• No results found

Dynamic Pricing, Do Customers Prefer a

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Dynamic Pricing, Do Customers Prefer a"

Copied!
20
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Systematic and Unsystematic Time-Based

Dynamic Pricing, Do Customers Prefer a

Pattern?

First supervisor: dr. A.E. Vomberg Second supervisor: dr. E. de Haan

Peter Neef Thesis Defense

(2)

Table of contents

1. Introduction 2. Previous Research 3. Conceptual Model 4. Methodology 5. Results 6. Conclusion 7. Managerial Implications

8. Limitations and Future Research

(3)

About 1.3 billion ton of food gets

wasted per year, a part of this is

(4)

Introduction

▸ Dynamic pricing is adopted in the supermarket industry

▸ Simple discounts on fresh products based on the quality of the

product increases revenue (Herbon et al., 2012) and reduces waste (Buisman & Haijema, 2019)

▸ There are multiple ways of dynamic pricing

▸ Do customers prefer a pattern in time-based dynamic pricing?

(5)
(6)

Previous Research

▸ Customers are more likely to accept prices that are easy to understand and transparent (Kannan & Kopalle, 2001)

▸ Dynamic pricing that breaks a social norm leads to lower perceived price fairness and customer satisfaction and a higher likelihood of punishment actions from the customer towards the retailer

(Garbarino & Maxwell, 2010)

(7)

Previous Research

▸ Positive attitudes of customers are lower towards a firm when they perceive that prices of this firm are unfair (Campbell, 1999).

▸ A wide variation of time-based dynamic prices increases uncertainty (Kannan & Kopalle, 2001)

▸ Ambiguity aversion stems from the fear of criticism people have

(8)

Previous Research

▸ For non-perishable products it is more likely that a dynamic pricing strategy has a negative impact than for perishable products (Kannan & Kopalle 2001).

(9)
(10)

Methodology

10

▸ Story based experiment

▸ New supermarket

(11)

Methodology

▸ Measures for unfairness, uncertainty, purchase satisfaction and switching intention

▸ Leaflets and approached via social media

▸ 109 complete responses

▸ Confirmatory Factor Analysis

(12)

Results Purchase Satisfaction

(13)
(14)

Results Moderation

(15)

Hypotheses

H1a: Systematic versus Unsystematic Dynamic Pricing  Purchase Satisfaction H1b: Systematic versus Unsystematic Dynamic Pricing  Switching Intention H2a: H1a is mediated by Price Unfairness

H2b: H1b is mediated by Price Unfairness H3a: H1a is mediated by Price Uncertainty H3b: H1b is mediated by Price Uncertainty

(16)

Additional Important Findings

(17)

Conclusion

▸ Systematic relative to unsystematic dynamic pricing influences customer attitudes and intentions directly and/or indirectly

▸ Perceived price unfairness and (to some extent) perceived price uncertainty mediate these effects

(18)

Managerial Implications

18

▸ Choice between systematic and unsystematic dynamic pricing

▸ Managers need to decrease perceived price unfairness when implementing unsystematic time-based dynamic pricing

(19)

Limitations and Future Research

19

▸ Convenient sample

▸ Reverse causality cannot be ruled out

▸ A large part did not pass both manipulation checks

▸ Relevant to look at the explanation from the supermarket

(20)

20

Thank you!

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

• Main effects: Personalized dynamic pricing has a negative effect on consumers’ perceived price fairness, trust in the company and repurchase intentions.

Independent variables are the daily product price, minimum competitors price, maximum competitors price, average competitors price, the number of competitors, price

During an online scenario-based experiment, participants were shown two different pricing strategies (time-based pricing vs. behavioural-based pricing) in a way that it is

General price level of the retailer Price changing frequency Price variation Preference of dynamic pricing purchase scenarios Gender Purchase decisions...

Although it is shown in the results that price changing frequency and price variation relative to retailer characteristics do not have a significant effect on consumers’ choice

Drawing on theories of price fairness and uncertainty, this present study tries to discuss circumstances that affect consumers’ judgments regarding price fairness

How do perceived price unfairness and perceived price uncertainty influence the effect of systematic relative to unsystematic time-based dynamic pricing on

This study expands the current body of literature, as this discussion illustrates that dynamic pricing software supports control and also creates opportunities for simultaneously