University of Groningen
The alternative war on drugs
Bruijn, Michelle
DOI:
10.33612/diss.168718831
IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from
it. Please check the document version below.
Document Version
Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record
Publication date:
2021
Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database
Citation for published version (APA):
Bruijn, M. (2021). The alternative war on drugs: drug evictions, cannabis regulation and the legal
consequences of adapting to the limitations of criminal law in the field of drug control. University of
Groningen. https://doi.org/10.33612/diss.168718831
Copyright
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).
Take-down policy
If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.
Abend, G. (2008). The meaning of theory. Sociological Theory, 26(2), 173-199.
Adam, C., Hurka, S., & Knill, C. (2017). Four styles of regulation and their implications for comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 19(4), 327-344. Adams, L. H. J. (2011). Wat de rechtsvergelijking vermag: Over onderzoeksdesign. Ars Aequi, 60(3),
192-201.
Adviescommissie Experiment Gesloten Cannabisketen. (2018). Een experiment met een gesloten cannabisketen. Retrieved from https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/rapporten/2018/06/20/een-experiment-met-een-gesloten-cannabisketen.
Aedes. (2017). Coroporatiemonitor: huisuitzettingen en huurachterstanden 12 april 2016. Retrieved from https://www.aedes.nl/artikelen/aedes/vereniging/kennisproducten-aedes/corporatiemonitor/ corporatiemonitor.html.
AEFA. (2018a). Report of the Senate Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade:
The subject matter of Bill c-45 – an Act respecting cannabis and to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, the Criminal Code and other Acts, insofar as it relates to Canada’s international obligations. Ottawa: Canada Senate. Retrieved from https://sencanada.ca/content/sen/committee/421/
AEFA/reports/AEFA_BILLC-45_Report_Final_e.pdf.
AEFA. (2018b). Proceedings of the Standing Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs and International
Trade, Issue No. 41, 21 March 2018. Retrieved from https://sencanada.ca/en/Content/Sen/
Committee/421/AEFA/41ev-53882-e.
AFR. (1997). Cannabis, health and public policy. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation (AFR). Retrieved from https://www.camh.ca/-/media/files/pdfs---public-policy-submissions/cannabis-healthpublicpolicy1997-pdf.pdf.
Albiston, C. (1999). The rule of law and the litigation process: the paradox of losing by winning. Law and
Society Review, 33(4), 869-910.
Alexander, B. K. (1990). Peaceful measures: Canada’s way out of the “War on Drugs”. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Allison, P. (1999). Multiple regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.
American Civil Liberties Union. (2015). Silenced: How nuisance ordinances punish crime victims in New
York. New York: ACLU Foundation.
Anderson, D. C. (1995). Crime and the politics of hysteria. New York: Times Books.
APPGDPR (All-Party Parliamentary Group for Drug Policy Reform). (2013) Towards a safer drug
policy: challenges and opportunities arising from ‘legal highs’. London: All-Party Parliamentary
Group for Drug Policy Reform.
Ashworth, A., & Zedner, L. (2010). Prevention orders: A problem of undercriminalisation? In R. A. Duff, L. Farmer, S. E. Marshall, M. Renzo & V. Tadros (Eds). The Boundaries of the Criminal Law (pp. 59-87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ashworth, A., & Zedner, L. (2008). Defending the criminal law: Reflections on the changing character of crime, procedure, and sanctions. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 2(1), 21–51.
Atkins, B. (1991). Party capability theory as an explanation for intervention behavior in the English court of appeal. American Journal of Political Science, 35(4), 881-903.
Austin, I. (2017). Trudeau unveils bill legalizing recreational marijuana in Canada. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/13/world/canada/trudeau-marijuana.html Austin. R. (2002). Step on a crack, break your mother’s back: Poor moms, myths of authority, and
B
Baan Working Group [Werkgroep Verdovende Middelen]. (1972). Achtergronden en Risico’s van
Drugsgebruik. ’s-Gravenhage: Staatsuitgeverij.
Bandow, D. (1991). War on drugs or war on America. Stanford Law & Policy Review, 3, 242-260. Barak, A. (2012). Proportionality: Constitutional rights and their limitations (No. 2). Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Barkan, S. M., Bintliff, B., & Whisner, M. (2015). Fundamentals of Legal Research. St. Paul: Foundation Press.
Barrus, D., Capogrossi, K., Cates, S., Gourdet, C., Peiper, N., Novak, S., Lefever, T., and Wiley, J. (2016).
Tasty THC: Promises and challenges of cannabis edibles. Methods report (RTI Press) (Vol. 2016).
Research Triangle Park, NC: NIH Public Access.
Bartie, S. (2010). The lingering core of legal scholarship. Legal Studies, 30(3), 345-369.
BCD. (2019). Ingezetene criterium leidt tot overlast. Bond voor Cannabis Detaillisten, 10 October 2019. Retrieved from https://coffeeshopbond.nl/blog/ingezetenencriterium-leidt-tot-overlast.
Beckett, K, & Herbert, S. (2009). Banished: The new social control in urban America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Been, V., Brazill, C., Dastrup, S., Gould Ellen, I., Infranca, J., Mc Donnell, S., Weselcouch, M., & Williams, M. (2010). State of New York City’s housing and neighborhoods 2010. New York: Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy.
Belina, B. (2007). From disciplining to dislocation: area bans in recent urban policing in Germany.
European Urban and Regional Studies, 14(4), 321-336.
Beltrame, J. (2001). Reefer madness: The sequel. MacLean’s, 114(32), 22-25. Retrieved from http:// archive.macleans.ca/article/2001/8/6/reefer-madness-the-sequel.
Bergman, D. (2014). De eerste coffeeshop van Nederland. Rolling Stoned, 10 december 2014. Retrieved from https://www.cnnbs.nl/de-eerste-coffeeshop-van-nederland/.
Besluit selectiecriteria. (2012). Besluit selectiecriteria uitsprakendatabank Rechtspraak.nl. Retrieved from https://www.rechtspraak.nl/Uitspraken-en-nieuws/Uitspraken/Paginas/Selectiecriteria.aspx. Bewley-Taylor, D., & Jelsma, M. (2012). The UN drug control conventions: The Limits of
Latitude. Transnational Institute, Series on Legislative Reform of Drug Policies, 18, 1-24. Bieleman, B., & Goeree, P. (2000). Coffeeshops geteld: Aantallen verkooppunten van cannabis in
Nederland. Groningen: Intraval.
Bieleman, B., & Naayer, H. (2006). Coffeeshops in Nederland 2005: Aantallen coffeeshops en
gemeentelijk beleid 1999-2005. Groningen: Intraval.
Bieleman, B., & Nijkamp, R. (2010). Coffeeshops in Nederland 2009: Aantallen coffeeshops en
gemeentelijk beleid 1999-2009. Groningen: Intraval.
Bieleman, B., Beelen, A., Nijkamp, R., De Bie, E. (2008). : Coffeeshops in Nederland 2007: Aantallen
coffeeshops en gemeentelijk beleid 1999-2007. Groningen: Intraval.
Bieleman, B., Biesma, S., Snippe, J., & De Bie, E. (1996). Quick Scan: Ontwikkeling in Aantal
Coffeeshops in Nederland. Groningen: Intraval.
Bieleman, B., Goeree, H., & Naayer, H. (2003). Coffeeshops in Nederland 2002: Aantallen, gemeentelijk
beleid en handhaving AHOJ-G criteria. Groningen: Intraval.
Bieleman, B., Mennes, R., & Sijtstra, M. (2015). Coffeeshops in Nederland 2014: Aantallen coffeeshops
Bieleman, B., Mennes, R., & Sijstra, M. (2017). Coffeeshops in Nederland 2016: Aantallen coffeeshops
en gemeentelijk beleid 1999-2016. Groningen: Intraval.
Bieleman, B., Nijkamp, R., & Schaap, F. (2010). 0- en 1-meting: Monitor coffeeshopbeleid Rotterdam. Groningen: Intraval.
Bieleman, B., Schakel, L., De Bie, E., & Snippe, J. (1995). Wolken boven koffieshops: Inventarisatie van
overlast rond koffieshops en ontwikkelingen in gemeentelijk cannabisbeleid. Groningen: Intraval.
Blickman, T. (2012). The future of the Dutch coffeeshops is in the hands of the liberal-conservative party. Transnational Institute (TNI), 4 October 2012. Retrieved from https://www.tni.org/en/article/dutch-election-result-and-coffeeshops.
Blom, T. (2008). Opiumwetgeving en drugsbeleid. Deventer: Wolters Kluwer.
Boekhout van Solinge, T. (1999). Dutch drug policy in a European context. Journal of Drug Issues, 29(3), 511–528.
Boister, N. (2001). Penal aspects of the UN drug conventions. The Hague: Kluwer Law International. Boudreau, M. (2018). Hippies, yippies, the counterculture, and the Gastown riot in Vancouver,
1968-71. BC Studies, 197, 39-65.
Bovenkerk, F., Hogewind, W., Korf, D., & Milani, N. (2003). Hennepteelt in Nederland: het probleem van
de criminaliteit en haar bestrijding. Utrecht: Willem Pompe Instituut.
Bradley, C. M. (1993). The failure of the criminal procedure revolution. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Breunese, H. M. B., Brouwer, J. G., & Schilder, A. E. (1996). Wapenen tegen drugsoverlast. Deventer: W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink.
Brickell, K., Arrigoitia, M. F., & Vasudevan, A. (Eds.) (2017). Geographies of forced eviction:
Dispossession, violence, resistance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bright, S. (2010). Dispossession for arrears: The weight of home in English law. In L. O’Mahony & J. Sweeney (Eds.), The idea of home in law: Displacement and dispossession (pp. 13-40). Surry: Ashgate.
Brody, S. (1976). The effectiveness of sentencing: A review of the literature. London: Home Office. Bröring, H. E., & Jurgens, G. T. J. M. (2006). De bestuurlijke boete is zo gek nog niet! Bespiegelingen
over buitengerechtelijke beboeting in het bestuursrecht en het strafrecht naar aanleiding van de wet O.M.-afdoening. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Bestuursrecht, 10, 340–348.
Bröring, H. E., De Graaf, K. J., Albers, C. L .G. F. H., Damen, L. J. A., Klap, A. P., Klingenberg, A. M., Marseille, A. T., Tolsma, H. D., & Van der Veen, G. A. (2016). Bestuursrecht deel 1: Systeem,
bevoegdheid, bevoegdheidsuitoefening, handhaving. Den Haag: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
Brouwer, J. G., & Bruijn, L. M. (2016a). Case note: ECLI:NL:RVS:2016:1506. AB Rechtspraak
Bestuursrecht, 30(274).
Brouwer, J. G., & Bruijn, L. M. (2016b). Case note: ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2016:331. AB Rechtspraak
Bestuursrecht, 24(207), 1245-1248.
Brouwer, J. G., & Bruijn, L. M. (2017). Case note: ECLI:NL:RVS:2017:634. AB Rechtspraak
Bestuursrecht, 38(330).
Brouwer, J. G., & Bruijn, L. M. (2019). Case note: ECLI:NL:RVS:2018:3663. AB Rechtspraak
Bestuursrecht, 11(113), 851-858.
B
Brouwer, J. G., & Schilder, A.E. (2011). Woonoverlast en de persoonlijke levenssfeer: Naar een balans tussen bescherming en beperking. NJCM Bulletin, 36(3), 307-324.
Brouwer, J. G., & Schilder, A. E. (2012). Over de grenzen van gedogen. Het failliet van de B en I in het coffeeshopbeleid. Nederlands Juristenblad, 44/45(253), 3082-3089.
Brown, A. P. (2004). Anti‐social behaviour, crime control and social control. The Howard Journal of
Crime and Justice, 43(2), 203-211.
Bruijn, L. M. (2018). De ontwikkeling van de Wet Damocles: burgemeesters trekken zwaard in de strijd tegen drugs. Tijdschrift voor Bijzonder Strafrecht & Handhaving, 4(3), 143-162.
Bruijn, L. M., & Post, C. (2017). Nul op het rekest voor coffeeshops en bordelen? Over de wenselijkheid van een nulbeleid. In P. van den Berg, & G. Molier (Eds.), In dienst van het recht (pp. 25-40). Den Haag: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
Bruijn, L. M., & Vols, M. (2016). Case note: ECLI:NL:RVS:2016:1506. Jurisprudentie voor Gemeenten,
7(48).
Bruijn, L. M., & Vols, M. (2017a). Case note: ECLI:NL:ABRVS:2016:2840. Jurisprudentie voor
Gemeenten, 2(18).
Bruijn, L. M., & Vols, M. (2017b). Ondermijning, drugscriminaliteit en vertrouwen in de rechtstaat: Een analyse van de toepassing van de Wet Damocles. In H. D. Tolsma, & P. de Winter (Eds.), De
wisselwerking tussen recht en vertrouwen bij toezicht en handhaving (pp. 189–205). Den Haag: Boom
Juridische Uitgevers.
Bruijn, L. M., Vols, M., & Brouwer, J. G. (2018). Home closure as a weapon in the Dutch war on drugs: Does judicial review function as a safety net? International Journal of Drug Policy, 51, 137-147. Bryan, M. C. (1979). Cannabis in Canada: A decade of indecision. Contemporary Drug Problems, 8,
169-192.
Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Buerger, M. E., & Mazerolle, L. G. (1998). Third-party policing: A theoretical analysis of an emerging trend. Justice quarterly, 15(2), 301-327.
Burgard, S. A., Seefeldt, K. S., & Zelner, S. (2012). Housing instability and health: findings from the Michigan Recession and Recovery Study. Social science & medicine, 75(12), 2215-2224. Burney, E. (1999). Crime and banishment: Nuisance and exclusion in social housing. Winchester:
Waterside Press.
Burrows, J., & Tarling, R. (1982). Clearing up crime. London: Home Office.
Cain, J. (1994). Report of the Task Force into illicit narcotic overdose deaths in British Columbia. Burnaby, BC: Province of British Columbia, Office of the Chief Coroner. Retrieved from https:// drugpolicy.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Cain-Report.pdf.
CALD. (2005). Council of Australian law deans statement on the nature of legal research. Retrieved from https://cald.asn.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/cald-statement-on-the-nature-of-legal-research-20051. pdf.
CAMH (Centre for Addiction and Mental Health). (2000). Position on the legal sanctions related to
cannabis possession. Retrieved from http://www.cfdp.ca/camh.htm.
Canadian Bar Association. (1994). Submission on Bill C-7. Ottawa: National Criminal Justice Section of Canadian Bar Association. Retrieved from https://www.pot.tv/video/2001/01/18/1842/.
Carstairs, C. (1998). Innocent Addicts, Dope Fiends and Nefarious Traffickers: Illegal Drug Use in 1920s English Canada. Journal of Canadian Studies, 33(3), 145-162.
Carstairs, C. (2006). Jailed for possession: Illegal drug use, regulation, and power in Canada,
1920-1961. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Carter, D. P. (2017). Public, nonprofit, and for-profit sector regulatory approaches in third-party regulatory administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(4), 726–744.
Castle, C. (2003). You Call That a Strike-A Post-Rucker Examination of Eviction from Public Housing Due to Drug-Related Criminal Activity of a Third Party. Georgia Law Review, 37, 1435-1469. Caulkins, J. P., Reuter, P., Iguchi, M. Y., & Chiesa, J. (2005). How Goes the “War on Drugs”? An
Assessment of U.S. Drug Problems and Policy. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
CBS. (2016). Voorraad woningen. Centraal bureau voor statistiek. Retrieved from http://statline.cbs.nl/ Statweb publication/?DM=SLNL&PA=82900NED&D1-=a&D2=0&D3=0,75,187,361,412&D4=l& HDR=T&STB=G1,G2,G3&VW=T
CBS. (2017a). Bevolking; geslacht, leeftijd, burgerlijke staat en regio, 1 januari. Retrieved from http://statline.cbs.nl/Statweb/publication/?DM=SLNL&PA=03759NED&D1=0&D2=129 132&D3=57-60,65,69-70,72-75,77,80,82,84-85,90-91,94-96,99-100,104- 105,108,110,112,115,118,123,125-128,135,137,139-141,143-146,148,150,153-155,159,161- 162,164-165,167,170,173,176-177,179-181,184-185,187,189-191,193,195,197-199,201- 202,204,209,214-215,217-218,220-221,224-225,227,229,235-237,239-240,242,246-248,250- 254,257,260,263,265,268,270,272,275,279-280,282,284-287,289,291,296,299,305-306,309- 314,316,320-323,325,328,334-337,339,341,345,347,350-353,355,357,359,361-362,364-366,369- 370,376-378,381-382,385-386,391,395,397,399-400,402,409-411,414-419,421-424,427,429- 432,434,436,438-439,448-449,452,454-455,457,459-461,470-471,473-474,481-482,484,487,489,493- 496,499-500,506,508,512,515-516,518,524,527,530,533,537,546-548,550-551,553-555,558,560- 561,565,567-570,573,575-578,583,585-586,590-592,595-596,599,601-604,606,608,612,614- 615,620-622,624-627,632,636-637,639-640,644-645,649,651-652,658,662-664,666,671,673- 674,679,682,685-687,690,694-696,701,703-704,706,709-710,712,714-715,721-722,724-726,728,730- 734,736,738-739,741,743-745,748,750-753,755-756,758-759,761,764-765,768,770,773,776-777,781- 785,792,794,796-797,799,802,807-808,810-813,816-817,821,826-827,831-832,834,836,838-839,843-844,846-847,850,852,854,861-863,865,867-869,872-873&D4=l&VW=T%22f.
CBS. (2017b) Voorraad woningen; eigendom, type verhuurder, bewoning, regio. Statline Centraal Bureau
voor Statistiek. Retrieved from http://statline.cbs.nl/Statweb/publication/?VW=T&DM=SLNL&PA=
82900NED&D1=a&D2=a&D3=0,6-18&D4=a&HD=180223-1114&HDR=T&STB=G1,G2,G3 CCSA (CCSA National Working Group on Addictions Policy). (1998). Cannabis control in Canada:
Options regarding possession. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse. Retrieved from http://
www.druglibrary.net/schaffer/Library/studies/canfinal2.htm.
Cerdá M., & Kilmer, B. (2017). Uruguay’s middle-ground approach to cannabis legalization.
International Journal of Drug Policy, 42, 118–20.
Chatwin, C. (2003). Drug policy developments within the European Union: The destabilizing effects of Dutch and Swedish drug policies. British Journal of Criminology, 43(3), 567-82.
Cheh, M. M. (1991). Constitutional limits on using civil remedies to achieve criminal law objectives: Understanding and transcending the criminal-civil law distinction. Hastings Law Journal, 42(5), 1325-1413.
Chemerinsky, E. (1999). Substantive due process. Touro Law Review, 15, 1501-1534. Chin, G. J. (2002). Race, the war on drugs, and the collateral consequences of criminal
B
Chynoweth, P. (2008). Legal research. In A. Knight & L. Ruddock, Advanced research methods in the
built environment (28-38). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Clinton, B. (1996a). State of the Union Address, Jan. 23, 1996.
Clinton, B. (1996b). Remarks by the President at One Strike Symposium, Mar. 28, 1996.
Clinton, S. (2005). Evicting the innocent: Can the innocent tenant defense survive a Rucker preemption challenge. Boston University Law Review, 85, 293.
Cohen, S. (1972). Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
Cohen, S. (1985). Visions of social control: Crime, punishment and classification. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Commentary on the Trafficking Convention. (1988). Commentary on the United Nations Convention
against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances 1988. New York: United
Nations.
Cooper, H. L. (2015). War on drugs policing and police brutality. Substance Use & Misuse, 50(8-9), 1188-1194.
Cooper, J. (2006). Procedural Due process, human rights and the added value of the right to a fair trial. Judicial Review, 11(1), 78-91.
Corstens G. J. M. (2014). Het Nederlands strafprocesrecht. Deventer: Wolters Kluwer.
Costa, A. M. (2008). Making drug control ‘fit for purpose’: Building on the UNGASS decade. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
Cox, C. (2018). The Canadian Cannabis Act legalizes and regulates recreational cannabis use in 2018. Health Policy, 122(3), 205-209.
Crawford, A. (2009). Governing through anti-social behaviour: Regulatory challenges to criminal justice.
The British Journal of Criminology, 49(6), 810-831.
Crawford, A. (2011). From the shopping mall to the street corner: Dynamics of exclusion in the governance of public space. In A. Crawford (Ed.), International and comparative criminal justice and
urban governance (pp. 483-518). Cambridge University Press.
Crépault, J-F. (2019). Legalize It (But Don’t Advertise It): The Public Health Case for Cannabis Legalization. In A, Potter & D. Weinstock (Eds.), High Time: The Legalization and Regulation of
Cannabis in Canada (pp. 79-96). Québec: McGill- Queen’s University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods
approaches. London: Sage publications.
Cross, F. B. (2007). Decision Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Currie, J., & Tekin, E. (2015). Is there a link between foreclosure and health? American Economic
Journal: Economic Policy, 7(1), 63-94.
Dane, S. M. (1993). Eliminating the labyrinth: A proposal to simplify federal mortgage lending discrimination laws. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 26(3), 527-572.
Daniels, G., & Schill, M. H. (2001). State of New York City’s housing and neighborhoods 2001. New York: Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy.
Dannemann, G. (2006). Comparative Law: Study of Similarities or Differences? In M. Reimann & R. Zimmermann (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (pp. 383–419). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davies, J. (2016). Marijuana wins big, as dark struggles loom. Drug Policy Alliance. Retrieved from http://www.drugpolicy.org/blog/marijuana-wins-big-dark-struggles-loom
De Boer, N. (2019). Street-level Enforcement Style: A Multidimensional Measurement Instrument.
International Journal of Public Administration, 42(5), 380-391.
De Coninck, J. (2010). The functional method of comparative law: “Quo Vadis”? Rabels Zeitschrift Für
Ausländisches Und Internationales Privatrecht / The Rabel Journal of Comparative and International Private Law, 74(2), 318-350.
De Graaf, P. (2017). Burgemeesters: deltaplan tegen drugscriminaliteit. De Volkskrant, 14 februari 2017. De Kort, M. (1994). The Dutch cannabis debate, 1968–1976. Journal of Drug Issues, 24(3), 417-427. De Kort, M. (1995). Tussen patiënt en delinquent. De geschiedenis van het Nederlandse drugsbeleid.
Hilversum: Uitgeverij Verloren.
De Kort, M., & Cramer, T. (1999). Pragmatism versus ideology: The Dutch drug policy continued.
Journal of Drug Issues, 29(3), 473-493.
De Meijer, M. (2017). Georganiseerde criminaliteit laat strafrecht bijna verdampen. NRC Handelsblad. Retrieved: from https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2017/01/18/georganiseerde-criminaliteit-laat-strafrecht-bijna-verdampen-a1541824
De Middeleer, F., & De Ruyver, B. (2017). De verschuiving van illegale drugsmarkten van Nederland naar België. Perceptie of realiteit? Justitiële Verkenningen, 43(2), 103-123.
De Vries, F. (2004). De held is geharnast. Passionate, 11, 47-50.
De Waard, B. (2016). Proportionality in Dutch administrative law. In S. Ranchordás & B. de Waard (Eds.), The Judge and the proportionate use of discretion: A comparative study (pp. 109-141). New York: Routledge.
De Winter, P. (2019). Tussen de regels. Den Haag: Boom juridisch.
De Winter, P., & Hertogh, M. (2020). Public Servants at the Regulatory Front Lines: Street-Level Enforcement in Theory and Practice. In H. Sullivan, H. Dickinson, & H. Henderson (Eds.), The
Palgrave Handbook of the Public Servant. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Decorte, T. (2010). The case for small-scale domestic cannabis cultivation. International Journal of Drug
Policy, 21(4), 271–275.
Department of Justice Canada. (2014). National Anti-Drug Strategy. Government of Canada. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/news/archive/2014/01/national-anti-drug-strategy.html.
Depla, P., Everhardt, V., & Van Gijzel, R. (2014). Manifest Joint Regulation. 31 January 2014. Retreived from: https://www.voc-nederland.org/persberichten_pdf/LR_Manifest_Joint_regulation_31_ januari_2014.pdf.
Desmond, M. (2012). Eviction and the reproduction of urban poverty. American Journal of
Sociology, 118(1), 88-133.
Desmond, M. (2015). Unaffordable America: Poverty, housing, and eviction. Fast Focus: Institute for
Research on Poverty, 22(22), 1-6.
Desmond, M. (2016). Evicted: Poverty and profit in the American city. New York: Crown. Desmond, M., & Bell, M. (2015). Housing, poverty, and the law. Annual Review of Law and Social
Science, 11, 15-35.
Desmond, M., & Kimbro, R. T. (2015). Eviction’s fallout: housing, hardship, and health. Social forces,
B
Desmond, M., & Valdez, N. (2013). Unpolicing the urban poor: Consequences of third-party policing for inner-city women. American sociological review, 78(1), 117-141.
Devroe, E. (2012). A swelling culture of control?: De genese en toepassing van de wet op de
gemeentelijke administratieve sancties in België. Antwerpen/Apeldoorn: Maklu.
Devroe, E., Bruinsma, G., & Vander Beken, T. (2017). An expanding culture of control? The municipal administrative sanctions Act in Belgium. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 23(1), 59-76.
Di Ronco, A., & Peršak, N. (2014). Regulation of incivilities in the UK, Italy and Belgium: courts as potential safeguards legislative vagueness and excessive use of penalising powers? International
Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 42(4), 340-365.
Dickinson, G. S. (2015). Towards a new eviction jurisprudence. Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law &
Policy, 23(1), 1-59.
Dills, A. K., Goffard, S., & Miron, J. (2017). The effects of marijuana liberalizations: Evidence from
monitoring the future (NBER Working Paper No. w23779). Cambridge, US: National Bureau of
Economic Research.
Doran, N., & Papadopoulos, A. (2019). Cannabis edibles: Behaviours, attitudes, and reasons for use. Environmental Health Review, 62(2), 44-52.
Dotan, Y. (1999). Do the” haves” still come out ahead? Resource inequalities in ideological courts: The case of the Israeli High Court of Justice. Law and Society Review, 33(4), 1059-1080.
Duff, R. A., & Marshall, S. (2006). How Offensive Can You Get?: Regulating Offensive Behaviour. In A. von Hirsch & A. P. Simester (Eds). Incivilities: Regulating Offensive Behaviour (pp. 79-81). Portland: Hart Publishing.
Duncan, D., & Nicholson, T. (1997). Dutch drug policy: A model for America? Journal of Health and
Social Policy, 8(3), 1-15.
Dupras, D. (1998). Canada’s International Obligations under the Leading International Conventions on
the Control of Narcotic Drugs. Ottawa: Library of Parliament.
Eastwood, N. (2015). The coalition’s overhaul of anti-social behaviour legislation comes into effect.
Drugs and Alcohol Today, 15(2).
Eck, J. E., & Wartell, J. (1998). Improving the management of rental properties with drug problems: A randomized experiment. In L. G. Mazerolle & J. Roehl (Eds.), Civil remedies and crime prevention:
Crime prevention studies (Vol. 9) (pp. 161-185.). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
Edelman, L. B., & Suchman, M. C. (1999). When the” Haves” hold court: Speculations on the organizational internalization of law. Law and Society Review, 33(4), 941-991.
Eikenaar, H. (2017). Tilburgse burgemeester wil ook panden met kleine wietkwekerijen kunnen sluiten.
Het Algemeen Dagblad, 20 February 2017 Retrieved from
http://www.ad.nl/tilburg/tilburgse-burgemeester-wil-ook-panden-met-kleine-wietkwekerijen-kunnen-sluiten~aebd88ea/ Eisenberg, T., & Farber, H. (2003). The government as litigant: Further tests of the case selection
model. American Law and Economics Review, 5(1), 94-133.
Ellis, P. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect sizes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Epstein, L., & King, G. (2002). The rules of inference. The University of Chicago Law Review, 69(1),
1-133.
Epstein, L., & Martin, A. D. (2010). Quantitative approaches to empirical legal research. In P. Cane, & H.M. Kritzer (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research (pp. 901-925). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Epstein, L., & Martin, A. D. (2014). An Introduction to Empirical Legal Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Erickson, P. G. (1992). Recent trends in Canadian drug policy: The decline and resurgence of prohibitionism. Daedalus, 121(31), 239-268.
Ewert, M. Y. (2016). One Strike and You’re out of Public Housing: How the Intersection of the War on Drugs and Federal Housing Policy Violated Due Process and Fair Housing Principles. Harvard
Journal on Racial & Ethnic Justice, 32, 57.
Ewing, K. D. (2010). Bonfire of the liberties: New labour, human rights, and the rule of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fagan, J., Davies, G., Holland, J., & Dumanovsky, T. (2005). The bustle of horses on a ship: Drug control in New York City Public Housing. Columbia Public Law & Legal Theory Working Papers, 5(89). Fais, C. (2008). Denying access to justice: the cost of applying chronic nuisance laws to domestic
violence. Columbia Law Review, 108, 1181-1225.
Farole, D. J. (1999). Reexamining litigant success in state supreme courts. Law & Society Review, 33(4), 1043-1058.
Fée, D. (2016). Housing and citizenship in the UK: Towards a conditional right? Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique. French Journal of British Studies, 21(XXI-1).
Ferdinandusse, W. (2016). Cocaïneberg blijft groeien, haal drugs uit het strafrecht. NRC Handelsblad. Retrieved from https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2016/12/13/cocaineberg-blijft-groeienhaal-drugs-uit-het-strafrecht-5772965-a1536501
Fernald, M. (2017). America’s rental housing 2017. Cambridge, US: Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University.
Fick, S., & Vols, M. (2016). Best protection against eviction?: A comparative analysis of protection against evictions in the European Convention on Human Rights and the South African Constitution. European journal of comparative law and governance, 3(1), 40-69.
Fife, R. (1999). Police chiefs get through to the top. National Post, April 22, 1999. Retrieved from http:// www.cfdp.ca/natpost.htm.
Finn, P. (1995). The Manhattan district attorney’s narcotics eviction program. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
Fischer, B. (1997). The battle for a new Canadian drug law: A legal basis for harm reduction or a new rhetoric for prohibition? A chronology. In P. Erickson, D. Riley, Y. Cheung & P. O’Hare (Eds.), Harm
Reduction: A New Direction for Drug Policies and Programs (pp. 47-68). Toronto: University of
Toronto Press.
Fischer, B. (1999). Prohibition, public health and a window of opportunity: An analysis of Canadian drug policy, 1985–1997. Policy Studies, 20(3), 197–210.
Fischer, B., Ala-Leppilampi, K., Single, E., & Robins, A. (2003). Cannabis law reform in Canada: Is the “Saga of Promise, Hesitation and Retreat” coming to an end? Canadian Journal of Criminology and
Criminal Justice, 45(3), 265-298.
Flacks, S. J. (2018). Drug law reform, performativity and the politics of childhood. International Journal
of Drug Policy, 51, 56-66.
Fleiner, F. (1928). Institutionen des Deutschen Verwaltungsrechts. Tübingen: Scientia.
Fleming, A. C. (2005). Protecting the innocent: The future of mentally disabled tenants in federally subsidized housing after HUD v. Rucker. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 40, 197-222.
B
Flint, J. (2002). Social housing agencies and the governance of anti-social behaviour. Housing Studies,
17(4), 619–637.
Flint, J. (Ed.). (2006). Housing, urban governance and anti-social behaviour: Perspectives, policy and
practice. Bristol: Policy Press.
Flint, J., & Pawson, H. (2009). Social landlords and the regulation of conduct in urban spaces in the United Kingdom. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 9(4), 415-435.
Fralick, P. (1993). Comment on Bill C-85 [unpublished document]. Ottawa: Canadian Center on Substance Abuse.
Friedman, L. M. (1998). Law reviews and legal scholarship: Some comments. Denver University Law
Review, 75(2), 661-668.
Galanter, M. (1974). Why the “haves” come out ahead: Speculations on the limits of legal change. Law &
Society Review, 9(1), 95-160.
Garland, D. (1996). Limits of the sovereign state: Contemporary crime control strategies. British Journal
of Criminology, 36(4), 445-471.
Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Garland, D. (2008). On the concept of moral panic. Crime, Media, Culture, 4(1), 9-30.
Gemeente Rotterdam. (2003). Samenwerkingsconvenant aanpak malafide eigenaren Rotterdam. Retrieved from www.rotterdam.nl
Giffen, P. J., Endicott, S. J., & Lambert, S. (1991). Panic and indifference: The politics of Canada’s drug
laws: A study in the sociology of law. Ottowa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
Girelli, G. (2018). The Death penalty for drug offenses: Global overview 2018. Aldgate: Harm Reduction International. Retrieved from https://www.hri.global/files/2019/02/22/HRI_DeathPenaltyReport_2019. pdf.
Gladwell, M. (2002). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Boston: Back Bay Books.
Global Commission on Drug Policy. (2011). War on Drugs. Report of the Global Commission on Drug
Policy. Retrieved from https://www.globalcommissionondrugs.org/wp-content/themes/gcdp_v1/pdf/
Global_Commission_Report_English.pdf.
Global Commission on Drug Policy (2016). Advancing drug policy reform: A new approach to
decriminalization. Retrieved from http://globalcommissionondrugs.org.
Godlee, F., & Hurley, R. (2016). The war on drugs has failed: doctors should lead calls for drug policy reform. The British Medical Journal, 355. Retrieved from https://www-bmj-com.proxy-ub.rug.nl/ content/355/bmj.i6067.
Government of Canada. (1988). Action on drug abuse: Making a difference. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada.
Government of Canada. (2018). Bill C-45: An Act respecting cannabis and to amend the Controlled
Drugs and Substances Act, the Criminal Code and other Acts – Summary. Ottawa: Government
of Canada, Parliament of Canada. Retrieved from http://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/42-1/ bill/C-45/royal-assent.
Government of Canada. (2019). What you need to know about cannabis. Cannabis in Canada: get the
facts. Ottawa: Government of Canada. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/services/health/
Governor General. (2015). Making real change happen. Speech from the Throne to open the first session
of the forty-second parliament of Canada. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/privy-council/
campaigns/speech-throne/making-real-change-happen.html.
Graham, L. (2015). Legalizing marijuana in the shadows of international law: the Uruguay, Colorado, and Washington models. Wisconsin International Law Journal, 33(1), 140-166.
Gray, J. (2010). Why our drug laws have failed: a judicial indictment of war on drugs. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Grodzins, M. (1957). Metropolitan segregation. Scientific American, 197(4), 33-41.
Grund, J. P. J., & Breeksema, J. J. (2013). Coffee shops and compromise. New York: Open Society Foundations.
Guidelines for Public Housing Authorities (HAs). Retrieved from https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/
administration/hudclips/notices/pih/96pihnotices.
HAA. (n.d.). Houston Apartment Association: Ordinance guide - Forfeiture Abatement Support Team. Retrieved from https://www.haaonline.org/Display.aspx?ID=257.
Habibi, R., & Hoffman, S. J. (2017). Legalizing cannabis violates the un drug control treaties, but progressive countries like canada have options. Ottawa Law Review, 49(2), 427-460.
Hall, M. A., & Wright, R. F. (2008). Systematic content analysis of judicial opinions. California Law
Review, 96(1), 63-122.
Hall, W. (2009). The adverse health effects of cannabis use: what are they, and what are their implications for policy? International Journal of drug policy, 20(6), 458-466.
Hansen, R., Bill, L., & Pease, K. (2003). Nuisance offenders: Scoping the public policy problems. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Confronting Crime: Crime Control Policy under New Labour (pp. 80–94). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
Harris, B. (1999). Representing homeless families: repeat player implementation strategies. Law &
Society Review, 33(4), 911-939.
Harris, J. (1996). Clinton Links Housing Aid to Eviction of Crime Suspects. Washington Post, 29 March 1996. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1996/03/29/clinton-links-housing-aid-to-eviction-of-crime-suspects/fd81a5bb-a407-4f85-b427-5a6d2754da5f/.
Hathaway, A. D., & Erickson, P. G. (2003). Drug reform principles and policy debates: Harm reduction prospects for cannabis in Canada. Journal of Drug Issues, 33(2), 465-495.
Haynie, S. L. (1994). Resource inequalities and litigation outcomes in the Philippine Supreme Court. The
Journal of Politics, 56(3), 752-772.
He, X, & Su, Y. (2013). Do the “haves” come out ahead in Shanghai courts? Journal of Empirical Legal
Studies, 10(1), 120-145.
Heal, K., Tarling, R., & Burrows, J. (1985). Policing today. London: Home Office.
Health Canada. (2012). Canadian alcohol and drug use monitoring survey (CADUMS): Summary of
results for 2011. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/health-concerns/
drug-prevention-treatment/drug-alcohol-use-statistics/canadian-alcohol-drug-use-monitoring-survey-summary-results-2011.html#a9.
Health Canada. (2017). Health Canada launches public consultation on proposed approach to the regulation of cannabis, 21 November 2017. Canada.ca. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/ health-canada/news/2017/11/health_canada_launchespublicconsultationonproposedapproachtother. html.
B
Health Canada. (2018). Canada legalizes and strictly regulates cannabis. Ottawa: Government of Canada. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/news/2018/10/canada-legalizes-and-strictly-regulates-cannabis.html.
Hendley, K., Murrell, P., & Ryterman, R. (1999). Do repeat players behave differently in Russia? Contractual and litigation behavior of Russian enterprises. Law and Society Review, 33(4), 833-867. Himmelstein, J. L. (1983). From killer weed to drop-out drug: the changing ideology of
marihuana. Contemporary Crises, 7(1), 13-38.
Home Office. (2014). Defining and measuring ant-social behaviour. London: Home Office. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/ file/116655/dpr26.pdf.
House of Commons Special Committee on Non-Medical Use of Drugs. (2002). Policy for the new
millennium: Working together to redefine Canada’s drug strategy. Ottawa: House of Commons.
Retrieved from https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Committee/372/SNUD/Reports/RP1032297/ snudrp02/snudrp02-e.pdf.
House of Commons. (2002). Debates, 30 September 2002. Retrieved from https://lop.parl.ca/sites/ PublicWebsite/default/en_CA/ResearchPublications/LegislativeSummaries/372LS456E#1txt Howard, R. M. (2001). Wealth, power, and the internal revenue service: Changing IRS audit policy
through litigation. Social Science Quarterly, 82(2), 268-280.
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative
health research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/assthsg.html#2009-2019_data. https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/assthsg.html#2009-2019_data.
HUD PD&R. (2017). National Housing Market Summary. Retrieved from https://www.huduser.gov/ portal/sites/default/files/pdf/NationalSummary_3Q17.pdf.
HUD User. (2008). A Picture of Subsidized Households for 2004 - 2008. Retrieved from https://www. huduser.gov/portal/picture/query.html.
HUD User. (2016). A Picture of Subsidized Households for 2009 – 2019. Retrieved from HUD User. (2018). A Picture of Subsidized Households for 2009 – 2019. Retrieved from HUD. (1996). Notice PIH 96-16 (HA): One Strike and You’re Out” Screening and Eviction HUD. (2015). Notice PIH 2015-19 - Guidance for Public Housing Agencies (PHAs) and Owners of
Federally-Assisted Housing on Excluding the Use of Arrest Records in Housing Decisions. Retrieved
from https://www.hud.gov/sites/documents/PIH2015-19.PDF.
Huisman, W., & Koemans, M. (2007). Administrative measures in crime control. Erasmus Law
Review, 1(5), 121-143.
Huisman, W., & Nelen, H. (2014). The lost art of regulated tolerance? Fifteen years of regulating vices in Amsterdam. Journal of Law and Society, 41(4), 604-626.
Human Rights Watch. (2004). No second chance: People with criminal records denied access to public
housing. New York: Human Rights Watch. Retrieved from https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/
reports/usa1104.pdf.
Human Rights Watch. (2017). License to kill: Philippine police killings in Duterte’s ‘war on
drugs’. Human Rights Watch. Retrieved from https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/report_pdf/
Hunter, C., & Nixon, J. (2001). Taking the blame and losing the home: women and anti-social behaviour.
The Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 23(4), 395-410.
Hunter, C., Nixon, J., & Slatter, M. (2005). Neighbours behaving badly: Anti-social behaviour, property rights and exclusion in England and Australia. Macquarie Law Journal, 5.
Husak, D., & De Marneffe, P. (2012). For & Against the Legalization of Drugs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hutchinson, T. (2010). Researching and writing law. Sydney: Thomson Reuters.
Hutchinson, T. (2013). Doctrinal research: researching the jury. In D. Watkins & M. Burton (Eds.),
Research methods in law (pp. 8-39). New York: Routledge.
Hutchinson, T., & Duncan, N. (2012). Defining and describing what we do: doctrinal legal research.
Deakin Law Review, 17(1), 83-119.
Hyshka, E. (2009). The saga continues: Canadian legislative attempts to reform cannabis law in the twenty-first century. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 51(1), 73-92. ICSDP. (2010). Effect of drug law enforcement on drug-related violence: evidence from a scientific
review. Vancouver: International Centre for Science in Drug Policy.
INCB. (1983). Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 1983. New York: United Nations. INCB. (1989). Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 1989. New York: United Nations. INCB. (1991). Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 1991. New York: United Nations. INCB. (1992). Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 1992. New York: United Nations. INCB. (1993). Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 1993. New York: United Nations. INCB. (1995). Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 1994. New York: United Nations. INCB. (1996). Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 1995. New York: United Nations. INCB. (1997). Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 1996. New York: United Nations. INCB. (2000). Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 1999. New York: United Nations. INCB. (2001). Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 2000. New York: United Nations. INCB. (2002). Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 2001. New York: United Nations. INCB. (2003). Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 2002. New York: United Nations. INCB. (2004). Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 2004. New York: United Nations. INCB. (2008). Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 2008. New York: United Nations. INCB. (2018). Statement by the International Narcotics Control Board on the entry into force of Bill
C-45 legalising cannabis for non-medical purposes in Canada. 17 October 2018, INCB. Retrieved from https://www.incb.org/incb/en/news/press-releases/2018/statement-by-the-international-narcotics- control-board-on-the-entry-into-force-of-bill-c-45-legalising-cannabis-for-non-medical-purposes-in-canada.html.
INCB. (2019). Report of the international narcotics control board for 2018. New York: United Nations. INCB. (2020). Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 2019. Vienna: United Nations. Jacobs, J., & Vols, M. (2017). Juristen als rekenmeesters: Over de kwantitatieve analyse van
jurisprudentie. In P. A. J. van den Berg, & G. Molier (Eds.), In dienst van het recht: Opstellen
aangeboden aan prof. mr. J.G. Brouwer ter gelegenheid van zijn afscheid als hoogleraar Algemene Rechtswetenschap aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen (Brouwer bundel) (pp. 89-104). Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.
B
Jansen. A. (1989). Cannabis in Amsterdam. Een geografie van hashish en marijuana. Muiderberg: Uitgeverij Coutinho.
Jelsma, M., & Blickman, T. (2009). Drug policy reform in practice experiences with alternatives in
Europe and the US. Transnational Institute (TNI). Retrieved from https://www.tni.org/en/publication/
drug-policy-reform-in-practice.
Jelsma, M., Boister, N., Bewley-Taylor, D., Fitzmaurice, M., & Walsh, J. (2018). Balancing treaty stability
and change: Inter se modification of the UN drug control conventions to facilitate cannabis regulation.
Swansea: Global Drug Policy Observatory.
Jensen, E. L., Mosher, C., Gerber, J., & Angulski, K. (2019). Progress at the state level versus recent regress at the federal level: Changes in the social consequences of the U.S. war on drugs. Contemporary Drug Problems, 46(2), 139–164.
Jonker-Verkaart, M. & Wassenberg, F. (2015). Kansen voor Particuliere Huur in Nederland. Platform 31. Retrieved from https://www.platform31.nl/publicaties/kansen-voor-particuliere-huur-in-nederland (Last accessed 8 January 2018).
Kagan, R. A. (1989). Editor’s introduction: Understanding regulatory enforcement. Law & Policy, 11(2), 89-119.
Kagan, R. A. (1994). Regulatory enforcement. In D. Rosenbloom & R. Schwartz (Eds.), Handbook of
regulation and administrative law (pp. 383–422). New York: Marcel Dekker.
Kagan, R. A., & Scholz, J. T. (1984). The “Criminology of the Corporation” and regulatory enforcement strategies. In K. Hawkins & J.M. Thomas (Eds.), Enforcing regulation (pp. 67-95). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
Kearns, A., Hiscock, R., Ellaway, E., & Macintyre, S. (2000). ‘Beyond four walls’. The psycho-social benefits of home: Evidence from West Central Scotland. Housing studies, 15(3), 387-410. Kelly, S. N. (2006). Separating the criminals from the community procedural remedies for innocent
owners in Public Housing Authorities. New York Law School Law Review, 51, 379-404. Kenna, P., & Gailiute, D. (2013). Growing coordination in housing rights jurisprudence in Europe?
European Human Rights Law Review, 6, 606-614.
Kenna, P., Benjaminsen, L., Busch-Geertsema, V., & Nasarre-Aznar, S. (2016). Pilot project – Promoting
protection of the right to housing – Homelessness prevention in the context of evictions. Luxembourg:
Publications Office of the European Union.
Kenna, P., Nasarre-Aznar, S., Sparkes, P., & Schmid, C. U. (Eds.) (2018). Loss of homes and eviction
across Europe: A comparative legal and policy examination. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing
Limited.
Kennedy, P. (2008). A guide to econometrics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Kiel, T. (2017). Gemeenten Sloten in 2016 Met Wet Damocles Duizend Panden. The Post Online, 5
October 2017. Retrieved from
http://politiek.tpo.nl/2017/10/05/tpo-onderzoekt-gemeenten-sloten-2016-wet-damocles-duizend-panden/.
Klein, A. (2019). What jurisdiction for harm reduction: Cannabis policy reform under Canadian federalism. In A, Potter & D. Weinstock (Eds.), High time: The legalization and regulation of
cannabis in Canada (pp. 132-148). Québec: McGill- Queen’s University Press.
Koemans, M. L. (2011). The war on antisocial behaviour: rationeles underlying antisocial behaviour
policies (Doctoral dissertation). Leiden: E.M. Meijers Institute, Graduate School of Legal Studies,
Kopczynski, M. (2008). The Haves coming out Behind: Galanter’s Theory Tested on the WTO Dispute Settlement System. Unpublished manuscript. Received from: https://works.bepress.com/mary_ kopczynski/1/
Kopp, R. E., Shwom, R. L., Wagner, G., & Yuan, J. (2016). Tipping elements and climate–economic shocks: pathways toward integrated assessment. Earth’s Future, 4(8), 346–372.
Korf, D. (2002). Dutch coffee shops and trends in cannabis use. Addictive behaviors, 27(6), 851-866. Korf, D. (2019). Cannabis regulation in Europe: Country report Netherlands. Transnational institute
(TNI). Retrieved from https://www.tni.org/files/publication-downloads/cr_ned_def.pdf Kritzer, H. M. (2003). The government gorilla: Why does government come out ahead in appellate
courts? Do the have’s still come out ahead? In H. M. Kritzer & S. S. Silbey (Eds.), In litigation: Do
the have’s still come out ahead? (pp. 342-370). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Lafrenière, G. (2003). Legislative summary: Bill C-38: An Act to amend the Contraventions
Act and the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act. Ottawa: Library of Parliament.
Retrieved from https://lop.parl.ca/sites/PublicWebsite/default/en_CA/ResearchPublications/ LegislativeSummaries/372LS456E#asterixend.
Langley, T. (2014). Living without protection: Nuisance property law unduly burden innocent tenants and entrench divisions between impoverished communities and law enforcement. Houston Law
Review, 52(4), 1255-1286.
Lawless, R. M., Robbennolt, J. K., & Ulen, T. S. (2010). Empirical methods in law. Austin: Aspen Publishers.
Le Dain, G., Lehmann, H. E., Bertrand, M., Campbell, I. L., & Moore, J. J. (1972). Cannabis: a report of
the commission of inquiry into the non-medical use of drugs. Ottawa: Information Canada.
Le Dain, G., Lehmann, H. E., Bertrand, M., Campbell, I. L., & Stein, J. P. (1973). Final report of the
commission of inquiry into the non-medical use of drugs. Ottawa: Information Canada.
Le Gouvernement Luxembourgeois. (2019). Étienne Schneider et Félix Braz ont fait le point sur leur visite d’études au Canada dans le cadre de la légalisation du cannabis récréatif. Gourvernement.
lu, 17 May 2019. Retrieved from https://gouvernement.lu/fr/actualites/toutes_actualites/
communiques/2019/05-mai/17-schneider-braz-canada.html.
Lebovits, G., & Seidman, D. J. (2007). Drug holdover proceedings: An overview from ‘knew,’ to ‘should have known,’ to ‘strict liability’. NYSBA One-on-One Journal, 35(2), 16-26.
Lempert, R. (2010). The inevitability of theory. California Law Review, 98(3), 877-906.
Leuw, E. (1991). Drugs and drug policy in the Netherlands. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A
review of research (pp. 229-276). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Leuw, E. (1996). Initial construction and development of the official Dutch drug policy. In E. Leuw, & I.H. Marshall (Eds.), Between prohibition and legalization: The Dutch experiment in drug policy (pp. 23-40). Amsterdam: Kugler Publications.
Leuw, E. & Marshall, I. E. (Eds.). (1996). Between prohibition and legalization: The Dutch experiment in
drug policy. Amsterdam: Kugler Publications.
Levine, H. G. (2002). The secret of worldwide drug prohibition: The varieties and uses of drug prohibition. The independent review, 7(2), 165-180.
Levshina, N. (2015). How to do linguistics with R: Data exploration and statistical analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Levy, S. D. (2008). The collateral consequences of seeking order through disorder: New York’s Narcotics Eviction Program. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 43, 539-580.
B
Leyton M. (2019). Cannabis legalization: Did we make a mistake? Journal of psychiatry &
neuroscience, 44(5), 291–293.
Liberal Party of Canada. (2013). Legalization of marijuana: answering questions and developing a
framework – Policy Paper. Retrieved from http://canevolve.ca/files/Liberal_Policy_paper.pdf.
Liberal Party of Canada. (2015). Real change: A new plan for a strong middle class. Retrieved from https://www.liberal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/New-plan-for-a-strong-middle-class.pdf.
Linders, T., & Van Egmond, J. (2018). Recordaantal drugspanden gesloten door Brabantse burgemeesters.
Omroep Brabant, 18 February 2018. Retrieved from https://www.omroepbrabant.nl/nieuws/2648122/
recordaantal-drugspanden-gesloten-door-brabantse-burgemeesters.
Lindsey, T., & Nicholson, P. (2016). Drugs Law and Legal Practice in Southeast Asia: Indonesia,
Singapore and Vietnam. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street‐level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Liu, M. (2002). Letter from Michael Liu, Assistant Secretary, HUD to Public Housing Directors, 6 June 2002. Retrieved from https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=DOC_10888.pdf. Lo, C. W. H., Fryxell, G. E., & van Rooij, B. (2009). Changes in enforcement styles among environmental
enforcement officials in China. Environment and Planning, 41(11), 2706–2723. Loevinger, L. (1948). Jurimetrics: the next step forward. Minnesota Law Review, 33(455).
LOVS. (2020). Oriëntatiepunten voor straftoemeting en LOVS-afspraken. Rechtspraak.nl. Retrieved from https://www.rechtspraak.nl/Voor-advocaten-en-juristen/Reglementen-procedures-en-formulieren/ Strafrecht/Paginas/Orientatiepunten-voor-straftoemeting.aspx
Lurigio, A. J., Davis, R. C., Regulus, T. A., Gwiasda, V. E., Popkin, S. J., Dantzker, M. L., Smith, B., & Ovellet, L. (1998). More effective place management: An evaluation of Cook County’s narcotics nuisance abatement unit. In L. G. Mazerolle & J. Roehl (Eds.), Civil remedies and crime prevention:
Crime prevention studies (Vol. 9) (pp. 187-218). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
Maalsté, N., & Hebben, R. J. (2012). Gevolgen invoering wietpas Zuid Nederland. Stichting Epicurus. Retrieved from http://www.detransparanteketen.nl/upload/files/Gevolgen%20invoering%20wietpas%20 Zuid%20Nederland.pdf.
Maalsté, N., Huigen, M.C., & Lallush, S. (2014) Verplicht nummer: Onderzoek naar de lokale
handhaving van het coffeeshopbeleid. Access interdit. Retrieved from
http://accesinterdit.nl/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Verplicht-nummer-def.pdf.
MacCoun, R. (2011). What can we learn from the Dutch cannabis coffeeshop system? Addiction, 106(11), 1899-1910.
MacCoun, R., & Reuter, P. (1997). Interpreting Dutch cannabis policy: reasoning by analogy in the legalization debate. Science, 278(5335), 47-52.
Mackor, A.R. (2012). Legal doctrine as a non-normative discipline. Law and Method, 2(1), 22-45. Malcolmson, P., Myers, R., Baier, G., & Batemen, T. M. J. (2016). The Canadian regime: An introduction
to parliamentary government in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Mann, K. (1992). Punitive civil sanctions: The middleground between criminal and civil law. Yale Law
Marseille, A. T., Tolsma, H. D., Bröring, H. E., Damen, L. J. A., De Graaf, K. J., Van Montfort, A. J. G. M., Schueler, B. J., & Winter, H. B. (2016). Bestuursrecht deel 2: Rechtsbescherming tegen de
overheid. Den Haag: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
Martel, M. (2006). Not this time: Canadians, public policy, and the marijuana question, 1961-1975. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Martel, M. (2008). Law versus medicine: The debate over drug use in the 1960s. In M. Farhni & R. Rutherdale (Eds.), Creating Postwar Canada: Community, Diversity, and Dissent, 1945-75 (pp. 315-333). Vancouver: UBC Press.
Martinson, R.L. (1974). What works? Questions and answers in prison reform. The Public Interest, 37, 22-54.
Mascini, P., & van Wijk, E. V. (2009). Responsive regulation at the Dutch Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority: An empirical assessment of assumptions underlying the theory. Regulation &
Governance, 3(1), 27–47.
Matthews, R. (2014). Realist criminology. Hampshire: Pallgrave MacMillan.
Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
May, P. J., & Winter, S. (1999). Regulatory enforcement and compliance: Examining Danish agro-environmental policy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18(4), 625–651.
May, P. J., & Winter, S. (2000). Reconsidering styles of regulatory enforcement: Patterns in Danish agro‐ environmental inspection. Law & Policy, 22(2), 143-173.
May, P. J., & Wood, R. S. (2003). At the regulatory front lines: Inspectors’ enforcement styles and regulatory compliance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(2), 117–139. Mazerolle, L. G., Roehl, J., & Kadleck, C. (1998). Controlling social disorder using civil remedies:
Results from a randomized field experiment in Oakland, California. In L. G. Mazerolle & J. Roehl (Eds.), Civil remedies and crime prevention: Crime prevention studies (Vol. 9) (pp. 141-159). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
Mazerolle, L., & Ransley, J. (2006). Third party policing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. McAllister, L. K. (2010). Dimensions of enforcement style: Factoring in regulatory autonomy and
capacity. Law & Policy, 32(1), 61–78.
McCormick, P. (1993). Party capability theory and appellate success in the supreme court of Canada, 1949–1992. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 26(3), 523–540.
McCrudden, C. (2006). Legal research and the social sciences. Law Quarterly Review, 122, 632-650. McEwen, C. A., & Maiman, R. J. (1984). Mediation in small claims court: Achieving compliance through
consent. Law & Society Review, 18, 11-49.
McGinty, E. E., Samples, H., Bandara, S. N., Saloner, B., Bachhuber, M. A., & Barry, C. L. (2016). The emerging public discourse on state legalization of marijuana for recreational use in the US: Analysis of news media coverage, 2010–2014. Preventive Medicine, 90, 114-120.
McMahon, M. (1990). ‘Net-widening’ vagaries in the use of a concept. The British Journal of
Criminology, 30(2), 121-149.
Medvedeva, M., Vols, M., & Wieling, M. (2019). Using machine learning to predict decisions of the European Court of Human Rights. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1-30.
B
Menkel-Meadow, C. (1999). Do the haves come out ahead in alternative judicial systems?: Repeat players in ADR. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 15, 19-61.
Michaels, R. (2006). The functional method of comparative law. In M. Reimann & R. Zimmermann (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (pp. 339-382). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Mills, J. H. (2016). The IHO as actor: The case of cannabis and the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs
1961. Hygiea internationalis, 13(1), 95-115.
Ministry of Justice, & Ministry of Interior and Kingdom Affairs. (2002). Naar een veiliger samenleving. Den Haag, October 2002. Retrieved from https://kennisopenbaarbestuur.nl/media/230107/Naar-een-veiliger-samenleving.pdf.
Misérus, M., & Zoetbrood, N. (2017). De burgemeester wordt steeds meer een crimefighter. De
Volkskrant. Retrieved from
http://www.volkskrant.nl/binnenland/de-burgemeester-wordt-steeds-meer-een-crimefighter~a4491441/
Mock, N. H. (1997). Punishing the innocent: no-fault eviction of public housing tenants for the actions of third parties. Texas Law Review, 76(6), 1495-1503.
Monsma, K., & Lempert, R. (1992). The value of counsel: 20 years of representation before a public housing eviction board. Law and Society Review, 26(3), 627-667.
Morgan, J. P., Riley, D., & Chesher, G. B. (1993). Cannabis: Legal reform, medicinal use and harm reduction. In N. Heather, A. Wodak, E. Nadelmann, & P. O’Hare (Eds.), Psychoactive drugs & harm
reduction: From faith to science (pp. 211-229). London: Whurr Publishers London.
Morgenthau, R. M. (2009). Report of the District Attorney County of New York 2000 – 2009. Retrieved from http://star.worldbank.org/corruption-cases/sites/corruption-cases/files/documents/arw/Nolasco_ New_York_County_District_Atty_Rept_Dec_30_2009.pdf.
Moser, S. C., & Dilling, L. (Eds). (2006). Creating a climate for change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mosher, J. (1938). Look out for Mary Jane. Maclean’s Magazine, 51(12). Retrieved from https:// warmlandcentre.ca/2018/03/macleans-look-out-for-mary-jane-1938/.
Mostyn, B., & Gibbon, H. (2018). Transnational social movement theory and the waning war on drugs: Case studies from UNGASS 2016. International Journal of Drug Policy, 51, 148-155.
Moye, J. (2003). Can’t stop the hustle: The Department Of Housing And Urban Development’s one strike eviction policy fails to get drugs out of America’s projects. Boston College Third World Law
Journal, 23(2), 275-292.
Muller, E. R., & De Vries, J. (Eds.) (2014). Burgemeester. Deventer: Kluwer.
Muncie, J. (2008). The punitive turn in juvenile justice: Cultures of control and rights compliance in Western Europe and the USA. Youth Justice, 8(2), 107-121.
National Audit Office. (2016). Efficiency in the criminal justice system. London: National Audit Office. NCSL. (2019). Marijuana overview. National Conference of State Legislatures, 17 October 2019.
Retrieved from https://www.ncsl.org/research/civil-and-criminal-justice/marijuana-overview.aspx. Nettleton, S. (2001). Losing a home through mortgage repossession: The Views of Children. Children and
Society, 15(2), 82-94.
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Nielsen, V. L. (2015). Law enforcement behaviour of regulatory inspectors. In P. Hupe, M. Hill, & A. Buffat (Eds.), Understanding street-level bureaucracy (pp. 115-131). Chicago: Policy Press.
Niemeijer, E. (2015). Galanter revisited: do the ‘haves’ (still) come out ahead? In B. Hubeau, & A. Terlouw (Eds.), Legal aid in the low countries (pp. 85-102). Antwerpen: Intersentia.
Nijkamp, R. & Bieleman, B. (2012). Coffeeshopbezoek Rotterdam voorjaar 2012. Groningen/Rotterdam: Intraval.
Nixon, R. (1971). Special Message to the Congress on Drug Abuse Prevention and Control, June 17. Retrieved from https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/special-message-the-congress-drug-abuse-prevention-and-control.
O’Neill, L. (2019). These 3 countries will be next to legalize weed. The Greenfund.com, 16 Dec 2019. Retrieved from https://thegreenfund.com/these-3-countries-will-be-next-to-legalize-weed. OHCHR. (2014). The Right to Adequate Housing (Fact Sheet No. 21/Rev. 1). Geneva: United Nations. Onderzoekscommissie WODC I. (2018). Betrouwbaar onderzoek: Onderzoekscommissie WODC I inzake
deugdelijkheid drugsonderzoeken. Den Haag: Onderzoekscommissie WODC I.
Onderzoekscommissie WODC II. (2019). Ongemakkelijk onderzoek: Naar een betere balans in de relatie
tussen WODC en beleid. Den Haag: Onderzoekscommissie WODC II.
Onderzoekscommissie WODC III. (2018). De melding terecht: Onderzoek naar de afhandeling
van een klacht van een medewerker over de beïnvloeding van WODC-onderzoeken. Den Haag:
Onderzoekscommissie WODC III.
Örücü, E. (2007). Developing comparative law. In E. Örücü, & D. Nelken (Eds.), Comparative law: A
handbook (pp. 43-66). Portland: Hart Publishing.
Ossebaard, H. C., & Van de Wijngaart, G. F. (1998). Purple haze: the remaking of Dutch drug policy.
International Journal of Drug Policy, 9(4), 263-271.
Owen, H. J. (1971). The Role of Trial Courts in the Local Political System: a Comparison of Two Georgia
Counties. (Unpublished PhD dissertation), Department of Political Science, University of Georgia.
Patterson, D. (2010). A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Perrin, B., & Audas, R. (2018). Report card on the criminal justice system #2. Ottawa:
MacDonald-Laurier Institute.
Peršak, N. (2016). Regulation and social control of incivilities. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. Peters, L. J. J. (2018). Dealen met ondermijningsdelicten: Naar een efficiënte strafprocedure voor
ondermijnende criminaliteit. Deventer: Wolters Kluwer.
Peters, Th. (2017). Het sluiten van woningen op basis van de Opiumwet: ordemaatregel of straf?
Gemeentestem, 122, 120-129.
Pinto, M. (2018). Awakening the Leviathan through Human Rights Law – How Human Rights Bodies Trigger the Application of Criminal Law. Utrecht Journal of International and European Law, 34(2), 161–184.
Plunk, A. D., Peglow, S. L., Harrell, P. T., & Grucza, R. A. (2019). Youth and adult arrests for cannabis possession after decriminalization and legalization of cannabis. JAMA pediatrics, 173(8), 763-769. Pommer, F. (2018). Raad van State handhaaft bestendige lijn: bij meer dan 0,5 gram harddrugs is
toepassing van artikel 13b Opiumwet gerechtvaardigd. Hekkelman.nl, 16 March 2018. Retrieved from https://www.hekkelman.nl/blog/overheidszaken/raad-van-state-handhaaft-bestendige-lijn-bij-meer-dan-0-5-gram-harddrugs-is-toepassing-van-artikel-13b-opiumwet-gerechtvaardigd/.
Post, C., Brouwer, J.G., & Vols, M. (2018). Regulation of prostitution in the Netherlands: Liberal dream or growing repression? The European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 24, 1-20.
B
Posthumus, N. (2012). Geen gemeente wil de wietpas – tien grote ‘coffeeshopgemeenten’ tegen. NRC
Handelsblad, 29/09/2012.
Potter A. (2019). In praise of political opportunism, or, how to change a policy in only fifty years. In A, Potter & D. Weinstock (Eds.), High Time: The legalization and regulation of cannabis in Canada (pp. 9-21). Québec: McGill- Queen’s University Press.
Potter, A., & Weinstock, D. (Eds.). (2019). High time: The legalization and regulation of cannabis in
Canada. Québec: McGill- Queen’s University Press.
Pound, R. (1910). Law in books and law in action. American Law Review, 44, 12-36.
ProCon. (2018.). Legal recreational marijuana states. Retrieved from https://marijuana.procon.org/view. resource.php?resourceID=006868.
Provine, D. M. (2008). Unequal under law: Race in the war on drugs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ranchordás, S., & de Waard, B. (2016). Proportionality crossing borders: why it is still difficult to recognise sparrows and cannons. In S. Ranchordás, & B. de Waard (Eds.), The judge and the
proportionate use of discretion: A comparative study (pp. 1-12). New York: Routledge.
Regeerakkoord. (2017). Vertrouwen in de toekomst: regeerakkoord 2017-2021. Retrieved from https:// www.rijksoverheid.nl/regering/documenten/publicaties/2017/10/10/regeerakkoord-2017-vertrouwen-in-de-toekomst.
Rehm, J., & Fischer, B. (2015). Cannabis legalization with strict regulation, the overall superior policy option for public health. Clinical pharmacology & therapeutics, 97(6), 541-544.
Reinarman, C. (2009). Cannabis policies and user practices: Market separation, price, potency, and accessibility in Amsterdam and San Francisco. International Journal of Drug Policy, 20(1), 28-37. Reinarman, C., & Levine, H. G. (Eds.). (1997). Crack in America: Demon drugs and social justice.
Berkeley: University of California Press.
Reiss, A. J. (1984). Consequences of compliance and deterrence models of law enforcement for the exercise of police discretion. Law and Contemporary Problems, 47(4), 83–122.
Rijksoverheid. (2019). Spelregels experiment gesloten coffeeshopketen. Den Haag: Rijksoverheid. Retrieved from https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/brochures/2019/04/11/spelregels-experiment-gesloten-coffeeshopketen.
Riley, D. (1998). Drugs and drug policy in Canada: A brief review and commentary. Prepared for the
honourable Pierre Claude Nolin. Ottawa: Canadian Foundation for Drug Policy
& International Harm Reduction Association. Retrieved from https://sencanada.ca/content/sen/ committee/362/ille/rep/rep-nov98-e.htm#9.%20Harm%20Reduction.
Roehl, J. (1998). Civil remedies for controlling crime: The role of community organizations. In L. G. Mazerolle & J. Roehl (Eds.), Civil remedies and crime prevention: Crime prevention studies (Vol. 9) (pp. 241-259). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
Rolles, S., & Murkin, G. (2013). How to regulate cannabis: a practical guide. Transform Drug Policy Foundation. Retrieved from https://transformdrugs.org/product/how-to-regulate-cannabis-a-practical-guide/.
Rolles, S., Murkin, G., Powell, M., Kushlick, D., Saunter, N., & Slater, J. (2016). The alternative
world drug report: count the costs of the war on drugs (2nd ed.). Bristol: Transform Drug Policy
Foundation.
Room, R., & MacKay, S. (2012). Roadmaps to reforming the UN drug conventions. Oxford: Beckley Foundation Press.
