• No results found

What Will Happen after Withdrawal of the Candy from the Lecture?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "What Will Happen after Withdrawal of the Candy from the Lecture?"

Copied!
1
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

184 © 2019 Education for Health | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow

Dear Editor,

In their article titled, “Candy lectures: Can incentive improve the quality of student preparation in clinical lectures?” Kaliyadan and Khan[1] describe how they used candy as a reward to increase student participation and preparedness in clinical lectures. We would like to challenge this thinking and approach on the basis of self-determination theory (SDT) of motivation.[2] SDT favors motivation that comes from genuine interest, i.e., intrinsic motivation, rather than motivation that comes from rewards and other external factors, i.e., extrinsic motivation. A review on the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation reported that withdrawal of rewards from an activity that was intrinsically motivating in the first place undermined future intrinsic motivation for the activity.[3] Are we concentrating on quick wins by offering incentives to students for their participation in lectures and sacrificing the long-term attitude toward lifelong learning and continuing professional development? It would be interesting to investigate the long-term effect of giving out candies; not in terms of participation of the students during the lectures, but in terms of their learning (surface or deep) and retention of knowledge. An autonomy-supportive environment in the lecture which actively engages students in the topic at hand and highlights the relevance of the topic in patient practice,[4] in our opinion, would serve the purpose even in the absence of candies. In our paper, on how to enhance intrinsic motivation of students in the classroom, we have provided 12 concrete tips including giving importance to what students want, creating a self-determined internal state which guides student behavior, getting the students to participate actively, giving them the responsibility for their learning, structured guidance, optimal challenge, constructive feedback and emotional support, acknowledging feelings of negative affect, showing the relevance of uninteresting activities, providing choices, and employing autonomy-supportive language.[5]

The million dollar question for all educators is “Do we want to fill the bucket or light the fire?”[2] in the case of our students.

Financial support and sponsorship Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Rashmi A. Kusurkar

1,2

, Gerda Croiset

1,2 1Department of Research in Education, Amsterdam UMC,

Vrije Universiteit, VUmc School of Medical Sciences, Institute of Education and Training, 2Faculty of Psychology and Education,

LEARN! Research Institute for Learning and Education, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Address for correspondence: Dr. Rashmi A. Kusurkar,

Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Institute of Education and Training, PK KTC 5.002, Postbus 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E‑mail: R.Kusurkar@vumc.nl

References

1. Kaliyadan F, Khan AS. Candy lectures: Can incentive improve the quality of student preparation in clinical lectures? Educ Health 2016;29:57‑8.

2. Kusurkar R, ten Cate O. AM last page: Education is not filling a bucket, but lighting a fire: Self‑determination Theory and motivation in medical students. Acad Med 2013;88:904.

3. Deci EL, Koestner R, Ryan RM. A meta‑analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychol Bull 1999;125:627‑68.

4. Kusurkar RA, Croiset G. Autonomy support for autonomous motivation in medical education. Med Educ Online 2015;20:27951. 5. Kusurkar RA, Croiset G, Ten Cate TJ. Twelve tips to stimulate

intrinsic motivation in students through autonomy‑supportive classroom teaching derived from Self‑determination Theory. Med Teach 2011;33:978‑82.

What Will Happen after Withdrawal of the Candy

from the Lecture?

Letter to the Editor

Access this article online

Quick Response Code:

Website:

www.educationforhealth.net

DOI:

10.4103/efh.EfH_106_16

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Kusurkar RA, Croiset G. What will happen after withdrawal of the candy from the lecture?. Educ Health 2018;31:184.

© 2019 Education for Health | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Fabrikanten halen uit zichzelf deze producten pas van de markt wanneer er geen commerciële belangen meer zijn of als deze dreigen te worden geschaad door rechtszaken of claims

Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of

The decision maker will thus feel less regret about an unfavorable investment (the obtained out- come is worse than the forgone one) that is above ex- pectations than when that

The discussions are based on five lines of inquiry: The authority of the book as an object, how it is displayed and the symbolic capital it has; the authority of the reader and

On the other hand noise levels has a positive impact on happiness and amount of social interaction with housemates has a very small negative impact on the happiness of students

To see whether these findings hold true when applied to the surveyed groups, the same regression model was used as the one used to answer the sub question “How

Note 3: 47 patients in drug-free remission at year 10 achieved this (i.e. achieved and maintained remission allowing to taper to drug-free) on the following treatment

For example, in the context of Freeman et al.’s (2002) reasoning, social withdrawal may more likely be accompanied by interpersonal mistrust rather than by a lack of social