Jurisdiction Entries

Jurisdiction Entries

Long note forms

1. Federal case, with a Supreme Court case in running text in the footnote using \runcite

2. Database case

3. Lower federal-court case (with Supreme Court action)

4. State case with 2 reporters

5. Canadian case

6. UK case with round brackets

7. UK case with square brackets

Short note forms

8. Federal case

9. Database case

10. Lower federal-court case

11. The same, to show ibidem handling

12. State case with 2 reporters

13. Canadian case

14. UK case with round brackets

15. UK case with square brackets

Legislation Entries

Long note forms

16. Congressional bill

17. Congressional public law

18. Congressional debate post 1873

19. Congressional debate in Congressional Globe

20. Congressional report

1. United States v. Christmas, 222 F.3d 141, 145 (4th Cir. 2000). The court also noted that under United States

v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1, 7 (1989), police may briefly detain a person without probable cause if the officer believes

criminal activity “may be afoot.”Christmas, 222 F.3d at 143.

2. Horn v. Pub. Water Supply Dist. No. 8, No. WD 63889, 2005 WL 119835 (Mo. Ct. App. Jan. 21, 2005). 3. City of Las Vegas v. Walsh, 124 P.3d 203 (Nev. 2005), cert. denied, 547 U.S. 1071 (2006).

4. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc., 32 N.J. 358, 161 A.2d 69 (1960). 5. Robertson v. Thomson Corp., [2006] 2 S.C.R. 363 (Can.).

6. R v. Dudley and Stephens, (1884) 14 Q.B.D. 273 (D.C.).

7. Regal (Hastings) Ltd. v. Gulliver and Ors, [1967] 2 A.C. 134 (H.L.) (Eng.). 8.Christmas, 222 F.3d at 145. 9.Horn, 2005 WL 119835, at *3. 10.Walsh, 124 P.3d at 215. 11.Id.at 212. 12.Henningsen, 32 N.J. 358. 13.Robertson, 2 S.C.R. 363.

14.Dudley and Stephens, 14 Q.B.D. 273. 15.Regal (Hastings) Ltd., 2 A.C. 134.

16. Homeland Security Act of 2002, H.R. 5005, 107th Cong. (2002).

17. Homeland Security Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-296, § 2, 116 Stat. 2135 (2002). 18. 148 Cong. Rec. S10,491 (daily ed. Oct. 16, 2002) (statement of Sen. Dodd). 19. Cong. Globe, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. 39 (1866).

20. Select Comm. on Homeland Security, Homeland Security Act of 2002, H.R. Rep. No. 107-609, pt. 1 (2002).

21. Congressional hearing

22. Executive proclamation

23. State statute from database

24. State statute

25. Federal constitution

26. State constitution

27. Canadian statute

28. UK statute before 1963

29. UK statute since 1963

30. UK parliamentary debate

31. UK command paper

32. UN resolution

Short note forms

33. Congressional bill

34. Congressional public law

35. Congressional debate post 1873

36. Congressional debate in Congressional Globe

37. Congressional report

38. Congressional hearing

39. Executive proclamation

40. State statute from database

41. State statute

42. Federal constitution

43. State constitution

44. Canadian statute

21. Homeland Security Act of 2002: Hearings on H.R. 5005, Day 3, Before the Select Comm. on Homeland Security, 107th Cong. 203 (2002) [hereinafter Hearings on H.R. 5005] (statement of David Walker, Comptroller General of the United States).

22. Proclamation No. 8214, 73 Fed. Reg. 1439 (Jan. 8, 2008).

23. An Act Guaranteeing Governmental Independence, Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 520.020 (LexisNexis 1985) (passed Jan. 3, 1974).

24. S. Res. 20, 37th Leg., 2d Sess. (Okla. 1979). 25. U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 2.

26. Ark. Const. of 1868, art. III, § 2 (superseded 1874).

27. Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, R.S.C., c. C-36, s. 5 (1985) (Can.). 28. Act of Settlement, 1701, 12 & 13 Will. 3, c. 2.

29. Manchester Corporation Act, 1967, c. xl (Eng.). 30. 407 Parl. Deb. H.C. (5th ser.) (1944–45) cols. 425–46.

31. HM Treasury, The Basle Facility and the Sterling Area, 1968, Cmnd. 3787.

32. S.C. Res. 7, The Spanish Question, ¶ 4(a) (June 26, 1946),http://www.un.org/documents/sc/res/1946/ scres46.htm.

33.H.R. 5005.

34. § 2, 116 Stat. 2135. 35. 148 Cong. Rec. S10,491.

36. Cong. Globe, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. 39. 37.H.R. Rep.No. 107-609, pt. 1.

38.Hearings on H.R. 5005, supra note21. 39. 73 Fed. Reg. 1439.

40. Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 520.020. 41. Okla.S. Res. 20.

42. U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 2. 43. Ark. Const. of 1868, art. III, § 2. 44. R.S.C., c. C-36, s. 5.

45. UK statute before 1963

46. UK statute since 1963

47. UK parliamentary debate

48. UK command paper

49. UN resolution

Legal Entry

50. Treaty, long form

51. Treaty, short form

Abbreviations

Hearings on H.R. 5005

Homeland Security Act of 2002.

Treaty

Treaty Banning Nuclear Weapon Tests in the Atmosphere, in Outer

Space and Under Water.

Legal Authority Shorthands

(U.S. unless noted.)

A.C.

Appeal Cases (UK).

Cong.

Congress.

Cong. Globe

Congressional Globe.

Cong. Rec.

Congressional Record.

F.

Federal Reporter.

Fed. Reg.

Federal Register.

Q.B.D.

Queen’s Bench Division (UK).

R.S.C.

Revised Statutes of Canada.

S.C.R.

Supreme Court Reports (Canada).

Stat.

United States Statutes at Large.

U.S.

United States Supreme Court Reports.

WL

Westlaw.

References

The editors of the Columbia Law Review, the Harvard Law Review, the University of

Penn-sylvania Law Review, and the Yale Law Journal, comps. The Bluebook: A Uniform System of

Citation. 20th ed. Cambridge, MA: The Harvard Law Review Association, 2015.

45.Act of Settlement, c. 2.

46.Manchester Corporation Act, c. xl. 47. 407 Parl. Deb. H.C. (5th ser.) cols. 425–46. 48. Cmnd. 3787, at 15–16.

49.The Spanish Question, supra note32, ¶ 4(a).

50. Treaty Banning Nuclear Weapon Tests in the Atmosphere, in Outer Space and Under Water, U.S.-U.K.-U.S.S.R., Aug. 5, 1963, 14 U.S.T. 1313, at 45 [hereinafter Treaty].