• No results found

Information network on Rare Cancers

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Information network on Rare Cancers"

Copied!
1
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Information network on Rare Cancers

Jan Maarten van der Zwan1, Annalisa Trama2, Riccardo Capocaccia3, Gemma Gatta2, Sabine Siesling1 and the RARECARENet working group

1Comprehensive Cancer Centre The Netherlands (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands; 2Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy, 3Istituto Superiore di Sanita, Rome, Italy

Background

A previous project called RARECARE (Surveillance of rare cancers in Europe) was an initiative to define and disseminate information about the burden of rare cancers in Europe. RARECARE revealed that rare cancers are not so rare. In Europe 500,000 rare cancers are newly diagnosed each year. Which means that 22% of all cancer cases are rare cancers. Due to their low frequency, rare cancers pose particular challenges such as late or incorrect diagnosis, less access to appropriate therapies, and absence of clinical trials. Overall a lower relative survival is found in patients diagnosed with a rare cancer. RARECARE Project turned into RARECAREnet which is a network of organisations collaborating in research and the identification of the appropriate solutions to address rare cancers difficulties.

Objective

The RARECAREnet project aims at:

t building an information network to provide comprehensive information on rare cancers to the community at large (oncologists, general practisioners, researchers, health authorities, patients) t promoting international collaborative groups to foster research on

rare cancers

t identifying determinants of variations in survival across Europe t supporting better health care planning and resource allocation for

rare cancers t empowering patients

Methods

Main actions based on cancer registry data:

t Provision of updated incidence, prevalence and survival estimates for rare cancers, based on the EUROCARE database, including EU cancer registry data

t Create wide consensus with the major EU scientific societies and patient organisations on quality criteria for centres / networks of expertise for rare cancers

t High resolution studies on selected rare cancers (sarcomas, testicular cancer, head and neck cancer and GEP-NETs), to determine the health care pathway of these cancers

t Identification of centres of expertise for rare cancers in collaboration with patient organisations

Results

Quality criteria for centres / networks of expertise were developed in a multidisciplinary setting, resulting in indicators focusing on the three main pillars within the patient pathway:

1. Diagnosis

o Use of specific imaging o Stage at time of diagnose o Pathology report (reviewed)

o Time between pathological confirmation and first treatment 2. Treatment

o Referral pattern

o Free margins after surgery / number of revisions o Time between first treatment and adjuvant therapy 3. Follow-up

o Vital status of the patient o Cause of death o Last date of follow-up

A high resolution study is put in place covering 4 national Cancer Registries and 11 regional Cancer Registries in Europe. Final results will be published at our website: www.rarecarenet.eu

In Europe

16,500,000

people live with cancer

4,300,000

with a rare cancer

PREVALENCE 24% of all people

living with cancer in Europe have a rare cancer

65%

47%

SURVIVAL

the survival of people diagnosed with rare cancer is lower than survival of patients with common cancers common cancers rare cancers 80% 69% 68% 52%

years after diagnosis

1 3 5

RARE CANCERS ARE NOT RARE

RARECAREnet supports rare cancers to be a political priority in the EU and EU member states, international collaboration to deal with the wide range of difficulties is essential.

RARECAREnet (information network on rare cancers) has received funding from the European Union, in the framework of the Health Programme.

COLLABORATING PARTNERS t Rare Cancers Europe (RCE)

t European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO) t European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) t European Organisation for Research and Treatment of

Cancer (EORTC)

t European School of Oncology (ESO) t European Cancer Organisation (ECCO) t Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche

Médicale (INSERM)-Orphanet t Centro Léon Bérard, Lyon, France t EUROPEAN CANCER REGISTRY BASED STUDY

ON SURVIVAL AND CARE OF CANCER PATIENTS (EUROCARE)

t Leukemia Patient Advocates Foundation t European Partnership for Action Angainst Cancer

(EPAAC) t Cancer52, UK

t European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)

ASSOCIATED PARTNERS t Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale

dei Tumori, Milan, Italy

t The University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK t Institut de Cancérologie Gustave Roussy, France t Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Italy t Integraal Kankercentrum Nederland (IKNL) t European Cancer Patient Coalition t National Oncology Hospital, Bulgaria t Cancer Society of Finland - Insitute

for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research, Finland

t Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia t National Cancer Registry Ireland

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

On the other hand, Part 3 highlights the doctrine of the Spirit: “Spirit and co- venant: Reformed Pneumatology in very different contexts.” Part 4 focuses on the ecumenical nature

Het COR-model is ontwikkeld voor de evaluatie van natuurontwikkelingsconcepten voor de Centrale Open Ruimte naar hun mogelijke betekenis voor vegetatie en fauna (Harms et al.,

To give you some extra information: all seven participants were granted a residence permit for the Netherlands; only two participants live in an asylum seeker center;

Installation view from ‘Cubism and Abstract Art’, Museum of Modern Art, New York, 1936.. Taken from: Kabinetten, gallerijen en musea: het verzamelen en presenteren van naturalia

Aan het ontwerp van een onderwaterdrone worden voorwaarden ge- steld: een duidelijke omschrijving van de functie waarvoor de drone is ontworpen

Wie dit materiaal taalkundig wil onderzoeken, zal zich er uiteraard bewust van moeten zijn dat het taalgebruik van Verwey en Witsen nogal overheerst, want samen zijn zij goed

Er is geen verband gevonden tussen deze twee variabelen, niet voor de groep met hoge mate of met lage mate van mishandeling (p-waardes van p > 0,10).. Deze bevinding komt wel

Similarly, to lower spatial similarity, healthy participants (Figure 6) exhibited a higher degree of dimensionality, as expressed by the larger repertoire of orthogonal and