• No results found

Adverse events after cervical spinal manipulative therapy: consensus based classification and definitions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Adverse events after cervical spinal manipulative therapy: consensus based classification and definitions"

Copied!
1
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Adverse events after cervical spinal manipulative therapy:

consensus based classification and definitions.

Background: Cervical spinal manipulations (CSM) are frequently employed techniques to alleviate neck pain and headache.

Minor and major complications following CSM have been described, though

clear consensus on definition and the

classification of the complications had not yet been achieved. As a result, incidence rates may be underestimated.

Objective: The aim of this study was to

develop a consensus-based classification of adverse events following cervical spinal manipulations which has good potential in clinical practice and research.

Design: A three round Delphi-study. Method: Medical specialists, manual

therapists, and patients (n=30) participated in an online survey. In Round 1, participants were invited to select a classification system of adverse events. Potential complications were inventoried and detailed in accordance with the ICF and the ICD-10. In Round 2,

panel members categorized the potential

complications in their selected classification. During the third round, it was inquired of the participants whether they concurred with

the answer of the majority of participants.

Results: Thirty four complications were defined. Consensus was achieved for 29 complications for all durations [hours,

days, weeks]. For the remaining five

complications, consensus was reached

for two of the three durations [hours, days, weeks].

Conclusions: A consensus-based

classification system of adverse events after cervical spinal manipulation was

developed which comprises patients’ and

clinicians’ perspectives and has only a small number of categories. The classification

system includes a precise description of potential adverse events and is based on international accepted classifications (ICD-10 and ICF). This classification system

may be useful for utilization in both clinical practice and research.

Healthy Ageing

Kranenburg, H.A.*(a, c), Lakke, S.E. (a), Schmitt, M. (b), Van der Schans, C.P. (a, c) *contact details: h.a.kranenburg@pl.hanze.nl

a) Research group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing, Hanze University Groningen, University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, the Netherlands b) SOMT, Institute for Master Education in Manual Therapy, Amersfoort, the Netherlands

c) Department of Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands

Hours Days Weeks Hours Days Weeks Hours Days Weeks Definition:

ICF-B210: Sensory functions relating to sensing the presence of light and sensing the form, size, shape and colour of the

visual stimuli.

Level of agreement:

0-59% = no consensus 60-74% = mild consensus 75-100% = strong consensus Length of time the

complication lasted Classification

34 complications, for 29 consensus

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Chapter 3 Adverse events following cervical manipulative therapy: consensus on classification among Dutch medical specialists, manual therapists, and

In most published cases a cervical manipulation was involved during the treatment session.(Ernst, 2007; Nielsen et al., 2017) The Heath and Youth Care Inspectorate in The Netherlands

The aim of this survey was to quantify the amount of TJM used within the lumbar, thoracic, mid/ lower cervical (C3-C7) and upper cervical (C0-C3) regions among Dutch certified

After showing the panel members their individual indications of AE in the three categorical classification system and the indications of the majority of panel

frequently used in patients with neck pain and headache. Pre-manipulative cervical instability and arterial integrity tests appear to be unreliable in identifying patients at risk

The proportion of patients with CeAD that received a CSM prior to hospitalization was low (two) No relevant significant differences were found between patients with

Several movements of the cervical spine have been postulated to alter the amount of blood flow volume or velocity (hemodynamics) in the cervical vessels.(Mitchell, 2009) For

A serious medical pathology is rarely the cause of neck pain (<1%).(Blanpied et al., 2017) In most cases, the pathoanatomical basis for neck pain is unclear and the pain is