• No results found

Vraag Score

1. Ik kan het persoonlijk erg goed vinden met mijn leidinggevende 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2. Mijn leidinggevende is iemand die je graag als vriend hebt 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3. Ik heb veel plezier om samen te werken met mijn leidinggevende 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 4. Mijn leidinggevende verdedigd mijn werkgerelateerde beslissingen bij een

manager, zelfs zonder volledige kennis over de beslissing in kwestie

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

5. Mijn leidinggevende zal het voor me opnemen als ik een vergissing maak 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6. Mijn leidinggevende neemt het voor me op als ik “aangevallen” wordt door

anderen

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

63 niet staat in mijn functieomschrijving

8. Ik ben bereid om extra inzet te tonen, bovenop datgene wat vereist is, voor het belang van mijn team

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

9. Ik ben onder de indruk van de werkgerelateerde kennis van mijn leidinggevende

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

10. Ik heb bewondering voor de werkgerelateerde kennis en competentie van mijn leidinggevende

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

11. Ik heb bewondering voor de professionele vaardigheden van mijn leidinggevende

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Deel 3. Organisatieverandering

Vraag Score

1. Ik denk dat de meeste veranderingen een negatieve impact hebben op onze klanten

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

2. Plannen voor toekomstige verbeteringen zijn zeldzaam in deze organisatie 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3. De meeste veranderingsprojecten die bedoeld zijn om problemen op te

lossen, brengen vaak weinig goeds

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

4. Ik heb een goed gevoel over veranderingsprojecten in deze organisatie 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5. Ik ervaar organisatieverandering als een positief proces 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6. Ik vind organisatieverandering verfrissend 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Enkele korte vragen over uzelf

Geslacht:

_______________________________________

Leeftijd:

_______________________________________

Hoe lang bent u werkzaam in deze organisatie?

64 Wat is uw functie?

_______________________________________

Hoe lang bent u werkzaam in deze functie?

_______________________________________

Sinds wanneer bent u lid van dit team?

_______________________________________

Hoeveel relevante werkervaring heeft u?

_______________________________________

Wat is uw hoogst genoten opleidingsniveau?

_______________________________________

Wat was uw studierichting?

65 Appendix 4. Coding scheme

Individual attitude towards change

Code Description Example

Positive attitude

 Having a general positive attitude towards change

A1: “I feel like I’ve always had a positive attitude towards change”

Critical attitude

 Having a general critical attitude towards change

B2: “It depends on if I know why we have to change. Arguments are really important.” Negative

attitude

 Having a general negative attitude towards change

A7: “It’s never fun to change. But sometimes we have to, if we want it or not.”

Individual change readiness

Code Description Example

Negativecognitive change readiness

 Not thinking about change as beneficial

 Missing the logic and arguments supporting the change

A6: “In this organization there is a belief that change is the cure for all our issues, however most of the times it are just people that do not follow their promises.” Positivecognitive

change readiness

 Wanting to cooperate with change projects

 Thinking about change as effective

B3: “I understood why change was needed, I got the picture, they’ve explained it well. So I do believe in the effectiveness of this change.”

Negative affective change readiness

 Seeing change as something difficult and painful

Having a feeling that you

can’t influence change

 Being cynical

B3: “One of the reasons that I go to work is about the social relationship with my coworkers. Since April, I’ve lost a lot of friends in this organization.”

Positive affective change readiness

Experiencing positive

emotions towards change

 Having a good feeling about change

A10: “I love change.”

Team attitude towards change

Code Description Example

Positive attitude

 The belief there is a collectively positive attitude towards change

B4: “I believe that this team has a good attitude towards change.”

Critical attitude

The belief there is a collectively

critical attitude towards change

A6: “The attitude of this team towards every change is critical. Our team is pretty critical.”

Negative attitude

 The belief there is a collectively negative attitude towards change

A3: “I think we do not like change in general.”

66 Team change readiness

Code Description Example

Negativecognitive change readiness

 The team demands arguments in order to change

 The view that past changes were not effective

A3: “Everyone in this team shares the view that past change initiatives in this organization were not as effective as promised.”

Positivecognitive change readiness

 The belief there is a collectively critical attitude towards change

 The team demands arguments in order to change

B1: “We are critical about change, you need to come up with good

arguments.”

Negative affective change readiness

 The team is cynical about change

A1: “I think we always assume the most negative about change”

Positive affective change readiness

Feelings of a positive

climate within the team

B4: “There is a good energy within the team. We’ve positively embraced change.”

LMX

Code Description Example

Critical / challenging relationship

 The manager gives feedback to the employee

 The manager asks difficult questions to empower the employee

 The manager engages in discussion about work-related issues

A3: “The manager sometimes asks a difficult question back, and I really appreciate that.”

Open / partner relationship

 A relationship based around honesty

The room to talk about

anything

 Both manager and employee feel confident to ask for help

 A relationship based on equality

 Using the manager as a soundboard for ideas

B1: “My manager is someone who is honest and open. She feels

confident to tell me what’s on her mind.”

Personal

supportiverelationship

 Room to talk about private issues

 The manager is empathic and a good listener

The feeling of a pleasant

relationship

Perceived mutual trust,

support and respect

A4: “This manager is really interested and listens to my personal goals and wishes.”

67 Facilitatingrelationship  Manager delegates tasks

to employees

 No support on content but on process

B3: “She would help me to come with my own solution to my problem. But she won’t come with her own solution.”

LMX – change readiness

Individual level

Code Description Example

LMX relationship has a positive influence on individual change readiness

The employee is more

receptive towards new change projects

because of his/her LMX relationship

 The employee sees opportunities when confronted with change because of his/her LMX relationship

 The manager has some credibility with his/her subordinates

A4: “Because I have a good relationship with my manager, I think that I’m more positive towards change. Maybe that’s just a feeling. I think I relate work related issues to the person.”

Communication  The manager is able to explain change projects in a clear way

 The manager offers new perspectives of thinking about change

A1: “If issues are clearly communicated, It is much easier for me to understand why things are happening.”

Rational skills  The manager uses good

arguments

 The manager is convincing

 The manager is able to engage in a useful discussion

A7: “Well he knows what he is talking about. Because of this, I tend to accept more from him. So I have more

68 Team level

Code Description Example

LMX relationship has a positive influence on team change readiness

 Within the team there is the perception that the manager has a positive influence on their change readiness

A7: “I don’t think that if the manager thinks it’s a good idea, everyone follows. However, I do think that the team members would take it in consideration.”

Communication  The manager is able to

explain change projects in a clear way

 The manager listens well to the wishes of the team

A4: “This manager listens really well to what is happening within the team and what can be improved.”

Rational skills  The manager uses good arguments

 The manager is convincing

 The manager is able to engage in a useful discussion

A6: “I think that he has a good influence on us. He uses arguments to make his point. We are sensitive to arguments.”

Political skills  Manager is skilled in representing the team within the whole company

 Manager has a good reputation within the company

A3: “This manager is someone with a reputation, which is really

pleasant. He has power within the organization.”

69 Subgroups

Code Description Example

Perceived subgroups  The perception of existing subgroups

B3: “Yes, we have one team within the team.”

Faultline basis  Location B1: “Also based on location, these people all come from the same location”

 Function B2: “Well, eventually we have most contact because of our function.”

 Shared history B6: “What defines us as a subgroup is that we know each other better and longer.”

Subgroupcharacteristics  Sense of humor

 Personal relationships

 Being a coalition

Collectively participating in

social activities

A6: “They would not let each other down. They form a strong

collective.”

Subgroup change readiness

 The distinct view on change from the subgroup

A2: “Perhaps this subgroup is more cynical towards change than the subgroups in other locations.” Subgroupsprocesses  People within the

subgroup are taking over each other’s personality traits

 People within the subgroup influence each other’s view on change

Manager A: ““I have the impression that A3, A2 and A5 are dominant in the view on change. These three also work longer within the company.””

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN