• No results found

S4D4C - Using science for/in diplomacy for addressing global challenges

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "S4D4C - Using science for/in diplomacy for addressing global challenges"

Copied!
1
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Using science for/in diplomacy

for addressing global challenges

The complexity and geopolitical scale of grand challenges necessitates concerted international efforts turning them into challenges of foreign policy and science alike. Diplomatic skills as well as scientifi c expertise are needed to tackle these challenges. Unfortunately, the interface between both does not always function optimally as communication between the scientifi c and diplomatic communities can be complicated. There is a great potential for better harnessing global science and science cooperation for European science diplomacy and foreign policy goals, both at EU and MS level. Not only can scientifi c advice mechanisms in EU foreign policy benefi t from advances in research, but innovations in carrying out research may hold opportunities for foreign policy impact.

Running from 2018-2020 and as a collaboration uniting scholars of innovation, science, higher education and governance, the S4D4C project aims to support current and future European science diplomacy for the benefi t of European capacities, EU foreign policy goals and especially the development of solutions for global challenges.

The project applies a mixed-methods approach. In the start-up phase a survey eliciting needs of science diplomats across the globe and a stock-taking of the science diplomacy literature was undertaken. Nine exploratory case studies followed along three lines:

1. Foreign policy challenges as driver of science diplomacy

2. European science (cooperation) as opportunity for science diplomacy 3. EU instruments as options for coordination and science diplomacy

In the remainder of the project, participatory methods such as co-creation workshops and focus groups are employed. Dissemination and engagement with practice is reached through global and European networking meetings and trainings.

• Science diplomacy as a concept is not of unequivocal analytical use. In some contexts it is also used as a purely symbolic, political signifi er. (D2.2 State-of-the-art report)

• The survey assessing science diplomats needs fi nds that there is a strong

demand for information, channels for communication and interaction, and training in all facets of the necessary skillset. This includes

“negotia-tions, communication and networking as well as regarding the understand-ing of the various intersections of science and foreign affairs”. In addition, (science) diplomatic work cannot be completely relocated into virtual reali-ty; personal, facework contact is still of considerable importance. (D2.3 Baseline analysis and needs assessment)

• The variability of science diplomacy activities, mechanisms, capacities and resources means that practitioners and scholars need to think jointly in

terms of variable governance frameworks, if grand challenges are to be

tackled effectively. (D2.4 Policy Brief #1)

• Science diplomacy is an amalgamation of many different practices. (D3.3 Case study briefs)

• Realizing innovative and mutually acceptable science diplomacy arrange-ments requires constructive and anticipatory engagement between

stakeholders across policy levels. Such engagement can be achieved by

implementing modes for identifying topics and arrangements, modes for scoping/developing knowledge and modes for refl ection. (D4.1/4.4 Me-ta-governance framework)

C

ONTRIBUTION

TO

T

RANSFORMATIVE

I

NNOVATION

P

OLICY

R

ESEARCH

Ewert Aukes, Sanaz Honarmand, Gonzalo Ordóñez-Matamoros, Stefan Kuhlmann

Science, Technology & Policy Studies, University of Twente

TIP47

P

ROJECT

DESCRIPTION

AND

RATIONALE

M

ETHODS

F

INDINGS

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 770342.

Science diplomacy as a new instrument for achieving societal transformation in the international governance arena | Science diplomacy as an instrument to mediate rights and responsibilities across borders | New governance arrangements for science diplomacy to tackle grand challenges | Translation of national interests into integrated, “Frame 3” thinking

Figure: Preliminary conceptualisation of a governance framework for science diplomacy. Figure: Infographic showing the traditional view on science diplomacy.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

The responsibilities of applied higher education therefore also need to include designing new methodologies for innovation that includes professional knowledge, identity and action,

A one-way repeated measures ANOVA was conducted to compare the effects of different board and wall color combinations on the total number of incorrect answers in the matching test,

• Innovation in four fields : target groups, formats, organisational structures, and cooperation. • Case study approach

Thus like Niles and the Reformers (see Chapters 2 and 3), Bullinger stressed the importance of the preacher’s calling, emphasised that the content of true preaching has to

International Centre for Higher Education Research Kassel, University of Kassel. Changes in newcomers’ psychological contracts during organizational socialization: A study of

Applying this theory is valuable as it helps understand how SI collaborations are structured, which allows to bring the pain points and challenges to light that arise

Op basis van zowel de bureaustudie als de sporen en vondsten die zijn aangetroffen tijdens de prospectie met ingreep in de bodem wordt er verder onderzoek