Human-powered waterpumps for small scale irrigation
purposes in Zambia
Citation for published version (APA):
van Schijndel, J. J. (1990). Human-powered waterpumps for small scale irrigation purposes in Zambia: a survey
and a preliminary selection of pumps to be tested. Eindhoven University of Technology.
Document status and date:
Published: 01/01/1990
Document Version:
Publisher’s PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers)
Please check the document version of this publication:
• A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be
important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People
interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the
DOI to the publisher's website.
• The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review.
• The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page
numbers.
Link to publication
General rights
Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain
• You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.
If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license above, please follow below link for the End User Agreement:
www.tue.nl/taverne Take down policy
If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us at: openaccess@tue.nl
providing details and we will investigate your claim.
Human-Dowered waterpumps for small scale
irrigation purposes in Zambia; a survey
and a preliminary selection of pumps
to be tested.
APPENDIX A: Information on pump 1-85.
J.J.
van Schijndel
February 1990
Eindhoven University of Technology
The Netherlands
..
.
PUMP SELECTION TABLES
The ratings in the following tables represent the "best judgment" of the
Project staff. They are based in large part on laboratory and/or field data,
which are summarized tor each pump in the Handpump Compendium
which follows Chapter 6.
PUMP SELECTION GUlDE 79
.,;,.- •• ,. ..... ~~.~'~~:>~ ..... -.~ .. T'"~ • ., ..... _ •
-, :,
...
-'~'..
.;.~.-'.-~.~-~_ .... ---":"~" , .. ~-:...
-..-.;:;.....
,._., ...-
.r ~~ . ...-...: . . ~ •. :...~ . . __ _ • __ .. • . ,"I. • _ _._ ... ' • ..:.. ... 4:.tJ .", t .:.. ) "e'I
E:=:~iii.jj(.j"iiriili~!Bi,.j:'lJ:I.:g:;::;::::'-::'=::,=-1
waiting 10 be repaired. They thus take account ol the lact that
~
t
which are suitable lor village mainlenance and can be repaired q~may be more ·reliable" than Ihose which require more CO~
maintenance, even if the latter break down less Irequently.
THE RATINGS
Ratings in !he
Pump
Selection Tab/es are based on evaluation of pumpperformance in the laboratory and field trials. Three ratings are used:
00 Good
o
=
Adequate- =
Does nat
meet minimum requirementsA more detailed interpretation of the ratings for specific headings
can
be found in !he eaner part of this Ctlapter.lumn 1 -
Pump Name
The pumps
are
liste<! alphabetically in four sections. according 10 !heffia)(jmum pUrl'ping lift recomrnended by the manufacturer. The reference number which precedes eadh pump name indicates the order of the PlfllpS in !he Handpump Compendium.
lumn 2 -
Data
Souree
L The pump has been tested in the laboratory F The pump has trcId a minimum of 2 years' lield trials
(F) The pump has rad limited field trials
lumn 3 -
Discha
Rate
The disdlarge rate deemed 'adequate" for each pumping lift is noted at !he top of the appropriate taöle. The rate reduces as depth increases, lor the reasons explained r1 Box 5.1. Some deepwell pumps thus actIieve 1<lwer ratings for low-lift applications, where users wiU opt for pL;mps giving greater discharges. A special note is made where a pump is available wittl a range of co,'linder sizes or adjustable stroke length, to sul different depths.
lumn 4 -
Ease of lIaintenance
Ratings indicate !he
ease
with 'a!hich maintenance can be carried out by:A A vi IIage caretakcef
B
An area mechanic C A mobrle mainter1ance teamlumn 5 -
Reliability
Re!iability rati1"9S
are
an indica1ion of !he proportion ol the time that the pvnp is !ikely to be functiOnlrIQ properly. Separate ratings are given lor di7'erent daily outputs. The ra:ings combine judgments ol the "mean time belore lailure" (MTBF) and !he probabie "downtime" when the pump isolumn 6 -
Corrosion Resistance
Ratings are base<! primarily on the materials ol the downhole corl'Cl
nents. Galvanized steel pumprods and ri~ing mains are not corr~
resistant in aggressive water and eam a - rating.
olumn 7 -
Abrasion Resistance
Ratings indicate the pump's capability to pump sand-Iaden
w_
Performance in laboratory and field trials is combined with asse~ of the se al and valve types. For non-suction pumps, leather cupsea. are rated - • though the extent ol abrasion damage will be related: i !he daily output of the pump. Analysts may therefore accept lower TaIe: I pumps lor light duty appIications.olumn 8 -
Manufacturing Needs
Ratings indicate the ease with which a pump could be manufactured
r
ideveloping country with!he specilied level of industrial development. 1 Low induslTial base, limited quality control
2 Medium-level industry, no special processes
3 Advanced industry. good quality control
olumn 9 -
Short list
The Analyst develops a short list by entering a check mark agars'
those pumps meeting his selection criteria.
olumn 10 -
Ca
ifal Cost
Analysts should obtain current prices lor short-listed pumps.
olumn 11 -
Remarks
Special leatures ol individual pumps are noted in th is
cokP
I.Amplification of the notes is given below ..
Amplification of the ratings
tor
individual pumps
can
be
tound in the Handpump Compendium
NOTES ON TABLES
Tf-e notes re/are to pumps
WIm
the same reference number - i.e. Nore 1.1 reters to PlJmp 14. /he Mi3Jidev. In the tab/es. ratings fo which the note re'ers are higr.ightedLU
Note 1. The 00 corrosion rating lor the Abi-ASM is based on current mcdels. Earfier modeIs did suffer trom corrosion.
Note 2- The 0 corrosion ranmg for the Alridev is based on the use of staJnless steel pumprods, offerBd as an option.
Note 7. The Duba Tropie 7 s a high-discharge pump designed for !Wo-person operatien.
Notes 9 and 10. The India Mark " uses a gravity return on the p\Jnger. and requires a minimum cylinder setting ol 24 meters (one manufacrurer offers a fixed-link system for shallower settings).
80
Note 14. The Maldev is a pumphead only. All ratings are based
on
l'use of conventional downhole components.
Note 16, Reliability ratings lor the Monolift are based on pumps
~
metal gears. Plastic gears were less reliable.Note 21. The 00 corrosion rating lor the Vergnet is based on
oP"
modeis. Earlier models did suffer trom corrosion. 1"
Note 23, The 00 discharge rating lor the Volanta takes account
d ,
pump's adjustable stroke length. Present designs require a minimum diameter ol 11 Omm.
Note 30. Downhole components of the Kangaroo are corrosion
~
tant. The 0 rating relates to the pedal return spring. ~
Note 40. The Rower is designed as an irrigation pump, and haS a'
i Pump name
I
1. flGH UFT PUMPS (G-45 meters)
ahi.ASM L IFl
'5..-Mona~P3
L FIs
Nlra AF84 L 'S I ; Deepset , Z)SWti80
& 81f
Vl1IQ.net Z3 Volan:a (F) F L F LL F
-o
00o
00'o
00'o'
o
o
o
o
00' 00' 00'-o
o
00'-o
00IIT1:RMEDIATE LIFT PUMPS (0-25 meters)
I
~ l;O~nLD6
25 DMR(C.
1
L FF
L fI
25 Nira AR6I
Ll1N LIFT PUMPS (0-12 meters);:' Blair F ~...E1hiooia BP50 L ~ I{~~ rvu L F 11 Malaw: Mark V F ~ Nira .hF85 L F
I
.
.!
"!.ara
L Fi
1~ON
PUMPS (0-7 meters)~-AID Syction F ,1..I..~tnn L
i
.lnaJS;j
Suction.E
i
!'
~
Suction(~l
.I'~w
No. 6 _l (F) ~ . Rn..u.... l IFl~.
i~OO
~
:" &r\rv-_ •.•. ~ -"'11UNA1. PUMPS 00' 00' 00'o
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00Maximum pumping lift -
7 meters
"Adequate" discharge rate -
19 liters/minute
I
- 00 00 00 0 1 - 00 ' 0 -00 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 o i o 0 - 00 00 00 0 1- - I - -- oo!oo 00 ! 0 1- 0 0 0 - - 100 0 0 0 0 0 - -- 00 00 00 0 - - ' -- 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 _ - -- 00 00 00 .: 00. _0. - - -- 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 - 1 -- 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 - ' 0 -- 0 0 · 00 00 _00_ 0 - i - -- 1 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 0 . 0 -- 00 00 00 100 0 - - -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- - 0 - 00 00 00 '00 0-
!
-
-- - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 -- - 00 00 00'0 - i 00--
oo
!
oo
00 '0 0 0 0 0 0 - = - 00 00 oo ! 0 1- - I - 0 - 00 00 00 00..QQ. 00 100-o
00 00 00 00 0 00 0 -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0-o
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 o 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 - 00o
00 - 00 o 00o
00o
00o
00o
00 00 00 00 00 ·0 00 - 00 - 0o
00 00 00 00 00o
0 - 0o
00 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - 0 - 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 0 - 00o
0 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 - 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 - 00 - 0 0 0 0 0 - 00 00 00 0 1 - 0 00 - 0 00 0 0 0 0 0o
- 1 - 00 00 00 00 00 00100 00o
0 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0o
00 00 00 0 1- - 0 - 00 00 00 00 00 OOOO. Q . O 0 ·- DO DOo
00 00 00 0 1- - - - 00 00o
00 00 00 0 1 - 0 0 - 00 00o
00 00cY.I
2...1_ - 0 - .00 DO 00 00 00 00 0 1- - 00 - 00 00 DO DO 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 D DO 0 0 0 0o
00 00 00 00 0 0 00 - 00 00o
00 00 00 0 1- 0 - 00 00 Short Price list (US$) , !i
Remarks See Note 1 See Note 2 See Note 7 See Note 9 See Note 10 See Note 14 See Note 16 See Note 21 See Note 23 7m max. liftSee
Note 30 'i
7m max. lift Ii
I See Note40~
1:(:
---+----+---+--+-~--~--~~_+--~--~_r--+_~----~--~---~<1~---+--~---4--~+-4--+-+~-4--~+-~-+--~--~---~
~s
that discharge ratings are based on choice of the correct cylinder size trom a range offered by the manufacturer.PUMP SELECTlON GUlDE 81
I
·
·
'-.'''''~ ..
'~.~.:r"'"(.~
'-'
.
'
"
~
:.
' ~~
:
;·k
_ . ___ .~ .... ""':"s....-_ . _._,
_
.
...
.
.
"
.. _
_
_...-..~__
_ ...
.
...
'
..
'
..
;,IIii
..
...
'
·
'
M;
_iIiII.\
IIiI~
...<~:
_'
.
Cote d'lvoire/France
Ger'.eral DescriptIon
Th: !':!-ASM is a hybrid pump using a p..n::s::and manufactured in the Cote d·',c·~ and the hydraulically operated V~ pumping element made in France (P J""'O 21). There are na mechanical links
be':'JOS'S"l the above and below Qfound unr:s. "oIimary cylinder in the pumpstand is ::::o-rected by plastic hose to a stain-less ;;:~I casing, in which a flexible ru:ce"' ~embrane contracts and expands to -r:~"':Nater through a second hose to
~ ;.;..--"ce.
-oe
pumpstand is partly cast iron are ~"jy fabricated mild steel. Fulcrumbe:r-r;s are split and injection molded in n)'o- :rass or stainless steel is used for thë
-=rrary
drive cylinder and the brass pl.I'Ç': -as leather ring seals.ManJtacture
T~ :J.J'"pstand is suitable for manufac-tu~ - ~eveloping countries with loundry, fa:rczoo and machining ski lis, and could be -o:i";ed for all-fabricated manufacture. Th~ :elow-ground pumping element re'J..;~ specialized techniques, high skill le.'?-s :rd high quality conlrol.
~
A:lca- 'nduslrie, 01 BP 343, Abidjan, 01 C:rE :'·'.oire.
lnó<::ative prices - Feb 1985
Per _ ,r
T wr
,:se
(per meIer)98
US$690 US$3
Laboratorv Tests
Date tested: 1982 Reported: Han4Jumps Project Report No. 3
Performance
data
(typical values)
Head (meters) 7 25 45
Pumping rate (cydeslmin) 38 40 42
Volume/min (liters) 10 10 10 .
Input (watts) 82 129 175
MechanicaJ efficiency (%) 14 32 43
Maximum handle force (kg-I) 20 35 45
Footvalve leakage (mVmin) No significant leakage
The volume discharged per stroke ranged trom 0.25 liters
at
45 meters liftto
0.27 liters at 7 meters lift.Evalustion
The two test pumps were weil packed, but had suffered some damage. Threads on the pumphead base were damaged on one of the samples, and Ihe baseplates were distorted on both. Handle components were not correctly aligned on either pump.
Comprehensive and weil illustrated installation and maintenance Instruc-tions we re supplied in Freneh. Insta-lIation is straightforward and does not require lifting tackle. Lightweight poly-ethylene hoses connect the pumpstand with the pumping element.
Malntenance too is simpie.
Primary cylinder piston seals are likely to need frequent replaeement, but the task is straightforward and quick. The lightweight hoses mean th at the pumping element can be extracted by hand, without lifting tackle, and Ihe element itself is easy to dismantIe provided the appropriale hexa-gon keys are available. However, if the diaphragm fai/s, a full replacement unit is needed, at comparatively high cost.
The 4000 hour endurance test was carried out at 40 cycles per minute, with a simu/ated head of 45 meters, subsequently reduced to 20 meters. The original leather seals on the primary cyl-inder plunger ware out very early in the lest. They we re replaced with seals of different materials but conlinued to wear out rapidly. The fulcrum in the handle ware oul after about a third of Ihe test periad and the bolt securing the drive piston rad to the luierum broke at about the same lime. About half way through the endu-rance test, the rubber buffer in the plunger was lound to have collapsed and was replaced.
In contrast with Ihe problems experi
-eneed with the above ground components.
the below ground pumping element suff-ered na breakdowns and was stiJl in goad working order at the end of the 4000
hours.
Repeated lailure of the primary cyl-inder plunger seaJs was attribuled la sharp edges detected on the replenishing hole in the cylinder. The hole had not been properly deburred during manulacture - a difficult operation because of the position ofthe hole.
The manufacturer has changed the design ol the fulcrum and the pumprod fixing since the laboratory tests.
Corrosion was delected on the plunger rad and the pumping element end caps, and inside!he pumpstand.
Both the pumpstand and the handle were undamaged in Ihe Impact tests, and the pump completed the allotted 96,000 cycles of handle shock tests without failure.
Users quickly became accustomed to the rhythm required to operate the pump, but lound it tiring to use because of the comparatively low discharge rate and high efforts needed.
The overaJl conclusion ol the labor-alory trials was that there is a marked contrast between the reliability of the pumpstand and above ground works and that ol Ihe belowijround pumping element. While the pumping element proved very reliable, the pumpstand was judged to be unsuitable lor community water supply.
Madilications have since been made to the pumpstand. II the problems can be overcome, the Abi-ASM is seen as a potential VLOM pump because ol its simple installation and maintenanee requirements.
----_.-
--~-~ _.~.-~-.---A4
Field Trials
Test conditions
Number Head Data of range available Country pumps (meters) (months)
Cote d'lvoire 8 10·30 13
The basic design concept ol the Abi--ASM pump has been to combine the positive leatures ol the Abi·MN and Verg net pumps. The Vergnet below-ground compo· nents are easy to install and extract and have good corrosion resistance. The lever operation ol the Ab; is generally prelerred to the loot-operated Vergnet by West Alrican users.
The ASM pump is still being
developed and improvements are needed in the pumpstand design (bearings, handle, piston/cylinder assembly). Imp-rovements are also being sought in the diaphragm, to bring greater reliability and Iower prices.
In Cote d'lvoire, the pump has proved easy to install. requiring no heavy equipment or special tools.
Maintenance too is quick and easy. The seals ol the primary cylinder plunger had to be replaced at intervals ol about six months and the plastic luierum bearings at a similarlrequency.
The diaphragm proved gene rally reliable, though when lailure did occur it was necessary to replace it, at a cost ol about US$ 200.
PUMP
The :J_~:l's discharge rate ranged
Irom 0.51: -:J cu m/h, which was judged
to be ade:;_~:e by most users. There is a
notabie ci~='ence between dlscharges
measured - !"le lield and these in the laboratory :'5Cnarge depends not only on
the numb€-' :i strokes per min_ne, but also
on the rh)-:-- applied. VIllagers operate the ASM a: 2':-35 strokes per minute at 50·
75% ol .~, stroke. The measured
discharge
s:es
at 10, 20. 30 and 40strokes pe -,nute were respectively 3.2, 8.5, 15.8. ë.
-c
26 liters per mi~ute at liftsbetween 1 Cr a'1d 20m.
No p":Ç,e'!1s were enro ... ntered with
corrosion. ë.-C the pump does not suffer
Irom abras,:r. However, sand. silt or clay
in the waw 00 enter the dléi;)'1ragm and
were resp::.-s,bie lor ruptures in several cases.
Users found the AS~fs pumping
action qun" acceptable, and !he pump has
high VLOM xtential.
Assessment
Ratings are based on bath
IaOoratory and field tests.
Discharge Rate
From the field trial results, Ihe pump is clearly capable of achieving reasonable discharges when used wth the right rhythm. It eams an 'adequate' (0) rating lor lifts of 12,
25 and 45 meters, but is below !he
mnimum lor a 7m lift.
Esse
of MaintenanceThe above ground components ol
the Abi·ASM are easily maintained b,' village caretakers, but Ihe need
fcy skilled mechanics to dismantie
tt.e
pumping element means thatthe pump is rated 'unsuitable- (-)
fcy Level A maintenance. Absence
0' rods and rising mains eams the
p_'mp a 'goocr (00) rating lor Level
B
maintenance at all pumping lifts.Reliability
FJeld evidence ol breakdowns and repair interventions eams Ihe pump
a
00 ratingtor
reliability at a daily GJtput of 1.5 m3/d, 0 lor 4m3/d at 7, 12 and 25m ifts and - lor 8m3/daoo
lor 4m3/d at 45m.Con'osion Resistance
Beiow ground components of the pump are made trom corrosion resistant materlals. Though some
corrosion
was
experienced withear1ier modeIs, and the pumpstand,
prWnary drive piston roef and
dlaphragm end caps are slightly
Vl#lerable te corrosion, !he pump
now eams a 00 rating.
Abrasion Resistance
The ASM pump is little affected by
abrasion,
as
!he pumping element!las
no
seaJs. However, Ihediaphragm
can
rupture if sand or siltfills Ihe element. The rating is thef'efore reduced to o.
Manufacturing Needs
"llis is a hybrid pump. The below
groond components require special
skiI!s,
but
!he pumpstand isSlitable
tor
manufacture incoontries with foundry, fabrication
and machining skilIs. Ratings lor
manufacturing environments 1,2
aoo
3are
1herefore - , 0 and 0respectively .
. .. ._ ... < •• 0#-~ • •• _.~ __ .... _ • .( ... _
Kenya
• I' i'; " I f ·:
~
i
·
~.::
-";
,
'f:
,r f' ·,,1·,'.
'I,'~~ ~ ... . 1,"General Description
The Alridev is a pump design developed during the course ol the Project with sup -port Irom donors, researdl organizations and private companies. Available in the public domain, the design has aimed 10 demonstrate !he VLOM concepts ol easy, low-cost maintenanc:e and suitatr ility lor manulacture in developing countries,
The present design. which began limited product ion in Kenya towards the end ol 1985, is being modified lurther as a result ol lield experiences. Production ol the pumphead has also started in smal! numbers in Malawi, as a second gene -ration ol its lorerunner the Maldev (Pump 14),
The Alridev pumpstand is an all-steel labrication consisting largely ol stock sections, and involves a minimum ol close -loleranee machining. The T-bar handle comes in !Wo versions: a 3:1 mechanical advantage lor 10-30 meters lift; and a 4.5:1 mechanical advantage lor 30-45m lift. A direct action version is under
100
'
.
. ... _ ~t,. __ .. de r' • tb _ . .. _ .
Laboratory Tests
THE AFRIDEV PUMP HAS NOT BEEN TESTED IN THE
CATR LABORATORY
development lor lower lifts. The different hand les mean that the same 50mm diameter long-stroke cylinder can be used lor all lifts (see Box 4.6 in Chapter 4). Handle bearings are twin bushes ol proprietary plastics which snap together.
Rising main is 63mm
00
solvent welded uPVC pipe susperded Irom the pumpstand using a compressed rubber cone. Standard pumprods are 10mm galvanized mild steel with sçecial hooked joints which eliminate threaos and need no tools lor assembly or dismantling. Stain-less steel pumprods are ava.lable at extra cost lor corrosive groundwater.The standard 50mm cylinder is a long stainless steel tube sleeved into uPVC pipe. Plunger and lootvalve are identical components comprising !Wo plastic mol-dings permanently spin-we«Jed together (prototypes in !he lield were machined). A molded rubber valve bobbin snaps into the valve housing by hand. The plunger seal is also a snap lining, which
can
be installed by hand and removed with (he help ol a household knile. A lishing 1001. consistingol a sm all grappling device at !he end ol a length ol rope grips the lootvalve to remove it lor maintenance.
This lishing tooi and a lorged socket spanner are the only tools required lor installation and maintenance.
Manufacture
Though "modem" materials are used in !he
Alridev, all components can be locally manulactured in Kenya, with the excep-tion ol the stainless steel cylinder liners which are imported,
SupplIers
The Afridev design is available in !he
public domain. Inlonmation on individual manulacturers is available Irom The Regional Project Officer, Rural Water Supply Handpumps Project, The World Bank, PO Box
305n,
Nairobi. Kenya,Indicative prlces - Targets
Complete pump to , 30 meters Spares pack US$450 US$12
PUMP
Field Trials
Test conditions
Number Head Data
of range availabie Country pumps (meters) (mon/hs)
Kenya 37 10-49
8
Malawi 3 10-25 12
As the Afridev design has developed,
different prototypes have been tested during field trials in Kenya and Malawi,
though the progressive nature of the design means that the monitoring time for newly developed components is neces-sarily restricted.
An important aspect of the design has been the extensive research and specialist advice on plastic components, particularly bearings.
Developments have concentrated on simplification of maintenance and meas-ures to maximize local manufacturing potential.
Installation is simpie; even at depths ol
45
meters, there is no need lor litting equipment. Two ski lied people can comp-lete installation in about two hours (mainly taken up in making the solvent-cement joints in the rising mains).In Kenya, the Afridevs were installed on wells with pumping heads ol 10-50 meters, averaging 25-30 meters. These arduous test conditions led to very few breakdowns. Some early prototype plastic bearings seized due to poor dimensioning,
but since the present bearings were
installed at the beginning ol 1986, there has been linie wear, though corrosion ol bearing housings has resulted in some
darnage to the bearings.
Users like the Alridev. The varia.ble handle mechanica I advantage maintains a high discharge with easy operation over
a
range Irom 10 to 50 meters. Corrosion is nol a problem, il stainless steel roosare
used when water is aggressive. Nrtrile rubber seals in the polished stainless steel cylinder lining give abrasion resis-tance, which is further improved by the
use
of a large diameter suction pipe. This minimizes sand ingress by reducing watel" veIocities at the cylinder intake.The hooked connections on the
pumprods have proved successlul.
ena/)-~ng !Wo people to remove and replace
a
pi'Jnger and lootvalve Irom a depth ol 30min about30 minutes without the need lor kI-ting tackle or special tools. Some pumprod breakages have occurred, and these have been anributed to shortcomings in the
production of the hooked connections. The push-lit bearings also make village maintenance very easy.
Overall, the Alridev design is
now
demonstrating that deepwell handpumpscan
be maintained by villagers, effectivelyand economically, and that locaJ
manufac-ture can produce reliable pumps at
an
atfordabIe cost.CAUSES
or
ESSEN11AL INTERVENTlONS2 2.5 -3 1.1
...
toe Z 2.5..
IE :z Jo: % 0 1..4i
~ 0 0 2 0i
1.2 0 I~
L5~
~o.a
u lil: j'"'
~
f;EO .•
:.
'"'
~ :. 0..4 IE 0.5:.
0.2 0 0H[)..HanCSla RH-A.oc:I hanoer RM-Ihs.no ma.n PE~ng .I.menl
F-fulcrum PR-Pump '00 PS-Pdlon ...al F\I.sooc val we OT -Olher
PUMP
1j.
..
.
... 0...-" ...
Afridev
Assessment
Field testing has
beeft
carried outon pre-production models ol the
Alridev. Design modif.cations are being made continoously, most recently
to
overcome problems identified with beamg housing corrosion and hooked pumprod manufacture. The ratings rellect field trial perfonmanoe so far, but!he limited nature of these trials means that !he rati~ are not
weil substantiated at ths stage.
Discharge Rate
The variabIe handle mechanical
advantage ensures
a
high dis-charge lorheads
frorr. 10 to SOm.but the
"goocr
(00) r.tjng recluces ~ "adequate· (0)ter
7m lifts,where even !he shortest practical
handle could nat compete with
discharges from drect action pumps (a direct actio1 version of
!he Afridev is being deYeloped).
&se
of MaintenanceThe Alridev is a
VLOM
pump, andNis have ronfirmed iIs easy maintenance. justifyflg !he 00 rating at all depths tor all
mainten-ance systerns.
Aeliability
The combination of ~ repairs and low frequency ol breakdowns
eams the pump a 00 rating lor
most
operating c:ordiOons,redu-eng
to
0 tor iIts ol 4&n or a daily output 018m.Yd.CofTosion Reslstance
All downhole
components
are
corrosion resistant
Ct
stainless steel pumprodsare
selected). However, comlSion of !he pump-head bearing housing reduces the rating too.AbrasIon Resistance
The nitrile saai in 1he poIished stainless steel cylinder lining handles sand-laden water
reason-. ably weil, eaming Ihe pump
a
rating ol "adequate· (0
J
-Manu1acturing
Neects
The Afridev
uses a rumber
olmodem materiaIs, !he majority ol which could be reliably processed in most developing OOi#ltries. The
need
to
in1)Ort staness steel cylinder linings and Ile quality controlneeded
in plastics manu-tacture reduce !he 00 rating tor categories 2 and 3 ~ 0 torCategDfy 1 coontries.
Sr; Lanka
General Oescription
This is a deepwell version ol a pump derived Irom a basic design developed by !he Battelle Memoriallnstitute and Georgia InsliMe ol Technology on behall ol USAID. The pumpstand consists ol a cast iron drive head assembly and cast iron base joined by a steel tube. The lulcrum stand is pinned to !he pumps tand below
and the handle above, so that the lulcrum moves in an are as the handle is operated.
The cylinder is conventional but uses uPVC tube instead ol brass. The plunger is fitted wi!h two leather cupseals and there are !Wo !ootvaJves - one fitted to an extension pipe below Ihe cylinder.
Manufacture
Basic ski lis ~ loundry worl<., machining and leather crafting are needed to manu-lacture the pump and carelul quality control is needed to ensure interchange-ability ol
pé\rtS-Suppl/ers
The field test pumps were supplied by Diason Pumps Ltd, 112 Isipathana Mawatha, Cdombo 5, Sri Lanka.
The laboratory tests were carried out on pumps trom Honduras (the Funymaq)
and Indonesia (the Sumber Banyu).
Prlces -
Not available
The AID Defivative pumps are specilically designed to be manulactured in the deve-loping country in which they will be used.
Local prices should be obtained. -.",
• __ ., ... __ ... ". , "%2' .
@
Laboratory Tests
The AID Derivative manulactured in
sn
Lanka has not been tested in f'e CATR Laboratory. This evaluation is related to the tesling of pumps based on the sa;-e :1esign manulactured in Honduras (the Funymaq) and Indonesia (ttle Sumber B.ry1..i. Thepumps were tested in 1983/84 and separate reports are included in Handpurrps
?-::;eet
Report No. 3,
Performance data (typIcai values)
Head (meters)
7
25
~Pump· SB FM
sa
FM
SB RotPumping rate (cyclesImin) 40
38
3029
30 30Volume/min (liters) 34 27
2S
20 2421
Input (watts)
67
85 145 134 229 ZlOMechanical efficiency (%) 58 35 69 61 76 66 Maximum handle lorce (kg-I) 10 12 30 30 45 50 Footvalve leakage (mVmin) NS
NS
0.4 NS 2.4NS
• SB
=
Sumber Banyu;, 78mm cylinder; FM - Fooymaq, lOmm cylinder; !'iS:No
significant leakage,
Evaluation
Though the basic design ol the !Wo pumps is the same, the Funymaq performed much better in the endurance tests than the Sumber Banyu. It would therelore be unwise to draw general conclusions about
all AID Derivatives on the basis ol these tests, though they do indicate pointers to be taken into consideration when evalu-ating the pumps.
For example, both pumps demand a substantial complement ol tools and equip-ment lor InstalIation and mainte-na nee and there was difficulty in assembling the pumps Irom the compo-nents supplied. In the case ol the Sumber Banyu, components ol the !Wo sample pumps were not interchangeable, and the spares supplied did not lit either pump. The Funymaq pump tops did not fit the bodies (holes were drilled in the wrong positions) and the handles were stift to operate. Clearly, good quality control is needed il pumps are to be serviceable.
The design is such that Irequent lubrication ol the handle and lulcrum link pivots is needed lor satislactory pump operation. Below ground maintenance inv-olves removal ol the complete assembly and therelore needs heavy lifting equip-ment, and Irequent attention is likely to be needed to the leather cupseals and loot-valves.
Initially, the 4000 hour enduranee test on the Sumber Banyu was conducted at 40 cycles per minute with a simulated head ol 45 meters. Rapid we ar ol linkages in the pumpstand, broken rods and worn lootvalves led to live lailures in
the IJst 1000 hours, and !re "Ie:ld was reduced to 30 meters lor !he ~arder of
the tests.
Pumprod lailures contin:.ec 1:) accur,
incluóng !Wo lailures ol !he ;:x.;-çer rad when the lootvalve leather -::Efj away and aJlowed ttle cast iron weg'"! 1:) 'out the
plurçer. At ttle end of !he :es"L
:ne
C)1-inder end caps were heavil, NSted, !he plurçer and cupseals ware ~It n goodconcilion and the cylinder
xre
.-aspol-ishec1 but o!herwise showin; ~* signs of we ar. All other parts had be:;r. -e:oaced at sor.-e stage.
The Funymaq was :=-S:~: at 30 meters simulated head tro,- ~ ;!3rt and
per'ormed very much ~ ~an the Sumber Banyu. Only one ~;L.
-e
xcurred dur'ng the 4000 hours, ~:-e
leather 100000Iaive broke away and ;a,~ severeda~age to !he plunger a-c
:-e
cylinder bore. There was considef3:1€ -o:>ar in the ha:-dle bearings and guidf x):<s by the er<! ol the 4000 hours. :"1:l...gh they renained serviceable. ~=
..;-
.
•
-naq was baCly corroded at the end :f :-oe :est.The Sumber Bany~ :2-=<e casting
b~e at 400 Joules in
:-e
impact test bI.-t Ihe heavier casling :f :->: FunyrT'aq sl.lVived without damage.The overall ~ ol Ihe taooratory tests was thal
:-oe
:,JO design~.as some shortcomings. r :r-::<:utar. the SèCond lootvaJve is rea_ "'C:I< and can actually cause worse oa-~ ::"an would occur without it. Good :;I...è:~.' controt is reeded if the pump IS ::: :l:? used lor community water suppl,
,,:x:
~IS was not achieved on the pumps le;;:ec' .... :
. '- .
.;
I . ir ..
AID
Derivative (Deepwell)
Field Trials
Test conditions
Number Head Data
of range availablf
Country
pumps (meters) (monttl$Sri Lanka 9 2.6°-5.2 11
° Average head
In the Sri Lankan field trials, the deepwel pumps operated at only small pumping 11'":5
and with comparatively low outpU1S. Tr-.e field trials therefore yield little evidence ;;f
the pump's likely performance in high Ir':
applications.
No instruC1ion manual was supplie: with the pumps. Skilled workers a-: needed tor installation and they must b:
equipped with tools and lifting equipme~
On average, it took four workers about toIo:
hours to instal! each pump. A concre.:
pedestal is desirabie, to lift the operator 1:)
a comfortabie position.
The exposed drive head means !hE:
frequent lubrication is needed of th:
pumphead moving parts (at least once
a
month). The whole pump assembly has 1:)
be removed for any repair to the plunger
er-valve assembly, and this means that
a
pump mechanic and !Wo trained worke:; must be available with special tools are ski 115. Great care is needed in handling th: cast iron parts. A new gas ket is neeOe:
each time that the pumpstand is removec. and care is needed when dismantling !hé
threaded cylinder cap from the uPVC cylinder.
All test pumps performed withoLf. major failure, but leather cupseals were replaced on three pumps. Plungers ant!
check valves remained in good condition and there were few signs of wear on the cylinders. Crosshead guides and blocks were wom but still serviceable and little wear occurred on the fulcrum and rodhanger pins, which were weil lubricated during the trials.
The pumping action and relatively high delivery (24 liters per minute at 30
strokes per minute) we re popular with the users, and the pumps proved weil suited to this comparativety light duty. It was clear however th at maintenance commit-ments will be quite high and call tor significant resources in terms of manpower and equipment.
Laboratory probIems over the interchangeability of components were not encountered in the field trials on Sri Lankan manufaC1ured pumps.
In concluding !hat the pump is adequate for very !ow lifts and relatively light use, it must be recognized that a suC1ion version of the pump (Pump No 34)
is available tor lifts up to 7 meters, and has the advantage !hat the cylinder does not have to be lifted
out
lor maintenance.CAUSES OF'
ESSENTIA:..
INltRVEN110NS
10 0.' 0.04 I 0 0 0
J
0.3 0.2•
E
~ O.t 2 L.. ... _ -... --.lllfl-Iii'l'....,.-_--'-O.O 0~ndle RH-Roei h.lnoer RM-R .... nç ma" PE-Pumpmg elemenl F-Fuh:rum PR-Pump roei PS-Pisaon Ha FV-Foot v.lve OT -Other
PUMP
Assessment
Because all AID Deepwell field trial pumps were installed in shallow weiIs, 1tle laboratory tests have been especially important in rating this PUr1ll.
Dlacharge Rate
The pump delivers a high discharge lor moderate effort at shallow lifts, and eams a "goed"
(00) rating lor ifts of 7 and 12 meters. The high handle force needed at higher heads reduces the rating
to
"'adequate' (0) at 25 and 45 meters.Ease of MaIntenance
The naed lor ifting gear and special tools means thal the pump is rated "Unsuitableo (-) for Level A maintenance. At 7m and
12m. area mechanics
can
readily carry out maintenance, eaming a00 rating lor level B, but this
drops
to
0 al 2Sm and 45m, where lifting gear bealmes essentiaJ.Rellabllity
Laboratory tesis showed !hat the
AID Deepwell pump would need excessive maintenance lor anything other !han low ift and Iow output applications.
h
is therefore rated - tor lifts higher than 12 meters and lor highoutput appJications at all lifts
Corroslon Resistance
Heavy corrosion occurred in the Jaboratory tests and some rusting was apparent in the field trials. The rating is theretore - .
Abrasion ResisCance
Leather cupseals are known to be
a problem when sand is present in the water, and the pump is therefore raled - lor abrasion resistance.
Manufacturing Needs
A1though intended for manufacture in developing countries, the AID Deepwell needs carelul quality control of casting and machining. h
therelore rates lor manufacturing environment 1 (\ow
industrial deveIopment) , but 00
tor environments 2 and 3.
103
Zambia
I
---1
. .?'Laboratery Tests
I
Tt(' handJr
General Descriptien
The Bestobell is a conventional lever-action deepwel! force pump, designed and manufactured in Zambia. The pumpstand and T-shaped handle are fabricated from mild steel. Handle bearings are bali races. A single spanner fits all the fastenings in the pumpstand. The pump is designed to use uPVC rising main. With 2 inch rising main, the piston may be withdrawn without removing the main. Footvalve mainte-nance does require extraction of the full below ground assembly. Pumprods are 12mm steel with threaded connectors.
The cylinder is heavy duty uPVC pipe. Early models used leather ring seals, but the current design has a molded rubber seal fitted to the uPVC piston body. Piston components are also used in the footvalve, or aSocia valve is supplied as anoption.
.Manufacture
Above and below ground components are suitable for manufacture in many devel-oping countries, with care needed in alig-ning and assembling handle bearings and in cutting threads in the cylinder barrel.
Suppliers
BestobelI Zambia Ltd, 875 Zambia Road, PO Box 230003, Ndola, Zambia.
Indicative prices - 1986
Per unit, excluding pumprod and rising main
104
US$225
Date tested: t 986
Performance data
(typical
vaJues)
Head (meters)
Pu~ngra!e(cyc~rrUn)
Volume/min (liters) Input (watts)
Mechanical efficiency (%)
Maximum handle force (kg-f)
Footvalve leakage (mVmin)
Evaluatlon
The !wo test pumps were securely pad<ed
in a wooden case. Bearings in ene randle assembly were in poor condition. possibly as a result of damage during assembly. Otherwise, both pumps were recefved in goed condition.
Comprehensive and helpfuI instruc-tions were supplied in Engrlsr!. Insta!-lation is relatively easy, with no reed for
lifting tackle, provided that uPVC ~sing
maln is used (the pump can aIso be used
with galvanized steel rising maln).
Malntenance is also
straight-forward, as the plunger can be WI'ltO'awn
without removing the rising main (:hJugh
the who Ie below-ground assembly ~t be
removed to service the footva!ve. One spanner fits all the pumpstand tastenngs,
but care wil! be needed when new harldle
bearings have to be titted.
The 4000 hour endurance test
was carried out at 40 cycles per ~ute,
with a simulated head ot 45 meters. At the
beginning of the test, the pump was ~ned
with a piston of the early design. with leather ring seals. There we re no 'a;lures in the first 2000 hours. when PI-:-:-ping clean water. However, when the cyinder was dismantled tor inspection, the ;::oston
body was found to have broken ber .. een the !wo leather seals.
The piston was replaced. but 'ailed
soon after the start of the second p."ase of Ihe test, when sand and Kieselg\.JY had been added to the water. Sand err:becded in the leather seals had caused se<ere wear of the cylinder bore. The foor.aJve had also developed a serious leak. :gain
7 43 12 29 49 6
Reported: Report nat yet published
25
40 1171
63
15 No significant leakage 45 40 11 111 71 26due to sand contamination. A new piston, machined from uPVC and with a molded rubber seal, was fitted, along with aSocia
footvaive. In this form, the pump
completed the remainder of the endurance test. Both piston and footvalve ware in goed working order at the final inspectio,!.
Following these tests, the manufac-turer has adopted a piston design gjmilar to that introduced in the laboratory. and intends to usa the same components in the footvalve. The S.ocla valve will be avail-able as an altemative.
Corrosion was detected ins'ade the
pumpstand and on the center spindle of
the original piston, which was not stain-lesssteei.
In the Impact tests. the baseplate was distorted by a heavy impact on the pumpstand, and a small crack appeared at the weid. The handle fulcrum bracket broke during Ihe handle shock test.
The pump was generally weil rec-eived by users, who liked the T-handle and the relatively low efforts required. However, some adults considered that the rate of delivery was rather low.
The overall concluslon of the laboratory tests was that the Bestobell was a design with goed potential tor manufacture, maintenance and repa!r in developing countries, but requiring some additional development before it could be considered tor large scale application.
The manutacturer has been
hampered by the limited availability of suitable materials in Zambia, but nas nevertheless demonstrated a receptive and t1exible attitude.
PUMP
Field Trials
THE BESTOBELL PUMP HAS NOT BEEN TESTED IN
THE PROJECT FIELD TRIALS
PUMP
~ ... ~~ n . . . , II!".' IIIIII""",',""--'~-'~'.
.
r .BestobelI
Assessment
The
BestobeI1
ratings are basedon lts perlormance in Iaboratory
trials and on judgments of the
Project s1aff using oomparisons
with ptJITl)S of similar design.
Dlscharge Rate
Though!he pump is
easy
to usa,it is difficult
to
sustlina
very highoutput. Wrth acx:eptable WOrK
inputs, it scores en "adequate" (0) rating fOf all lifts.
Ease of Malntenance
Even at shallow settings, !he
pump is not suitable tor main·
tenance by a village caretaker
(Level A), though area mechanics
wil! tind it easy to service. Uiting
gear is likely
to
be neeóed for liftsof 25 meters or more. The pump
therefOfe eams a "good" (00)
rating lOf Level B
mairaenance
at7m and 12m, reducing to
"adequate" (0) at 25m éWld 45m.
Rellability
Replacement of the onpinal piston
with a
new
design ifTl)l'oved !hepump's performance in the
laboratOf)' trials. In its new form,
reliabi Iity is rated as 00 for an
output
of 1.5m3/d, and 0 for 4m3/dat lifts
up
to
25 meters.. h is notconsidered suitable
tor
a dailyoutput of &n3/d and wiCh presently
available data, it is c:onsidered
prudent te rate ft "unsultable" (-) for 4m3/d at a 11ft of 45m.
Corrosion
Reslstanc:e
Wrth stainIess steef
pumprods,
and piston spindIe, no corrosion
of downhole c:omponents
occurred in the IaborëIIDry trials.
Spots of rust inside the
pumpstand reduce the rating to o.
Abrasion Aeslstance
After replacement of h \eather
saais with molded rubber, a üttIe
abrasion occurred in the
laboratOf)' tests, but 1he pump
remained in good wortórlg order. h
!herefare eams a 0 rating.
Manufactur1ng
NeedsThough !he Bestobel has been
designed lor manufacture in a
developing country, a degree of
quality c:ontrol
is
needect Thisreduces
Ihs
00 ratingto
0 formanufaaumg envirorment 1 (Iow
level of
inclJstrial
deveIopment)...
... " _~~ .... ilIoo,....l,&._. _ _ ~, .!.,.~_ •.®
United Kingdom
.,'"
i~l
+
~CIl
~
.
11'
\
~/General Description
The Climax is a rotary~rive reciprocating
force pump of long-standing design. The
pumpstand is predominantly cast iron and
has a large counterbalanced flywheel
driving the pumprod via a crank and
conn-ecting rod. Twin flywheels are available
as
an option. Internal medlanical parts are
splash lubricated Irom an oil bath. A
moving pumprod seal in a cylinder below
the crank provides a double-acting effect
to smooth the Ilowol water.
A range of cylinder diameters is
avail-able to suit different depths. The cylinder
is a brass tube with a gunmetal plunger
fitted with !wo leather seals. An alternative model is available with extraetabie pistoo
and lootvalve. Woeden pumprods are
supplied with the extraetabie vaJve
cylirder and galvanized steel rods with !he
non-extractable cylinder.
Manufacture
Bath pumpstand and cylinder require goOO iron and gunmetal loundry and machinery slolls with high quality cor.trol.
Suppliers
Wildon Engineering (Worcester) Ltd,
White-ladies Close. Little Loodon, Worcester.
WRllPZ.UK.
Indicative prices - Jul 1985
Single flywheel pump50mm rising main (per meter) Pumprods and connectOf'S (m) Non-ex1ractable cylinder Extractable cylinder
106
US$480 US$7.50 US$3.10 US$90 US$105Laboratory Tests
Date tested: 1979 Repot1ed: O.D.A Repo/11981
Perfonnance
data
(typIcaI values) -
2.25 Inch cylinder
Head (meters)
7
2545
Pumping rats (cycJesImin) 29 60 29 60 29 60
Volume/min (liters) 9.3
19
918.5
8..7
18
Input (watts) 31 64 63
130
89183
Mechanica!
efficiency ~ 33 32 58 58 73 73Maximum handle force (110-1) 15 25
18
20 1015
Footvalve Ieakage (mllnin) Not significant
0.8
3.5
Note:
The
maximum handle force is vel)' operator dependentand
is
higher when startingtrom
rest
Evaluatlon
A
very
heavy pump (185 lig in all lor the pumpstand), which though complicated isdesigned to have a longife. lts weight
means that InstallatIon and
malnte-nsnee involve the use r:J heavy lifting
equipment. Though the cotional
ex1rac-table cylinder avoids the "eed for rising
main removal during mantenance, the
pumpstand still has to be removed belore
the piston and vaJve can be ex1racted. The crank case oil needs periodic replen-ishment.
The design ol the pump proved
popular with most users. Use ol a very
heavy flywheel makes the pump smooth
and easy to operate. even :Jn deep wells,
though the starting and S?:lpping handle
load can be as high as 351g-l. Also, the
continuing flywheel rotation after the user
has stopped pumping is a 1azard to any
children who may stray near to the last
moving handle. The purrcstand design
makes it difficuit to achieve a satislactory
sanitary seal. as it is rela::Jvely easy lor
contaminated water to seep under the
base and down inside the wel casing. There are many exte-1al fixings on the pump, mainly nuts anc balts without
locking was hers. which are easy to
re move. The pump is not :-erelore resis-tant to vandalism or pilferage_
Leathers supplied w~ the sample
pumps were too thick (5rm instead ol
4.2mm). When the pump was installed the
operation was just satislac::ry, but after a lew days the leathers swelled and jammed
in the cylinder ..
Second and third SE":S ol leathers
purchased Irom the man~'acturer
expe-rienced the same probie,. so leathers lrom a different sou ree W€fe substituted and used in all the lests. These were
satislactQ('f, and mechanical efficiencies up to 74% were recorded.
The endurance
test
was
conducted at 40 cycles per minute with a
simulaled head ol 45 meters. The Climax
proved
very
reliable. There Wefe nobreak-downs during the 4000 hoors ol pumping and no significant wear of key compo-nents. Some leakage through the
pump-stand inspection cover was easily rectified
and did not recur.
The high handle loads during starting and stopping did cause fatigue failure ol the handle at the threaded connection with the Ilywheel, where maximum bending Ioad
occurs. Repeat tests on a fatigue testing
machine revealed that loods as low as 20kg-1 could cause lailure within a million revolutions.
Use ol a brass cylinder with
galva-nized rising main and pumprods causes
corrosion problems in acidic waters, and
severa pitting occurred in bath the pipe and !he red near the cylinder when pum-ping water with a high dissolved oxygen content. Tha pumpstand withstood !he
Impact
tests
satisfactorily.In comparison with other deepwell
pumps, the Climax's performance was
liked by users. The flywheel action gives
an even discharge Irom !he spout. and
most buckets could be filled without
splashing, though the relatively low spout
(375mm) may mean that some containers would have to be tilted.
The ov8f'8l1 conclusIon ol t11e
laboratory trials
was
that !he Climax is aweil-made. easy to usa and reliable pump, liked by users. but with some minor problems with the handle and leathers
needing 10 be overcome. lts heavy
construction makes it unsuitable lor village-Ievei maimenance.
\ , ',
.
....
.
Field Trials
.
PUMP
~~;
~
.
7-._THE CLIMAX PUMP WAS NOT FIELD TESTED
BY THE HANDPUMPS PROJECT
..
.
Climax
Assessment
In
!he absence of field trials. ratings lor the Climax pump are base<:! mainly on performance in !he Iaboratory tests.Discharge Rate
A range ol cylinders losuit different lifts allows the Climax to achieve
"goocr
(00) ratings tor all pumping lifts.EMe of Malntenance
The pump is difficult to service and requires a mobile
mainte-nance
team tor installations at alldepths. It is therefore ratad unsuitable (-) lor maintenance
systems
A
andB
.
Aeliabll ity
The pump per10rmed relatively weil in the laboratory endurance test and achieves a 00 rating lor reliability lor depths up to 25 meters and daily outputs up to
4m3Jd. The rating reduces to 0 lor
~ output of 8m3/d at all lifts and
tor 4fn3/d at 45rn lift, where the
operating eftort and wear ot
moving parts
is
greater.CorrosIon Reslstance
Corrosien OCQJrred in the Iaboratory, and the Climax's downhole components are not corrosion resistant. It is therelore rated unsuitable under this heading.
Abrasien Reslstance
The pump survived without breakdown in the Iaboratory
sand-pumping tests, but use ot !eather Q4)SeaJs means
a -
ratingtor
abrasion resistance.llanufacturing Needs
The manufacturing lacilities and stalIs required
te
make theClimax. and the degree ot quality cantroI needed. mean that it is unsuitable lor manufacture in
countries with
!ow
or moderate industriaI development (cate-gories 1 and 2). However, as specialist facilities are not ~red,the
PUIJl) is rated 00 lor manufaclure under Category 3 (high level industrial deve-Iopment).Japan
u
_l-
~
General Description
The Dragon pump is available either as a shallow·well suction pump or as a deepwell lorce pump. The pump tested was the deepwell conliguration, as illustrated. The pumpstand is principally cast iron. with a discharge valve in the spout allowing either tree discharge or delivery under pressure through a ho se or pipet The tubular steel handle moves through an unusually wide arc (178°).
In the deepwell pump. !he cast iron cylinder body and enamelled steel liner ol the shallow·well version is retained as a pedestal. The pump needs a mounting plinth at least 300mm high, to provide ade· quate clearance under the spout. The deepwell cylinder is conventional seam· less 63mm brass tube with cast iron end caps. The plunger has !Wo leather cup-seals and the lootvalve has a rubber seat.
Manufacture
Gunmetal and iron loundry work and basic machining are required and good quality contral is needed to ensure correct lunc-tioning and interchangeability ot parts.
Suppliers
Kawamoto Pump Manulacturing Co. 11 ·39
4-chome, Ohsu. Naka·ku, Nagoya.
Japan. Similar pumps made in the Philip-pines by Sea Commercial Inc (Jetmatic) and Malanday Machining and Manulac-turing Corp (Sea Horse).
Prices -
Not available
108
-....".--
;"'y,~."~ ___ ._..: .. ~_ .. __ . _ .. '-' ... " ... , ... • .. _ili~_'M ... t."tIli6 ... SIio'iiïi-**IIII"~ . . . '
Laboratory Tests
Date tested: 1982 Reported: Handpumps Pro,ect REport No. 3
Performance data (typlcal values) -
63mm dia. cylinder
Head (meters) 7
Pumping arc'
P
poPumping rate (cycles/min) 40 40
Volume/min (liters) 22 11
Input (watts) 80 35
Mechanica! effICiency (%) 31 34
Maximum handle force (kg-f) 8 8
Foot valve leakage (mVmin)
25
F 40 22 16852
18 No signifICant leakage45
F 40 21 244 63 30• At 7 meters head, tests were conduct9d boiIJ with the tuil 1780 t~1e move-ment (F
=
Full) and with on/y the centra/Waf movement utilized (P = PaltiaJ).Eva/uatlon
The !Wo sample pumps we re weil packed and were received in good condition.
No InstalIation instructlons
were supplied with the pumps and installation proved difficult, as the cyl-inder stroke length is virtually the same as the handle movement in the pumphead and carelul adjustment ol pumprod length is needed to avoid damage during operation. A plinth is needed to provide adequate clearance under the pump spout. Lilting tackle is required tor pump installation.
Malntenance demands are likely 10
be high, involving regular lubrication and
frequent repair or replacement ol
pumpstand components. Below ground maintenance involves removal ol the complete assembly. which means that litting tackle must be available.
The 4000 hour endurance test was carried out at 40 strokes per minute with a simulated head ol 45 meters. The Dragon 2 tailed three times during the testing: once when the handle lork broke after wear had caused it to come in contact with the luierum pin relaining screw; and !Wice as a result of breaks in Ihe threaded section ol pumprods.
Alter 1000 hours, the plunger had become difficult to remove because of scale in the cylinder bare; the lootvalve guide and pumprod gland we re wom; the spout would not swivel into the pressure delivery position; and there was some corrosion ol cylinder end caps and the plunger rod. Inspeetion alter a lurther
1000 hoors revealed thar hande fulcrum
joints were badly wom and &ere were
signs of wear on the plunger valve. The three breakdowns occurred in the second half ol the :ests" The linaJ inspection revealed thaI :ne p..npstand.
cylirder and plunger ~e g€rerally in
goed condition. but the 'ootva'/e guide
was badly worn and thereNas s::me wear
on !he valve stem. The CIlinder :nd caps
were rusty, there was cO:'Slderable
corTOSion on the plunger rod. and the outJa diverter valve had n..:sted soid.
The Dragon 2 lailed :he SI:.:! impact test on the handle. whicn bega') to bend at !he Iowest impact enE"gy (5: Joules). AI 200 Joules. Ihe base casll-g ol Ihe purrç:lStand broke.
Many users 10unCl It dficult to deelde on the best o::eralirg action. beea.:Jse of the very large handle
movoement. Those who ~:tem~ a lull
slroke lound Ihe exa;;gera!:d body
movemenlS uncomlortable~
The overall condusion ol Ihe
la.bcr"atory lrials was Iha: Ihe : ragon 2 seens designed lor tamy use perhaps ser.·rng up to 15 people. and :s ~ot
suffi-ciertty robusl lor co-mun-:-! water
sup~. It is inexpensive. but nlensive use Nill produce rapid wear in
r:-.:
movingparts ol the pumps~"d. :nd rod
brea<ages are also likey. Th,: diverter valve is seen as an unne:essa"! compli-catioo lor most applicallcns. T-e arc ol movoement is 100 large. partl::..:arly as Ihere is litlle pisIon mOI,:men: al each
end ol Ihe handle moveme-t.
Field Trials
PUMP,
THE DRAGON 2 PUMP WAS NOT FIELD TESTED
BY
THE HANDPUMPS PROJECT
.O:~"'I'j,~ ... _ . .. "" ... + _ _ ... "" .... _ ... __ :-.
-).\
Dragon 2
Assessment
In !he absence of field Inê!is
ratings for the Dragon 2 pump
ar:
based mainly on pertormarlC€ ir
!he laboratory tests. A sucror
version of the pump is availa:lo~
for lifts up to 7 meters. but thE:sE
ratings are based on the deePl"'='
version tested in !he Iaboralory.
Dlscharge
Rate
The Dragon 2 should be ca~E
of comparatively high lischa~
over the full range of pumprç
lifts. However, !he awkward
DPE-rating action reduces the ratinç 11:
"adequate" (0) in eacll tabIe. Eaae of Malntenance
Though lifting tackle is rr:r:
needed for shallow lifts (7 or 1;'
meters), the relative complei"
of servicing makes it unsuitiOe
forvillage-ievel maintenance
(Sto;-tem A) even
at
these lifts. ArëE.mechanics would need asss
-tance for servicing at depths ~
25 meters or more so that
r.E
ratings for level B maintenarx:e
are "good" (00)
tor
lifts of 7ma-c
12m and '~e" (0) for lifts ~
25mand45m_
Rellability
The laboratory
tests
showedr.:::
the Dragon Is not weil suited I:
intensive use,
or
to pumping Itl:of 25 meters or more. For Iow It.l:
and light use. servicing
nee::s
would not be higtI and \he pUfTlllS
!herefore rated 00 at ifts of 7rr
and 1201 lor a daily
output
~1.5m3/d, 0 at fle same lifts b
4m3/d and - tor arnJid At 25r.
and 45m, !he
raMg
is-_Corroslon
Reslstance
Significant conusion
was
obse!'-ved in the Iaboratory lests, é!r1C
!he Dragon is nol suitable for use
with cotTOSive water.
Abrasion Ru' .... ce
Use of leather aJPS6aJs earns l1e
pump a - rating lor abrasi7'
resistance .
. ManufacturIng Needs
The
Dragon 2
is not sUtabIe bmanufaclure in c:ountries with a
!ow level of industrial
develap-ment (category 1) because of lt1e
need lor foundry and machinf'ç
ski lis. For categories 2 iWld 3. ~
ratings