University of Groningen
Small and smart?
Pereira, Edwina Evelina
IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from
it. Please check the document version below.
Document Version
Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record
Publication date:
2018
Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database
Citation for published version (APA):
Pereira, E. E. (2018). Small and smart? an exploratory analysis of economic institutional choices of small
countries and territories in the Caribbean. University of Groningen, SOM research school.
Copyright
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).
Take-down policy
If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.
520722-L-st-Pereira-SOM
520722-L-st-Pereira-SOM
520722-L-st-Pereira-SOM
520722-L-st-Pereira-SOM
Processed on: 26-6-2018 Processed on: 26-6-2018 Processed on: 26-6-2018 Processed on: 26-6-2018Propositions for the thesis
Small and smart?
An exploratory analysis of economic institutional choices of small countries and territories in the Caribbean
By Edwina E. Pereira
1. Caribbean small open economies choose exchange rate stability instead of price stability as monetary policy goal, because they have no control over the domestic inflation rate as a consequence of their size.
2. Importing institutions from advanced economies could be a recipe for failure in Caribbean small open economies.
3. Being a small country or territory is not a liability, provided that the country or territory has inclusive institutions and policies nurturing economic resilience. 4. The exchange rate regime determines monetary policy in Caribbean small open
economies.
5. Measures of economic resilience should account for institutional quality of monetary policy.
6. Small countries have better economic and political institutions than bigger countries to compensate for their size constraints.
7. There are no significant differences between monetary policy institutions of sovereign Caribbean countries and those of politically dependent countries and territories in the Caribbean.