• No results found

Bestuur en toezicht bij universiteiten: Bijlagen

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Bestuur en toezicht bij universiteiten: Bijlagen"

Copied!
10
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Bijlagen

Bestuur en toezicht bij universiteiten:

Een onderzoek naar de naleving van de ‘code goed bestuur universiteiten’

Yvonne Hofman

December 2009

(2)

Inhoudsopgave

BIJLAGE 1:RESULTATEN KWANTITATIEVE ANALYSE ... 3

BIJLAGE 2:SELECTIE BEPALINGEN UIT DE CODE ... 4

(3)

Bijlage 1: Resultaten kwantitatieve analyse

1.3

2.1.1 2.2.1

3.1.3 3.2.3 3.4.3 5.1 1.2 2.1.9 3.3.1 3.3.5 2.1.6 2.1.8 2.2.3 2.2.4 2.2.5 3.3.4 3.3.6 3.4.1 3.4.2 4.2.1 Totaal Totaal % UU 2007 0 2 1 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 33 79 UU 2008 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 36 86 UL 2007 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 1 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 37 88 UL 2008 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 1 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 37 88 UM 2007 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 38 90 UM 2008 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 38 90 TUE 2007 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 42 100 TUE 2008 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 42 100 WU 2007 0 2 1 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 36 86 WU 2008 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 41 98 UT 2007 2 2 1 2 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 35 83 UT2008 1 2 1 2 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 34 81 TuD 2007 0 2 1 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 37 88 TuD 2008 0 2 1 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 37 88 RUN 2007 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 34 81 RUN 2008 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 34 81 RUG 2007 1 2 1 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 32 76 RUG 2008 0 2 1 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 31 74 UvT 2007 2 2 1 2 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 29 69 UvT 2008 0 2 1 2 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 27 64 VU 2007 1 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 37 88 VU 2008 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 38 90 OU 2007 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 34 81 OU 2008 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 34 81 UvA 2007 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 34 81 UvA 2008 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 34 81 EUR 2007 0 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 32 76 EUR 2008 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 34 81 Totaal 23 56 46 56 8 48 56 56 48 26 18 56 54 56 56 56 48 56 56 56 52 Totaal % 41 100 82 100 14 86 100 100 86 46 32 100 96 100 100 100 86 100 100 100 93

(4)

Bijlage 2: Selectie bepalingen uit de code

Bepaling Wel onderzocht

Niet onderzocht

Wel

publicatieverplichting

Geen

publicatieverplichting Kwalitatief van aard

Interne werking

Anders

1.1 v v 1.2 v 1.3 v 1.4 v 2.1.1 v 2.1.2 v v 2.1.3 v v 2.1.4 v v 2.1.5 v 2.1.6 v 2.1.7 v 2.1.8 v 2.1.9 v 2.2.1 v 2.2.2 v 2.2.3 v 2.2.4 v 2.2.5 v 2.3.1 v v 2.3.2 v 2.3.3 v 3.1.1 v v 3.1.2 v 3.1.3 v 3.2.1 v 3.2.2 v 3.2.3 v 3.3.1 v 3.3.2 v 3.3.3 v 3.3.4 v 3.3.5 v 3.3.6 v 3.3.7 v 3.4.1 v 3.4.2 v 3.4.3 v 4.1.1 v 4.1.2 v 4.1.3 v 4.2.1 v 4.3.1 v 4.3.2 v 4.3.3 v 4.4.1 v v 4.4.2 v

(5)

Bijlage 3: Statistische toetsen

Beschrijvende statistiek

Descriptive Statistics

N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

Governance score in 2007 14 29 42 35,00 3,187 Governance score in 2008 14 27 42 35,50 3,858 Aantal medewerkers 2007 14 597,00 5447,00 3433,1857 1397,26236 Aantal medewerkers in 2008 14 626,00 5553,00 3521,1500 1404,27203 D/E ratio 2007 14 ,30 2,52 1,0267 ,59685 D/E ratio 2008 14 ,30 8,24 1,5008 2,02967

Saldo baten en lasten 2008 14 -10800000 66892000 9974077,43 2,014E7

Saldo baten en lasten 2007 14 -11000000 23800000 9496812,71 9947897,057

optelsom scores bepalingen 14 2,00 6,00 3,0714 1,26881

optelsom scores bepalingen 14 2,00 6,00 3,3571 1,44686

Valid N (listwise) 14

Invloed van de omvang op de governance score in 2007

Coefficientsa Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. B Std. Error Beta 1 (Constant) 34,661 2,426 14,290 ,000

Aantal medewerkers 2007 9,873E-5 ,001 ,043 ,150 ,883

a. Dependent Variable: Governance score in 2007

Invloed van de omvang van de universiteit op de governance score in 2008

Coefficientsa Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. B Std. Error Beta 1 (Constant) 32,538 2,848 11,425 ,000 Aantal medewerkers in 2008 ,001 ,001 ,306 1,114 ,287

(6)

Invloed van de financiële ruimte van de universiteit op de governance score in 2007

Coefficientsa Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. B Std. Error Beta 1 (Constant) 36,286 1,131 32,088 ,000

Saldo baten en lasten 2007 -1,354E-7 ,000 -,423 -1,616 ,132

a. Dependent Variable: Governance score in 2007

Invloed van de financiële ruimte van de universiteit op de governance score in 2008

Coefficientsa Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. B Std. Error Beta 1 (Constant) 35,551 1,206 29,473 ,000

Saldo baten en lasten 2008 -5,161E-9 ,000 -,027 -,093 ,927

a. Dependent Variable: Governance score in 2008

Exclusief TU Delft

Coefficientsa Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. B Std. Error Beta 1 (Constant) 35,758 1,254 28,513 ,000

Saldo baten en lasten 2008 -6,680E-8 ,000 -,204 -,691 ,504

(7)
(8)

Invloed van de rechtsvorm op de governance score in 2007

Group Statistics

Publiek of privaat N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

Governance score in 2007 publiekrechtelijke vorm 11 35,45 2,979 ,898

privaatrechtelijke vorm 3 33,33 4,041 2,333

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for

Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means

95% Confidence Interval of the Difference F Sig. t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Std. Error

Difference Lower Upper

Governance score in 2007 Equal variances assumed ,250 ,626 1,024 12 ,326 2,121 2,072 -2,393 6,635 Equal variances not assumed ,848 2,625 ,467 2,121 2,500 -6,519 10,761

(9)

Invloed van de rechtsvorm op de governance score in 2008

Group Statistics

Publiek of privaat N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

Governance score in 2008 publiekrechtelijke vorm 11 36,18 3,281 ,989

privaatrechtelijke vorm 3 33,00 5,568 3,215

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for

Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means

95% Confidence Interval of the Difference F Sig. t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Std. Error

Difference Lower Upper

Governance score in 2008 Equal variances assumed 1,183 ,298 1,299 12 ,218 3,182 2,449 -2,154 8,518 Equal variances not assumed ,946 2,392 ,430 3,182 3,363 -9,237 15,600

Invloed van financieringsstructuur op governance score in 2007

Coefficientsa Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. B Std. Error Beta 1 (Constant) 33,880 1,775 19,083 ,000 D/E ratio 2007 1,091 1,509 ,204 ,723 ,483

(10)

Exclusief Open Universiteit

Coefficientsa Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. B Std. Error Beta 1 (Constant) 32,345 2,132 15,169 ,000 D/E ratio 2007 2,997 2,130 ,391 1,407 ,187

a. Dependent Variable: Governance score in 2007

Invloed van financieringsstructuur op governance score in 2008

Coefficientsa Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. B Std. Error Beta 1 (Constant) 35,562 1,352 26,295 ,000 D/E ratio 2008 -,041 ,549 -,022 -,075 ,941

a. Dependent Variable: Governance score in 2008

Exclusief Open Universiteit

Coefficientsa Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. B Std. Error Beta 1 (Constant) 33,800 2,121 15,934 ,000 D/E ratio 2008 1,848 1,842 ,290 1,003 ,337

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden Downloaded.

Similarity coefficients for binary data : properties of coefficients, coefficient matrices, multi-way metrics and multivariate coefficients..

Similarity coefficients for binary data : properties of coefficients, coefficient matrices, multi-way metrics and multivariate coefficients..

Although the data analysis litera- ture distinguishes between, for example, bivariate information between variables or dyadic information between cases, the terms bivariate and

it was demonstrated by Proposition 8.1 that if a set of items can be ordered such that double monotonicity model holds, then this ordering is reflected in the elements of

Several authors have studied three-way dissimilarities and generalized various concepts defined for the two-way case to the three-way case (see, for example, Bennani-Dosse, 1993;

In this section it is shown for several three-way Bennani-Heiser similarity coefficients that the corresponding cube is a Robinson cube if and only if the matrix correspond- ing to

Coefficients of association and similarity based on binary (presence-absence) data: An evaluation.. Nominal scale response agreement as a