UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl)
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
Filling the gaps
The endothelium in regulating vascular leakage and leukocyte extravasation
Schimmel, L.
Publication date
2018
Document Version
Final published version
License
Other
Link to publication
Citation for published version (APA):
Schimmel, L. (2018). Filling the gaps: The endothelium in regulating vascular leakage and
leukocyte extravasation.
General rights
It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).
Disclaimer/Complaints regulations
If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.
Filling the gaps
The endothelium in regulating
vascular leakage and leukocyte
extravasation
Lilian Schimmel
Filling the gaps: The endothelium in regulating vascular leakage and leukocyte extravasation Lilian Schimmel
Uitnodiging
voor het bijwonen van de
openbare verdediging van
het proefschrift
Filling the gaps: The
endothelium in regulating
vascular leakage and
leukocyte extravasation
door
Lilian Schimmel
Vrijdag 15 juni 2018
om 14:00 uur
Agnietenkapel
Oudezijds Voorburgwal
231, Amsterdam
Na afloop bent u van
harte uitgenodigd voor de
receptie ter plaatse
Lilian Schimmel
lilianschimmel90@gmail.comparanimfen
Mark Hoogenboezem
m.hoogenboezem@sanquin.nlSimon Tol
s.tol@sanquin.nl Cover_Lilian Schimmel.indd 1 26-4-2018 19:49:25Filling the gaps
The endothelium in regulating
vascular leakage and leukocyte
extravasation
ISBN: 978-94-6233-962-0
The studies performed in this thesis were performed at the Department of Plasma Proteins, Molecular Cell Biology Lab, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, Academic Medical Center, University of
Amsterdam, The Netherlands and financially supported by the Rembrandt Institute of Cardiovascular Science.
Printing of this thesis was financially supported by Sanquin Research and Vasculitis Stichting.
Photo cover by Willem Schimmel Layout by Ivar Noordstra
Printed by Gildeprint © 2018 by Lilian Schimmel All rights reserved
Filling the gaps
The endothelium in regulating vascular leakage and leukocyte extravasation
ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT
ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam op gezag van de Rector Magnificus
prof. dr. ir. K.I.J. Maex
ten overstaan van een door het College voor Promoties ingestelde commissie, in het openbaar te verdedigen in de Agnietenkapel
op vrijdag 15 juni 2018, te 14.00 uur
door
Lilian Schimmel
Promotiecommissie:
Promotor: prof. dr. P.L. Hordijk Universiteit van Amsterdam
Copromotores: dr. J.D. van Buul Universiteit van Amsterdam
dr. V. de Waard AMC-UvA
Overige leden: prof. dr. T.W.J. Gadella Universiteit van Amsterdam prof. dr. C.J.M de Vries Universiteit van Amsterdam
prof. dr. E. Lutgens Universiteit van Amsterdam
dr. J.C. Sluimer Maastricht University
prof. dr. A. Sonnenberg Leiden Academic Centre for
Drug Research
“All we know is still infinitely less than all that remains unknown”
Table of contents
8 26 52 106 124 148 182 208 228 231 232 234 235 General introductionLeukocyte transendothelial migration: A local affair F-actin rich contractile endothelial pores prevent vascular leakage during leukocyte diapedesis through local RhoA signaling
Endothelial RhoB and RhoC are dispensable for leukocyte diapedesis and for maintaining vascular integrity during diapedesis
The Rho-GEFs FGD5 and Tuba differentially regulate the small GTPase Cdc42 to control leukocyte
extravasation and vascular permeability
Stiffness-induced endothelial DLC-1 expression forces leukocyte spreading through stabilization of the ICAM-1 adhesome
Rac1 activation by the endothelial GEF Tiam1 marks sites for leukocyte diapedesis through guiding junctional membrane ruffles
Summary and concluding remarks Nederlandse samenvatting Curriculum Vitae Portfolio Publication list Dankwoord Chapter 1 Chapter 2 Chapter 3 Chapter 4 Chapter 5 Chapter 6 Chapter 7 Chapter 8 Addendum
1Depart of Plasma Proteins, Molecular Cell Biology Lab, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Labora-tory, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Plesmanlaan 125, Amsterdam 1066 CX, The
Netherlands *Authors contributed equally
Modified from: Rho GTPases: Molecular Biology
in Health and Disease, Chapter 10 Endothelial
specific GTPase signaling during leukocyte
ex-travasation, 2018. ISBN: 978-981-3228-78-8
Lilian Schimmel
1*, Sofia Morsing
1*, Jos
van Rijssel
1* & Jaap D. van Buul
1*
Chapter 1
10
General introduction
William Harvey was the first to discover the existence of blood circulation through a closed network of arteries and veins composing the vascular system. He published his findings in 1628, in his book entitled “Exercitatio Anatomica de Motu Cordis et Sanguinis in Animalibus”, which is translated as “An anatomical exercise on the motion of the heart and blood in living beings”. This new insight rocked the worlds general perspective of blood flow through the human body.
Harvey roughly measured the amount of blood the heart could pump out into the body and discovered that with each beat about 56.8 ml (2 oun-ces) of blood left the heart. When this was extrapolated, under resting condi-tions of 72 beats per minute, the heart would pump 245 liters (540 pounds) of blood into the body every hour. This large volume of blood indicated that the blood must be circulating, since it would be impossible for a body to conti-nuously generate such large volume of new blood every hour. The presence of aortic valves between the heart and aorta, which only functioned under one-way flow direction, prompted Harvey to conclude that the blood goes out of the heart to all parts of the body via the arteries and it returns to the heart via the veins, making blood circulation a closed circuit (Figure 1) However, Harvey was never able to physically see the connection between arteries and veins by the so-called capillaries. It was only three years after Harvey’s death, that Marcello Malpighi proved the missing link in Harvey’s model of blood circulation in 1660.
Figure 1
A B Figure 1. Development of models
of the cardiovascular system. (A) One of the first models of the
cardiovascular system according to Erasistratus (315-240 BC), in which the arteries are filled with air, and all the blood, derived from the liver and is distributed throughout the body by the veins. Finally, the blood evaporates via the skin after it reached its destination organs.
(B) William Harvey’s (1578-1657)
closed circulatory model, in which not only the pulmonary circuit is a closed loop. Also the arteries and veins are connected with each other, after his discovery that the quantity of blood
General introduction
11 After Harvey’s new perception of the vascular system, the main compo-nent of blood, the red blood cell was described about the same time by Jan Swammerdam in 1658. However, it took about 2 centuries before Gabriel Andral and William Addison discovered the existence of white blood cells or leukocytes in 1843. Leukocytes are part of the immune system and defend the body against pathogens and foreign materials.
Inflammation and leukocyte transendothelial migration
Nowadays, we know that the blood circulation exists of a dense and complex network of connected blood vessels throughout the entire human body, for-ming the vascular system. This organ permits transport of nutrients, oxygen, hormones and red and white blood cells in order to maintain body homeos-tasis, which is essential for human health. In addition, the vascular system governs guidance to leukocytes that traffic through the blood vessels provi-ding protective immune functions and keeping our body free of pathogens,
cancer and foreign materials 2,3.
Inflammation is part of the complex protective response of tissues
to harmful stimuli, such as pathogens or damaged cells 4 in which
leukocy-tes, blood vessels, and molecular mediators are all involved to eliminate, clear and repair tissue damage. An impaired inflammatory response leads to progressive tissue damage due to harmful stimuli (e.g., bacteria), which compromises the survival of the organism. On the other hand, excessive or chronic inflammatory responses may lead to a plethora of diseases like hay fever, atherosclerosis or rheumatoid arthritis. Therefore, tight regulation of the inflammatory process is crucial.
During inflammation or immune surveillance, the interaction between leukocytes and the inner lining of blood vessels, the endothelial cells (ECs) intensifies, which leads to leukocyte adhesion and subsequent transendothe-lial migration (TEM). TEM, also referred to as extravasation, is a well-defined multistep process in which leukocytes exit the blood vessels following the successive steps of rolling, firm adhesion and crawling and finally
diapede-sis, further described in paragraph 1.3 (Figure 2) 5,6. The last stage of TEM,
diapedesis, can occur either via the paracellular route, i.e. through the ECs
junctions 7,8, or the transcellular route, i.e. through the EC body 9–11. TEM is a
close collaboration between leukocytes and the ECs in which rapid remode-ling of the cytoskeleton of the ECs is essential in order to allow leukocytes to
pass the tight EC barrier that normally maintains vascular homeostasis 12–15.
Actin, GTPases, GEFs and GAPs
The actin cytoskeleton is composed of G-actin monomers that polymerize into larger filaments of which two chains intertwine to form the so-called fila-mentous (F)-actin fibers. There are myosin motor proteins that move along the F-actin fibers and generate intracellular contractile forces. The actin
Chapter 1
12
toskeleton is a highly dynamic structure that controls cell movement, shape and adhesion, intracellular transport and cytokinesis. Changing cell shape is essential for ECs to let leukocytes pass via TEM.
During leukocyte extravasation, the ECs receive several input signals that initiate dynamic rearrangements of the actin cytoskeleton in order to let leukocytes pass, and prevent vascular permeability. In order to do so, these input signals need to be converted into an intracellular response that induces local actin polymerization, degradation, branching and contraction resulting in spatial and temporal cytoskeletal remodeling. A family of proteins that ful-fills the task of inducing actin remodeling in time and place and in response to extra- and intracellular cues are the Rho GTPases including RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42.
Rho GTPases cycle between an active GTP (guanosine triphospha-te)-bound state and an inactive GDP (guanosine diphosphatriphospha-te)-bound state. This cycling is regulated by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) and GTPase activating proteins (GAPs). ECs express over 22 Rho GTPases and
more than 70 GEFs and a similar number of GAPs 16. GEFs and GAPs are
the upstream and downstream regulators of Rho-GTPases controlling their spatiotemporal activation and signaling. Combining different GEFs, GAPs and GTPases enables cells to fine-tune complex cellular processes such as maintenance of stable endothelial cell-cell junctions at one side of the endothelial cell, whereas at the other side a leukocyte is penetrating. Cur-rent studies use functional Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based biosensors to study local GEF and GAP activity within the cell to chart spati-otemporal (in)activation of GTPases. A more detailed description of activati-on of the actin cytoskeletactivati-on polymerizatiactivati-on machinery by GTPases and the function of endothelial GEF and GAP proteins is given in Chapter 2.
Step by step regulation of leukocyte extravasation by GTPases
Based on the multistep leukocyte TEM model, we will introduce the function of endothelial actin regulation by GTPases during TEM in 3 parts: Rolling, Firm adhesion and crawling, and Diapedesis (Figure 2A, B, C and D respec-tively).
Rolling
In response to inflammatory stimuli, ECs upregulate adhesion molecules to capture activated leukocytes, and direct them to the site of inflammation. The first step in this process is leukocyte rolling, accomplished through weak binding of sialyl Lewis-x-like structures on the leukocyte- or endothelial sur-face to their selectin ligand on the opposite sursur-face. The three main select-ins are platelet selectin (P-selectin; CD62P), endothelial selectin (E-selectin; CD62E) and leukocyte selectin (L-selectin; CD62L). An example of a selectin ligand is the mucin-like P-selectin glycoprotein ligand 1 (PSGL-1; CD162),
General introduction
13 which is constitutively expressed on a subset of leukocytes and on the
surfa-ce of ECs 17–19. It has the potential to bind all members of the selectin family,
including E- and L-selectin, but it binds with highest affinity to P-selectin 20.
P-selectin is stored in Weibel-Palade bodies of ECs and is rapidly released
at the cell surface in response to stimuli such as histamine or thrombin 21.
Ac-tivation of the GTPase Rac1 has been correlated with Weibel-Palade body release, through a mechanism that involves reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. This way, Rac1 regulates P-selectin exposure on the EC surface
22,23.
Expression of E-selectin on ECs is induced by tumor necrosis
fac-tor-α (TNFα) and interleukin-1 (IL-1) 24. The signaling pathway of E-selectin
upregulation involves nuclear factor κB (NFκB) and c-jun N-terminal kinase
(JNK) /p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38MAPK) 25,26. The GTPase
RhoA is capable of activating the NFκB signaling pathway 27–29 and
expressi-on of a dominant-negative mutant RhoA has been shown to inhibit E-selectin
expression on the endothelial surface 30,31 as a result of suppression of the
NFκB pathway.
Both the upregulation of P-selectin by Weibel-Palade body release and E-selectin by upregulation of transcription via NFκB signaling involve activation of the GTPases Rac1 and RhoA respectively upon similar stimuli. That is where regulation by Rho-GEF comes in play.
For example Trio, which is activated upon histamine or thrombin sti-mulation, contains two distinct GEF domains; the GEF1 domain activates
Rac1/RhoG; and the GEF2 domain activates RhoA 32–34.Confirming the role
of RhoA in E-selectin expression, silencing of Trio resulted in decreased ex-pression of E-selectin in TNFα-stimulated ECs due to decreased RhoA acti-vity 35.
Besides upregulation of selectins on ECs to induce leukocyte rolling, TNFα also induces expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) via activation of the NFκB pathway. Moreover, TNFα induces formation of ICAM-1-rich filopodia on the EC surface, which is essential to facilitate leukocytes to the next step of firm adhesion and crawling. Localization of ICAM-1 into filopodia is regulated by filopodia-specific Myosin-X and
requi-res Cdc42 activity 36. Thus inflammatory stimuli not only regulate expression
of selectins for the rolling stage, also formation of ICAM-1-rich filopodia is induces to enhance progression towards the next step of firm adhesion and crawling.
Firm adhesion & crawling
By bridging the transition between the initial contact and the actual diapesis of leukocytes, the firm adhesion and crawling phase is critical for the de-cision if and where a leukocyte will breach the endothelial barrier. In the last two decades, it has become increasingly clear that there is intensive
Chapter 1
14
stalk between endothelial cell adhesion receptors and the cortical F-actin cy-toskeleton of the endothelium: (i) actin-binding proteins (ABPs) connect ad-hesion receptors to the actin cytoskeleton, and (ii) the signaling downstream of adhesion receptors controls the dynamics of the F-actin cytoskeleton.
Chemokine-induced activation of leukocyte integrins LFA-1 (αLβ2) and VLA-4 (αVβ1) allow these adhesion receptors to interact with their en-dothelial counter ligands ICAM-1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), respectively, resulting in firm adhesion of leukocytes to the en-dothelium. ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 are both members of the immunoglobulin family of adhesion receptors and become strongly upregulated by the ECs under inflammatory conditions. Binding of leukocyte integrins to ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 induces higher-order cluster formation in order to support firm ad-hesion of leukocytes 37,38.
Clustering of these adhesion receptors induces interaction with a number of ABPs of which at least eight (i.e., FilaminA/B/C, α-actinin1/4, cor-tactin, ezrin, moesin) have been reported to bind either directly or indirectly
to the intracellular domain of ICAM-1 39–43. Since the intracellular domain of
ICAM-1 is only 28 amino acids long, spatiotemporal regulation of ABPs inter-acting with 1 is necessary. Distinct molecular complexes with ICAM-1 are formed by Filamin B, α-actinin4 and cortactin, that result in different output signals regarding actin dynamics specific for the ABPs present in the complex 44.
Each ABP has been shown to regulate actin dynamics in a different
way. Through dimerization, Filamins can crosslink F-actin fibers 45. α-actinins
are involved in crosslinking antiparallel F-actin bundles 46, whereas cortactin
can activate the Arp2/3 complex to initiate local F-actin polymerization 47.
Surprisingly, these three ABPs are all required for efficient leukocyte adhesi-on 42–44. Besides linking adhesion receptors to the F-actin cytoskeleton, these
ABPs also have important functions as adaptor proteins to facilitate Rho GTPase signaling.
In addition to ABP recruitment, clustering of both ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 seems to be the main mechanism for inducing Rho GTPase signaling. Overall ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 clustering induced by the addition of antibodies directed against these adhesion receptors demonstrated that ICAM-1 is a
potent activator of RhoA in cultured ECs 48,49, whereas VCAM-1 signaling
leads to activation of Rac1 50,51. However, later studies were able to cluster
ICAM-1 more locally by using beads coated with anti-ICAM-1 antibodies. These studies found that ICAM-1 clustering also leads to the activation of RhoG and Rac1, which is mediated by the Rho-GEFs SGEF and Trio,
res-pectively 43,52,53. Both Trio and Rac1 were reported as binding partners of
Filamin 54, and Trio-mediated RhoG and Rac1 activation appeared to be
de-pendent on Filamin 53. This demonstrates that Filamin indeed functions as a
General introduction
15
also cortactin was shown to be required for RhoG activation 43. It is therefore
tempting to speculate that Filamin may scaffold the Trio and RhoG/Rac1 sig-naling cascade, whereas cortactin may be involved in SGEF-mediated RhoG activation.
Although these Rho GTPase signaling pathways are activated upon leukocyte adhesion-induced clustering of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1, their con-tribution to leukocyte firm adhesion is questionable. Knockdown of Rac1 or RhoG expression or use of dominant-negative Rac1 or RhoG did not affect
leukocyte adhesion 55,56. For most leukocytes the firm adhesion stage is not
much more than a quick transition from rolling to crawling on the ECs and therefore the effects of Rho GTPase activation upon adhesion receptor clus-tering is more likely to coincide with and regulate the consequent steps of
crawling and diapedesis 57.
After establishing firm adhesion, crawling to a site permissive for transmigration is the subsequent step. Pulling forces of leukocytes on en-dothelial ICAM-1 molecules activate a mechanosensitive response, that in-volves RhoA activation via its Rho-GEF LARG, in order to increase EC
stif-fness 58. Depletion of LARG resulted in reduced leukocyte crawling speed,
demonstrating that this signaling pathway contributes to stiffness-dependent leukocyte crawling. More details on the effects of endothelial and/or matrix stiffness on leukocyte crawling and TEM is given later on.
Diapedesis
The final and perhaps most complicated step of the multistep process of leukocyte TEM is the actual diapedesis, where leukocytes breach through the EC barrier in order to continue their way into the underlying tissues. In-tensifying the interactions between the two involved cell types (i.e. the leu-kocyte and the endothelial cell) during this stage is essential to ensure tight regulation of critical processes such as the opening and closure of the endo-thelial barrier to limit vascular leakage. The role of actin and its regulation of Rho GTPases during the transition from adhesion to initiating diapedesis, the opening of endothelial cell-cell junctions, the preservation of vascular per-meability during leukocyte diapedesis, and finally resealing of the EC barrier afterwards are discussed below.
Transition from leukocyte adhesion to the actual diapedesis is regu-lated by a process that involves endothelial membrane protrusions. These protrusions and their formation go by many different names that all describe the same phenomenon: the surrounding of the migrating leukocyte by EC membrane protrusions. The first study that reported these structures
descri-bed them as docking structures 59,60, shortly followed by the so-called
trans-migratory cup studies 10,61.
Other terms known for these structures are apical cups 55, dome
structures 62–64, actin dynamic structures 65 or ICAM-1-rich contact areas 43,66.
Chapter 1
16
Whether these structures function as adhesion platforms or are exclusively for transmigration support to limit vascular leakage, in the end they facilitate the transition of leukocytes from adhesion to the last stage of extravasation: diapedesis.
When taking a closer look at the actin structures present in these membrane protrusions, there are actually two different actin structures pre-sent: vertical actin branches towards the apical surface and a F-actin-rich ring surrounding transmigrating leukocytes, localized more at the basal pla-ne of the leukocyte-EC interaction. The vertical membrapla-ne protrusions are formed by polymerized actin filaments that require activation by RhoG and
Rac1 43,53,55 and contain adhesion receptors like ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 and
present pro-inflammatory chemokines such as IL-8 67–69.
The F-actin ring that surrounds passing leukocytes, is present on the
Rolling Leukocyte Endothelial cell Extracellular matrix P/E-selectin Cdc42 Rac1/RhoA TNFa ICAM1 TNFa-receptor
Firm adhesion and crawling
Trio
RhoGRac1
Actin binding proteins Branched Actin ICAM1 clustering Actin polymerization Cup formation Figure 2 (A)
Upon inflammatory stimuli like TNFα, ECs transmit the intracellular signal re-sulting in activation of Rac1 an RhoA which will release P-selectin from the Weibel Palade bodies, and cause upregu-lation of E-selectin. This makes rolling of leukocytes possible in order to slow them down and activate the integrins on the leukocytes. A second effect occurs in the ECs upon TNFα stimulation, for-mation of ICAM-1-rich filopodia on the apical surface, which is essential for the next step.
Figure 2 (B)
Interaction of the leukocyte integrins with endothelial ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 results in clustering of the adhesion molecules and recruitment of actin bin-ding proteins to the intracellular tail of ICAM-1 or VCAM-1. This anchors the adhesion molecules to the actin cytos-keleton an results in activation of RhoG and Rac1 via the GEF Trio. RhoG and Rac1 rearrange actin dynamics, resulting in formation of endothelial apical mem-brane protrusions.
General introduction
17
Diapedesis ICAM1 tension
LARG/Ect2 RhoA Actomyosin contraction Bundled Actin Closure Rac1 Actin polymerization Actin branching Figure 2 (C)
Pulling forces on ICAM-1 exerted by the moving leukocytes induce activation of RhoA via the GEFs LARG and Ect2. Myosin contractility downstream of RhoA signaling ensures the present actin ring that surrounds breaching leukocytes to seal off the transmigration pore during passage of leukocytes.
Figure 2 (D)
After passage of leukocytes, Rac1 dri-ven dri-ventral lamellipodia ensure closu-re of the transmigration poclosu-re and Rac1 activity is necessary for restoration of VE-cadherin-based endothelial cell-cell junctions.
more basal side inside the ECs. These rings, rich in F-actin and RhoA-dri-ven, will be described and discussed in Chapter 3. Involvement of the other GTPases RhoB and RhoC in regulating leukocyte diapedesis and vascular permeability will be discussed in Chapter 4.
After passage of leukocytes across the EC layer, the formed gaps need to be closed immediately in order to limit vascular leakage (Figure 2D). Dynamic F-actin bursts in lamellipodia-like structures on the ventral side of ECs are observed to close mechanical-induced micro-wounds in an
asym-metrical manner 12. These ventral lamellipodia show enrichment of Rac1
ef-fectors like cortactin, IQGAP and p47phox, indicating that Rac1-driven
ven-tral lamellipodia rapidly restore the EC barrier upon injury 12. The formation of
ventral lamellipodia that close the gaps is induced when leukocytes transmi-grate either via the para- or transcellular route. However, a major difference between the two routes is the need for junction restoration in case of pa-racellular transmigration. Dynamics of the major endothelial cell-cell junction molecule, VE-cadherin, is regulated by the Rac1-regulated actin nucleator
ARP2/3 65,70. Thereby, a second role for endothelial Rac1 during leukocyte
TEM is being described, emphasizing the need for specific spatiotemporal
Chapter 1
18
control by GEFs and GAPs.
Effects of ageing on cardiovascular diseases
More than 80% of all cardiovascular deaths in developed countries occurs
in the population aged 65 or older, making aging a major risk factor for
car-diovascular disease. It is well established that age-induced stiffening of the extracellular matrix (ECM) in the intima alters the condition of blood vessels. These alterations of increased ECM stiffness affect EC health and result in inflammation, hypertension and ultimately in vascular disease development and progression as occurs for atherosclerosis and pulmonary arterial hyper-tension (PAH) 71–75.
Age related vascular stiffening
Increased vascular ECM stiffness is induced upon aging and/or inflammati-on, as was shown by rigidity measurements, using murine aortas of different
ages 76, and in murine and human atherosclerotic plaques 77,78. Vascular
cal-cification is often observed in human atherosclerotic plaques and is known to induce EC dysfunction, which is one of the main characteristics of arterial
aging 79. In mice, age-induced increases in ECM stiffness disrupts
VE-cad-herin based cell-cell junctions and enhances vascular permeability 76,80. Until
now, it remains very difficult to modulate ECM stiffness, as processes such as calcification seem to be irreversible. A number of studies attempted to
inhibit or reverse ECM stiffening, but were all unsuccessful 81–84. Hence,
fo-cus of current research has shifted towards the translational effects of ECM stiffness on ECs to explore the possibilities of reversing the response of ECs to increased ECM stiffness, instead of directly targeting ECM stiffening.
Effect of ECM stiffness on leukocyte TEM
The relevance of ECM stiffness on EC function becomes clear when per-forming leukocyte TEM experiments. The specific location that leukocytes choose to exit the circulation is presumably not a matter of coincidence. Sites on the endothelium are favored by leukocytes to cross the EC barrier; so-cal-led transmigration “hotspots”. Which components determine these hotspots remains unclear, however, it seems that leukocytes use the crawling stage to find these hotspots.
So far, several key principals of taxis have been studied that each affect the site of leukocyte diapedesis by means of attraction towards an optimal concentration of chemokines (chemotaxis), density of adhesion
mo-lecules (haptotaxis) or cellular stiffness (durotaxis) 15. The processes of
che-motaxis and haptotaxis are described in more detail in Chapter 2.
Durotaxis is the type of cell migration in which a substrate stiffness gradient guides the cells in a certain direction. For most cell types this is
General introduction
19 from the ECM and in case of leukocyte TEM from the subcellular stiffness variations of the ECs. Migration of neutrophils on fibronectin-coated stiffness substrate gradients ranging from soft (4kPa) until stiff (13kPa) show fastest
crawling speeds on 7 kPa 87. ECs themselves were also shown to have an
increasing central-to-peripheral stiffness gradient, which was largely
depen-dent on the ICAM-1-interacting ABPs α-actinin 4 and cortactin 44. Using
po-dosome-like protrusions, leukocytes were shown to probe the ECs to sense
local stiffness and thereby find their path for TEM 9,88.
Neutrophils have been shown to increase their spreading and migra-tion persistence on stiffer substrates, resulting in increased migramigra-tion
distan-ce on the apical side of ECs 87,89. As the lateral migration distance of crawling
neutrophils increases, their chances of finding the transmigration hotspot increases as well, suggesting that durotaxis is an important aspect of
leuko-cyte TEM 90. It is well established by ex vivo studies that areas of increased
ECM stiffening such as in atherosclerotic lesions or in the lung
microvascu-lature from PAH patients, there is increased leukocyte extravasation 91. In
conclusion, it is now widely accepted that an increase in substrates stiffness
is correlated with increased leukocyte extravasation 76,92–94.
Scope of the Thesis
In this thesis, we demonstrate different aspects of the active role of ECs in the process of leukocyte TEM. In particular we focused on the role of the ac-tin cytoskeleton, its regulation by the Rho family of small GTPases, and their spatiotemporal activation and deactivation by GEFs and GAPs respectively. Although many efforts have been made, we still know relatively little on the true contribution of Rho GTPases in the process of leukocyte TEM. The work presented in this thesis contributes to the elucidation of some of the most well-studied family members such as RhoA and Rac1, but also shows some more insight in the less investigated family members like RhoB, RhoC and Cdc42.
In Chapter 2, we provide an overview of EC proteins and signaling
pathways that are involved in regulating leukocyte TEM and limiting vascular leakage during this process.
In Chapter 3, we describe a specific role for endothelial RhoA
ac-tivity during leukocyte TEM. Activation of this GTPase is established via ICAM-1-mediated recruitment of the GEFs LARG and Ect2, which results in Myosin II-driven contractility of a F-actin-rich ring that surrounds trans-migrating leukocytes. Operating like an elastic strap, this F-actin ring limits leakage of plasma proteins, while leukocytes are able to pass and migrate to underlying tissues.
In Chapter 4, we report that in contrast to RhoA, two other closely
related GTPases RhoB and RhoC are not involved in regulating leukocyte diapedesis or for maintenance of vascular integrity during leukocyte
Chapter 1
20 desis.
In Chapter 5, we examine the regulation of Rho GTPases in basal
endothelial permeability, leukocyte-induced vascular leakage or leukocy-te TEM efficiency by means of an shRNA-based screen for Rho-GEFs and GAPs. A novel role for the small Rho GTPase Cdc42 in regulating TNFα-in-duced ICAM-1-rich filopodia formation is regulated by the
Rho-GEF FGD5. Moreover, an additional function for Cdc42 is shown to be regulated by the Rho-GEF Tuba and concerns the closure of EC gaps after passage of leukocytes.
In Chapter 6, we show a Rho-GAP-independent function for DLC-1
in translating substrate stiffness towards leukocyte adhesion and TEM ef-ficiency. Increased substrate stiffness due to disease, like atherosclerosis, results in upregulation of endothelial DLC-1. This Rho-GAP facilitates, inde-pendent of its GAP function, the stabilization of the ICAM-1 adhesome. The ICAM-1 adhesome is a protein complex induced upon ICAM-1 clustering by leukocyte binding and involves actin adaptor proteins to locally remodel the EC actin cytoskeleton and thereby to provide a proper surface for leukocyte spreading.
In Chapter 7, we address the effects of Rac1 activation by the GEF
Tiam1 on leukocyte TEM. Tiam1 expression in EC is stiffness- and inflam-mation-dependent, and activation of endothelial Rac1 by constitutive active Tiam1 regulates leukocyte transmigration sites. Rac1 activation results in formation of endothelial dorsal membrane ruffles that guide leukocytes to-wards optimal sites for transmigration.
In Chapter 8, we discuss the findings described in this thesis. We
address our work on leukocyte adhesion (chapter 6), transmigration (chapter 5), leukocyte-induced permeability (chapter 3 & 4) and the effects of aging and substrate stiffness (chapter 6 & 7) from an EC point of view and put it in a broader perspective.
General introduction
21
References
1. ElMaghawry, M., Zanatta, A. & Zampieri, F. The discovery of pulmonary circulation: From Imhotep to William Harvey. Glob. Car-diol. Sci. Pract. 2014, 31 (2014).
2. Grivennikov, S. I., Greten, F. R. & Karin, M. Immunity, Inflammation, and Cancer. Cell 140, 883–899 (2010).
3. Nourshargh, S., Hordijk, P. L. & Sixt, M. Breaching multiple barriers: leukocyte mo-tility through venular walls and the intersti-tium. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 366–78 (2010).
4. Pober, J. S. & Sessa, W. C. Evolving func-tions of endothelial cells in inflammation. Nature Reviews Immunology 7, 803–815 (2007).
5. Butcher, E. C. Leukocyte-endothelial cell re-cognition: three (or more) steps to specificity and diversity. Cell 67, 1033–6 (1991). 6. Springer, T. A. Traffic signals for lymphocyte
recirculation and leukocyte emigration: the multistep paradigm. Cell 76, 301–14 (1994). 7. Kroon, J., Daniel, A. E., Hoogenboezem, M.
& van Buul, J. D. Real-time Imaging of Endo-thelial Cell-cell Junctions During Neutrophil Transmigration Under Physiological Flow. J. Vis. Exp. e51766 (2014). doi:10.3791/51766 8. Schulte, D. et al. Stabilizing the
VE-cad-herin-aplhacatenin complex blocks leuko-cyte extravasation and vascular permeability. EMBO J. 30, 4157–4170 (2011).
9. Carman, C. V. et al. Transcellular Diapedesis Is Initiated by Invasive Podosomes. Immuni-ty 26, 784–797 (2007).
10. Carman, C. V. & Springer, T. a. A transmi-gratory cup in leukocyte diapedesis both through individual vascular endothelial cells and between them. J. Cell Biol. 167, 377– 388 (2004).
11. Feng, D., Nagy, J. A., Pyne, K., Dvorak, H. F. & Dvorak, A. M. Neutrophils emigrate from venules by a transendothelial cell pathway in response to FMLP. J. Exp. Med. 187, 903–15 (1998).
12. Martinelli, R. et al. Release of cellular ten-sion signals self-restorative ventral lamel-lipodia to heal barrier micro-wounds. J. Cell Biol. 201, 449–465 (2013).
13. McDonald, D. M. Endothelial gaps and per-meability of venules in rat tracheas exposed
to inflammatory stimuli. Am. J. Physiol. 266, L61–L83 (1994).
14. McDonald, D. M., Thurston, G. & Baluk, P. Endothelial gaps as sites for plasma leakage in inflammation. Microcirculation 6, 7–22 (1999).
15. Schimmel, L., Heemskerk, N. & van Buul, J. D. Leukocyte transendothelial migration: A local affair. Small GTPases 8, (2017). 16. Van Buul, J. D., Geerts, D. & Huveneers, S.
Rho GAPs and GEFs: Controling switches in endothelial cell adhesion. Cell Adhes. Migr. 8, 108–124 (2014).
17. Abadier, M. & Ley, K. P-selectin glycopro-tein ligand-1 in T cells. Current Opinion in Hematology 24, 265–273 (2017).
18. Frenette, P. S. et al. P-Selectin Glycoprotein Ligand 1 (Psgl-1) Is Expressed on Platelets and Can Mediate Platelet–Endothelial In-teractions in Vivo. J. Exp. Med. 191, 1413– 1422 (2000).
19. Martins, P. D. C. et al. P-selectin glycopro-tein ligand-1 is expressed on endothelial cells and mediates monocyte adhesion to activated endothelium. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 27, 1023–1029 (2007).
20. Tinoco, R., Otero, D. C., Takahashi, A. A. & Bradley, L. M. PSGL-1: A New Player in the Immune Checkpoint Landscape. Trends in Immunology 38, 323–335 (2017).
21. Rondaij, M. G., Bierings, R., Kragt, A., Van Mourik, J. A. & Voorberg, J. Dynamics and plasticity of Weibel-Palade bodies in endo-thelial cells. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology 26, 1002–1007 (2006). 22. Vischer, U. M., Jornot, L., Wollheim, C. B. & Theler, J. M. Reactive oxygen intermediates induce regulated secretion of von Willebrand factor from cultured human vascular endot-helial cells. Blood 85, 3164–3172 (1995). 23. Yang, S. X., Yan, J., Deshpande, S. S., Irani,
K. & Lowenstein, C. J. Rac1 regulates the release of Weibel-Palade Bodies in human aortic endothelial cells. Chin. Med. J. (Engl). 117, 1143–1150 (2004).
24. Schnoor, M. Endothelial Actin-Binding Proteins and Actin Dynamics in Leukocyte Transendothelial Migration. J. Immunol. 194, 3535–3541 (2015).
25. Read, M. A., Neish, A. S., Gerritsen, M. E.
Chapter 1
22
& Collins, T. Postinduction transcriptional repression of E-selectin and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1. J. Immunol. 157, 3472 LP-3479 (1996).
26. Schindler, U. & Baichwal, V. R. Three NF-kappa B binding sites in the human E-se-lectin gene required for maximal tumor ne-crosis factor alpha-induced expression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 5820–31 (1994).
27. Perona, R. et al. Activation of the nuclear factor-κB by Rho, CDC42, and Rac-1 pro-teins. Genes Dev. 11, 463–475 (1997). 28. Rodríguez, R. et al. TNF triggers mitogenic
signals in NIH 3T3 cells but induces apopto-sis when the cell cycle is blocked. Eur. Cyto-kine Netw. 18, 172–180 (2007).
29. Montaner, S., Perona, R., Saniger, L. & La-cal, J. C. Multiple signalling pathways lead to the activation of the nuclear factor kappaB by the Rho family of GTPases. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 12779–12785 (1998).
30. Chen, X.-L. et al. Rac1 and Superoxide Are Required for the Expression of Cell Adhe-sion Molecules Induced by Tumor Necrosis Factor-α in Endothelial Cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 305, 573 LP-580 (2003).
31. Nübel, T., Dippold, W., Kleinert, H., Kaina, B. & Fritz, G. Lovastatin inhibits Rho-regu-lated expression of E-selectin by TNFalpha and attenuates tumor cell adhesion. FASEB J. 18, 140–142 (2004).
32. Timmerman, I. et al. A local VE-cadherin and Trio-based signaling complex stabilizes endothelial junctions through Rac1. J. Cell Sci. 128, 3041–54 (2015).
33. Blangy, A. et al. TrioGEF1 controls Rac- and Cdc42-dependent cell structures through the direct activation of RhoG. J. Cell Sci. 113, 729–39 (2000).
34. van Rijssel, J., Hoogenboezem, M., Wes-ter, L., Hordijk, P. L. & van Buul, J. D. The N-terminal DH-PH domain of trio induces cell spreading and migration by regulating lamellipodia dynamics in a Rac1-dependent fashion. PLoS One 7, 1–13 (2012).
35. Van Rijssel, J. et al. The Rho-GEF Trio re-gulates a novel pro-inflammatory pathway through the transcription factor Ets2. Biol. Open 2, 569–79 (2013).
36. Kroon, J. et al. Inflammation-Sensitive My-osin-X Functionally Supports Leukocyte Extravasation by Cdc42-Mediated
ICAM-1–Rich Endothelial Filopodia Formation. J. Immunol. ji1700702 (2018). doi:10.4049/ jimmunol.1700702
37. Barreiro, O. et al. Endothelial tetraspanin mi-crodomains regulate leukocyte firm adhesion during extravasation. Blood 105, 2852–2861 (2005).
38. Van Buul, J. D. et al. ICAM-1 clustering on endothelial cells recruits VCAM-1. J. Bio-med. Biotechnol. 2010, (2010).
39. Carpén, O., Pallai, P., Staunton, D. E. & Springer, T. a. Association of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) with ac-tin-containing cytoskeleton and alpha-acti-nin. J. Cell Biol. 118, 1223–34 (1992). 40. Celli, L., Ryckewaert, J.-J., Delachanal, E. &
Duperray, A. Evidence of a functional role for interaction between ICAM-1 and non-muscle α-actinins in leukocyte diapedesis. J. Immunol. 177, 4113–4121 (2006).
41. Heiska, L. et al. Association of ezrin with intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and -2 (ICAM-1 and ICAM-2): Regulation by phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 21893–21900 (1998). 42. Kanters, E. et al. Filamin B mediates
ICAM-1-driven leukocyte transendothelial migrati-on. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 31830–31839 (2008). 43. Schnoor, M. et al. Cortactin deficiency is as-sociated with reduced neutrophil recruitment but increased vascular permeability in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 208, 1721–1735 (2011). 44. Schaefer, A. et al. Actin-binding proteins
differentially regulate endothelial cell stiff-ness, ICAM-1 function and neutrophil trans-migration. J. Cell Sci. 4470–4482 (2014). doi:10.1242/jcs.154708
45. Stossel, T. P. et al. Filamins as integrators of cell mechanics and signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 138–145 (2001).
46. Courson, D. S. & Rock, R. S. Actin cross-link assembly and disassembly mechanics for alpha-actinin and fascin. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 26350–26357 (2010).
47. Kirkbride, K. C., Sung, B. H., Sinha, S. & Weaver, A. M. Cortactin: A multifunctional regulator of cellular invasiveness. Cell Ad-hes. Migr. 5, 187–198 (2011).
48. Etienne, S. et al. ICAM-1 signaling pathways associated with Rho activation in microvas-cular brain endothelial cells. J.Immunol. 161, 5755–5761 (1998).
General introduction
23 49. Thompson, P. W., Randi, A. M. & Ridley, A.
J. Intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, but not ICAM-2, activates RhoA and sti-mulates c-fos and rhoA transcription in en-dothelial cells. J. Immunol. 169, 1007–1013 (2002).
50. Cook-Mills, J. M. et al. Calcium mobiliza-tion and Rac1 activamobiliza-tion are required for VCAM-1 (vascular cell adhesion molecu-le-1) stimulation of NADPH oxidase activity. Biochem. J. 378, 539–47 (2004).
51. van Wetering, S. et al. VCAM-1-mediated Rac signaling controls endothelial cell-cell contacts and leukocyte transmigration. Am.J.Physiol Cell Physiol 285, C343–C352 (2003).
52. Van Buul, J. D., Kanters, E. & Hordijk, P. L. Endothelial signaling by Ig-like cell adhesi-on molecules. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology 27, 1870–1876 (2007). 53. van Rijssel, J. et al. The Rho-guanine nucleo-tide exchange factor Trio controls leukocy-te transendothelial migration by promoting docking structure formation. Mol. Biol. Cell 23, 2831–2844 (2012).
54. Bellanger, J. M. et al. The Rac1- and RhoG-specific GEF domain of trio targets fi-lamin to remodel cytoskeletal actin. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 888–892 (2000).
55. Van Buul, J. D. et al. RhoG regulates endot-helial apical cup assembly downstream from ICAM1 engagement and is involved in leu-kocyte trans-endothelial migration. J. Cell Biol. 178, 1279–1293 (2007).
56. Wojciak-Stothard, B. et al. Monocyte adhesi-on and spreading adhesi-on human endothelial cells is dependent on Rho-regulated receptor clus-tering. J Cell Biol 145, 1293–307 (1999). 57. Muller, W. A. Localized signals that regulate
transendothelial migration. Current Opinion in Immunology 38, 24–29 (2016).
58. Lessey-Morillon, E. C. et al. The RhoA gu-anine nucleotide exchange factor, LARG, mediates ICAM-1-dependent mechanot-ransduction in endothelial cells to stimulate transendothelial migration. J. Immunol. 192, 3390–8 (2014).
59. Barreiro, O. et al. Dynamic interaction of VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 with moesin and ez-rin in a novel endothelial docking structure for adherent leukocytes. J. Cell Biol. 157, 1233–1245 (2002).
60. Barreiro, O., Vicente-Manzanares, M., Urzainqui, A., Yanez-Mo, M. & San-chez-Madrid, F. Interactive protrusive structures during leukocyte adhesion and transendothelial migration. Front Biosci 9, 1849–1863 (2004).
61. Carman, C. V, Jun, C.-D., Salas, A. & Sprin-ger, T. a. Endothelial cells proactively form microvilli-like membrane projections upon intercellular adhesion molecule 1 engage-ment of leukocyte LFA-1. J. Immunol. 171, 6135–6144 (2003).
62. Petri, B., Phillipson, M. & Kubes, P. The Physiology of Leukocyte Recruitment: An In Vivo Perspective. J. Immunol. 180, 6439– 6446 (2008).
63. Petri, B. et al. Endothelial LSP1 is involved in endothelial dome formation, minimizing vascular permeability changes during neu-trophil transmigration in vivo. Blood 117, 942–952 (2011).
64. Phillipson, M., Kaur, J., Colarusso, P., Bal-lantyne, C. M. & Kubes, P. Endothelial domes encapsulate adherent neutrophils and minimize increases in vascular permeability in paracellular and transcellular emigration. PLoS One 3, (2008).
65. Mooren, O. L., Li, J., Nawas, J. & Cooper, J. A. Endothelial cells use dynamic actin to facilitate lymphocyte transendothelial migra-tion and maintain the monolayer barrier. Mol. Biol. Cell 25, 4115–29 (2014).
66. Vestweber, D., Zeuschner, D., Rottner, K. & Schnoor, M. and ICAM-1 clustering in en-dothelium Implications for the formation of docking structures. 1–5 (2013).
67. Middleton, J. et al. Transcytosis and surface presentation of IL-8 by venular endothelial cells. Cell 91, 385–395 (1997).
68. Whittall, C., Kehoe, O., King, S., Rot, A. & Patterson, A. Europe PMC Funders Group Europe PMC Funders Author Manuscripts A chemokine self-presentation mechanism involving formation of endothelial surface microstructures ¶. 190, 1725–1736 (2013). 69. Shulman, Z. et al. Transendothelial
migrati-on of lymphocytes mediated by intraendothe-lial vesicle stores rather than by extracellular chemokine depots. Nat.Immunol. 13, 67–76 (2012).
70. Abu Taha, A., Taha, M., Seebach, J. & Schnittler, H.-J. ARP2/3-mediated
Chapter 1
24
on-associated lamellipodia control VE-ca-dherin-based cell junction dynamics and maintain monolayer integrity. Mol. Biol. Cell 25, 245–56 (2014).
71. Zieman, S. J., Melenovsky, V. & Kass, D. A. Mechanisms, pathophysiology, and therapy of arterial stiffness. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 25, 932–943 (2005).
72. Marti, C. N. et al. Endothelial dysfunction, arterial stiffness, and heart failure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 60, 1455–1469 (2012). 73. Tan, W., Madhavan, K., Hunter, K. S., Park,
D. & Stenmark, K. R. Vascular stiffening in pulmonary hypertension: cause or conse-quence? (2013 Grover Conference series). Pulm. Circ. 4, 560–580 (2014).
74. Wang, Z. & Chesler, N. C. Pulmonary Vascu-lar Wall Stiffness: An Important Contributor to the Increased Right Ventricular Afterload with Pulmonary Hypertension. Pulm. Circ. 1, 212–223 (2011).
75. Ley, K., Laudanna, C., Cybulsky, M. I. & Nourshargh, S. Getting to the site of inflam-mation: The leukocyte adhesion cascade updated. Nature Reviews Immunology 7, 678–689 (2007).
76. Huynh, J. et al. Age-Related Intimal Stiffe-ning Enhances Endothelial Permeability and Leukocyte Transmigration. Sci. Transl. Med. 3, 112ra122-112ra122 (2011).
77. Chai, C. K. et al. Local axial compressive mechanical properties of human carotid atherosclerotic plaques-characterisation by indentation test and inverse finite element analysis. J. Biomech. 46, 1759–1766 (2013). 78. Tracqui, P. et al. Mapping elasticity moduli
of atherosclerotic plaque in situ via atomic force microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 174, 115– 123 (2011).
79. Lee, H.-Y. & Oh, B.-H. Aging and Arterial Stiffness. Circ. J. 74, 2257–2262 (2010). 80. Krishnan, R. et al. Substrate stiffening
pro-motes endothelial monolayer disruption through enhanced physical forces. AJP Cell Physiol. 300, C146–C154 (2011).
81. Hope, S. A. & Hughes, A. D. Drug effects on the mechanical properties of large arteries in humans. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 34, 688–693 (2007).
82. Little, W. C. et al. The effect of alagebrium chloride (ALT-711), a novel glucose cross-link breaker, in the treatment of elderly
pa-tients with diastolic heart failure. J. Card. Fail. 11, 191–195 (2005).
83. Willemsen, S. et al. Effects of alagebrium, an advanced glycation end-product breaker, in patients with chronic heart failure: Study design and baseline characteristics of the BENEFICIAL trial. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 12, 294–300 (2010).
84. Zieman, S. J. et al. Advanced glycation end-product crosslink breaker (alagebrium) im-proves endothelial function in patients with isolated systolic hypertension. J.Hypertens. 25, 577–583 (2007).
85. Pelham, R. J. & Wang, Y.-L. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substra-te flexibility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 13661–13665 (1997).
86. Lo, C. M., Wang, H. B., Dembo, M. & Wang, Y. L. Cell movement is guided by the rigidi-ty of the substrate. Biophys. J. 79, 144–152 (2000).
87. Stroka, K. M. & Aranda-Espinoza, H. Neu-trophils display biphasic relationship bet-ween migration and substrate stiffness. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 66, 328–341 (2009). 88. Martinelli, R. et al. Probing the
biomechani-cal contribution of the endothelium to lymp-hocyte migration: diapedesis by the path of least resistance. J Cell Sci 127, 3720–3734 (2014).
89. Oakes, P. W. et al. Neutrophil morphology and migration are affected by substrate elas-ticity. Blood 114, 1387–1395 (2009). 90. Schaefer, A. & Hordijk, P. L.
Cell-stiff-ness-induced mechanosignaling - a key dri-ver of leukocyte transendothelial migration. J. Cell Sci. 128, 2221–2230 (2015).
91. Dorfmüller, P., Perros, F., Balabanian, K. & Humbert, M. Inflammation in pulmonary ar-terial hypertension. Eur. Respir. J. 22, 358– 363 (2003).
92. Jannat, R. a., Dembo, M. & Hammer, D. a. Traction forces of neutrophils migrating on compliant substrates. Biophys. J. 101, 575– 584 (2011).
93. Stroka, K. M. & Aranda-Espinoza, H. Endo-thelial cell substrate stiffness influences neu-trophil transmigration via myosin light chain kinase-dependent cell contraction. Blood 118, 1632–1640 (2011).
94. Stroka, K. M. & Aranda-Espinoza, H. A bio-physical view of the interplay between
me-General introduction
25 chanical forces and signaling pathways
du-ring transendothelial cell migration. FEBS J.
1Department of Plasma Proteins, Molecular Cell Biology Lab, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Labo-ratory, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Plesmanlaan 125, Amsterdam 1066 CX, The
Netherlands
Small GTPases (2017); 1:1-15
Lilian Schimmel
1, Niels Heemskerk
1&
Jaap D. van Buul
1Leukocyte transendothelial
migration: A local affair
28
Chapter 2
Summary
Inflammation is part of the complex biological response of body tissues to harmful stimuli, such as pathogens. It serves as a protective response that involves leukocytes, blood vessels and molecular mediators with the pur-pose to eliminate the initial cause of cell injury and to initiate tissue repair. Inflammation is tightly regulated by the body and is associated with transient crossing of leukocytes through the blood vessel wall, a process called tran-sendothelial migration (TEM) or diapedesis. TEM is a close collaboration between leukocytes on one hand and the endothelium on the other. Limi-ting vascular leakage during TEM but also when the leukocyte has crossed the endothelium is essential for maintaining vascular homeostasis. Although many details have been uncovered during the recent years, the molecular mechanisms from the vascular part that drive TEM still shows significant gaps in our understanding. This review will focus on the local signals that are induced in the endothelium that regulate leukocyte TEM and simultaneous preservation of endothelial barrier function.
29
Review: Leukocyte transendothelial migration
Introduction
The vascular system is a complex network formed by numerous connected blood vessels that are embedded in tissue throughout the human body. Re-moving all tissues leaving only the vascular system intact fully outlines the shape of the human body showing the high density of blood vessels in our tissues and organs. Proper functions of this high density network are essen-tial for human health, since it provides our body with nutrients, oxygen and hormones and regulates body homeostasis such as temperature and pH. In addition the vascular system governs guidance to traveling immune cells and thereby supports protective immune functions that keep our body free
of pathogens, cancer and foreign material 1,2. In case of inflammation or
im-mune surveillance the cells lining the luminal site of blood vessels, known as endothelial cells (ECs), attract and direct traveling immune cells to suitable exit sites in the vasculature allowing cells to enter underlying tissue. ECs therefore fulfill an important supportive role in guidance and directional mi-gration of trafficking immune cells. During inflammation ECs expose a variety of adhesion molecules at their surface that slow down and arrest traveling immune cells in the blood circulation. These adhesive molecules are thought to provide guidance cues to immune cells where to breech the blood vessel wall through a multi-step process known as transendothelial migration (TEM)
or diapedesis 3. Although many adhesion molecules have been identified,
the exact composition of adhesion molecules that determine a suitable exit site for immune cell diapedesis remains elusive. It is well appreciated that blood vessels in inflamed tissues are more permissive for macro molecules. This endothelial leakiness supports several inflammatory functions such as activation of the complement system and recruitment of innate immune cells. Paradoxically, recruitment of innate immune cells occurs through transient
openings in the endothelium without plasma leakage 4–6. This indicates that
vascular permeability for small macromolecules and immune cells are sepa-rately regulated. Which mechanisms protect the endothelial barrier during leukocyte diapedesis is currently poorly understood.
In several diseases, such as thrombocytopenia, ischemia and rheu-matoid arthritis accumulation of immune cells evoke serious tissue damage. In case of thrombocytopenia it is known that the physical movement of
immu-ne cells through the ECs barrier elicits organ hemorrhages 7. This bleeding
disorder is partly caused due to the incapability of ECs to maintain a tight barrier during the physical movement of immune cells through the EC layer. In the past years lots of effort has made into the development of blocking antibodies targeting leukocyte integrins or integrin ligands that are exposed at the endothelial surface. Blocking immune cell exit sites may prevent TEM and consequently reduce patients symptoms. However, 2 clinical trials that
30
Chapter 2
tried to interfere with adhesion molecules evoked serious side effects and aggravated the patients conditions, since the blocking antibodies used in the trial activated the immune cells in contrast to their predicted blocking effect
8. In order to improve treatments for diseases that involve immune cell traffic
it is a necessity that we increase our understanding about what processes occur during leukocyte TEM, both at the cellular and molecular level. In this review, we focus on how immune cells travels through the endothelial barrier and discuss recent insights on how ECs protect their barrier function during immune cell trafficking.
31
Transendothelial migration ‘hotspots’
The regulation of immune cell trafficking is complex and goes far beyond our current understanding. Although much is yet to discover, intensive rese-arch over the past decade has revealed several fundamental principles that regulate cell migration in a variety of immune cell related responses such as hematopoiesis, immune surveillance and innate and adaptive immunity. The current paradigm of TEM is a refined version of the multi-step model
that was first proposed by Butcher and Springer 9,10. The current order in the
multistep paradigm are; leukocyte rolling, arrest, crawling, firm adhesion and transmigration. The latter occurs either through the endothelial junctions
(pa-racellular route) 11,12 or through the endothelial cell body (transcellular route)
13–15. Interestingly, leukocytes diapedesis gives the impression to occur at
predefined places in the endothelium lining. Some locations even favor the migration of multiple immune cells that breech the endothelial lining in rapid succession. In fact, when looking at a transmigrating leukocyte, just prior to exiting, the leukocyte changes its crawling morphology to a more round appearance. This raises some important questions, such as what factors determine these so called ‘hotspots for transmigration’, why do 2 routes exist and what defines the usage of one over the other. Judging on the recordings of transmigrating leukocytes, it appears that the leukocytes search the en-dothelial monolayer to find an exit point, indicating that they use the crawling step as a sort of searching period. However, strong evidence on this latter suggestion is missing and requires future investigations. So far, several key principles have been established, although it needs to be kept in mind that these principles are based on in vitro studies and therefore can only ser-ve as a model that awaits confirmation in future in vivo studies. First of all, immune cells are attracted toward an optimal concentration of chemokines (chemotaxis), density of adhesion molecules (haptotaxis) or cellular stiffness (durotaxis). Secondly, migration into a tissue or organ is believed to follow the path of least resistance (tenertaxis). In addition, shear forces, vessel type and composition of the glycocalyx play an important regulatory role in dictating suitable exit sites. Each principle will be briefly delineated starting with chemotaxis.
Chemotaxis
Chemokines are of key importance for leukocyte TEM not only because of their involvement in chemotaxis but also because of their role in integrin ac-tivation inducing leukocyte arrest (Figure 1A). Chemokines are immobilized by heparan sulfate (HS) proteoglycans that are part of a 50–100 nm nega-tively charged network on the apical surface of EC called the glycocalyx.
Immobilized chemokines elicit integrin-mediated adhesion 16. Recently, it has
Review: Leukocyte transendothelial migration
32
Chapter 2
been shown that perivascular macrophages located between the tissue and blood vessels, secrete chemokines that cause local “hotspots” for neutrophil
diapedesis in vivo 17. These chemokines secreted in the extravascular space
are bound to glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and are subsequently transcyto-sed to the luminal side of the vasculature. There are some indications that oligomeric chemokine-forms activate leukocyte-integrins that direct leuko-cyte arrest and firm adhesion whereas monomeric-forms activate integrin
subsets on the leukocyte that govern cell movement 18,19.
Haptotaxis
Similar ideas have been suggested for integrin ligands presented at the api-cal surface of ECs where the amount of leukocyte-integrin ligands regulates leukocyte behavior. A good example of haptotaxis is the amount of ICAM-1 molecules present at the endothelial surface (Figure 1B). Surface density and distribution of endothelial ICAM-1 induced a transition from paracellular to transcellular migration, while intermediate levels favored the paracellular
route 20,21. Related to the amount of surface ligands,
neutrophil-ECinteracti-ons during TEM does increase integrin expression at the surface of
neutrop-hils thereby affecting their activity and behavior after transmigration 22.
Durotaxis
Migrating cells sense environmental cues that give direction to their move-ment. Migrating cells are attracted to an optimal surface stiffness also called stiffness sensing or durotaxis (Figure 1C). Leukocytes sense and respond to their physical surroundings, for example in vitro neutrophils migrate slower on soft (4 kPa) and very rigid (13 kPa) fibronectin coated surfaces whereas optimal crawling speeds were reached on 7 kPa. Interestingly fibronectin density also affected the outcome of migration speed. Using FN concentrati-ons of 100 µg/ml the optimal stiffness for migration is 4 kPa while on 10 µg/
ml the optimal rigidity for maximal migration is increased to 7 kPa 23. This
suggests that leukocyte TEM in vivo depends on the combination between matrix rigidity (i.e. durotaxis) and the amount of available surface ligands (i.e., haptotaxis) for leukocytes to interact with.
Tenertaxis
Another phenomenon that is often observed in vitro when the endothelial bar-rier is very tight, is the predominant use of the transcellular route, whereas weak endothelial junctional integrity shows high association with paracellular
diapedesis (Figure 1D) 24. To find these spots of low resistance, lymphocytes
dynamically probe the underlying endothelium by extending invadosome-like protrusions into its surface that deform the plasma membrane, depolymerize F-actin filaments at the membrane cortex and ultimately breach the barrier
com-33
mon principle namely ‘the path of least resistance’ 24. However, determining
where the path of least resistance is present in vivo is very difficult, if not impossible. The observations of tenertaxis for TEM are so far only performed in in vitro studies. Another point is the seemingly contradictory effects of du-rotaxis and tenertaxis. According to tenertaxis, leukocytes would prefer a site of low endothelial cytoskeletal density, while according to durotaxis
leukocy-tes need an optimum cytoskeletal stiffness to cross the vessel wall 24. This
opposing arguments for determining the transendothelial migration ‘hotspot’ indicate that the mechanism that determines the TEM hotspot is likely an in-terdependent combination of the TEM factors chemo-, hapto-, duro- and te-nertaxis, where, dependent on specific (patho)physiological conditions, one factor may play a more dominant role over the other in determining the site for leukocytes to cross.
Shear forces
The impact of shear forces on leukocyte behavior has been established by several research groups. Transmigration kinetics of neutrophils was
signifi-cantly faster under shear stress than under static conditions (Figure 1E) 26.
Leukocyte extravasation primarily takes place in the postcapillary venules
of the inflamed tissue where the flow velocity is between 1–10 dyn/cm 2,27.
Cinamon and co-workers showed that specifically for lymphocytes TEM was
promoted by a continuous physiological flow between 0.75 and 5 dyn/cm 2,28.
From these data it was concluded that flow-induced mechanical signals are coupled to Gi protein signaling at the luminal endothelial cell surface,
resul-ting in further enhancing lymphocyte TEM 29. Additional work from the same
group convincingly showed that shear stress promotes extensive filopodia
formation by T-lymphocytes 19. Filopodia are small membrane “finger-like”
protrusions that leukocytes use to probe the luminal endothelial surface be-fore and during TEM. This process of lymphocyte probing the endothelial surface was underscored by a report by Carman and colleagues, who
refer-red to these structures as invading podosomes 30.
Although the majority of leukocyte extravasation occurs under low shear conditions in postcapillary venules, during some pathological condi-tions such as atherosclerosis, monocytes adhere and transmigrate through the endothelial lining of the artery wall where shear stress is much higher. It was been shown that leukocytes tethered to and rolled on platelet-decorated ultra-large Von Willebrand factor (ULVWF) string-like structures presented
on the luminal side of the endothelium 31. Leukocytes scanned for activated
platelets to interact via P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (PSGL-1) resulting in clustering and activation of the β2 integrin Mac-1 that mediates
neutrop-hil TEM 32,33. This simultaneous interaction with activated platelets and the
endothelium results in rapid neutrophil exit and the onset of inflammation 34.
Using platelets as intermediate substrates, monocytes are able to
transmi-Review: Leukocyte transendothelial migration
34
Chapter 2
grate under high shear stress varying between 20 and 40 dyn/cm 2,31. Thus,
also matrices generated on the luminal surface of the endothelium can drive leukocyte TEM under high shear conditions.
Vascular beds
Leukocyte diapedesis through the blood brain barrier, into the peritoneum or lungs has been shown to be differentially regulated (Figure 1F). For instan-ce, neutrophil diapedesis in ICAM-1/P-selectin knock-out mice is normal in
the lungs but totally abrogated in the peritoneum 35. Recently, it has been
shown that locking the endothelial junctions prevented leukocyte diapedesis, but not in all tissues. Diapedesis into lung, skin and cremaster was severely reduced, establishing the paracellular route as the dominant route in the-se tissues. However, the migration of naïve lymphocytes into lymph nodes and transmigration of neutrophils into the peritoneum was not affected by
junctional locking 36. Moreover, during inflammation in the respiratory tract of
rats, plasma proteins leakage is predominantly observed in the post-capillary venules whereas capillaries and arterioles did not leak. Under these inflam-matory conditions most leukocytes, in particular neutrophils, transmigrate in
the collecting venules downstream of the leaky post-capillary venules 4. This
landmark paper reveals that plasma protein leakage and leukocyte recruit-ment are 2 separable events that can occur side by side, but this leakage is not necessarily caused by the transmigration of immune cells through the ECs.
Chemotaxis Haptotaxis Durotaxis
Tenertaxis Shear forces Vessel type
Paracellular Transcellular Lung Skin Cremaster Lymph node Peritoneum BBB TEM Substrate stiffness Adhesion molecules Figure 1 Cellular stiffness Para Trans Path of least resistance
Monomeric chemokines GAG + oligomeric
chemokines
a b c