• No results found

Familial hypercholesterolemia. The determination of phenotype - 6 Cardiovascular disease risk and genetic variation, A study in 2000 familial hypercholesterolemia heterozygotes

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Familial hypercholesterolemia. The determination of phenotype - 6 Cardiovascular disease risk and genetic variation, A study in 2000 familial hypercholesterolemia heterozygotes"

Copied!
15
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl)

Familial hypercholesterolemia. The determination of phenotype

Jansen, A.C.M.

Publication date

2003

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA):

Jansen, A. C. M. (2003). Familial hypercholesterolemia. The determination of phenotype.

General rights

It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s)

and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open

content license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulations

If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please

let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material

inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter

to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You

will be contacted as soon as possible.

(2)

geneticc variation

AA study in 2000 familial hypercholesterolemia

heterozygotes s

Angeliquee CM Jansen

1

, MD; Emily S van Aalst-Cohen

1

, MD; Michael WT

Tanck

2

,, PhD; Marcel R Fontecha

3

, BS; Suzanne Cheng

3

, PhD; Joep C

Defesche

1

,, PhD, and John JP Kastelein

1

, MD, PhD

Departmentss of 'Vascular Medicine and 2Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Academic Medicall Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Departmentt of Human Genetics, Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Alameda, California, USA.

(3)

Abstract t

Background d

Familiall hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common hereditary disorder, characterized by elevated low-density-lipoprotein(LDL)-cholesteroll and by premature cardiovascular disease (CVD). Geneticc variation outside the LDL-receptor gene is presumed to play an important role in thee clinical phenotype of this disorder, in terms of onset and severity of CVD. However, studiess that simultaneously examine polymorphisms in numerous genes do not exist for FH patients. .

Methodss and results

Wee genotyped 2092 FH patients for 65 polymorphisms in 36 candidate genes. During 98.6333 person-years, 692 (33.1 %) patients had at least one cardiovascular event. Multivariate Coxx survival analysis revealed that the G20210A polymorphism in the prothrombin gene wass most strongly associated with a significantly increased CVD risk (GA versus GG; p< 0.0001).. In addition, three other polymorphisms were also associated with increased CVD risk;; Met235Thr in the angiotensinogen gene, Thr347Ser in the apolipoprotein A4 gene andd Gly460Trp in the alpha-adducin gene, whereas conversely, the Ser311Cys substitution inn the paraoxonase-2 gene and the C1100T variant in the apolipoprotein C3 gene related too decreased CVD risk (p<0.05).

Conclusions s

Inn the largest cohort of FH patients studied to date, we identified six polymorphisms in candidatee genes that were related to CVD risk. Our results constitute a step forward in the unravellingg of the hereditary propensity towards CVD in FH and might lead to better risk stratificationn and hence to more tailored therapy in terms of CVD prevention.

(4)

Introduction n

Familiall hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common, hereditary disease, classically characterized byy elevated levels of plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and premature cardiovascularr disease (CVD).1 Characteristically, the mean age of onset of CVD is between 400 and 45 years in male FH patients and in female FH patients 10 years later.12 Nevertheless, thee phenotypic expression of this disorder, in terms of onset and severity of atherosclerotic vascularr disease, varies to a very large extent.3

tt l „ X - _ i . i _ l . . _ . _ I v . . _ / _ _ l : _ l - J _ * ~ _ . , : _ 4 . _ i _ ^ + + ! _ . , + , , « + , . : U , . 4 - „ + „ + Ur%>-<-< n . k r t ^ r t i i l U I I I U I L U M c R e i y ,, d p e t u u i y U i ^ u n u u a i a C A Ü L J U I I l a n u n v n a t L U I m l u u i t r i u u I C J C J U L U I O I < LICJI

phenotypicc differences. Previous studies have mostly focused on classical CVD risk factors andd the functional variety among LDL-receptor mutations.46 While both indeed do influence thee occurrence of CVD, they can only partially explain the large differences.

Geneticc differences affect susceptibility to disease and whilst premature atherosclerosis cann be linked in rare cases to single-gene disorders, most individuals do not carry such DNA defects.. The 'common disorder, common variant' theory predicts that the largest part of thee variation in susceptibility to prevalent disease in humans is caused by variants that occurr in high frequency in multiple genes.7

Suchh genetic variation must also play an important role in the development of CVD in FH. Thiss is substantiated by the fact that clustering of CVD occurs in FH kindreds.8 In FH, so far, onlyy small case-control studies have been carried out, studying the role of one or only severall polymorphisms. However, it is well known that large studies yield more conservative resultss than smaller studies, prone to over-estimate the risks.9 Unfortunately, large-scale associationn studies involving significant numbers of polymorphisms are lacking in FH. Our objective,, therefore, was to investigate the contribution to CVD risk of polymorphisms in a substantiall number of candidate genes in a large cohort of patients with heterozygous FH.

Methods s

Design n

Thee present investigation was a retrospective, multicenter, cohort study. The central DNA andd Biobank at the Academic Medical Centre contains DNA samples and demographics of moree than 9300 severely hypercholesterolemic patients collected from Lipid Clinics throughoutt the Netherlands. We randomly selected a cohort of 4000 hypercholesterolemic patientss (from 27 different hospitals) out of this database.

Dataa collection

Phenotypicall data, FH diagnostic criteria (see below), risk factors, laboratory parameters

(5)

andd CVD endpoints, were acquired by reviewing the patients' records by 13 data collectors. Too ensure data completeness, additional information was sought from general practitioners, patients,, and hospitals that patients had visited formerly. To obtain consistent datasets, qualityy guidelines were implemented. All data collectors underwent extensive training; handbookss with clinical definitions were used and interobserver studies were carried out. Dataa collectors were blinded for DNA genotyping results. The Ethics Institutional Review Boardd of each participating hospital approved the protocol and written informed consent wass obtained from all patients (except deceased patients).

FHH diagnostic criteria

Wee used a combination of established diagnostic criteria to identify patients with FH.u-, a 1 2 Withh regard to the Simon Broome report2, we did not distinguish between definite and possiblee FH, but applied more stringent cut-off LDL-C levels. Male and female FH patients of 188 years and older were included if they met the following criteria: (I) the presence of a documentedd LDL-receptor mutation, or (II) an LDL-C level above the 95th percentile for genderr and age, in combination with (a) the presence of tendon xanthomas in the patient orr in a first-degree relative, or (b) an LDL-C level above the 95th percentile for age and genderr in a first-degree relative, or (c) proven CAD in the patient or in a first-degree relative underr the age of 60 years. Only one index case per family was included.

Classicall risk factors

Malee gender, age, smoking, body mass index and the presence of hypertension and diabetes mellituss were considered classical risk factors. The lifetime consumption of cigarettes was definedd by start and stop dates. Hypertension was defined when the diagnosis had been madee and when anti-hypertensive medication was prescribed, or if three consecutive measurementss of blood pressure were >140 mmHg systolic or > 90 mmHg diastolic. Diabetes mellituss was defined when the diagnosis had been made and medication (insulin or oral anti-diabetics)) was prescribed, or by a fasting plasma glucose of > 6.9 mmol/L.

Laboratoryy parameters

Lipidd levels, as stated in the medical record, were determined in fasting patients not using lipid-loweringg medication for at least 6 weeks. Total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesteroll (HDL-C) and triglycerides were measured by standard methods. LDL-C was calculatedd with the Friedewaid formula.

Cardiovascularr disease endpoints

Thee occurrence of CVD was the primary outcome of our study and was diagnosed by the presencee of at least one of the following: (I) myocardial infarction, proven by at least two

(6)

off the following: (a) classical symptoms (>15 minutes), (b) specific EKG abnormalities, (c) elevatedd cardiac enzymes (> 2x upper limit of normal); (II) percutaneous coronary intervention orr other invasive procedures; (III) coronary artery bypass grafting; (IV) angina pectoris, diagnosedd as classical symptoms in combination with at least one unequivocal result of one off the following; (a) exercise test, (b) nuclear scintigram, (c) dobutamine stress ultrasound, (d)) a more than 70% stenosis on a coronary angiogram; (V) ischemic stroke, demonstrated byy CT- or MRI scan (VI) documented transient ischemic attack; (VII) peripheral arterial bypass graft;; (VIII) peripheral percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or other percutaneous invasive

; ^ 4 - ~ - >> lr. ; . ( I V \ ;m+ „ . - ™ ; + + ~ . ^ + . - I - . . . , 4 1 . - - . + ; . - . » A^f'irM^A - . i - ^ U r r l ^ i l m m n t n m r It-! mrr\W\r\ -i + i n n

III I I C I VCI IlIWi l, \ l ^ / II n e t 11 II1.LCI K i . i a u u n . a i i u i i u c n n c u a j L i a j j i t u t J ^ I M ^ L U M I J M I w n i u n i u u u n

withh at least one unequivocal result of one of the following: (a) ankle/arm index<0.9 or (b) aa stenosis (>50%) on an angiogram or duplex scan.

Iff information on CVD did not strictly fulfill the above mentioned criteria the case was presentedd to an independent adjudication committee.

Selectionn of DNA polymorphisms

Wee genotyped 65 polymorphisms in 36 candidate genes that were associated with CVD by theirr contribution to lipid metabolism, blood pressure regulation, coagulation and hemostasis, homocysteinee metabolism, endothelial function, cell adhesion, inflammation or plaque stability. .

Geneticc analyses

Genomicc DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes by standard procedures. Genotypingg was performed using multiplex PCR- and hybridization-based assays, essentially ass previously described.'3 Samples were blinded for genotyping.

Thee accuracy of genotyping in 500 randomly selected DNA samples was assessed at by re-analysiss of several polymorphisms in different genes (CETP, MTHFR, LPL). Less than 0.5% off discordant results were found.

Statisticall analysis

Differencess between subgroups were tested with chi-square statistics or independent sample t-testt (for triglycerides (skewed distribution) on logtransformed data). To adjust for the effectss of age and gender we used multiple linear or logistic regression.

Coxx proportional hazard regression analysis with forward selection was used to model the associationn of all genetic polymorphisms simultaneously and the occurrence of CVD as a dependentt variable. Follow-up started at birth and ended for each individual at the date of thee first occurrence of established CVD. Patients without CVD were censored at the date of thee last Lipid Clinic visit or at the date of death attributable to other causes. First, each

polymorphismm was assessed individually with the use of an additive, dominant or recessive

(7)

geneticc model, respectively. The genetic model with the maximum log-likelihood was selected ass "best fitting" genetic model and entered into the multivariate model. Since polymorphisms mightt express their untoward effects via for example hypertension, diabetes rmellitus, obesity orr dyslipidemia we decided not to introduce these factors as covariables in our models. Instead,, we only added covariates that are independent of the polymorphisms: gender and smokingg (time-dependent). For smoking we implemented a linearly decreasing risk effect forr the three years after cessation.14 To enable comparison of our results with those from earlierr studies, we additionally performed the same Cox regression model with adjustments forr multiple risk factors. The detected hazard ratios were identical and are not shown in the resultss section. A loglikelihood ratio test was used to detect pairwise linkage disequilibrium. Statisticall analyses were performed using SPSS software {version 10.0, Chicago, Illinois). Hazardd ratios with a p-value of less than 0.05 were considered to be suggestively associated; thosee with p-values less than 0.001 were considered statistically significant.

Results s

Uponn reviewing 4000 medical records and application of our diagnostic criteria, 2400 patients weree diagnosed with FH. Among the remaining 1600 patients, the vast majority had other dyslipidemias,, whereas 23 (0.6%) patients were unwilling to participate. Complete genotypes weree obtained in 2092 patients (87,2%). The 308 remaining patients did not differ in terms off CVD or any other characteristic. In our ongoing DNA diagnostic program, the LDL-receptor defectt has been identified in 52.8 % of these patients.

Clinicall characteristics of the 2092 patients are described in table 1. During 98.633 person-years,, 692 (33.1 %) patients had at least one cardiovascular event, including three individuals whoo died from their first documented CVD event. Mean age of onset of CVD was 48.4 years.. Patients with CVD were older, more often males and smokers and had a higher prevalencee of hypertension and diabetes mellitus. More obesity and higher TC levels were alsoo observed among CVD patients, but were not significant after adjustment for age and gender.. LDL-C levels did not differ between CVD and non-CVD patients. HDL-C levels were lowerr (1.14 0.32 vs. 1.24 0.36 mmol/L; p<0.001) and median triglyceride levels higher (1.766 vs. 1.48 mmol/L; p<0.001) in patients with CVD.

Thee 36 genes and 65 polymorphisms examined in the study are presented in table 2. For threee polymorphisms in the CETP gene (Asp442Gly, G to A at +1 and an inserted T at +3 in intronn 14) only homozygous wild-type subjects were found and these were excluded from furtherr analysis.

Multivariatee Cox survival analysis with the 62 polymorphisms simultaneously, adjusted for genderr and smoking, revealed that the G20210A polymorphism in the prothrombin gene

(8)

exhibitedd a strong association with a significantly increased risk of CVD (GA versus GG; p< 0.0001)) (table 3). In addition, five other polymorphisms were identified to be associated withh CVD; Met235Thr in the angiotensinogen gene, Thr347Ser in the apolipoprotein (apo) A44 gene and Gly460Trp in the alpha-adducin gene, all with increased risk, and conversely, Ser3111 Cys in the paraoxonase-2 gene and C1100T in the apoC3 gene with decreased risk (p<0.05).. Strong linkage disequilibrium was observed between the polymorphisms C1100T inn apoC3 and Thr347Ser in apoA4 (D'=-0.928).

Thee genotyptc distributions of the polymorphisms are given in table 4.

Tablee 1 . Clinical characteristics of 2092 FH patients w i t h and w i t h o u t ca

Patientt number (%) Malee sex (%)

Agee at first Lipid Clinic visit (years) Agee at tast Lipid Clinic visit (years)

Smoking,, ever (%) Hypertensionn (%) Diabetess mellitus (%) Bodyy mass index (kg/m2)

Totall cholesterol (mmol/L) LDLL cholesterol (mmol/L) HDLL cholesterol (mmol/L) Triglyceridess (mmol/L)

Valuess are given as mean levels aree given as median w i t h the inte

CVDD + 6922 (33.1%) 61.3 3 50.55 ( 11.3) 56.66 ( 11.4) 82.9 9 17.3 3 10.4 4 25.77 ) 9.655 ) 7.411 ) 1.144 ) 1.766 [1.28-2.38] standard deviation, C V D --14000 (66.9%) 42.5 5 42.11 ( 12.6) 46.55 ( 12.8) 70.4 4 6.3 3 3.4 4 24.88 ( 3.6) 9.400 ( 1.87) 7.300 ( 1.82) 1.244 ) 1,488 [1.02-2.09; rdiovascularr c pp value << 0.001 << 0.001 << 0.001 << 0.001 << 0.001 << 0.001 << 0.001 0.02 2 0.3 3 << 0.001 << 0.001 isease e pp value adjusted forage forage andd gender na a na a na a << 0.001 << 0.001 << 0.001 0.1 1 0.05 5 0.4 4 << 0.001 0.001 1

exceptt where given as percentages. Triglycerides rquartilee range between brackets. CVD+

present;; CVD-, cardiovascular disease absent; na, not c densityy lipoprotein.

indicatess card applicable;; LDL, low-density lipop

ovascularr disease rotein;; HDL,

(9)

high-Tablee 2. The 65 polymorphisms examined in the Gene e Lipidd metabolism Lipoprotein(a) ) Apolipoproteinn A4 Apolipoproteinn B Apolipoproteinn C3 Apolipoproteinn E [^-adrenergicc receptor Cholesteryll ester transferr protein Hepaticc lipase Loww density lipoprotein receptor r

Lipoproteinn lipase

Paraoxonase e

Paraoxonase-2 2 Peroxisomee proliferator-activatedd receptor gamma2

Polymorphism m C93T T G121A A Thr3475er r Gln360His s Thr71lle e C(-641)A A C(482)T T T{-455)C C C1100T T C3175G(Sstl) ) T3206G G Cys112Arg g Arg158Cys s Trp64Arg g C(-631)A A C(-629)A A He405Val l Asp442Gly y G(+1)A A (+3)TT ins in intron 14 TaqlB B C(480)T T Ncol+/-- in exon 18 T(-93)G G Asp9Asn n Asn291Ser r Ser447Term m Met55Leu u Gln192Arg g Ser31Kys s Proo 12 Ata

Bloodd pressure regulation (part 1)

Dipeptidyl l carboxypeptidasee 1 (== Angiotensin-converting enzyme) )

Angiotensinogen n

Angiotensinn II receptor type 1 Alpha-adducin n

Atriall natriuretic peptide precursorr A Aluu element l/D inn intron 16 Met235Thr r A1166C C Gly460Trp Gly460Trp G664AA (Val7Met) T2238C(Scal) ) study y Gene e Polymorphism m

Bloodd pressure regulation (part 11)

B2-adrenergicc receptor

Epitheliall sodium channel

G-proteinn B3 subunit

Coagulationn and hemostasis

Coagulationn factor II (Prothrombin) ) Coagulationn factor V Coagulationn factor VII

B-fibrinogen n Glycoproteinn la Glycoproteinn Ilia Plasminogen-activatorr inhibitor typee 1 Homocysteinee metabolism

Cystathionee beta synthase

Methylenetetrahydrofolate e reductase e

Endotheliall function

Nitricc oxide synthase type 3

Argg 16Gly Gln27Glu u Trp493Arg g A!a663Thr r C825TT (splice variant) G20210A A Arg506Gln n Arg353Gln n (-323)) 10bp del/ins G(-455)A G(-455)A G873A A Leu33Pro o (-675)) 5G/4G G11053T T Combination n lle278Thrr and 68-bpp insertion C677T T A(-922)G G C(-690)T T G894TT (Glu298Asp)

Celll adhesion, inflammation and plaque stability

E-selectinn (endothelial leukocyte adhesionn molecute-1; ELAM) Intercellularr adhesion molecule-1 Tumorr necrosis factor alfa

Tumorr necrosis factor betaa (lymphotoxin alpha) Metall loproteinase 3 (Stromelysin-I) ) Ser128Arg g Leu554Phe e Gly214Arg g G(-376)A A G(-308)A G(-308)A G(-244)A G(-244)A G{-238)A A Thr26Asn n (-1171)5A/6A A

(10)

Tablee 3. Multivariate Cox regression of Gene e Prothrombin n Angiotensinogen n Apolipoproteinn A4 Paraoxonase-2 2 Apolipoproteinn C3 Alpha-adducin n Polymorphism m G20210A A Met235Thr r Thr347Ser r Ser311 ICys C1100T T Gly460Trp p polymorphismss associated w i t h Bestt fitting geneticc model Dominant t Dominant t Recessive e Recessive e Recessive e Dominant t Hazard d Ratio o 2.47 7 1.23 3 1.40 0 0.66 6 0.67 7 1.17 7 cardiovascularr disease 95%% CI 1 . 5 8 - 3 . 8 8 8 1.04-- 1.45 1.011 - 1.95 0.455 - 0.97 0.488 - 0.94 1.002-- 1.38 P P << 0.0001 0.013 3 0.044 4 0.035 5 0.020 0 0.047 7

Tablee 4. Distributions of polymorphisms associé Genee and polymorphism

Prothrombin n Angiotensinogen n Apolipoproteinn A4 Paraoxonase-2 2 Apolipoproteinn C3 Alpha-adducin n G20210A A G/G G G/A A A/A A M e t 2 3 5 t h r r M e t / M e t t Met/Thr r Thr/Thr r Thr347Ser r Thr/Thr r Thr/Ser r Ser/Ser r Ser311Cys s Ser/Ser r Ser/Cys s Cys/Cys s C1100T T c/c c C/T T T/T T Gly460Trp p Gly/Gly y Gly/Trp p Trp/Trp p

tedd w i t h cardiovascular disease

CVDD + percent t 97.1 1 2.9 9 0 0 34.3 3 48.2 2 17.5 5 66.8 8 27.6 6 5.6 6 58.6 6 36.9 9 4.4 4 56.0 0 38.2 2 5.8 8 60.5 5 34.2 2 5.3 3 C V D --percent t 98.4 4 1.6 6 0 0 39.1 1 46.4 4 14.5 5 67.2 2 28.7 7 4.1 1 57.4 4 35.5 5 7.1 1 55.6 6 35.8 8 8.6 6 64.0 0 30.5 5 5.5 5 79 9

(11)

Discussion n

Wee investigated the contribution of a significant number of polymorphisms in a large number off candidate genes to CVD risk in FH patients. Strikingly, the G20210A polymorphism of thee prothrombin gene was most strongly related to a significantly increased CVD risk. In addition,, five other polymorphisms were associated with CVD: three with increased risk; Met235Thrr in the angiotensinogen gene, Thr347Ser in the apoA4 gene and Gly460Trp in thee alpha-adducin gene, and in contrast, the Ser311 Cys substitution in the paraoxonase-2 genee and the C11 DOT variant in the apoC3 gene with decreased risk.

Ourr results are in line with earlier findings. The prothrombin mutation G20210A leads to increasedd plasma levels of prothrombin and an excessive risk of venous thrombosis.^ Many studiess have focused on the role of this mutation in arterial disease, mostly with negative results.16177 In contrast, two large studies showed a pronounced effect of this polymorphism onn CVD events in dyslipidemic patients.'319 This finding supports the strong association betweenn G20210A carriership and CVD risk in our FH patients who suffer from severe dyslipidemiaa from birth onwards.

Recently,, the M235T polymorphism of the angiotensinogen gene was associated with increasedd levels of angiotensinogen and a corresponding increase in the risk of hypertension, ass assessed in 45.267 individuals.20 Again, in our FH patients, the combined effect of elevated angiotensinogenn and LDL-C levels might explain the occurrence of CVD.

Wee identified two common variants of the gene cluster ApoA1-C3-A4-A5 to be significantly associatedd with CVD risk (Thr347Ser in apoA4 and C1100T in apoC3). Apolipoproteins play aa central role in lipid metabolism and this cluster of apolipoprotein genes has been identified ass a locus with significant effects on triglyceride levels.2122 Only very recently, the first prospectivee study on genetic variants in this gene cluster and CVD risk in the general populationn was reported.23 Remarkably, in this large study, exactly the same t w o polymorphismss were associated with an increase and decrease in risk, respectively. The functionalityy of either of these two polymorphisms, however, is uncertain, since our results mightt reflect the strong linkage disequilibrium across this gene cluster.

Paraoxonase,, an HDL-associated enzyme, may protect LDL-cholesterol against oxidation. Ourr results are in concordance with the findings of an earlier FH study, and homozygotes forr Ser311 Cys of paraoxonase-2 seem to be protected against CVD.24

Finally,, the Gly460Trp polymorphism of the a-adducin gene, associated with CVD in our cohort,, is a candidate gene for essential hypertension. In a prospective study of healthy individuals,, the 460Trp allele was associated with CVD, albeit only in a subgroup of hypertensivee patients."

(12)

Thee strengths of the present study lie in several areas. Firstly, the application of stringent criteriaa ensured a diagnosis of FH. In addition, the use of definitions of CVD and the independent adjudicationn committee led to appropriate definition of patients with and without CVD. Secondly,, by recruiting patients from all over the country, and by using our patient registration database,, we minimized selection on large families and genetically isolated communities. Moreover,, by choosing a cohort design and deriving our 'cases' and 'controls' from a common population,, we reduced the chance of population stratification and spurious associations. Thirdly,, the large size of the cohort provided sufficient power to detect small relative risks.

c;.-.,-,%% + u ^ ^{t^r+ ,^-t — „ ^ i , , „ „ , . „ u ; . - ™ % ;n -. ^ ; „ „ i „ „ „ „ „ „ ; „ u + u ~ ; ^ - f i , , ^ ~ ^ „ , J u . , ^ ~ !

.™,,-mU;,-~-s,-J KK n_c UICCHCI.L u i a p u i y i i i u i p i i o t i t 111 a .™,,-mU;,-~-s,-J i n y i c y c n c 11 n y i IL U C II I I IL»CI iv_cu uy (juiyiiiur|jiii:>iM:>

inn other genes, it was important to simultaneously assess the effects of multiple polymorphismss in many genes.

Fourthly,, our data collection process is unusual for retrospective studies. To obtain consistent datasets,, quality guidelines were implemented. A pilot study was performed to reconsider andd adjust all elements of the study design. Standardized history and physical examination wass documented in a tested case record form; handbooks with data collection guidelines weree used and interobserver studies were performed. Data collection was centrally monitored,, double data entry into the central database was applied, and a consistency checkk of the final data set was performed. In addition, by replicating 500 DNA samples, the accuracyy of genotyping could be confirmed.

Lastly,, we applied more stringent criteria for statistical significance to avoid problems of 'repetitivee testing', which often occurs in studies of multiple polymorphisms. Importantly, a cohortt study design enabled us to determine hazard ratios or relative risks. Many association studiess have had case-control designs with odds ratios as the outcome parameter. Whereas oddss ratios mimic relative risks remarkably well when the outcome of interest is rare, this is nott the case for CVD in FH (a prevalence of 33.1 % in our FH cohort), where odds ratios mightt exaggerate the actual risk.

Severall limitations of our study should also be mentioned. Firstly, in this retrospective study, thee primary source of data was the medical record. Medical records are primarily intended for patientt care and not for research purposes. Secondly, no standardized information was available onn life-style factors, such as dietary habits and physical activity. As a result, the interaction betweenn these environmental factors and genetic variants could not be ascertained. Finally,, our study included patients visiting a Lipid Clinic. In theory, patients with the most detrimentall genetic profiles might have died before referral. Therefore, genetic polymorphismss associated with more severe CVD or early death could have been missed, leadingg to an underestimation of the risk.

Inn conclusion, in the largest cohort of FH patients studied to date, we identified six polymorphismss in candidate genes related to CVD risk. Considering the limitations of

(13)

associationn studies, we suggest our results should be replicated, also in prospective studies off large and well-defined FH populations, in which genetic and environmental modifiers shouldd be carefully controlled. The long-term implications of our genetic studies, however, aree intriguing. Genotyping individuals for sets of polymorphisms could be helpful in improving cardiovascularr risk assessment of the individual FH patient. In addition, genetic markers mightt be used to institute individually tailored drug therapy. In this regard, the short-term clinicall implications of the present study might include clinical trials in which FH patients, stratifiedd according to genotype, are randomized to anti-platelet drugs {prothrombin gene

v u ii l ö i I L J ^( L i i i L i M j | j L i n , l i j i v c u i u y J ^ | J V J I y i F i u i f j i K J i i u i i i u i i y i u Lv. H j i i l ^ y *w Fi u n y VA u y v j u ^ n 1^ v^i

PPARa-agonists,, that act via modulation of apoC3 and apoA1 genes (ApoA1-C3-A4-A5 genee cluster).

Overall,, our results constitute a basis for further research and form a step forward in the unravelingg of the underlying mechanisms of CVD in FH.

Acknowledgments s

Thiss study was supported by a grant of the Netherlands Heart Foundation (98/165). J.J.P. Kasteleinn is an established investigator of the Netherlands Heart Foundation (grant 2000D039).. We are indebted to RMS personnel whoo supported this study. We acknowledge thee members of the independent adjudication committee: dr. R.J.G. Peters, cardiologist, prof.. dr. J. Stam, neurologist and prof. dr. D. Legemate, vascular surgeon. We thank all the patientss and the specialists of the participating Lipid Clinics.

References s

1.. Goldstein JL, Hobbs HH, Brown MS. Familial hypercholesterolemia.. In: Scriver CR, et al., editors.. The metabolic basis of inherited disease.. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2001: 2863-2913 3

2.. Risk of fata! coronary heart disease in familiall hypercholesterolemia. Scientific Steeringg Committee on behalf of the Simon Broomee Register Group. BMJ.

1991;303:893-896 6

3.. Sijbrands EJ, Westendorp RG, Defesche JC ett al. Mortality over two centuries in large pedigreee with familial

hypercholesterolemia:: family tree mortality study.. BMJ. 2001;322:1019-1023

4.. Ferrieres J, Lambert J, Lussier-Cacan S et al. Coronaryy artery disease in heterozygous familiall hypercholesterolemia patients with thee same LDL receptor gene mutation.

Circulation.Circulation. 1995;92:290-295.

5.. Sauvage Nolting PR, Defesche JC, Buirma RJ ett al. Prevalence and significance of cardiovascularr risk factors in a large cohort off patients with familial

hypercholesterolemia.. J Intern Med. 2003;253:161-168. .

6.. Umans-Eckenhausen MA, Sijbrands EJ, Kasteleinn JJ et al. Low-density lipoprotein receptorr gene mutations and cardiovascular riskk in a large genetic cascade screening populationn Circulation 2002;106:3031-3036.

(14)

7.. Risen N, Merikangas K. The future of geneticc studies of complex human diseases.

Science.Science. 1996;273:1516-1517.

8.. Sijbrands EJ, Westendorp RG, Paola LM et al.. Additional risk factors influence excess mortalityy in heterozygous familial hyperchoiesterolaemia.. Atherosclerosis. 2000;149:421-425. .

9.. loannidis JP, Trikalinos TA, Ntzani EE et al. Geneticc associations in large versus small studies;; an empirical assessment. Lancet. 2003,361:567-571. .

i u .. U J ivicureü ptuytdrri. w w w . n i f u p e u . u r y

2003. .

11.. DefescheJ. Familial Hypercholesterolemia. In:: Betteridge DJ e, editor. Lipids and Vascularr Disease. London, UK: Martin Dunitzz Ltd, 2000: 65-76.

12.. Williams RR, Hunt SC, Schumacher MC et al. Diagnosingg heterozygous familial

hypercholesterolemiaa using new practical criteriaa validated by molecular genetics. Am

JJ Cardiol. 1993;72:171-176.

13.. Cheng S, Grow MA, Pallaud C et al. A multilocuss genotyping assay for candidate markerss of cardiovascular disease risk.

GenomeGenome Res. 1999;9:936-949.

14.. Rea TD, Heckbert SR, Kaplan RC et al. Smokingg status and risk for recurrent coronaryy events after myocardial infarction.

AnnAnn Intern Med. 2002;137:494-500,

15.. Poort SR, Rosendaal FR, Reitsma PH et al. A commonn genetic variation in the 3'-untranslatedd region of the prothrombin genee is associated with elevated plasma prothrombinn levels and an increase in venouss thrombosis. Blood. 1996;88:3698-3703. .

16.. Atherosclerosis,Thrombosis and Vascular Biologyy Italian Study Group. No evidence of associationn between prothrombottc gene polymorphismss and the development of acutee myocardial infarction at a young age.

Circulation.Circulation. 2003; 107:1117-1122.

17.. Yamada Y, Izawa H, Ichihara S et al. Predictionn of the risk of myocardial infarctionn from polymorphisms in candidate genes.. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1916-1923. 18.. Doggen CJ, Cats VM, Bertina RM et al.

Interactionn of coagulation defects and cardiovascularr risk factors: increased risk of myocardiall infarction associated with factor VV Leiden or prothrombin 20210A.

Circulation.Circulation. 1998;97:1037-1041.

19.. Gardemann A, Arsic T, Katz N et al. The factorr II G20210A and factor VG1691A genee transitions and coronary heart disease.

ThrombThromb Haemost. 1999;81:208-213.

20.. Sethi AA, Nordestgaard BG, Tybjaerg-Hansenn A. Angiotensinogen gene polymorphism,, plasma angiotensinogen, andd risk of hypertension and ischemic heart disease:: a meta-analysis. Arterbscler

ThrombThromb Vase Biol. 2003;23:1269-1275.

21.. Groenendijk M, Cantor RM, de Bruin TW et al.. The apoAI-CIII-AIV gene cluster.

Atherosclerosis.Atherosclerosis. 2001; 157:1-1 i.

22.. Talmud PJ, Hawe E, Martin S et al. Relative contributionn of variation within the APOC3/ A4/A55 gene cluster in determining plasma triglycerides.. Hum Mol Genet.

2002;11:3039-3046. .

23.. Wong WM, Hawe E, Li LK et al. Apolipoproteinn AIV gene variant S347 is associatedd with increased risk of coronary heartt disease and lower plasma

apolipoproteinn AIV levels. Circ Res. 2003;92:969-975. .

24.. Leus FR, Zwart M, Kastelein JJ et al. PON2 genee variants are associated with clinical manifestationss of cardiovascular disease in familiall hypercholesterolemia patients.

Atherosclerosis.Atherosclerosis. 2001;154:641-649.

25.. Morrison AC, Bray MS, Folsom AR et al. ADD11 460W allele associated with cardiovascularr disease in hypertensive individuals.. Hypertension. 2002,39:1053-1057. .

(15)

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

What is the value of cervical culture of female partners, in the diagnosis of bacterial MAGI, compared to urethral swab culture after digital prostatic massage as the refe-

Teneinde deze vraag te beantwoorden werd een groep van 147 mannen, die het Centrum voor Voortplantingsgeneeskunde bezochten gevraagd deel te nemen aan dit prospectief

If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of

If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons.. In case of

cal'fulco van der veen'otto bleker'frederik slors»johan hamerlyncknhe girls poli envo'maten maatschap slotervaart'hille en sabine»loes booij*ben willem mol'yvonne pan-

De opleiding tot gynaecoloog werd gevolgd van 1990 tot 1996 in het Academisch Medisch Centrum (opleiders Prof Dr PE T effets 11 of Dr PB Lammes, Prof Dr OP Bleker) en het

It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly

De volgende vergelijkingen zijn gemaakt: tussen leden en niet-leden, tussen werknemers met een netto inkomen onder en boven ƒ 2500,-, tussen vrouwen en mannen, tussen