The machining process : cutting
Citation for published version (APA):
Hutchins, P. (1988). The machining process : cutting. (TH Eindhoven. Afd. Werktuigbouwkunde, Vakgroep Produktietechnologie : WPB; Vol. WPA0638). Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
Document status and date: Published: 01/01/1988
Document Version:
Publisher’s PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers)
Please check the document version of this publication:
• A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website.
• The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review.
• The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers.
Link to publication
General rights
Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain
• You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.
If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license above, please follow below link for the End User Agreement:
www.tue.nl/taverne
Take down policy
If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us at:
openaccess@tue.nl
providing details and we will investigate your claim.
THE MACHINING PROCESS CUTTING
wI-BY PATRICIA HUTCHINS
WPA 0638 OCTOBER, 1988
Eindhoven University of Technology
THE MACHINING PROCESS : CUTTING
According to J. Kaczmarek, the process of cutting used in
the machining of materials is done with cutting tools. These
tools have surfaces called the rake face (or cutting face) and
the flank (Fig 1.).
In the cutting process, wear takes place on the cutting
tool. Kaczmarek describes this result as the wearing action of a
tool, the ability to lose volume and mass gradually during the
cutting process(5:76). Thomas J. Drozda and Charles Wick discuss
that the wear of the tool may be caused by abrasion, adhesion,
diffusion, chemical processes, or oxidation(2:144-145); Kaczmarek adds to this list mechanical forces(5:75).
According to Drozda and Wick, abrasion occurs when hard
particles from the chip slide on the tool face and remove tool
material. Adhesion occurs when two pieces of material are
brought together by high temperature and high pressure.
Diffusion occurs when atoms move from an area of "high atomic
concentration" to an area of low atomic concentration. The
chemical processes that can cause wear begin when the tool and
workpiece are used "in an environment of suitably active
chemicals." Oxidation results at very high temperatures which
cause the structure of the tool to weaken{2:144-145). The
mechanical forces that lead to wear mentioned by Kaczmarek, may
be mechanical abrasion, ultimate strength wear, or fatigue
strength wear{5:75).
As said earlier, in diffusion, atoms move from one lattice
point of high atomic concentration to one of low atomic
concentration, and Paul H. Black points out that solid-state
diffusion is a cause of flank wear and crater wear in cutting
tools(I:127). Drozda and Wick define flank wear as a form of
abrasion that occurs between the workpiece and the flank of the
tool (Fig 2.). The rate of flank wear increases as the cutting
2
,
L _ _~_~_~,,::::_,..-..,, __
fIG. 't. c.~oSS S"Er..""(loN of \AlOU,", t"~f!>\OE j1IOL S Kco"",AlC> J:LANt. w'''A..
A14D c.R"~ll. IIVttAt\.· O"S~,p L.4HE " ORIG-INA" ou"t"L'NE.
Also shown in Fig 2., is crater wear, defined by Drozda and
wick as a combination of adhesion, abrasion, and chemical
diffusion that occurs on the rake face of the tool(2:3.1-2).
According to Black, as the chip moves over the rake face, i t
rubs on the face of the tool, thus creating a crater; Black
believes the following method is how a crater is formed:
( l ) "As the chip glides over the cutting face of the tool, i t is at high temperature as a result of heat generated at the shear
plane and frictional heat from its passage over the tool face.
Local adhesion of a pair of contacting asperites will take place
in the absence of an absorbed film, and the pair of asperites
will be temperature-welded together to form a junction.
Continued movement of the chip will cause failure of the junction at its weakest point and a particle of the chip is transferred to the tool.
(2)"Diffusion will now
particle of the chip and the
Conditions of high temperature
occur between the
adjacent particle
transferred
of the tool.
and large diffusion gradient at
the junction are favorable to diffusion and allow migration to
the chip at the expense of the lo~alized region of the tocl, so
that the tool material adjacent to the transferred chip particle
becomes weakened.
(3}"The particle, which may have accumulated additional chip
material, will now be 'wiped off' the tool face by the oncoming
chip. Since the weakest section of the particle, on account of
diffusion, now lies within the surfaces of the tool, when the
particle leaves the tool face it will carry with i t a
microparticle of the tool."(1:129-132)
Drozda and Wick ref ere to the resisLance of any of these
wear mechanisms, so that the cutting tool will have a long life
and i t will keep its shape and cutting effeci~ncy, as a
requirement of the tool(2:3.1). Kaczmarek defines the tool life
as the "working time of the tool point, or cutting time under
constant cutting conditions until conventional dulling of the
tool point [the loss of the tool's capacity to machine workpieces
under given conditions] occurs." He also explains that as the
cutting speed is varied within a wide range, the tool life may be considerably increased or decreased(5:82).
a.
3
John L. Feirer and Earl E. Tatro describe the three kinds of
chip that may be formed during the cutting process. These kinds
of chip are the discontinuous chip, the continuous chip, and the
continuous chip with a built-up edge. The discontinuous chip, or
broken chip (Fig 3.), is a small chip produced when the workpiece
is compressed in front of the cutting tool until a piece of the
workpiece is broken away. The discontinuous chips are each
individually separate. WORKPIECE d b c e WORKPIECE WORKPIECE
f \ ~ ~ . Howa discontinuous chip is formed. The edge of the cutting tool in a and b is compressing the metal. The chip in c and d is breaking away from the metal, and the chip in e is now completely separated.
WORKPIECE
The continuous chip (Fig 4.) is produced the same way as the
discontinuous chip, except the piece of workpiece that is broken
off is continuous, ie. not separate pieces(3:8-10).
WORKPIECE
f\~ 4. A continuous chip is H ideal way of machining metal.
4
According to Black, because of little time for the chip to
aquire a film of oxide from the atmosphere, the newly formed chip
will scrub the surface of the cutting tool so that "asperites of
the tool and chip will be in contact at high temperature and
pressure", and as a result, particles from the chip may adhere to
the surface of the tool. Other particles roay then combine with
those from the chip that have adhered to the tool, creating a
built-up edge (Fig 5.).
WORKPIECE
'F \ G. ~. A continuous chip with built-up edge results in a roughe surface.
Because the particles of the chip have more time to adhere
to the tool at low cutting speeds, the built-up edge forms more
quickly. In the machining at high cutting speeds, friction at
the tool-chip interface is lower, resulting in slower formation
of the built-up edge. High cutting speeds are therefore favored
because of low wear and because of a good finish of the surface.
The built-up edge damages the workpiece in two ways:
(1) "By the change in shape of the active cutting edge due to the pressence of the built-up edge
(2)"By the presence of fragments dislodged from the built-up edge as they pass into the tool-workpiece interface."(1:ll7)
To show the relationship between Wear of a cutting tool and
time, five tool ~aterials witt their corresponding diffusion
coefficients and predicted wear rates, given by P.O. Hart~ng and
B.M. Kramer, were used(4:77). The equations for the time of
diffusion and wear length are the following:
Time of Diffusion t:
1-t
=
x5
where x is the given distance,
coefficient.
and D is the diff~si~n
Wear Length L: L
=
1R
( 2 )where R is the predicted wear rate.
A graph of length vs. time was plotted to compare the
results (Fig 6.). A second graph was also plotted using LOG
values of the first graph as another form of co~parison (Fig 7.).
As can be seen in Graph 1., a linear relation can be obtained
from the five materials, excluding WC. Likewise in Graph 2., a
linear r2lation between ZrC, TiC, NbC, and VC can bE obtained
with WC resul~ing in an unlike manner.
Values of in Table 1.
the results of Eq~ations (1) and (2) can be seen
"\ r '-' J(
we.
t-r-
C 1 .'-\ i) ~ ') \ ~ i,-
(..; d ~ 8-:. v J /0-i
-
q-; -~ · \; I 11 I ( j :J " ~ 10 '" · '-\ \.it .10\ q Coa
; I~ ~ Y :;) I 'J • t;; • "! Q. "\,
') i .) I , Y " x l":; 1'-'!
J ~'"
~eLe- \. Q.ESVLTS Df! "Tl'E E ~~I"NS OF "'~f ,'M,
or-\\t=FvSloJol " ... 0 ,." .. Wf "12. It "'6rT~.
:i;::::L:~:J::~:~~':: ::T~:"C!:=:l::::e~:::~:J
.,.::::':'
.. . .
.':!-,
.e:· ·1 . ~i
r-f---'---~---+_----l--_t_--+_--+____,__t----l---C-+_-____t---+---+_-__!----C-_+_~ , i -·---r---·--·, I 1 -1 1 : ; 't : __ ~ ____l... ____ _
---l----j:-...,Lb~_I_ ---.:_-+_..:.:.'-..:C+-,-~---.:-+---.:_=___'
t-l---':_-'-l-'~---_-_'-_:_-:-+t-r_-~;~~-l--:l~.
"'::_:1-1:-_··_·.-...:-_···...:-~-l_r_--_··~·_-...:._:+_;~---·...:-_·_-~-'-i --'---f---.:--.!-'~ ---+----~---___i
1----"
----'1--· _' ._.
-~!_' il~,'.
'+'---+-'--::":"'-l--'---'---l--'--'--4--'---'--f---+--' ._ . ...:1)...;_'-_:~~-_-_-...:!_-_-_-...:-_C-_'.l-j-_'-_-_·-_-_-_l:..-'·
_' ----:--....i _. __ -'-___ ---: __
~~
~-- .... --1---+--____ -.
.._~-.--+---+----'-+---.l --f---.--+---'~.
._~--....:..j -I~
....~----+-'---=--'--~...:----.:-+.----.:-'-l--~.:-L:
ii
. 1 ; . ___
, ____
--!. .. ____ .---'-~+~-:-_l-~-i-::i··
... ---'- ...
[ - - - nL
___
·--jl_·-_-_-._:-_-_'-1+1 '-w. L- __ .~. __ I ' j ~-.. ---4---~--~~~---~----~----'--- ·1 I~--+---'-'----'-+-~-+-tlI~-...:.:.:...:....:+--'-:...:....:~~-+-..:..:..:....-'--t-..:..:..:....~~~...:---.:+--'-:..:.:...:-=+-'--'--'-+--'-'--".
--CLi -··-·~-·-t--...::~:·...:-l-~~l
--r
~ T " jt-:·-· .. __
,--t----:---+~.~+_-'-'-_j__...:....:_'_'+_~'--+~~~:...:....:+__'_'---_j__...:....:.:.:r_:-'-'--'--'--=.~f..---'----'---___+i_,________:----1
~
-~
!
I ~.--.-.-.+---+-...: ____
-1--.--j
h--·L--t----+---."t-... -~r____----+---+-~_+_ .J-..:~~-.--.l-.-.--L.
- - - < . , I . r . I;,._.~:1 ~---:--i
r-~r_______:+~~~~~~~+___:~~~~--+--_rr_____f___r____~-+_~~~f___!~U~~
..~
..~-~----+-~.---~·r·-.~
+
I
~j~_
11---1--.u.1
1:
i
1 ---4 -'---.---'---'"----i' ! I -I i I -'- ~-.___..:.. 1 . 1 _ _ _ _ _ __", _ _ _ _ : 1 I _____ n _ _ - - . - : _ I rLIST OF REFERENCES
1. Black, Paul H. Theory of Metal Cutting, McGraw-Hill, IJ.Y ..
1961.
2. Drozda, Thomas J. and Charles Wick. Tool and Manufacturing
Engineers Handbook. McGraw-Hill, Michigan, 1983.
3. Feirer, John L. and Earl E. Tatro, Machine Tool Metal
Working, McGraw-Hill, N.Y .. 1961.
4. Hartung, P. H. and B. M. Kramer. Tool Wear in Titaniu~
Machining.
5. Kaczmarek, J. Principles of Machining by Cutting, Abrasion,