• No results found

Achieving evidence for the management of arthralgia at risk for RA. Response to: ' the cost of arthralgia 'pretreatment' to prevent rheumatoid arthritis' by Rothschild

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Achieving evidence for the management of arthralgia at risk for RA. Response to: ' the cost of arthralgia 'pretreatment' to prevent rheumatoid arthritis' by Rothschild"

Copied!
1
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

1 Ann Rheum Dis Month 2020 Vol 0 No 0

Achieving evidence for the management of

arthralgia at risk for RA. Response to: ‘The cost

of arthralgia ‘pretreatment’ to prevent

rheumatoid arthritis’ by Rothschild

We read the letter from Rothschild with interest.1 We agree that we need more data and better evidence on: (1) how to determine the risk of patients with arthralgia progressing to ‘true RA’ and on (2) whether or not Disease Modifying AntiRheumatic Drug (DMARD) treatment is better than placebo in this phase. Both points were discussed in our Viewpoint.2 Cost–benefit analyses can only be performed afterwards.

Rothschild seems to agree with us not to condone treating patients presenting with arthralgia with DMARDs, pending further evidence. Still, there are different opinions in the field. This is illustrated by a recent study from the UK, in which rheu-matologists were asked about their management in clinical prac-tice of arthralgia patients with positive anti- cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies antibodies and signs of synovitis on power Doppler in at least one joint, but in the absence of clinically apparent arthritis. Seventy- one per cent of consultants said to start DMARD treatment, 16% would treat with glucocorticoids only, 8% considered inclusion in a clinical trial and only 3% replied to wait and see without immediate initiation of DMARD treatment.3

We believe it may be harmful if the rheumatic field gets too comfortable with initiating DMARD treatment already in arthralgia patients with a certain risk of developing true rheu-matoid arthritis (RA) without solid proof. Such a behaviour hampers the course of observational studies to properly deter-mine the risk of RA in individual patients. Hindering the natural course of patients in observational studies with DMARD treat-ment means that we will never be able to know which patients are being overtreated. Importantly, the regular use of DMARDs in this setting may also hinder the inclusion of arthralgia patients in ongoing and future placebo- controlled trials, as this will then be considered increasingly counterintuitive or unethical because physicians in daily clinical practice may increasingly consider DMARD treatment standard of therapy.

Annette van der Helm- van Mil ,1,2 Robert BM Landewé3,4

1Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands 2Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands 3Amsterdam Rheumatology Center, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 4Rheumatology, Zuyderland MC, Heerlen, The Netherlands

Correspondence to Professor Annette van der Helm- van Mil, Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; A. H. M. van_ der_ Helm@ lumc. nl

Handling editor Josef S Smolen

Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not- for- profit sectors.

Competing interests None declared. Patient consent for publication Not required.

Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re- use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

To cite van der Helm- van Mil A, Landewé RBM. Ann Rheum Dis Epub ahead of print: [please include Day Month Year]. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-216984 Received 15 January 2020

Accepted 15 January 2020

►http:// dx. doi. org/ 10. 1136/ annrheumdis- 2020- 216981 Ann Rheum Dis 2020;0:1. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-216984 ORCID iD

Annette van der Helm- van Mil http:// orcid. org/ 0000- 0001- 8572- 1437

RefeRences

1 Rothschild B. The cost of arthralgia “pretreatment” to prevent rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis.

2 van der Helm- van Mil A, Landewé RBM. The earlier, the better or the worse? towards accurate management of patients with arthralgia at risk for RA. Ann Rheum Dis

2020:pii: annrheumdis-2019-216716.

3 Mankia K, Briggs C, Emery P. How are rheumatologists managing Anticyclic citrullinated peptide Antibodies- positive patients who do not have arthritis? J Rheumatol

2019:jrheum.190211.

Correspondence response

4300.7802.430. Protected by copyright.

on February 5, 2020 at Erasmus Medical / X51

http://ard.bmj.com/

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

This section describes first the findings pertaining to respondents’ preferences for the five species and then the regression analysis of the species

(A) Association between age and bone mineral density (BMD) decrease, and (B) the development of clinical arthritis in clinically suspect arthralgia (CSA) patients with and

Daarbij zijn niet alleen de invloed van aerodynamische storingen van natuurlijke wind en die van luchtverplaatsingen en afscherming van wind door voor- namelij

Moisture content is the most important parameter in equestrian sport surface’s quality evaluation, as it significantly controls the total surface’s property and performance

Daarnaast kan van de kleine gemeente gezegd worden dat er geen kennis is over de nieuwe natuurwet en dat verdere diepgaande kennis van natuur bij de Omgevingsdienst zit, waardoor

• Lack of emotional and practical support from mental health professionals • Stigmatization by mental health professionals • Lack of cooperation among educational, medical

The rotational spring element representing the blade pitch control stiffness is adjusted to reach the first torsion mode T1 of approximately 3.7/rev equal to 26.4 Hz at 100%

Combined ‘full’ multiple multilevel logistic regression model of HIV status and behavioural, socioeconomic, and environmental variables in young adults (women 15–24 years and