• No results found

Preface-ISPRS workshop on unmanned aerial vehicles in geomatics (uav-g 2019)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Preface-ISPRS workshop on unmanned aerial vehicles in geomatics (uav-g 2019)"

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Preface UAV-g 2019 Dr. Francesco Nex

Department of Earth Observation Science (EOS), ITC Faculty, University of Twente PO Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) have become a popular instrument for a wide range of emerging applications such as mapping, search & rescue, infrastructure monitoring, precision farming, transportation, just to mention some of them. The UAV market has overcome 130 B$ value in the last year (source PWC report 2017) and the trend looks extremely promising for the upcoming years too. The economic boom has boosted the scientific and technological development of UAV technologies in the last decade. In this context, UAV-g was initiated in 2011 as the largest scientific event dedicated

to UAV in Geomatics and Remote Sensing. In the different editions, the new scientific challenges have made more evident the need for an inter-disciplinary approach leading to stronger synergies with adjacent disciplines.

The ambition of UAV-g 2019 was therefore to bring together experts from different domains such as

remote sensing, robotics, computer vision, aerospace engineering as well as UAV user communities. UAV-g showed to be the common house of all these experts where they can create synergies, learn about the recent developments and exchange views on the future directions of UAV research, applications and services. Researchers, developers, service and platform providers as well as end users participated in UAV-g and contributed with presentations, posters and discussions to create synergies between researches and applications on unmanned platforms. This multidisciplinary environment was also reflected in the composition of the Scientific Committee composed by experts with very different expertise and working all over the World. For the first time in its history, UAV-g was hosted in the

ISPRS GeoSpatial Week (GSW) 2019. This ensured a larger audience and impact of the conference on the Remote Sensing disciplines.

UAV-g 2019 received 29 Full-papers and 91 Abstract-based submissions. The members of the Scientific Committee thoroughly read and commented on these submissions while authors received feedback from at least three reviewers. Given the review results, 15 papers were accepted for the inclusion in the ISPRS Annals and 76 papers were accepted in the ISPRS Archives, while the remaining contributions were either rejected or withdrawn. All the accepted manuscripts show a high level of maturity, presenting novel and interesting ideas.

A great acknowledgement must be given to all the members of the Scientific Committee who did an excellent job in selecting the published contributions.

Local organizing chair

Francesco Nex – University of Twente, The Netherlands

Scientific committee

Helge Aasen – ETH Zurich, Switzerland Costas Armenakis – York University, Canada Mourad Bouziani – IAV Hassan II, Morocco Filiberto Chiabrando – Politecnico di Torino, Italy Davide Cucci – EPFL, Switzerland

Wolfgang Förstner – University of Bonn, Germany Matteo Fumagalli – Aalborg University, Denmark Kevin Franke – Brigham Young University, USA

The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XLII-2/W13, 2019 ISPRS Geospatial Week 2019, 10–14 June 2019, Enschede, The Netherlands

(2)

Andrea Fusiello – University of Udine, Italy

Markus Gerke – Technical University of Braunschweig, Germany Caroline Gevaert – University of Twente, The Netherlands Jean Marc Gilliot – AgroParisTech, France

Daniele Giordan – CNR IRPI, Italy

Görres Grenzdörffer – University of Rostock, Germany Norman Kerle – University of Twente, The Netherlands Taejung Kim – Inha University, Korea

Lammert Kooistra – Wageningen University and Research, The Netherlands Norbert Haala – University of Stuttgart, Germany

Petra Helmholz – Curtin University, Australia

Eija Honkavaara – National Land Survey of Finland, Finland Dorota Iwaszczuk – Technical University of Munich, Germany Arko Lucieer – University of Tasmania, Australia

Matthew McCabe – King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Saudia Arabia Farid Melgani – University of Trento, Italy

Sander Oude Elberink – University of Twente, The Netherlands Claudio Persello – University of Twente, The Netherlands Fabio Remondino – Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Italy Ewelina Rupnik – IGN, France

Václav Šafář – Research Institute of Geodesy, Topography and Cartography, Czech Republic Cyrill Stachniss – University of Bonn, Germany

Rudolph Triebel – DLR, Germany

Matthew Westoby – Northumbria University, UK

The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XLII-2/W13, 2019 ISPRS Geospatial Week 2019, 10–14 June 2019, Enschede, The Netherlands

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

The NDMI and NDVI datasets from Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 indicate some drought impact in the year 2018, however, no significant differences of drought impact are found between

Note that if one were to consider techniques which target more general loop forms — other than those of an affine nature — an automated evaluation such as the one adopted here might

• Welk advies zou je geven aan de CEO

The color represents the amount of product based on the peak area in GC-MS chromatogram where blue range squares indicate decrease in the amount while red range squares

Op het moment dat overheidsbeleid niet ondersteund wordt door burgers, dan kan dit volgens de auteurs verschillende oorzaken hebben: burgers hebben niet de indruk dat het beleid

On variables like Geography (both states are landlocked with an arid climate), population density (Kazakhstan), failing economic reforms (Uzbekistan), natural resources

In their enlightening comparative investigation of the institutional landscape around piracy in Somalia and the Gulf of Guinea, Hastings & Phillips (2015) outline that in

While both form and meaning in both iterations is the name ‘Geryon’, it refers both to the signified on the level of language (in this case, the narrative of the Geryoneis), but