• No results found

Academic publishing : today and tomorrow

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Academic publishing : today and tomorrow"

Copied!
17
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Academic publishing: today and tomorrow

Presented by:

(2)

Agenda

Agenda

 Universal access, quality and sustainability

 Emerging publication themesg g p

(3)

What do journal publishers do today?

3

• 5,000 new editors per year

• 500 new journals launched per year 3 million+ article submissions per year

• Organise editorial boards

Solicit and manage

b i i

• 2.5 million+ referees

• 3.75 million+ referee reports per year

• 50%+ of submissions rejected

g

• Launch new specialist journals submissions Manage peer review Archive and promote 50%+ of submissions rejected • 40 million articles available digitally, back

to early 1800s p Edit d promote y Publish and disseminate Edit and prepare • 125,000 editors • 350,000 editorial board members • 30 million+ author/publisher • 12 million researchers • 4,500+ institutions • 180+ countries • 1 billion+ downloads/year

Production communications per year

1 5 illi ti l d d

• 10 million+ printed pages/year

3

• 1.5 million new articles produced per year

• 350 years of back issues scanned, processed and data-tagged

(4)

Elsevier is committed to universal access, quality, and t i bilit

sustainability 1. Universal Access

We exist to disseminate information  We exist to disseminate information

 We will identify where remaining gaps exist and find viable mechanisms to close them

2 Quality 2. Quality

 Peer review provides essential quality controls

 We will invest to innovate in technologies that increase researchers’ productivity

3. Sustainability

 Journal publishers invest heavily to deliver a well-functioning communications system upon which society dependsp y p

 Access and dissemination mechanisms must ensure that these investments can be recovered.

 System must also be sustainable for those who fund it therefore we aim to increase efficiency and value-for-money

4

We support all mechanisms to achieve sustainable universal access to quality content

(5)

Where are we today? Access:

PRELIMINARY STUDIES – NOT YET RELEASED

Global Study - Phase 1

5

y

n=3759 Access to research n=2940 n=1262 articles by region n=1653 n=2989 Western Europe 94% Eastern Europe 84% North America 97% n=2118 n=1294 Middle East 85% APAC n=2565 n=1868 85% APAC 91% Africa Latin America 88% n=2273 n=841 Africa 78% n=2362

(6)

Universal Access is More than Just “Open Access” Open Access Information Transactions Subscriptions Lending & Open Access • Author Pays • Delayed Access • Manuscript Information Philanthropy • Patient Inform • Research 4 Life Transactions

• Pay Per View • Corporate Access • Application Subscriptions • Freedom Collections • Subject Collections Lending & Rental Options • DeepDyve • Manuscript Posting • Sponsored access • Application Marketplace Collections

• Walk-in Policy • ILL, Document Delivery

Different scientific communities have different requirements. We’re experimenting in all areas of Universal Access to see what offers p g sustainable options while maintaining the quality provided by peer review

(7)

Future approach for Manuscript Posting? Scopus Scopus cited by Links to full text

 Provides list of institution output

 Metdata (Scopus)

7

Metdata (Scopus)

 Cited by countrs

(8)

Emerging publication themes

Emerging publication themes

1 Emphasis will continue to shift from journal to

1. Emphasis will continue to shift from journal to

(9)

Trend continues: in 2011 we expect 75% of our users to directly enter article pages in ScienceDirect from external searches, compared to 32% in 2004

external searches, compared to 32% in 2004

Changing user behavior

Methods used by university faculty to locate articles

Methods used by university faculty to locate articles

(10)

‘People’s expectations have grown. Ten years ago, when

f f

you looked for something and found it you’d be really

impressed. Now when you don’t immediately find

l h hi k hi ’ b k

exactly what you want, you think something’s broken.

(11)

11

2. Platforms will get more intelligent and the

user experience richer

(12)
(13)

3. The “article of the future”

13

 Article didn’t change (much) in 350 years

 Print-based (although now in PDF form)

 Linear reading (top-left to bottom-right)

 Some changes happened though:

 Internal navigation

 Reference linking

 Supplementary data files

 Small-scale developments:

 Inline video, Semantic mark-up,

(14)
(15)

Interoperability: Research data sets

15

p

y

Rich links to data set repositories like

(16)

So what might the future look like?

So what might the future look like?

 Academic publishing has a future, as the (digital) world cade c pub s g as a u u e, as e (d g a ) o d

continues to change around us....

Scholarly behavior is remarkably unchanged but is altering

in some subject areas j

 Technology provides new tools, so far for existing purposes

(registration, certification, dissemination, archive) but

( g , , , )

technology affects attitudes to information (“web=free?”)

Business models will be viable if there is continuing respect g p

for IP/copyright and conditions exist that make publishing economic

(17)

17

Predicting the future

Predicting the future…

"There will never be a mass market for motor cars — about 1,000 in Europe — because that is the limit on the number, p of chauffeurs available!" — Gottlieb Daimler, inventor of the gasoline-powered automobile, 1889

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Besides these journals, as an illustration, the same indexes are presented for a number of more specialized and focused publications in different areas of medicine (the

Where Slimbouwen is based on the process and material related sustainability, Active House is aiming at an energy surplus being compatible with a high performance comfort and healthy

We also take a look at the role peer review has in (recent) mainstream philosophy, which we identify with the kind of philosophy that has dominated prominent philosophy journals

His letter raises two issues: (1) does publication bias occur, and (2) can the results of my study of rejected AJR submissions be generalized to the rejected submissions of

The goals of the first study were (1) to see whether author ’s ratings of the transparency of the peer review system at the journal where they recently published predicted

The achemso bundle provides a L A TEX class file and BibTEX style file in.. accordance with the requirements of the American Chemical

Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of

Other advantage which concluded by Williams and O’Reilly (1998) is that the teams made up of members from a variety of functional areas perform at a higher level than teams that