• No results found

Measuring and predicting anonymity - List of figures

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Measuring and predicting anonymity - List of figures"

Copied!
3
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl)

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

Measuring and predicting anonymity

Koot, M.R.

Publication date

2012

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA):

Koot, M. R. (2012). Measuring and predicting anonymity.

General rights

It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulations

If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.

(2)

List of Figures

1.1 Privacy in ‘functions’ and ‘states’, according to Westin [87]. . . 5

1.2 Taxonomy of privacy violations according to Solove [74]. . . 6

2.1 Degrees of anonymity according to Reiter and Rubin [67] . . . 14

2.2 Linking to re-identify data [76] . . . 24

3.1 Box-and-whisker plot showing anonymity set sizes kA, per munic-ipality. Whiskers denote the minimum and maximum values; the boxes are defined by lower and upper quartiles and the median value is shown. . . 37

3.2 Box-and-whisker plot showing anonymity set sizes kB, per munici-pality. Whiskers denote min-max values. . . 38

4.1 For all Dutch municipalities: the Kullback-Leibler distance and the estimated uniqueness probability, when revealing age. . . 48

4.2 For all Dutch municipalities: the Kullback-Leibler distance and the estimated uniqueness probability, when revealing age and gender. . 48

4.3 For two Dutch municipalities: the uniqueness probability as a func-tion of the group size k; also the curve under uniformity has been added. . . 51

4.4 For all Dutch municipalities: the e↵ect of aggregated (age) statistics on the KL-distance. . . 51

(3)

5.1 Mean number of singletons, as a function of the Kullback-Leibler distance . Left panels: full population; right panels: ages 0–79

only. Top to bottom: k = 60, 90, 120. . . 67

5.2 Variance of the number of singletons, as a function of the Kullback-Leibler distance . Left panel: full population; right panel: ages 0–79 only. . . 69

6.1 1, 2, and 3for two municipalities, as a function of the population size of the postal code area. . . 76

6.2 1 for all municipalities, as a function of the Kullback-Leibler dis-tance , for k = 20, 40, 60, 80. Notice that the observations ( ) are accurately predicted ( ) by the Kullback-Leibler distance () for various population sizes (k). . . 77

6.3 Graphical illustration of accuracy of the O( )-approximation;ES as a function of k for height, weight and birthday. The lines correspond to the estimates resulting from simulation, and the ‘+’ with the O( )-approximation. Tables show mean number of singletons for various values of k. . . 87

6.4 Expected number of singletons, for k = 5, 10, 20, 40, respectively (k = 30 is skipped due to page layout). The solid lines are the simulation-based estimates, the dots are the approximations based on the formulas derived in this Section. Per picture, the first 6 data points correspond to H = 0.5 cm, the second 6 data points to H = 1.0 cm, the third set of 6 data points to H = 2.0 cm, the fourth set of 6 data points to H = 5.0 cm, the fifth set of 6 data points to H = 10.0 cm, and the last set of 6 data points to H = 20.0 cm. Within each group of 6 data points, these correspond to W = 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0, 10, 20 kg. . . 88

6.5 Left panel: e↵ect of W for H fixed; right panel: e↵ect of H for W fixed. . . 89

7.1 Preliminary model for applying distribution-informed privacy pre-dictions as part of privacy policy making. . . 93

B.1 Revealing demographics: questionnaire screen 1. . . 107

B.2 Revealing demographics: questionnaire screen 2. . . 109

B.3 Revealing demographics: questionnaire screen 3. . . 109

B.4 Revealing demographics: questionnaire screen 4. . . 110 124

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

COMET: Cost and Outcomes of Medical Emergency Teams; CPR: Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation; DNAR: Do Not Attempt Resuscitation; GEE: Generalized Estimating Equations; ICC:

The primary outcome is the composite endpoint of either cardiopulmonary arrest, unplanned ICU admission or death while being admitted on a COMET ward per 1,000 admitted

study performed in an academic hospital in the Netherlands using a quasi-experimental approach, wards were randomized to measure vital signs and the Modified Early Warning

Although this study was not powered to analyze effectiveness of RRS on clinical outcome, protocolized measurement of vital signs and MEWS does show a trend towards a decrease in

Ondanks dat deze studie niet ontworpen was om te kijken naar de klinische effectiviteit van een SIS, was geprotocoliseerd meten van de vitale parameters en MEWS geassocieerd

Invited speaker, Rapid Response System conference, London UK, 2013. What’s going on in

De etentjes in je tuin waren een mooie afwisseling daar in Noord en ik wil je dan ook erg bedanken voor je hulp in zoveel dingen en niet in de laatste plaats, de naam van de

Through the experiences gained in his work together with the clinical setting of his PhD, his interests in the field of anaesthesiology grew and he will start his residency