• No results found

Correction: Gender differences in authorships are not associated with publication bias in an evolutionary journal(PLoS ONE (2019)13:8 (e0201725)Doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0201725)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Correction: Gender differences in authorships are not associated with publication bias in an evolutionary journal(PLoS ONE (2019)13:8 (e0201725)Doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0201725)"

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

University of Groningen

Correction

Edwards, Hannah A.; Schroeder, Julia; Dugdale, Hannah L.

Published in:

PLoS ONE DOI:

10.1371/journal.pone.0217251

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.

Document Version

Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date: 2019

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA):

Edwards, H. A., Schroeder, J., & Dugdale, H. L. (2019). Correction: Gender differences in authorships are not associated with publication bias in an evolutionary journal(PLoS ONE (2019)13:8

(e0201725)Doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0201725). PLoS ONE, 14(5), [e0217251]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217251

Copyright

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

(2)

CORRECTION

Correction: Gender differences in authorships

are not associated with publication bias in an

evolutionary journal

Hannah A. Edwards, Julia Schroeder, Hannah L. Dugdale

In the article byline, Julia Schroeder should be listed as co-corresponding author for this paper. Dr. Schroeder’s email address isjulia.schroeder@imperial.ac.uk.

Reference

1. Edwards HA, Schroeder J, Dugdale HL (2018) Gender differences in authorships are not associated with publication bias in an evolutionary journal. PLoS ONE 13(8): e0201725.https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0201725PMID:30157231

PLOS ONE |https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217251 May 22, 2019 1 / 1

a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 OPEN ACCESS

Citation: Edwards HA, Schroeder J, Dugdale HL (2019) Correction: Gender differences in authorships are not associated with publication bias in an evolutionary journal. PLoS ONE 14(5): e0217251.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0217251

Published: May 22, 2019

Copyright:© 2019 Edwards et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the

Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

In addition to this, although no causal relationship is implied, the research results revealed a practically significant positive correlation between the overall

Based on the results obtained from non-linear curve fitting calculations, the drug permeation enhancing effect of Aloe vera gel can be attributed to an increased

In this specific case, the research provides empirical evidence on (1) a core model of the PwC audit approach, (2) clear insights in the key differences in audit activities

professions, but the general trend for the associations of female person words before fine-tuning follows the results for statistically male professions: there are mostly

The study aim was to assess to which extent patients visiting outpatient departments for mood and anxiety disorders were monitored for relevant somatic comorbidities and

Since the statistically significant effect of forward lean- ing induced by stimulation could have been attributed to (1) the participants standing position or foot length, and (2)

ways. What kind of work does this require? What expectations are entailed? And how come expectations are so often not met despite the careful eff orts of designers