METRICS AND GOVERNANCE :
WAT IS DE IMPACT VAN OPEN SCIENCE OP DE
FUNDING, RANKINGS, INTEGRITEIT EN PROBLEMEN VAN DE HUIDIGE WETENSCHAP?
Karen Vandevelde – Senior Policy Advisor Research 8 November 2017
GHENT UNIVERSITY – RESEARCH DEPARTMENT
WIE BEN IK ?
Beleidsadviseur onderzoek @ Ghent University Gepassioneerd door interessant onderzoek & interessante carrières
Lid van diverse werkgroepen zoals:
EC-SGHRM “Open Science Rewards”
EC-SGHRM “Open, Transparent, Merit-Based Recruitment”
Ambassadeur voor EC’s “HR Excellence Strategy for Researchers”
ECOOM-UGent beleidsadviseur
OPEN SCIENCE IS GEMAKKELIJK !
Open Science is niets nieuws.
Iedereen voelt wel ergens een affiniteit met Open Science.
Vele onderzoekers brengen Open Science al in de praktijk (maar noemen het misschien niet zo).
OPEN SCIENCE IS MOEILIJK EN COMPLEX !
Fecher B., Friesike S.
(2014) Open Science:
One Term, Five Schools of Thought. In: Bartling S., Friesike S. (eds)
Opening Science.
Springer, Cham
Tweet tip van
@protohedgehog
(Jon Tennant)
DUS… HOE GAAN WE NU VERDER?
Vele onderzoekers, beleidsmakers, evaluatoren, bibliothecarissen hebben een affiniteit met Open Science, maar iedereen hecht zijn eigen prioriteit aan de invulling van dit concept. Dus …
Veranderingsmanagement
Verwachtingsmanagement
Sensibili- sering
Training &
opleiding Promotie
&
erkenning
EVALUATIES – INCENTIVES – PROMOTIE - ERKENNING
Waarom vond de EC een rapport rond
“Open Science Rewards” nodig?
Zolang onderzoekers niet erkend worden voor hun Open Science perspectief of activiteiten, zal Open Science de uitzondering blijven in de plaats van de regel.
Change minds
Change practices
Mogelijke Open Science criteria
Geen “toevoegingen”
maar:
Transversale implementatie
2 strategieën:
- Beloning - Straf
Research Output
Research Process
Service and Leadership Research
Impact Teaching
and
Supervision
Professional Experience
EVALUATIES – INCENTIVES – PROMOTIE -
ERKENNING
Possible Open Science Criteria Research output
Research activity Pushing forward the boundaries of open science as a research topic
Publications Publishing in open access journals
Self-archiving in open access repositories Datasets and research
results
Using the FAIR data principles
Adopting quality standards in open data management and open datasets
Making use of open data from other researchers Open source Using open source software and other open tools
Developing new software and tools that are open to other users
EC RAPPORT: EVALUATION OF RESEARCH
CAREERS IN OS CONTEXT
Research process Stakeholder
engagement / citizen science
Actively engaging society and research users in the research process
Sharing provisional research results with stakeholders through open platforms (e.g. Arxiv, Figshare)
Involving stakeholders in peer review processes
Collaboration and Interdisciplinarity
Widening participation in research through open collaborative projects
Engaging in team science through diverse cross-disciplinary teams
Research integrity Being aware of the ethical and legal issues relating to data
sharing, confidentiality, attribution and environmental impact of open science activities
Fully recognising the contribution of others in research projects,
EC RAPPORT: EVALUATION OF RESEARCH
CAREERS IN OS CONTEXT
Service and leadership
Leadership Developing a vision and strategy on how to integrate OS practices in the normal practice of doing research
Driving policy and practice in open science Being a role model in practicing open science
Academic standing Developing an international or national profile for open science activities
Contributing as editor or advisor for open science journals or bodies
Peer review Contributing to open peer review processes Examining or assessing open research
Networking Participating in national and international networks relating to
EC RAPPORT: EVALUATION OF RESEARCH
CAREERS IN OS CONTEXT
Research impact
Communication and Dissemination
Participating in public engagement activities
Sharing research results through non-academic dissemination channels
Translating research into a language suitable for public understanding
IP (patents, licenses) Being knowledgeable on the legal and ethical issues relating to IPR
Transferring IP to the wider economy
Societal impact Evidence of use of research by societal groups
Recognition from societal groups or for societal activities
Knowledge exchange Engaging in open innovation with partners beyond academia
EC RAPPORT: EVALUATION OF RESEARCH
CAREERS IN OS CONTEXT
Teaching and supervision
Teaching Training other researchers in open science principles and methods
Developing curricula and programmes in open science methods, including open science data management
Raising awareness and understanding in open science in undergraduate and masters programmes
Mentoring Mentoring and encouraging others in developing their open science capabilities
Supervision Supporting early stage researchers to adopt an open science approach
EC RAPPORT: EVALUATION OF RESEARCH
CAREERS IN OS CONTEXT
Professional experience Continuing
professional development
Investing in own professional development to build open science capabilities
Project management Successfully delivering open science projects involving diverse research teams
Personal qualities Demonstrating the personal qualities to engage society and research users with open science
Showing the flexibility and perseverance to respond to the challenges of conducting open science
EC RAPPORT: EVALUATION OF RESEARCH
CAREERS IN OS CONTEXT
Karen Vandevelde
Senior Policy Advisor Research RESEARCH DEPARTMENT
E Karen.Vandevelde@ugent.be T +32 9 264 95 04
www.ugent.be/en/research
Ghent University
@KarenVandevelde
www.linkedin.com/in/karenvandevelde
