• No results found

Title: Policy versus Practice. Language variation and change in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century Dutch

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Title: Policy versus Practice. Language variation and change in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century Dutch "

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Cover Page

The following handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation:

http://hdl.handle.net/1887/67132

Author: Krogull, A.

Title: Policy versus Practice. Language variation and change in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century Dutch

Issue Date: 2018-12-12

(2)

Andr eas Kr ogull P olic y v ersus Pr actic e

521

Policy versus Practice

Andreas Krogull

Language variation and change in

eighteenth- and nineteenth-century Dutch

Language variation and change in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century Dutch

This dissertation provides new insights into language variation and change in late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century Dutch. More specifically, it investigates whether and to what extent official language policy measures exerted influence on actual language practice.

During the nation-building period around 1800, the Northern Netherlands witnessed the introduction of a national language policy, which aimed at the spread of a homogeneous written standard variety of Dutch, conceptualised as a symbol of ‘the’ nation. In concrete terms, these top-down endeavours resulted in the first official codification of the Dutch orthography (Siegenbeek 1804) and grammar (Weiland 1805). Despite marking a decisive turning point in the standardisation history of Dutch, the effectiveness of the so-called schrijftaalregeling ‘written language regulation’ has never been investigated empirically.

Taking a historical-sociolinguistic approach, this dissertation aims to fill this research gap by examining the impact of language policy on patterns of variation and change. How successful was the schrijftaalregeling in disseminating the officialised norms across the population at large, as envisaged by the national government? Making use of the newly compiled Going Dutch Corpus, a diachronic multi-genre corpus comprising more than 420,000 words of authentic usage data (i.e. private letters, diaries and travelogues, newspapers), a wide range of orthographic and morphosyntactic features is analysed.

By presenting a systematic method to measure and assess the effects of policy on practice in the intriguing case of Dutch around 1800, the dissertation contributes to the vivid discussion on language norms and usage in international historical sociolinguistics.

ISBN 978-94-6093-306-6

Policy versus Practice

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

1) Internal communication via mobile phone has a significant positive effect on employee engagement. To measure the employee engagement level a combination of

Regression analysis with intention to sign up AED Alert as dependent variable, and attitude to sign up AED Alert, subjective norm and Self-efficacy sign up AED Alert as predictors. β

Policy versus Practice Language variation and change in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century Dutch... All

From the cases discussed, we can see that variants such as the diminutive suffix -ie and the personal pronoun mijn had disappeared from printed sources by the eighteenth century

The main difference with deradicalization strategies in the 1970s and the principal hindrance for the current counterterrorism policy is the fact that nowadays, public opinion

CERES wants to start a Development Policy Review Network, in which the most important evaluation reports of IOB, SNV, the Dutch co-financing agencies and others can be discussed

The influence of isomorphism and practice variation on the public management control system: The case of the WMO in Dutch municipalities.. Word

Since Chinese businessmen generally actively participate in this system, studying the economic activities of Chinese tax farmers in the tax farming system will help us understand