Maternal
colonization
or
infection
with
extended-spectrum
beta-lactamase-producing
Enterobacteriaceae
in
Africa:
A
systematic
review
and
meta-analysis
Andre
N.H.
Bulabula
a,b,*
,
Angela
Dramowski
a,b,
Shaheen
Mehtar
a,b aDivisionofHealthSystemsandPublicHealth,DepartmentofGlobalHealth,AcademicUnitforInfectionPreventionandControl,FacultyofMedicineand HealthSciences,StellenboschUniversity,CapeTown,SouthAfrica
bInfectionControlAfricaNetwork–ICAN,CapeTown,SouthAfrica
ARTICLE INFO Articlehistory: Received5June2017
Receivedinrevisedform22August2017 Accepted26August2017
CorrespondingEditor:EskildPetersen, Aar-hus,Denmark Keywords: Prevalence Maternalcolonization ESBL Enterobacteriaceae Pregnantwomen Post-partum Systematicreview Meta-analysisAfrica ABSTRACT
Objective:Tosummarizepublishedstudiesontheprevalenceofandriskfactorsformaternalbacterial colonizationand/or infectionwith extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E)inpregnantand/orpost-partumwomeninAfrica.
Methods:AsystematicreviewwasconductedusingthePubMed,Scopus,andGoogleScholardatabases. Bibliographies of includedeligible studieswere manually searchedto identifyadditional relevant articles.Nolanguagerestrictionwasapplied.Thetimeframeofthesearchincludedallrecordsfrom electronic database inceptionto July15, 2017. A random-effectsmeta-analysis was performed to summarizetheprevalenceandthe95%confidenceintervals(CI)ofESBL-Ecolonizationorinfectionin pregnantor post-partumwomenin Africa. Themeta-analysiswas conductedusing STATAIC 13.1 softwareandthemetapropfunction/plugin.
Results:Ten studies(sevenonpregnantwomenandthreeonpost-partumwomen)wereincluded, documentinga17%prevalenceofmaternalcolonizationwithESBL-EinAfrica(95%CI10–23%).The prevalenceofESBL-Eincommunityisolatesexceededthatinisolatesfromthehospitalsetting(22%vs. 14%). The most frequently reported ESBL-encoding gene was CTX-M (cefotaxime hydrolyzing capabilities).DataonriskfactorsformaternalESBL-Ecolonizationandinfectionareverylimited. Conclusions:Theprevalenceofcolonizationand/orinfectionwithESBL-Einpregnantandpost-partum womeninAfricaexceedsthatreportedfromhigh-andmiddle-incomesettings,representingariskfor subsequentneonatalcolonizationand/orinfectionwithESBL-E.
©2017TheAuthor(s).PublishedbyElsevierLtdonbehalfofInternationalSocietyforInfectiousDiseases. ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Introduction
Antimicrobialresistance(AMR)isagrowingthreattohuman healthglobally(WHO,2014;Frieden,2013).Amajormechanismof
AMR is the production of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase
(ESBL) enzymes, which confer resistance to penicillins,
cepha-losporins, and monobactams, but not to cephamycins and
carbapenems(PatersonandBonomo,2005;Pitoutetal., 2005), leavinglimitedtherapeuticoptionsforAMRinfections.In2013,the
US Centers for DiseaseControland Prevention (CDC)identified ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) as a serious threat (Frieden,2013).Inaddition,theWorldHealthOrganization(WHO) haspublishedaprioritypathogenslist,andresistantESBL-Eare classifiedas‘critical’,prioritynumber1(WHO,2017).
ESBL- E occur worldwide in both community and hospital
settings(Patersonand Bonomo,2005;Pitoutetal.,2005;Sonda et al.,2016; Storberg,2014;Luvsansharav etal., 2011), and the
reported incidence of infections in paediatric and neonatal
populations is increasing (Paterson and Bonomo, 2005; Sonda
etal.,2016;Storberg,2014;Flokasetal.,2017;PeiranoandPitout, 2010;Tansarlietal.,2014;Dramowskietal.,2015;Loganet al., 2014).ClinicalinfectionswithESBL-Eareassociatedwithincreased morbidity(including prolongedhospitalstay),increased health-carecosts,andhighermortalityratescomparedtoinfectionswith non-ESBL-E(Blombergetal.,2005;Zaoutisetal.,2005;Kimetal.,
*Corresponding author at: Division of Health Systems and Public Health, DepartmentofGlobalHealth,AcademicUnitforInfectionPreventionandControl, FacultyofMedicineandHealthSciences,StellenboschUniversity,CapeTown,South Africa.
E-mailaddress:[email protected](A.N.H. Bulabula).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2017.08.015
1201-9712/©2017TheAuthor(s).PublishedbyElsevierLtdonbehalfofInternationalSocietyforInfectiousDiseases.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-ND license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect
International
Journal
of
Infectious
Diseases
2002;Ndiretal.,2016).Amongneonates,children,andpregnant/ post-partumwomen,ESBL-Earefrequentlyimplicatedinurinary tractinfections(UTI)(Pitoutetal.,2005;PeiranoandPitout,2010) andbloodstreaminfections(BSI)(Luvsansharavetal.,2011;Flokas etal.,2017;Dramowskietal.,2015;Zaoutisetal.,2005;Lohand Sivalingam.,2007).AmongneonatalESBL-Einfections, Klebsiella pneumoniaeandEscherichiacoliarethemostfrequentlyisolated species(Flokasetal.,2017;Dramowskiet al.,2015;Zaidietal., 2005).
Well-established risk factors for early-onset neonatal sepsis includematernalinfections(e.g.UTIsandchorioamnionitis)and prolongedruptureofthemembranes(Chanetal.,2013;Chanetal., 2015).Inawell-poweredsystematicreview,additionalriskfactors identifiedwerematernalbacterialcolonizationofthevaginaltract (Chan et al., 2013; Chan et al., 2015) and poor antenatal care
(defined as less than four antenatal visits per pregnancy)
(Mizumotoetal.,2015;Lincettoetal.,2006).
Although ESBL-E are well-documented as important
blood-streampathogensinseveralAfricansettings(Flokasetal.,2017; Kimetal.,2002;Kangetal.,2004;Schiappaetal.,1996),littleis
known about the determinants and magnitude of maternal
colonizationwithESBL-E.Factorscontributingtothedevelopment
of AMR (including ESBL-E) in Africa include socio-economic
challenges and health-associated factors (Kariuki and Dougan, 2014)(suboptimalhygieneandsanitation(Tooleetal.,1995),weak health systems(Essacket al.,2016),lack oflaboratory capacity (Okekeetal.,1999),andmisuseofandeasyaccesstoantibiotics (Okeke et al., 1999)). A high burden of immunocompromised patients (HIV infection (Emacar et al., 2010) and diabetes
(Ntirenganyaetal.,2015)),environmental contamination(Dusé, 2005),andinadequatedecontaminationofmedicaldevices(Dusé, 2005), areother important factorsexacerbatingAMRpathogen transmissioninAfrica.Therelationshipbetweenthesefactorsand maternal colonization or infection with ESBL-E is unclear and requiresinvestigation.
This systematic review and meta-analysis summarizes the
magnitude of colonization or infection with ESBL-E among
pregnant andpost-partum women in Africaand theassociated
riskfactors.Knowledgeoftheburdenandriskfactorsofmaternal colonizationorinfectionwithESBL-Ewillassistwithclinicalcare, infectionprevention,andantibioticstewardship,andinformthe
future development of targeted interventions to reduce both
maternalandneonatalESBL-E-associatedmorbidityandmortality. Methods
Literaturesearch
A systematicreviewwas conductedin PubMed,Scopus, and
GoogleScholar.Thesearchstrategyincludedthefollowingwords,
medical subject heading(MeSH) terms, andBoolean operators:
“(enterobacteriaceaeORbacteria ORresistantORresistanceOR ‘non-susceptible’OR“nonsusceptible”OR“notsusceptible”)AND (coloni*ORinfect*ORcarri*)AND((AfricaORAlgeriaORAngolaOR BeninORBotswanaORBurkinaFasoORBurundiORCaboVerdeOR
CameroonORCentralAfricanRepublicORChadORComorosOR
DemocraticRepublicoftheCongoORRepublicoftheCongoOR
Coted’IvoireORDjiboutiOREgyptOREquatorialGuineaOREritrea
Table1
Characteristicsofstudiesincludedinthereview. Number Authorandyear
ofpublication
Country Study
design
Clinical samples
Population Numberofparticipantscolonizedwith ESBL-E/Totalparticipants(%colonized)
ESBL-Especiesincluded (isolate)andproportion
Setting 1 Olufunkeetal. (2014) Nigeria Cross-sectional Urine Pregnant women
69/264(26.1%) Escherichiacoli69/264 Hospital
2 Onwuezobe (2015) Nigeria Cross-sectional Urine Pregnant women 16/80(20%) Klebsiellapneumoniae8/ 16 Escherichiacoli6/16 Klebsiellaoxytoca1/16 Enterobactercloacae1/16 Community 3 Chereauetal. (2015) Madagascar Cross-sectional Stool Pregnant women 66/356(18.6%) Escherichiacoli46/66 Klebsiellapneumoniae11/ 66 Enterobactercloacae5/66 Citrobacterfreundii3/66 Morganellamorganii1/66 Community 4 Nelsonetal. (2014) Tanzania Cross-sectional Stool Post-partum women 16/113(15%) Escherichiacoli6/20 Enterobacterspp3/20 Klebsiellapneumoniae1/ 20 Citrobacterspp2/20 Pantoeaspp3/20 Proteusspp1/20 Hospital 5 Kabaetal. (2016)
SouthAfrica Cross-sectional Stool Post-partum women 4/90(4.4%) Klebsiellapneumoniae2/ 90 Escherichiacoli1/90 Enterobactercloacae1/90 Community 6 Sáez-lópezetal. (2016) Mozambique Cross-sectional Vaginal swabs Pregnant women
1/51(1.9%) Escherichiacoli1/51 Hospital
7 Djuikoue(2016) Cameroon
Cross-sectional
Stool Pregnant
women
15/26(57.7%) Escherichiacoli15/26 Community
8 Fortinietal. (2015) Nigeria Cross-sectional Stool Pregnant women
32/101(31.7%) Escherichiacoli32/101 Hospital
9 Bebelletal. (2017) Uganda Prospective cohort Urine Blood Post-partum women 8/174(4.6%) Escherichiacoli5/174 Klebsiellapneumoniae3/ 174 Hospital
10 Titoetal.(2017) Tanzania Cross-sectional
Urine Pregnant
women
4/49(8.2%) Escherichiacoli4/49 Hospital
OREthiopiaORGabonORGambiaORGhanaORGuineaOR Guinea-BissauORKenyaORLesothoORLiberiaORLibyaORMadagascar
ORMalawiORMaliORMauritaniaORMauritiusORMoroccoOR
MozambiqueORNamibiaORNigerORNigeriaORRwandaOR“Sao
TomeandPrincipe”ORSenegalORSeychellesORSierraLeoneOR SomaliaORSouthAfricaORSouthSudanORSudanORSwaziland
OR Tanzania OR Togo OR Tunisia OR Uganda OR Zambia OR
Zimbabwe))AND(ESBLORextended-spectrum-beta-lactamaseOR
extended-spectrum-
b
-lactamase OR extended spectrum betalactamase)AND((pregnantORpregnancyORgestationOR post-delivery OR postdelivery OR “post delivery” OR post-part* OR
postpartum OR “post partum” OR perinatal OR antenatal OR
prenatal OR women))”. Bibliographies of eligible studies were manuallysearchedtoidentifyadditionalrelevantarticles.Itwas attemptedto contact theauthors of relevant studies to obtain specificdetails.Followingthescreeningofpublications,atotalof 10articleswereincluded(Table1).
Studyselectionandeligibilitycriteria
Allpublicationsdescribingcolonizationand/orinfectionwith
ESBL-E in pregnant or post-partum African women in both
communityand hospital settings wereselected, irrespective of thestudydesign.Primarystudydesignsreportingtheproportion orprevalenceof ESBL-Einpregnantor post-partumwomen,as wellas risk factors,were eligible. No language restriction was applied.Thetimeframe ofthe searchincludedall recordsfrom electronicdatabaseinceptiontoJuly15,2017.Thearticleselection andexclusionprocessisshowninFigure1.
Dataextraction
Adataextractionformwasdesignedtocapturethefollowing information:firstauthorandyearofpublication;country;study design(anytype); studysetting(communityorhospital);study
population; number and percentage of women colonized or
infectedwithESBL-E;totalnumberofwomenrecruitedintothe study;ESBL-Eisolatesandtheirproportions;molecularidenti fi-cation ofESBL-Eisolates(if performed);factorsassociatedwith ESBL-Ecolonizationorinfectioninwomen.
Datasynthesis
Arandom-effectsmeta-analysiswasperformedtosummarize
theproportionsandthe95%confidenceintervals(CI)ofESBL-Ein pregnantorpost-partumwomeninAfrica.Toensureproportionate
weight distribution to studies presenting extreme prevalence
(near0or1),theFreeman–Tukeyarcsinemethodologywasapplied (Nyaga et al., 2014). The between-study heterogeneity was assessed usingthe I2 statistic(which quantifiesthepercentage of variation acrossstudies due to heterogeneityrather than to chance): I2 <75% was considered as moderate heterogeneity (HigginsandThompson,2002)and>75%reflectedhigh heteroge-neity,inwhichcasesubsetanalyseswereperformed.The
random-effects modelwas chosen basedontheanticipated assumption
thatstudiesreportingonthemagnitudeofESBL-Einpregnantand
post-partum women used different laboratory methods, were
conductedindifferentsettings(hospitalandcommunity),orhad otherunknown factorsinfluencing the magnitudeof ESBL-E in
pregnantand post-partum women in Africa. The meta-analysis
was performed using STATA IC version 13.1 software and the
metaprop function/plugin, which is a specific STATA program
designedforthemeta-analysisofbinomialdata,allowingpooling of proportions(Nyaga et al., 2014).Atotal of 1304 participants werepooledfromthestudiesincluded(927pregnantwomenand
377post-partumwomen).
Reportingofthemeta-analysisofobservationalstudies
This meta-analysis of observational studies is reported in compliancewiththeMOOSEstatementandchecklist(Stroupetal., 2000)(Meta-analysisofObservationalStudiesinEpidemiology).
Assessmentofbias
TheNewcastle–OttawaScale(Herzogetal.,2013)adaptedfor cross-sectionalstudies(seebelow)wasusedtoassesstheriskof biasforeachselectedstudy.Thisscaleincludesanevaluationof
participant selection, comparability,and outcome;each section hasamaximumnumberof‘stars’thatcanbeawardedasascore(5, 2, and 3, respectively). For the overall quality assessment, the
maximumscoreis10stars.Studieswitha minimumscoreof3
wereconsideredof acceptablemethodologicalqualityfor inclu-sioninthemeta-analysis(Table2).
Results
GeographicdistributionofarticlesdescribingESBL-Einwomenin Africa
Ten observational studies were included for quantitative
analysis. These were from Nigeria (n=3), Tanzania (n=2),
Madagascar (n=1), South Africa (n=1), Mozambique (n=1), Uganda (n=1), and Cameroon (n=1). Six studies reported on
pregnantwomenandfouronpost-partumwomen.Threestudies
reportedESBL-E isolatesfromurine,fiveothers fromstool,one fromvaginalswabs,andonefrombothurineandblood.
Table2
Riskofbiasassessmentforstudiesincludedinthequantitativesynthesis(allobservationalstudies).a Authorand
yearof publication
Selection Comparability Exposure Overall
quality assessment score(outofa maximumof 10) Representativenessofthesample Ascertainmentofexposure Comparabilityofthegroupson
thebasisofdesignoranalysis
Assessmentof outcome
Olufunke etal. (2014)
*Trulyrepresentativeofaverage pregnantwomenwithESBL Enterobacteriaceae
*Pregnantwomendiagnosedwith clinicalisolatesproducingESBL DDST
Studydidnotcontrolforother factors *Independentblind assessment 4 Onwuezobe (2015)
*Trulyrepresentativeofaverage pregnantwomenwithESBL Enterobacteriaceae
**Pregnantwomendiagnosedwith clinicalisolatesproducingESBL DDST
Studydidnotcontrolforother factors *Independentblind assessment 4 Kabaetal. (2016)
*Trulyrepresentativeofpost-partum womenwithESBLEnterobacteriaceaein thecommunity
**ESBLproductionwasconfirmed usingthecombinationdisctest
Studydidnotcontrolforother factors *Independentblind assessment 4 Chereau etal. (2015)
*Trulyrepresentativeofpregnant womenwithESBLEnterobacteriaceaein thecommunity
**ProductionofESBLinESC-resistant Enterobacteriaceaewasconfirmedby DDST(CASFM)
*Studycontrolledforother factors,multivariateanalysis
*Independentblind assessment
5
Nelsonetal. (2014)
*Trulyrepresentativeofpost-partum womenwithESBLEnterobacteriaceaein thehospital
*Rectalswabsplatedonto MacConkeyagar(OXOID,
Basingstoke,UK)supplementedwith cefotaxime2mg/lforpreliminary screeningofESBLbacterialisolates
Studydidnotcontrolforother factors *Independentblind assessment 3 Sáez-lópez etal. (2016)
Nodescriptionofparticipantselection **ESBLproducerswereidentifiedby DDSTusingCTX,AMCandCAZ
Studydidnotcontrolforother factors *Independentblind assessment 3 Djuikoue etal. (2016a,b)
*Trulyrepresentativeofoutpatient womenconsultingforasuspicionof UTI,duringthestudyperiod
**ThepresenceofESBLwas determinedusingthedoubledisc diffusionphenotypicmethod
*Studycontrolledforother factors,multivariateanalysis
*Independentblind assessment
5
Fortinietal. (2015)
*Trulyrepresentativeofhealthy pregnantwomenonthedayof admissiontohospitalinIbadan (Nigeria)
**Phenotypicandgenotypic characterizationofESBLproduction
Studydidnotcontrolforother factors *Independentblind assessment 4 Titoetal. (2017)
*TrulyrepresentativeofHIV-positive pregnantwomenattendingthePMTCT clinics;allconsentingHIV-positive pregnantwomenwereincludedduring thestudyperiod
**ESBLproductionwas
concomitantlytestedonthesame Mueller–Hintonagarplate,usingthe DDSTmethod
*Studycontrolledforother factors,multivariateanalysis
*Independentblind assessment
5
Bebelletal. (2017)
*Trulyrepresentativeoffebrile, hypothermic,ornormothermic post-partumwomeninthehospital
**ESBLphenotypeifsynergywas observedbetweenAMCandCAZor CTX
Thestudydesignalloweda4:1 ratioofnormothermicto febrile/hypothermic post-partumwomen,butdidnot controlforotherfactors
**Recordlinkageand thestatisticaltestused clearlydescribedand appropriate;p-value presented
5
AMC,amoxicillin–clavulanicacid;CASFM,CommittéAntibiogramme SociétéFrançaisedeMicrobiologie;CAZ,ceftazidime;CTX,cefotaxime;DDST,doublediscsynergy test;ESBL,extended-spectrumbeta-lactamase-producing;ESC,extended-spectrumcephalosporin;PMTCT,preventionofmothertochildtransmission;UTI,urinarytract infection.
a
ProportionestimatesofESBL-Einpregnantandpost-partumwomen inAfrica
Through meta-analysis of the eligible studies, the overall pooledestimateoftheESBL-Eproportioninpregnantand post-partumwomeninAfricawasdeterminedtobe0.17(95%CI0.10– 0.23)or17%(95%CI10–23%)(Figure2).Theheterogeneitywas high(I2=93.6%,p
<0.001).
ThepooledproportionofESBL-Einpregnantwomenwas0.22 (95%CI0.12–0.31)(Figure2)and thatofESBL-Einpost-partum womenwas 0.07 (95% CI 0.02–0.12). The pooled proportion of ESBL-Einhospitalsettingswas0.14(95%CI0.05–0.23)compared to0.22(95%CI0.09–0.34)incommunitysettings(Figure3).
The pooledproportionofESBL-E infectionswas 0.13(95%CI
0.01–0.27) compared to 0.19 (95% CI 0.01–0.27) for ESBL-E
colonizedpregnantandpost-partumwomen(Figure4). MolecularepidemiologyofESBL-Ecolonization/infection
Chereauetal.(2015)(Madagascar)identified66 ESBL-produc-ingisolatesinpregnantwomen,includingE.coli(n=46),Klebsiella spp(n=11),Enterobactercloacae(n=5),Citrobacterfreundii(n=3), andMorganellamorganii(n=1).Forty-fiveisolatescarriedabla CTX-Mgene,15carriedblaSHVandblaCTX-M genes,and twocarried a blaSHVgenealone.NoblaESBLgeneandnocefoxitinresistancewas detectedinfourESBL-producingE.coliisolates.Sáez-lópezetal.
(2016)identifiedoneESBL-EisolateanditcarriedtheCTX-M-15 gene.Kabaetal.(2016)reportedthatonemother–infantpairwas ESBL-positiveatbirthwithSHV-5-producingE.cloacae.Djuikoue etal.(2016a)reportedthatamong15E.coliESBL,allwereCTX-M group1(n=15).Fortinietal.(2015)foundE.coli(n=32)producing CTX-M-15.
DetectionandconfirmationofESBLinthelaboratory:whatmethods wereused?
Fivestudies(Nelsonetal.,2014;Olufunkeetal.,2014;Aljabri etal., 2010;Bebellet al.,2017;Titoet al.,2017), detectedESBL production using thedouble discsynergy test (DDST). Chereau etal.(2015),Djuikoueetal.(2016b),andKabaetal.(2016)utilized both synergy testing and molecularidentification of ESBL (PCR sequencing).Sáez-lópezetal.(2016)andFortinietal.(2015)used molecularidentificationofESBL.
FactorsassociatedwithESBL-EinpregnantwomeninAfrica Threestudiesincludedamultivariateanalysisofriskfactorsfor
ESBL-E colonization/infectionamong pregnantwomen. Chereau
et al. (2015) identifiedprivate indoor access todrinking water (oddsratio(OR)3.8,95%CI1.2–11.6)andlivinginanindividual house(OR2.2,95%CI1.0–4.8)asindependentriskfactorsfor
ESBL-E colonization among Malagasy women (after adjusting for
Heterogeneity between groups: p = 0.009 Overall (I^2 = 93.59%, p = 0.00); 1 Subtotal (I^2 = 94.10%, p = 0.00) 4 9 3 Post-partum 5 10 7 Subtotal (I^2 = .%, p = .) Pregnant Study 6 2 8 0.17 (0.10, 0.23) 0.26 (0.21, 0.32) 0.22 (0.12, 0.31) 0.19 (0.15, 0.23) 0.32 (0.23, 0.41) 0.04 (0.02, 0.11) 0.14 (0.09, 0.22) 0.58 (0.39, 0.74) 0.05 (0.02, 0.09) 0.07 (0.02, 0.12) ES (95% CI) 0.02 (0.00, 0.10) 0.20 (0.13, 0.30) 0.08 (0.03, 0.19) 100.00 10.66 67.59 10.97 9.46 10.92 10.34 5.98 11.15 32.41 Weight 11.02 9.57 9.94 % 0.17 (0.10, 0.23) 0.26 (0.21, 0.32) 0.22 (0.12, 0.31) 0.19 (0.15, 0.23) 0.32 (0.23, 0.41) 0.04 (0.02, 0.11) 0.14 (0.09, 0.22) 0.58 (0.39, 0.74) 0.05 (0.02, 0.09) 0.07 (0.02, 0.12) ES (95% CI) 0.02 (0.00, 0.10) 0.20 (0.13, 0.30) 0.08 (0.03, 0.19) 100.00 10.66 67.59 10.97 9.46 10.92 10.34 5.98 11.15 32.41 Weight 11.02 9.57 9.94 % -.5 0 .5 1
Poo
led prop
ortion of
ESBL-E in pregnan
t an
d po
st-partum
women
in Afric
a
deliveryperiodandstudyarea).Djuikoueetal.(2016b))foundthat thedetectionofantimicrobialactivityinthestoolsamplewasthe onlyindependentriskfactorassociatedwithESBLE.colicarriagein Cameroonianwomen(OR5.4,95%CI2.0–14.7).Bebelletal.(2017)) identifiedsinglemaritalstatus(OR2.6,95%CI1.1–6.1,p=0.026), lowCD4+countof<200/
m
l(OR2.9,95%CI1.1–7.7,p=0.031),andcurrent UTI symptoms (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1–6.0, p=0.03) as
independentpredictorsofESBL-Einfection.
The following elements were not found to be significantly
associated with ESBL-E colonization/infection in these three studies:beingemployedorbeingahousewife(Tito etal.2017), drinkingwatersupplyfromaspringorawell(Chereauetal.,2015), andhospitalizationinthelast3months(Djuikoueetal.2016a,b). Discussion
Thecloserelationshipofthemother–infantpairrepresentsa
potential risk for cross-transmission of maternal pathogens
leadingtoneonatalcolonizationorinfection.Severalstudieshave confirmed therole of maternalcolonization in the subsequent developmentofneonatalsepsis(particularlyforgroupB Strepto-coccus,butalsoforESBL-E)(Chanetal.,2013;Kabaetal.,2016; Denkeletal.,2014;Rettedaletal.,2015).
However,thescarcityofresearchondeterminantsofmaternal colonizationinAfricaisworrisome.Thismeta-analysisofeligible published studies determined an overall pooled prevalence of
colonizationorinfectionwithESBL-Einpregnantandpost-partum womeninAfricaof17%(95%CI10–23%).Thisrateofcolonizationor infectionwithESBL-E isinlinewithawell-poweredsystematic reviewconductedinAfricabyTansarlietal.(2014),whoreported proportions varyingfrom1.5%to22.8%(pooledfrom13studies withisolatesfromclinicalurinesamples)amongpatientseither infected or colonized with Enterobacteriaceae. However, these
proportions were notfor pregnant andpost-partum women as
specific groups. The pooled ESBL-E rate documented herein is
substantially higher than therates foundin high-and middle-incomecountries, e.g.,Norway(2.9%)(Rettedaletal.,2015)and Argentina (5.4%) (Villar et al., 2013). Possible explanations for
increased ESBL-E carriage among African populations (both in
community(Pitoutetal.,2005;Pallecchietal.,2004)andhospital settings) includepoverty, suboptimalhygiene,contaminationof drinking water (faeces (Bain et al., 2014), antibiotics), water
sewage, communal toilets, easy access to antibiotics among
pregnant and post-partum women in Africa, and possibly also
increased use of antibiotics in livestock in Africa (Kariuki and Dougan, 2014).Anotherpossibleexplanationis thatthelack of trainedhealthcareworkers(Kimang’a,2012)andweaklaboratory andinfectioncontrolcapacity(Pettietal.,2006)maycontributeto
healthcare-associated transmission of ESBL-E to pregnant and
post-partumwomen.
Another important finding is that the pooled proportion of
ESBL-Eincommunitysettingsexceededthatinhospitalsettings
Heterogeneity between groups: p = 0.324 Overall (I^2 = 93.59%, p = 0.00); 6 Subtotal (I^2 = 93.52%, p = 0.00) Study Community 8 Subtotal (I^2 = 94.28%, p = 0.00) 4 3 7 1 9 5 10 2 Hospital 0.17 (0.10, 0.23) 0.02 (0.00, 0.10) 0.22 (0.09, 0.34) ES (95% CI) 0.08 (0.03, 0.19) 0.14 (0.05, 0.23) 0.19 (0.15, 0.23) 0.04 (0.02, 0.11) 0.05 (0.02, 0.09) 0.26 (0.21, 0.32) 0.32 (0.23, 0.41) 0.14 (0.09, 0.22) 0.58 (0.39, 0.74) 0.20 (0.13, 0.30) 100.00 11.02 37.43 Weight 9.94 62.57 10.97 10.92 11.15 10.66 9.46 10.34 5.98 9.57 % 0.17 (0.10, 0.23) 0.02 (0.00, 0.10) 0.22 (0.09, 0.34) ES (95% CI) 0.08 (0.03, 0.19) 0.14 (0.05, 0.23) 0.19 (0.15, 0.23) 0.04 (0.02, 0.11) 0.05 (0.02, 0.09) 0.26 (0.21, 0.32) 0.32 (0.23, 0.41) 0.14 (0.09, 0.22) 0.58 (0.39, 0.74) 0.20 (0.13, 0.30) 100.00 11.02 37.43 Weight 9.94 62.57 10.97 10.92 11.15 10.66 9.46 10.34 5.98 9.57 % -.5 0 .5 1
Pooled prop
ortion of ES
BL-E in women,
Hospital vs Community sett
ing
s
(22%vs.14%)(Figure3).Thisfindingmayhavebeeninfluencedby thehighprevalenceofESBL-Eincommunityisolates(58%)inthe
Cameroonian study. However, another explanation may bethe
effectofhigh-levelESBL-Econtaminationofcommunitywaterand foodsources,lackofsanitation,andpossiblyoveruseofantibiotics.
TheapparentdifferenceinESBL-Eproportionsbetween
commu-nityandhospitalsettingscouldalsobeexplainedbythefactthat
all included studies from the community only studied ESBL-E
colonization. In this meta-analysis, the proportion of ESBL-E colonizationwasfoundtobegreaterthanESBL-Einfection.
ThedetectionofESBL-Einsamplesfromhospitalizedpregnant
women withshort lengths of stay may represent
community-acquiredcolonizationand/orinfectionwithESBL-E.Because ESBL-Estoolcarriagepersistsforavariablelengthoftime(Ahmedetal., 2014), the study population may have acquired ESBL-E during pregnancythatthenpersisteduptodeliveryandthepost-partum period, reflecting community-acquired antimicrobial resistance genesratherthanhealthcare-associatedacquisition.
ThepooledproportionofESBL-Ewashigheramongpregnant
womenthan post-partum women (22%vs. 7%)(Figure 2).This differencemaybeexplainedbyagreaterprobabilityofUTIswith ESBL-Eduringpregnancythaninthepost-partum period( Sáez-lópezetal.,2016).Itmayalsopossiblyrepresentdifferencesin asymptomaticbacteriuriaduringpregnancy,differencesin antibi-otic prescribing practices, and different decision-making when choosingtosendsamplesfrompregnantvs.post-partumwomen forculture.
The clinical significance of increased ESBL-E-associated UTI
during pregnancy is the potential for adverse pregnancy and
neonataloutcomes,includingintrauterinegrowthrestriction,low birthweight,prematureruptureofthemembranes,foetaldeath, andneonatalinfections(LohandSivalingam.,2007;Romeroetal., 1989;OvalleandLevancini,2001;Matuszkiewicz-Rowinskaetal., 2015).
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, a few studies attemptedtoreportonfactorsassociatedwithESBL-Ecolonization inwomeninAfrica;however,theriskfactorsanalysedvariedfrom
one study to anotherand their pooled estimates could not be
produced. The molecular epidemiology of theESBL-E enzymes
identifiedintheMadagascar(Chereauetal.,2015),Nigeria(Fortini etal.,2015),Cameroon(Djuikoueetal.,2016b),andMozambique (Sáez-lópezetal.,2016)studieswas inkeepingwiththeglobal predominanceoftheCTX-Mclone,whichisalsowidelyreportedin community-acquiredUTI(Pitoutetal.,2005;PeiranoandPitout, 2010;Pallecchietal.,2004;Livermoreetal.,2007).
Thissystematicreviewhasseveralstrengths.Acomprehensive searchofseveralelectronicdatabaseswasperformed,inaddition tomanualsearchesandattemptstocontactauthorsofrelevant studiestoobtainspecificdetails.Theauthorsmadeaneffortto search the ‘grey literature’ by using Google Scholar, as many African publications are not listed in PubMed or Scopus. This appearstobe thefirstsystematic reviewand meta-analysison ESBL-E colonization and/or infection focusing onpregnant and
post-partum women in Africa. This group is of particular
Heterogeneity between groups: p = 0.505
Overall (I^2 = 93.59%, p = 0.00); Infection 1 10 3 9 5 2 4 Subtotal (I^2 = .%, p = .) 8 6 7 Colonization Study Subtotal (I^2 = 93.50%, p = 0.00) 0.17 (0.10, 0.23) 0.26 (0.21, 0.32) 0.58 (0.39, 0.74) 0.04 (0.02, 0.11) 0.32 (0.23, 0.41) 0.14 (0.09, 0.22) 0.20 (0.13, 0.30) 0.19 (0.15, 0.23) 0.13 (-0.01, 0.27) 0.08 (0.03, 0.19) 0.02 (0.00, 0.10) 0.05 (0.02, 0.09) ES (95% CI) 0.19 (0.10, 0.27) 100.00 10.66 5.98 10.92 % 9.46 10.34 9.57 10.97 31.75 9.94 11.02 11.15 Weight 68.25 0.17 (0.10, 0.23) 0.26 (0.21, 0.32) 0.58 (0.39, 0.74) 0.04 (0.02, 0.11) 0.32 (0.23, 0.41) 0.14 (0.09, 0.22) 0.20 (0.13, 0.30) 0.19 (0.15, 0.23) 0.13 (-0.01, 0.27) 0.08 (0.03, 0.19) 0.02 (0.00, 0.10) 0.05 (0.02, 0.09) ES (95% CI) 0.19 (0.10, 0.27) 100.00 10.66 5.98 10.92 % 9.46 10.34 9.57 10.97 31.75 9.94 11.02 11.15 Weight 68.25 -.5 0 .5 1
Pooled
proportion of
ESBL-E in women
by "infe
ction or colon
ization" statu
s
importance for vertical transmission and subsequent neonatal colonizationand/orinfection.Eachstudywasthoroughlyassessed forriskofbias.
While informative,thissystematic reviewand meta-analysis hasanumberoflimitations.Thenumberofeligiblestudieswas
small, demonstrating the apparent lack of studies on ESBL-E
colonizationandinfectioninthispopulationgroup:pregnantand post-partumwomeninAfrica.Giventhelimitedsamplesize,the findingsofthissystematicreviewandmeta-analysismaynotbe generalizabletoallpregnantand/orpost-partumwomeninAfrica. Thepublicationsretrievedandincludedinthemeta-analysiswere allobservationalstudies,astudytypethatispronetomanybiases, including selection and information biases (Archer and Horn, 2006).
Morerobuststudiesareneededtounderstandhowfrequently
pregnant and/or post-partum women become colonized or
infectedwithESBL-EinAfrica,aswellastherelatedriskfactors
in both community and hospital settings, to inform future
interventionstoreduce theirrates. Interventions couldinclude improvedsanitationandwatersupplies,educationofmotherson personalhygiene,restrictionofantibiotic useduringpregnancy, andstrengtheningofinfectionpreventioninhealthcarefacilities. Plainlanguagesummary
The level of colonization and/or infection with ESBL-E in
pregnantand post-partumwomenin Africaishigher thanthat
reported from high- and middle -income settings. In African
pregnantand post-partumwomen,theprevalence ofESBL-E in
community isolates exceeds that in hospital isolates. Maternal ESBL-Ecolonization/infectionrepresentsariskformothertochild pathogentransmissionwiththepotentialforsubsequentneonatal colonizationand/orinfection.
Keyrecommendation
FurtherstudiesareneededtoestablishESBL-Ecolonizationand
infectionrates amongst pregnantand post-partumwomen and
theirdeterminantsinallAfricanregions.Interventionstoreduce
ESBL-E colonization and carriage in Africa should focus on
preventing both community- and healthcare-associated ESBL-E
acquisition.Potentialinterventionscouldincludetheprovisionof safesanitationandcleanwatersupplies,educationofmotherson personalhygiene,restricteduseofantibioticsinpregnancy,and
strengthening of infection prevention efforts in healthcare
facilities(handhygieneandappropriatedisinfectionofobstetric
equipmentandtheenvironment).
Researchgaps
Itisnotwellunderstoodhowfrequently pregnantand post-partumwomenbecomecolonizedandinfectedwithESBL-E,which riskfactorspromoteESBL-Ecolonization/infection,andhowthis couldbepreventedormanaged,bothincommunityandhospital settingsinAfrica.Inaddition,healthsystemsresearchisneededto
increase the understanding of the problem of antimicrobial
resistance in maternal and neonatal infections at the macro
(leadership or governance), meso (healthcare facilities and
programmes),andmicro(pregnantwomenorserviceconsumers) levels.
Fundingsources
None.
References
AhmedSalwaFouad,AliMostafaMohamedM,MohamedZienatKamel,Moussa TarekA,KlenaJohnD.Fecalcarriageofextended-spectrumb-lactamasesand AmpC-producingEscherichiacoliinaLibyancommunity.AnnClinMicrobiol Antimicrob2014;13(1):22,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-0711-13-22.
AljabriKhalidS,BokhariSomoaA,KhanMurtadhaJ.Originalarticle.AnnSaudiMed 2010;30(December):10–2,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0256-4947.72265.
ArcherSujataL,HornLindaVAN.Perspectivesinpracticepublishingnutrition research:areviewof2006.JAmDietAssoc2006;4:89–96,doi:http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.jada.2005.11.007.
BainRobert,CronkRyan,WrightJim,YangHong,SlaymakerTom,BartramJamie. Fecalcontaminationofdrinking-waterinlow-andmiddle-incomecountries:a systematicreviewandmeta-analysis.PLoSMed2014;11(5):e1001644.
BebellLisaM,NgonziJoseph,BaziraJoel,FajardoYarine,BoatinAdelineA,Siedner MarkJ,etal.Antimicrobial-resistantinfectionsamongpostpartumwomenata Ugandanreferralhospital.PLoS One2017;12(4):1–13,doi:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0175456.
BlombergBjørn,JureenRoland,ManjiKarimP,BushirS,MwakagileDavisSM, UrassaWillyK,etal.Highrateoffatalcasesofpediatricsepticemiacausedby gram-negativebacteriawithextended-spectrumbeta-lactamasesinDares Salaam,Tanzaniahighrateoffatalcasesofpediatricsepticemiacausedby gram-negativebacteriawithextended-spectrumB.JClinMicrobiol2005;43 (2):745–9,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.43.2.745.
ChanGraceJ,LeeAnneCC,BaquiAbdullahH,TanJingwen,BlackRobertE.Riskof early-onsetneonatalinfectionwithmaternalinfectionorcolonization:aglobal systematicreviewandmeta-analysis.PLoSMed2013;10(8),doi:http://dx.doi. org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001502.
Chan Grace J, Lee AnneCC, Baqui Abdullah H,Tan Jingwen,Black Robert E. Prevalenceofearly-onsetneonatalinfectionamongnewbornsofmotherswith bacterialinfectionorcolonization:asystematicreviewandmeta-analysis.BMC InfectDis2015;15(1):118,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0813-3.
ChereauFanny,HerindrainyPerlinot,GarinBenoit,HuynhBichTram,Randrianirina Frederique,PadgetMichael,etal. Colonizationof extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-andNDM-1-producingEnterobacteriaceaeamongpregnantwomen in the community in a low-income country: a potential reservoir for transmission of multiresistantEnterobacteriaceae to neonates.Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015;59(6):3652–5, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/ AAC.00029-15.
Denkel LuisaA, Schwab Frank, KolaAxel, LeistnerRasmus,Garten Lars, von WeizsackerKatharina,etal.Themotherasmostimportantriskfactorfor colonizationofverylowbirthweight(VLBW)infantswithextended-spectrum
b-lactamase-producingEnterobacteriaceae(ESBL-E).JAntimicrobChemother 2014;69(8):2230–7,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dku097.
DjuikoueIngridCécile,WoertherPaul-louis,ToukamMichel,BurdetCharles,Ruppé Etienne,GonsuKamgaHortense,etal.Intestinalcarriageofextendedspectrum beta-lactamase producingE.Coli inwomenwith urinarytract infections, Cameroon. J Infect Dev Ctries 2016a;10(10):1135–9, doi:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3855/jidc.7616.
DjuikoueIngridCècile,WoertherPaulLouis,ToukamMichel,BurdetCharles,Ruppè Etienne,GonsuKamgaHortense,etal.Intestinalcarriageofextendedspectrum beta-lactamase producingE.Coli inwomenwith urinarytract infections, Cameroon. J Infect Dev Ctries 2016b;10(10):1135–9, doi:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3855/jidc.7616.
DramowskiAngela,CottonMarkF,RabieHelena,WhitelawAndrew.Trendsin paediatricbloodstreaminfectionsataSouthAfricanreferralhospital.BMC Pediatr2015;15:33,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-015-0354-3.
DuséAG.Infectioncontrolindevelopingcountrieswithparticularemphasison SouthAfrica.SouthAfrJEpidemiolInfect2005;20(202):37–41,doi:http://dx. doi.org/10.1080/10158782.2005.11441230.
EmacarJ,OkemoP,GatheriG,KariukiS.AntibioticresistancepatternsofEscherichia coliisolatedfromHIV-seropositiveadultsatMbagathidistricthospital,Nairobi, Kenya.JApplBiosci2010;27:1705–14.
EssackSY,DestaAT,AbotsiRE,AgobaEE.AntimicrobialresistanceintheWHO Africanregion:currentstatusandroadmapforaction.JPublicHealth(Bangkok) 2016;39(1):fdw015,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdw015.
FlokasMyrtoEleni,KaranikaStyliani,AlevizakosMichail,MylonakisEleftherios. Prevalence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceaein pediatric bloodstream infections:asystematicreviewandmeta-analysis.PLoSOne2017;1–13,doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171216.
FortiniDaniela,FashaeKayode,VillaLaura,FeudiClaudia,CarattoliAlessandra, GarcıAurora.AnovelplasmidcarryingblaCTX-M-15identifiedincommensal Escherichia coli from healthy pregnant women in Ibadan, Nigeria. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2015;3:9–12, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jgar.2014.12.002.
FriedenTom.Antibioticresistancethreats.CDC2013;22–50Doi:CS239559-B.
HerzogR,Alvarez-PasquinMJ,DiazC,DelBarrioJL,EstradaJM,GilA. Newcastle-OttawaScaleadaptedforcross-sectionalstudies.2013.
Higgins JulianPT, Thompson Simon G. Quantifying heterogeneityin a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002;21(11):1539–58, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ sim.1186.
KabaM,ManenzheRI,MoodleyC,ZarHJ,NicolMP.Epidemiologyof extended-spectrum beta-lactamase- and carbapenemase-producingbacteria in stool fromapparentlyhealthychildren,SouthAfrica.(Posterpresentation).IntJInfect Dis2016;45:297–8,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2016.02.655.
KangCheol-in,KimSung-han,ParkWanBeom,KimHong-bin,KimEui-chong,Oh Myoung-don,etal.Bloodstreaminfectionsduetobeta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: risk factors for mortality and treatment outcome, with special emphasis on antimicrobial therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004;48(12):4574–81, doi:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/AAC.48.12.4574.
KariukiSamuel,DouganGordon.Antibacterialresistanceinsub-SaharanAfrica:an underestimatedemergency.AnnNYAcadSci2014;1323(1):43–55,doi:http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12380.
KimYun-kyung,PaiHyunjoo,LeeHoan-jong,ParkSu-eun,ChoiEun-hwa,Kim Jungmin,etal.Bloodstreaminfectionsbyextended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producingEscherichiacoliandKlebsiellapneumoniaeinchildren:epidemiology and clinical outcome. Society 2002;46(5):1481–91, doi:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/AAC.46.5.1481.
Kimang’aAN.AsituationalanalysisofantimicrobialdrugresistanceinAfrica:are welosingthebattle?.EthiopJHealthSci2012;22(2):135–43,doi:http://dx.doi. org/10.4314/ejhs.v22i2.
LincettoOrnella,Mothebesoane-anohSeipati,GomezPatricia,MunjanjaStephen. Antenatalcare.Lancet2006;51–62,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736 (86)91254-7.
Livermore David M, Canton Rafael, Gniadkowski Marek, Nordmann Patrice, Rossolini GianMaria,ArletGuillaume,etal. CTX-M:Changingthefaceof ESBLsinEurope.JAntimicrobChemother2007;165–74,doi:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/jac/dkl483.
LoganLataniaK,BraykovNikolayP,WeinsteinRobertA,LaxminarayanRamanan. Extended-spectrumb-lactamase-producingandthird-generation cephalospo-rin-resistantEnterobacteriaceaeinchildren:trendsintheUnitedStates, 1999-2011.JPediatricInfectDisSoc2014;3(4):320–8,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ jpids/piu010.
LohKY, Sivalingam N.Urinary tract infections in pregnancy. Malaysian Fam Physician20072007;2(2):54–7,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0094-0143(05) 70218-4.
LuvsansharavUlzii-Orshikh,HiraiItaru,NikiMarie,SasakiTadahiro,Makimoto Kiyoko,KomalamisraChalit,etal.Analysisofriskfactorsforahighprevalenceof extended-spectrum{beta}-lactamase-producingEnterobacteriaceaein asymp-tomaticindividualsinruralThailand.JMedMicrobiol2011;60(Pt5):619–24, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.026955-0.
Matuszkiewicz-RowinskaJoanna,MałyszkoJolanta,Wieliczko Monika.Urinary tract infections in pregnancy: old and new unresolved diagnostic and therapeuticproblems.ArchMedSci2015;11(1):67–77,doi:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5114/aoms.2013.39202.
MizumotoBR,MoreiraBM,Santoro-LopesG,CunhaAJ,DosSantosRMR, Pessoa-SilvaCL,etal.Qualityofantenatalcareasariskfactorforearlyonsetneonatal infectionsinRiodeJaneiro,Brazil.BrazJInfectDis2015;19(3):272–7,doi:http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2015.02.003.
NdirAwa,DiopAmadou,FayePapeMakhtar,CisséMoussaFafa,NdoyeBabacar, AstagneauPascal.Epidemiologyandburdenofbloodstreaminfectionscaused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae in a Pediatric Hospital inSenegal.PLoS One 2016;11(2):1–13, doi:http://dx.doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143729.
NelsonE,KayegaJ,SeniJ,MushiMF,KidenyaBR,HokororoA,etal.Evaluationof existenceandtransmissionofextendedspectrumbetalactamaseproducing bacteriafrompost-deliverywomentoneonatesatBugandoMedicalCenter, Mwanza-Tanzania.BMCResNotes2014;7:279,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ 1756-0500-7-279.
NtirenganyaCyprien,ManziOlivier,MuvunyiClaudeMambo,OgbuaguOnyema. Highprevalenceofantimicrobialresistanceamongcommonbacterialisolates inatertiaryhealthcarefacilityinRwanda.AmJTropMedHyg2015;92(4):865– 70,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.14-0607.
NyagaVictoriaN,ArbynMarc,AertsMarc.Metaprop:aStatacommandtoperform meta-analysisofbinomialdata.ArchPublicHeal2014;72(39):1–10,doi:http:// dx.doi.org/10.1186/2049-3258-72-39.
OkekeIN,LamikanraA,EdelmanR.Socioeconomicandbehavioralfactorsleadingto acquiredbacterialresistanceto antibioticsindevelopingcountries. Emerg InfectDis1999;5(1):18–27,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0501.990103.
Olufunke Oluduro Anthonia, Abiodun Aregbesola Oladipupo, Dunah Fashina Christina. Extended spectrum beta- lactamase- producing uropathogenic Escherichiacoliinpregnantwomendiagnosedwithurinarytractinfections inSouth-WesternNigeria.JMolBiolRes2014;4(1):34–41,doi:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5539/jmbr.v4n1p34.
OnwuezobeA. Extendedspectrum beta-lactamaseproducing uropathogensin asymptomatic pregnant women attending antenatal care in an urban communitysecondaryhealthfacility.AfrJClinExpMicrobiol2015;16(1):49– 53,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ajcem.v16i2.1.
OvalleA,LevanciniM.Urinarytractinfectionsinpregnancy.CurrOpinUrol2001;11 (1):55–9,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2005.05.006.
Pallecchi Lucia, Malossi Monica, MantellaAntonia, Gotuzzo Eduardo,Trigoso Christian,BartoloniAlessandro,etal.DetectionofCTX-M-typeb-lactamase genesinfecalEscherichiacoliisolatesfromhealthychildreninBoliviaandPeru. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004;48(12):4556–61, doi:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/AAC.48.12.4556-4561.2004.
PatersonDavidL,BonomoRobertA.Extended-spectrumbeta-lactamases:aclinical update.ClinMicrobiolRev2005;18(4):657–86,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/ CMR.18.4.657.
Peirano Gisele, PitoutJohann DD. Molecular epidemiologyof Escherichia coli producingCTX-Mbeta-lactamases:theworldwideemergenceofcloneST131 O25:H4.IntJAntimicrobAgents2010;316–21,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ijantimicag.2009.11.003.
PettiCA,PolageCR,QuinnTC,RonaldAR,SandeMA.LaboratorymedicineinAfrica: a barrier to effective health care.Clin Infect Dis2006;42(3)377–82 DOI: CID37615[pii]\r10.1086/499363.
PitoutJohannDD,NordmannPatrice,LauplandKevinB,PoirelLaurent.Emergence ofEnterobacteriaceaeproducingextended-spectrumbeta-lactamases(ESBLs)in thecommunity.JAntimicrobChemother2005;56(1):52–9,doi:http://dx.doi. org/10.1093/jac/dki166.
RettedalS,LöhrIH,BernhoffE,NatåsOB, SundsfjordA,ØymarK. Extended-spectrumb-lactamase-producingEnterobacteriaceaeamongpregnantwomen inNorway:prevalenceandmaternal-neonataltransmission.JPerinatol2015;35 (11):907–12,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jp.2015.82.
RomeroR,OyarzunE,MazorM,SirtoriM,HobbinsJC,BrackenM.Meta-analysisof therelationshipbetweenasymptomaticbacteriuriaandpretermdelivery/low birthweight.ObstetGynecol1989;576–82.
Sáez-lópez Emma,Guiral Elisabet, Fernández-orth Dietmar, Villanueva Sonia. Vaginalversusobstetric infectionEscherichiacoli Isolatesamong pregnant women: antimicrobial resistance and genetic virulenceprofile. PLoS One 2016;1–11,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146531.
SchiappaDA,HaydenMK,MatushekMG,HashemiFN,SullivanJ,SmithKY,etal. Ceftazidime-resistantKlebsiellapneumoniaeandEscherichiacolibloodstream infection:acase-controlandmolecularepidemiologicinvestigation.JInfectDis 1996;174:529–36,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/174.3.529.
SondaTolbert,KumburuHappiness,vanZwetselaarMarco,AlifrangisMichael,Lund Ole,KibikiGibson,etal.Meta-analysisofproportionestimatesof extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producingEnterobacteriaceaeinEastAfrica hospi-tals. AntimicrobResist Infect Control 2016;5(1):1–9, doi:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/s13756-016-0117-4.
Storberg Viktor.ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceaein Africaa non-systematic literature review ofresearch published 2008–2012. Infect Ecol Epidemiol 2014;1:20342,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/iee.v4.20342.
StroupDF,BerlinJA,MortonSC,etal.Meta-analysisofobservationalstudiesin epidemiology:aproposalforreporting.JAMA2000;283(15):2008–12.
Tansarli Giannoula S, Poulikakos Panagiotis, Kapaskelis Anastasios, Falagas MatthewE.Proportionofextended-spectrumb-lactamase(ESBL)-producing isolates among Enterobacteriaceae in Africa: evaluation of the evidence-systematicreview.JAntimicrobChemother2014;69(5):1177–84,doi:http://dx. doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt500.
TitoChaula,SeniJeremiah,Ng’walidaNhandi,KajuraAlphaxaid,MiramboMariam M,Devinney Rebekah, et al. Urinary tract infections among HIV-positive pregnantwomeninMwanzacity,Tanzania,arehighandpredictedbylowCD4+ count.IntJMicrobiol2017;2017,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4042686.
TooleMJ,BasikilaP,MaleS,LindgrenJ,RobertsL,RobinsonD,etal.Public-health impactofRwandanrefugeecrisis—whathappenedinGoma,Zaire,in July-1994.Lancet1995;345:339–44.
VillarHugoEdgardo,AubertVictoria,BaserniMarisaNoemí,JugoMonicaBeatriz. Maternalcarriageofextended-spectrumbeta-lactamase-producingEscherichia coliisolatesinArgentina.JChemother2013;25(6):324–7,doi:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1179/1973947813Y.0000000081.
WHO.Antimicrobialresistance.BullWorldHealthOrgan2014;61(3):383–94,doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13312-014-0374-3.
WHO. Global priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria to guide research, discovery,anddevelopmentofnewantibiotics.2017.
ZaidiAnitaKM,HuskinsWCharles,ThaverDurrane,BhuttaZulfiqarA,AbbasZohair, Goldmann Donald A. Hospital-acquired neonatal infections in developing countries. Lancet 2005;365(9465):1175–88, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(05)71881-X.
ZaoutisTheoklis E,GoyalMonika,ChuJaclyn H,CoffinSusanE,BellLouisM, NachamkinIrving,etal.Riskfactorsforandoutcomesofbloodstreaminfection causedbyextended-spectrumbeta-lactamase-producingEscherichiacoliand Klebsiellaspeciesinchildren.Pediatrics2005;115(4):942–9,doi:http://dx.doi. org/10.1542/peds.2004-1289.