTION¬FOR¬DIFFERENCES¬IN¬DISEASE¬DURA TION¬ AND¬ AUTOANTIBODY¬ STATUS¬ AN¬ INCREASE¬ IN¬ VARIATION¬

MODELS¬ THAT¬ TAKE¬ INTO¬ ACCOUNT¬ BOTH¬ GENETIC¬ AND¬ CLINICAL¬ CHARACTERISTICS¬ WILL¬ HAVE¬ TO¬ BE EVALUATED¬ IN¬ PATIENT¬ GROUPS¬ WITH¬ UNDIFFERENTIATED¬