2.2 Classification and labelling
2.2.3 Other phrases
2.2.3.2 Specific restrictions linked to the intended uses
Some of the authorised uses are linked to the following conditions (mandatory labelling):
See Appendix 2 – Copy of the product label
Applicant : BASF Nederland BV Evaluator : Ctgb, NL
Active substance.…: - Conc. of as ….: -
Safener: - Conc. of safener: -
Synergist: - Conc. of synergist: -
Applicant: BASF Nederland BV Professional use: ☒
Non professional use: ☐
Field of use: Fungicide
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Use-No.
(e)
Member state(s)
Crop and/
or situation
(crop destination / purpose of crop)
F, Fn, Fpn G, Gn, Gpn or I
Pests or Group of pests controlled (additionally:
developmental stages of the pest or pest group)
Application Application rate PHI
(days)
Remarks:
e.g. g
safener/synergist per ha
(f)
Method / Kind
Timing / Growth stage of crop &
season
Max.
number a) per use b) per crop/
season
Min.
interval between applications (days)
kg or L product / ha a) max. rate per appl.
b) max. total rate per crop/season
g or kg as/ha a) max. rate per appl.
b) max. total rate per crop/season
Water L/ha min / max
Minor uses according to Article 51 5 NL Grapevine
(wine, table) (VITVI)
F Erysiphe necator (UNCINE)
spraying BBCH 11-83 (April-September)
a) 3 b) 3
10 a) 0.15 b) 0.45
a) 0.045 b) 0.135
200-1200
35
Remarks table heading:
(a) e.g. wettable powder (WP), emulsifiable concentrate (EC), granule (GR)
(b) Catalogue of pesticide formulation types and international coding system CropLife International Technical Monograph n°2, 6th Edition Revised May 2008
(c) g/kg or g/l
(d) Select relevant
(e) Use number(s) in accordance with the list of all intended GAPs in Part B, Section 0 should be given in column 1
(f) No authorization possible for uses where the line is highlighted in grey, Use should be crossed out when the notifier no longer supports this use.
Applicant : BASF Nederland BV Evaluator : Ctgb, NL Remarks
columns:
1 Numeration necessary to allow references
2 Use official codes/nomenclatures of EU Member States
3 For crops, the EU and Codex classifications (both) should be used; when relevant, the use situation should be described (e.g. fumigation of a structure)
4 F: professional field use, Fn: professional field use, Fpn: professional and non-professional field use, G: non-professional greenhouse use, Gn: non-non-professional greenhouse use, Gpn: professional and non-professional greenhouse use, I: indoor application
5 Scientific names and EPPO-Codes of target pests/diseases/ weeds or, when relevant, the common names of the pest groups (e.g. biting and sucking insects, soil born insects, foliar fungi, weeds) and the developmental stages of the pests and pest groups at the moment of application must be named.
6 Method, e.g. high volume spraying, low volume spraying, spreading, dusting, drench Kind, e.g. overall, broadcast, aerial spraying, row, individual plant, between the plants - type of equipment used must be indicated.
7 Growth stage at first and last treatment (BBCH Monograph, Growth Stages of Plants, 1997, Blackwell, ISBN 3-8263-3152-4), including where relevant, information on season at time of application
8 The maximum number of application possible under practical conditions of use must be provided.
9 Minimum interval (in days) between applications of the same product
10 For specific uses other specifications might be possible, e.g.: g/m³ in case of fumigation of empty rooms. See also EPPO-Guideline PP 1/239 Dose expression for plant protection products.
11 The dimension (g, kg) must be clearly specified. (Maximum) dose of a.s. per treatment (usually g, kg or L product / ha).
12 If water volume range depends on application equipments (e.g. ULVA or LVA) it should be mentioned under “application: method/kind”.
13 PHI - minimum pre-harvest interval
14 Remarks may include: Extent of use/economic importance/restrictions
Applicant : BASF Nederland BV Evaluator : Ctgb, NL
Not relevant for extension of authorisation according Article 51.
3.1.2 Methods of analysis
3.1.2.1 Analytical method for the formulation
Not relevant for extension of authorisation according Article 51.
3.1.2.2 Analytical methods for residues
The proposed extension for use of Sercadis involves application on a crop that cannot be extrapolated from the current authorisation based on its crop group (matrix) and its MRL. However, the residue analytical methods, included in the List of Endpoints of the EFSA conclusion on the peer review of the active substance fluxapyroxad, are suitable for monitoring of the MRL’s. Therefore, the proposed extension remains within the existing risk envelope for the section residue analytical methods for food/feed of plant and animal origin.
The residue analytical methods for air, soil and water were accepted during the assessment which led to the original authorisation of Sercadis. This simplified extension does not give rise to re-assess these residue analytical methods.
The proposed extension for use of Sercadis is covered by the risk envelope of the existing authorisation for the section residue analytical methods.
3.1.3 Mammalian Toxicology Operator
The use requested within this application for extension with a minor use (Grapevine (wine, table) (F)) is not covered by the current authorisation. Therefore, a risk assessment was performed for the operator.
For fluxapyroxad, the EU-AOEL of 0.04 mg/kg bw/day was used. For the dermal absorption, a value of 1% for the concentrate and a value of 37% for the spray dilution has been used (for a spray dilution of 0.045 kg a.s./ha / 1200 L/ha = 0.0375 g/L, a dermal absorption percentage of 37% has been derived in the original authorisation).
Based on the risk assessment, the risk is acceptable for mechanical downward spraying without the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). Regarding mechanical upward spraying, manual downward
spraying and manual upward spraying, the risk is acceptable with PPE (gloves and coverall during application).
Bystander
Please, refer to the original authorisation. The uses applied for are within the risk envelope of the original
authorisation.
Applicant : BASF Nederland BV Evaluator : Ctgb, NL
Worker
Please, refer to the original authorisation. The uses applied for are within the risk envelope of the original authorisation.
3.1.4 Residues and Consumer Exposure
All data requirements are covered by the main authorisation except for the points mentioned within this section.
The application concerns an extension of minor use of the plant protection product Sercadis, an SC formulation containing fluxapyroxad as active substance, in table and wine grapes.
3.1.4.1 Residues
Grapes (cGAP-NL: 3 x 45 g/ha, int. 10 d, BBCH 11-83, PHI 35 d)
The submitted studies, including eight supervised residue trials in grapes, were already assessed in the frame of an MRL application (EFSA Journal 2015;13(9):4223). The intended GAP (3 x 45 g/ha, int. 10 d, BBCH 11-83, PHI 35 d) is less critical than the cGAP assessed by EFSA (3 x 60 g/ha, int. 10 d, BBCH 11-83, PHI 35 d). Since the applicant is owner of the studies, the data may be used to support the minor use extension. Based upon the available data, no MRL exceedance is expected.
The effect of processing was sufficiently addressed in the EFSA reasoned opinion as well.
Grapes are usually not fed to animals and they are not grown in rotation. Therefore, residues in animal commodities and rotational crops do not need to be addressed.
3.1.4.2 Consumer exposure
For the chronic consumer risk assessment, it is referred to the latest EFSA reasoned opinion in which all commodities to which fluxapyroxad may be applied are considered (EFSA Journal 2017;15(9):4975). The intended use in grapes was assessed by EFSA before, i.e. this use is covered by the reasoned opinion. The EFSA PRIMo rev. 2 was used for calculations.
A long-term consumer intake concern was not identified for any of the European diets incorporated in the EFSA PRIMo. The highest chronic intake was calculated to be 38% of the ADI (German child diet).
The acute consumer exposure was calculated using the HR value determined by EFSA in its reasoned opinion (EFSA Journal 2015;13(9):4223). The most critical commodity, table grapes, contributed to 8%
of the acute reference dose (ARfD).
In conclusion, no unacceptable risk to the consumer is expected when the product is applied according to the intended uses.
3.1.5 Environmental fate and behaviour
The new use of Sercadis applied for in grapevine has an equal (or lower) risk for persistence in soil, leaching to groundwater and emission to surface water and sediment as the already authorised uses.
No separate risk assessment is required.
Applicant : BASF Nederland BV Evaluator : Ctgb, NL
3.1.6 Ecotoxicology
The use applied for in grape vine was already included in the core dossier of the original authorisation, however as it was not intended for the Dutch market, the Dutch specific aspects (aquatic organisms, non-target arthropods and non-non-target plants) were not assessed.
The risk of the applied use in grapevine for the Dutch specific aspects is equal to or lower than the risk of the authorised uses with regard to the environment for the aspects aquatic organisms, non-target
arthropods, non-target plants and activated sludge. The existing restriction sentence can remain unchanged:
Om in het water levende organismen te beschermen, is toepassing in de teelt van pitvruchten op percelen die grenzen aan oppervlaktewater uitsluitend toegestaan indien voor 1 mei op het gehele perceel gebruik wordt gemaakt van een techniek uit tenminste de klasse DRT90.
3.1.7 Efficacy
According to Article 51 of the Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 the requirements for approval concerning the sufficient effect and any unacceptable effects on plants and plant products does not need to be checked.
3.2 Conclusions
PPP Sercadis is already registered in The Netherlands according to Directive 91/414/EEC or Reg. (EC) No. 1107/2009 taking into account the Uniform Principles of Reg. (EC) No. 546/2011.
The intended use is minor in nature and the extension of authorisation is in public interest. Effects on bees and other beneficials were evaluated in the frame of the already authorised uses. No additional effects are anticipated because of the extension of use.
Based on the risk assessment, no unacceptable risks are anticipated for the unprotected operator considering mechanical downward spraying; no unacceptable risks are anticipated for the protected operator considering mechanical upward spraying, manual downward spraying and manual upward spraying. Considering bystanders/residents and workers, the uses applied for are within the risk envelope of the current authorisation.
The intended use in table and wine grapes will not result in residues above the MRLs set in Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. A risk for consumers through the consumption of food with these residues of fluxapyroxad is not expected. There is no special risk mitigation necessary which deviate from the existing registration.
Considering an application in accordance with the evaluated use pattern and good agricultural practise as well as strict observance of the conditions of use no harmful effects on groundwater or adverse effects on the ecosystem are to be apprehended.
3.3 Further information to permit a decision to be made or to support a review of the
Applicant : BASF Nederland BV Evaluator : Ctgb, NL
conditions and restrictions associated with the authorisation None
Appendix 1 – Copy of the product authorisation
The final product authorisation in the Netherlands can be found on the Ctgb website:
www.ctgb.nl > choose English > Authorised products database > Search term: Sercadis
Applicant : BASF Nederland BV Evaluator : Ctgb, NL
organisme per toepassing toepassingen per 12 maanden
aantal liter middel per ha per 12
maanden
interval tussen toepassingen in dagen
dagen
Pitvruchten Schurft
10,25 – 0,3 L/ha 3 0,9 L/ha 7 35
Echte meeldauw
20,25 L/ha
1
Schurft (Venturia inaequalis, Venturia pirina)
2
Echte meeldauw (Podosphaera leucotricha)
Het gebruik in de teelt van druif is beoordeeld conform artikel 51 EG 1107/2009. Er is voor deze toepassing geen werkzaamheids- en
fytotoxiciteitonderzoek uitgevoerd. Er wordt daarom aangeraden een proefbespuiting uit te voeren, voordat het middel gebruikt wordt. Gebruik van dit middel in dit toepassingsgebied, komt voor risico en verantwoordelijkheid van de gebruiker
Toepassingsgebied Te bestrijden organisme Dosering (middel) per toepassing
Maximaal aantal toepassingen per 12 maanden
Minimum interval tussen
toepassingen in dagen
Veiligheidstermijn in dagen
Druif
(onbedekte teelt)
Echte meeldauw
30,15 L/ha 3 10 35
3
Echte meeldauw (Erysiphe necator)
Toepassingsvoorwaarden
Applicant : BASF Nederland BV Evaluator : Ctgb, NL
In pitvruchten het middel toepassen in 150-1000 liter water per ha.
Draag geschikte beschermende kleding, handschoenen tijdens het aanmaken van de spuitvloeistof en het spuiten.
Behandelde gebieden niet zonder beschermende kleding en handschoenen betreden totdat de spuitvloeistof is opgedroogd.
Om in het water levende organismen te beschermen is toepassing in de teelt van pitvruchten op percelen die grenzen aan oppervlaktewater uitsluitend toegestaan indien voor 1 mei op het gehele perceel gebruik wordt gemaakt van een techniek uit tenminste de klasse DRT90.
Resistentiemanagement
Dit middel bevat de werkzame stof fluxopyroxad. Fluxopyroxad behoort tot de Succinate dehydrogenase remmers (SDHI). De Frac code is 7.
Bij dit product bestaat er kans op resistentieontwikkeling. In het kader van resistentiemanagement dient u de adviezen die gegeven worden in
de voorlichtingsboodschappen, op te volgen.
Applicant : BASF Nederland BV Evaluator : Ctgb, NL
Applicant : BASF Nederland BV Evaluator : Ctgb, NL
Appendix 4 – Reference list
Annex point
Author Year Title
Source (where different from company)
Company, Report No.
GLP or GEP status (where relevant) Published or Unpublished
Data protection claimed Y/N
Owner Application number(s) submission for data protection
Date of submission application
Extra art 51 data protection claimed Y/N
Study used Y/N
Date of the consolidated data
protection
Short explanation extra data protection
(Extra) data protection applies?
KIIIA - physical and chemical properties of formula BAS 700 04 F - accelerated storage stability for up to 2 weeks at 54°C in HDPE packs BASF SE, Limburgerhof, Germany Fed.Rep.
2009/1119422 Yes
Unpublished
Yes BASF 20130974
ZTG
26-6-2013 Y 03-06-2026 Article 59 directive 1107/2009, 1 use = 3 months extra data protection
Yes New consolidated date:
03-09-2026 (20182580 NLKUG) - chemical and physical stability of formula BAS 700 04 F when stored for up to 3 years in HDPE packs BASF SE, Limburgerhof, Germany Fed.Rep.
2012/1015960 Yes
Unpublished
Yes BASF 20130974
ZTG
26-6-2013 Y 03-06-2026 Article 59 directive 1107/2009, 1 use = 3 months extra data protection
Yes New consolidated date:
03-09-2026 (20182580 NLKUG)
Applicant : BASF Nederland BV Evaluator : Ctgb, NL Unpublished
KIIIA 2.2.1/1, 2.2.2/1
Fischer 2010 a
Evaluation of physical and chemical
properties according to Directive 94/37/EC (Regulation (EC) No 440/2008)
BASF SE,
Ludwigshafen/Rhein, Germany Fed.Rep.
2009/1102207 Yes
Unpublished
Yes BASF 20130974
ZTG
26-6-2013 Y 03-06-2026 Article 59 directive 1107/2009, 1 use = 3 months extra data protection
Yes New consolidated date:
03-09-2026 (20182580 NLKUG)
KIIIA 2.3.3/1
Fisher 2010 a
Evaluation of physical and chemical
properties according to Directive 94/37/EC (Regulation (EC) No 440/2008)
BASF SE,
Ludwigshafen/Rhein, Germany Fed.Rep.
2009/1102207 Yes
Unpublished
Yes BASF 20130974
ZTG
26-6-2013 Y 03-06-2026 Article 59 directive 1107/2009, 1 use = 3 months extra data protection
Yes New consolidated date:
03-09-2026 (20182580 NLKUG)
KIIIA Kroehl, T. 2010 a
BAS 700 F 300 g/L SC - physical and chemical properties of formula BAS 700 04 F - accelerated storage stability for up to 2 weeks at 54°C in HDPE packs
Yes BASF 20130974
ZTG
26-6-2013 Y 03-06-2026 Article 59 directive 1107/2009, 1 use = 3 months extra data protection
Yes New consolidated date:
03-09-2026 (20182580 NLKUG)
Applicant : BASF Nederland BV Evaluator : Ctgb, NL Annex
point
Author Year Title
Source (where different from company)
Company, Report No.
GLP or GEP status (where relevant) Published or Unpublished
Data protection claimed Y/N
Owner Application number(s) submission for data protection
Date of submission application
Extra art 51 data protection claimed Y/N
Study used Y/N
Date of the consolidated data
protection
Short explanation extra data protection
(Extra) data protection applies?
BASF SE, Limburgerhof, Germany Fed.Rep.
2009/1119422 Yes
Unpublished KIIIA - chemical and physical stability of formula BAS 700 04 F when stored for up to 3 years in HDPE packs BASF SE, Limburgerhof, Germany Fed.Rep.
2012/1015960 Yes
Unpublished
Yes BASF 20130974
ZTG
26-6-2013 Y 03-06-2026 Article 59 directive 1107/2009, 1 use = 3 months extra data protection
Yes New consolidated date:
03-09-2026 (20182580 NLKUG)
KIIIA 2.9.1/1, 2.9.2/1
Reinmaan, S.
2013 a
Physical and Chemical Compatibility in Aqueous Tank Mixtures of BAS 700 04 F
BASF SE Agricultural Center Limburgerhof, Limburgerhof, Germany Fed.Rep.
2013/1110241 No
Unpublished
Yes BASF 20130974
ZTG
26-6-2013 Y 03-06-2026 Article 59 directive 1107/2009, 1 use = 3 months extra data protection
Yes New consolidated date:
03-09-2026 (20182580 NLKUG)
KIIIA 5.2.1/1
Bentz A., 2009 a
Quantitative determination of the
Yes BASF 20130974
ZTG
26-6-2013 Y 03-06-2026 Article 59 directive
Yes New
Applicant : BASF Nederland BV Evaluator : Ctgb, NL Unpublished
Siebecker M.
active ingredient Reg.No. 5 094 351 in BAS 700 04 F by HPLC
BASF SE, Limburgerhof, Germany Fed.Rep.
2009/1096910 No
Unpublished
1107/2009, 1 use = 3 months extra data protection
consolidated date:
03-09-2026 (20182580 NLKUG)
KIIIA 5.2.1/2
Bentz A. 2009 a
Validation of the analytical HPLC-method AFL0792/01:
Quantitative determination of the active ingredient BAS 700 F in BAS 700 04 F BASF SE,
Limburgerhof, Germany Fed.Rep.
2009/1096911 Yes
Unpublished
Yes BASF 20130974
ZTG
26-6-2013 Y 03-06-2026 Article 59 directive 1107/2009, 1 use = 3 months extra data protection
Yes New consolidated date:
03-09-2026 (20182580 NLKUG)
KIIIA 5.2.4/1
Siebecker M., Bentz A.
2010 a
Validation of analytical method APL0594/01:
Determination of toluene in BAS 700 F TGAI and formulation by GC/MS headspace BASF SE,
Limburgerhof, Germany Fed.Rep.
Yes BASF 20130974
ZTG
26-6-2013 Y 03-06-2026 Article 59 directive 1107/2009, 1 use = 3 months extra data protection
Yes New consolidated date:
03-09-2026 (20182580 NLKUG)
Applicant : BASF Nederland BV Evaluator : Ctgb, NL Annex
point
Author Year Title
Source (where different from company)
Company, Report No.
GLP or GEP status (where relevant) Published or Unpublished
Data protection claimed Y/N
Owner Application number(s) submission for data protection
Date of submission application
Extra art 51 data protection claimed Y/N
Study used Y/N
Date of the consolidated data
protection
Short explanation extra data protection
(Extra) data protection applies?
2009/1116595 Yes
Unpublished KIIIA
5.2.4/2
Bentz A., Siebecker M.
2010 a
Supplement of the analytical method APL0594/01:
Determination of toluene in BAS 700 F containing SC-, EC- and FS-formulations BASF SE,
Limburgerhof, Germany Fed.Rep.
2010/1021229 Yes
Unpublished
Yes BASF 20130974
ZTG
26-6-2013 Y 03-06-2026 Article 59 directive 1107/2009, 1 use = 3 months extra data protection
Yes New consolidated date:
03-09-2026 (20182580 NLKUG)
KIIIA 7.1.1/1
Cords S.-M.
Lammer E.-M.
2009 a
BAS 700 04 F: Acute oral toxicity study in rats
2009/1046046 Yes
Unpublished
Yes BASF 20130974
ZTG
26-6-2013 Y 03-06-2026 Article 59 directive 1107/2009, 1 use = 3 months extra data protection
Yes New consolidated date:
03-09-2026 (20182580 NLKUG) KIIIA
7.1.2/1
Cords S.-M.
Lammer E.-M.
2009 b
BAS 700 04 F: Acute dermal toxicity study in rats
2009/1046047 Yes
Unpublished
Yes BASF 20130974
ZTG
26-6-2013 Y 03-06-2026 Article 59 directive 1107/2009, 1 use = 3 months extra data protection
Yes New consolidated date:
03-09-2026 (20182580 NLKUG) KIIIA
7.1.3/1
Wittmer E.
Landsiedel 2010 a
BAS 700 04 F - Acute inhalation toxicity study
Yes BASF 20130974
ZTG
26-6-2013 Y 03-06-2026 Article 59 directive
Yes New
Applicant : BASF Nederland BV Evaluator : Ctgb, NL Unpublished
R. in Wistar rats - 4-Hour liquid aerosol exposure (head-nose only) 2010/1014827 Yes
Unpublished
1107/2009, 1 use = 3 months extra data protection
consolidated date:
03-09-2026 (20182580 NLKUG) dermal irritation / corrosion in rabbits 2009/1107323 Yes
Unpublished
Yes BASF 20130974
ZTG
26-6-2013 Y 03-06-2026 Article 59 directive 1107/2009, 1 use = 3 months extra data protection
Yes New consolidated date:
03-09-2026 (20182580 NLKUG) eye irritation / corrosion in rabbits
2009/1107321 Yes
Unpublished
Yes BASF 20130974
ZTG
26-6-2013 Y 03-06-2026 Article 59 directive 1107/2009, 1 use = 3 months extra data protection
Yes New consolidated date:
03-09-2026 (20182580 NLKUG) lymph node assay (LLNA) in mice (CBA/CaOlaHsd) 2011/1140866 Yes
Unpublished
Yes BASF 20130974
ZTG
26-6-2013 Y 03-06-2026 Article 59 directive 1107/2009, 1 use = 3 months extra data protection
Yes New consolidated date:
03-09-2026 (20182580 NLKUG)
Percutaneous penetration of [14C]-BAS 700 F formulated as BAS 700 04 F (seed
Yes BASF 20130974
ZTG
26-6-2013 Y 03-06-2026 Article 59 directive 1107/2009, 1 use = 3 months
Yes New consolidated date:
03-09-2026
Applicant : BASF Nederland BV Evaluator : Ctgb, NL Annex
point
Author Year Title
Source (where different from company)
Company, Report No.
GLP or GEP status (where relevant) Published or Unpublished
Data protection claimed Y/N
Owner Application number(s) submission for data protection
Date of submission application
Extra art 51 data protection claimed Y/N
Study used Y/N
Date of the consolidated data
protection
Short explanation extra data protection
(Extra) data protection applies?
treatment) through human split-thickness skin membranes (in-vitro)
2012/1258143 Yes
Unpublished
extra data protection
(20182580 NLKUG)
KIIIA 7.6.2/2
Hassler S. 2012 b
First amendment to report - BAS 700 F:
Percutaneous penetration of [14C]-BAS 700 F formulated as BAS 700 04 F (seed treatment) through human split-thickness skin membranes (in-vitro)
2012/1261427 Yes
Unpublished
Yes BASF 20130974
ZTG
26-6-2013 Y 03-06-2026 Article 59 directive 1107/2009, 1 use = 3 months extra data protection
Yes New consolidated date:
03-09-2026 (20182580 NLKUG)
Percutaneous penetration of [14C]-BAS 700 F formulated as BAS 700 04 F (fruit growing) through human split-thickness skin membranes (in vitro)
2012/1124291 Yes
Unpublished
Yes BASF 20130974
ZTG
26-6-2013 Y 03-06-2026 Article 59 directive 1107/2009, 1 use = 3 months extra data protection
Yes New consolidated date:
03-09-2026 (20182580 NLKUG)
Applicant : BASF Nederland BV Evaluator : Ctgb, NL Unpublished
KIIIA 8.2/1
Grosshans, F,
Schopfer, C. Bross, M.,
Kuhnke, G.
2010 Metabolism of 14C-BAS 700 F in wheat after seed treatment application.
2010 Report: 8.2/1 Document No: BASF DocID 2009/1112531 GLP: Yes
Unpublished
Yes BASF 20130974
ZTG
26-6-2013 Y 03-06-2026 Article 59 directive 1107/2009, 1 use = 3 months extra data protection
Yes New consolidated date:
03-09-2026 (20182580 NLKUG)
KIIIA 8.3.1/1
Kramm R. 2013 a
Study of the residue behaviour of BAS 700 F after application in the furrow before planting and on the seed potatoes directly after planting with BAS 700 04 F under field conditions in United Kingdom, Belgium, Netherlands and Germany, 2011 BASF SE, Limburgerhof, Germany Fed.Rep.
2012/1137316 Yes
Unpublished
Yes BASF 20130974
ZTG
26-6-2013 Y 03-06-2026 Article 59 directive 1107/2009, 1 use = 3 months extra data protection
Yes New consolidated date:
03-09-2026 (20182580 NLKUG)
KIIIA 8.3.1/1a
Kramm R. 2014 a
Study of the residue behaviour of BAS 700 F after application in the furrow before
Yes BASF 20130974
ZTG
26-6-2013 Y 03-06-2026 Article 59 directive 1107/2009, 1 use = 3
Yes New consolidated date:
Applicant : BASF Nederland BV Evaluator : Ctgb, NL Annex
point
Author Year Title
Source (where different from company)
Company, Report No.
GLP or GEP status (where relevant) Published or Unpublished
Data
Data