85
GLoBaLiserinG: waar BLiJft de MoraaL? (deeL 2)
Ingo Venzke Juridische keuzes bepalen de verdeling van macht en welvaart wereldwijd
inspiratie dienen als alternatief praktijkvoor beeld. Met haar tripartiete besluitvormings mechanisme geeft de IAO een stem aan verte genwoordigers van regeringen, werkgevers en werknemers. Als ook werkgevers en werk nemers aan de onderhandelingstafel van in ternationale economische verdragen aan
schuiven, zouden er waarschijnlijk heel andere belangenafwegingen gemaakt wor den en zouden de scheidslijnen tussen ar beid en kapitaal minstens even sterk zijn als tus sen verschillende landen.
Vertaling uit het Engels door Asaf Lahat.
Noten
1 Forst, R., Gerechtigkeit nach
Marx, in: Normativität und
Macht, Suhrkamp, Berlijn 2005, pp. 171185, p. 183. 2 Horkheimer, M., Traditional
and Critical Theory, in: Critical
Theory: Selected Essays, Conti nuum, New York 2002, 188–232, p. 204.
3 Marks, S., ‘False Contingency’,
Current Legal Problems, 62, 2009, p. 14.
4 Mouffe, C., Agonistics:
Thin-king the World Politically, Ver so, Londen: 2013.
5 Bernstorff, J. von, ‘Authority Monism in International Organisations: A Historical Sketch’, in: J. Mendes & I. Venz ke (red.), Allocating Authority, Hart, Oxford, pp. 99114. 6 Venzke, I., ‘An Extended Criti
que of International Invest ment Arbitration’, in: L. Gra doni & H. RuizFabri (red.),
Debacles: Illusions and Failures in the History of International Adjudication, Oxford Univer sity Press, Oxford 2018, in verschijning.
7 Kennedy, D., A Critique of
Adju-dication (fin de siècle), Har vard University Press, Cam bridge Mass. 1997; Norton, P.M., ‘The Law of the Future or a Law of the Past? Modern Tribunals and the Internatio nal Law of Expropriation’,
American Journal of Internatio-nal Law, 85, 1991, p. 474. 8 Texaco Overseas Petroleum
Company and California Asia tic Oil Company v. The Gover nment of the Libyan Arab Republic; Award on the Merits of 19 January 1977, 53 ILR 422, 17 ILM (1978).
9 Anghie, A., Imperialism,
Sove-reignty, and the Making of International Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005.
10 GATT Panel Report, United
States—Restrictions on Imports of Tuna, DS21/R, 3 september 1991, unadopted, BISD 39S/155,
punt 5.255.27.
11 Leiter, A., ‘The Silent Impact of the 1917 Revolutions on Inter national Investment Law’, ESIL Reflection, 6(10), 2017. 12 Sapphire International Petro
leums Ltd. v National Iranian Oil Company, Award, 15 maart 1963, (1963) 35 ILR 136, punt 1756.
13 Texaco Overseas Petroleum Company and California Asia tic Oil Company v. The Gover nment of the Libyan Arab Republic; Award on the Merits of 19 January 1977, 53 ILR 422, 17 ILM (1978), punt 45. 14 Weil, P., ‘The State, the Foreign
Investor and International Law: The No Longer Stormy Relationship of a Menage A Trois’, ICSID Review, 15(2), 2000, p. 415.
15 Bevir, M., ‘What is Genealo gy?’, Journal of the Philosophy
of History, 2(3), 2008, p. 263; Venzke, I., ‘Possibilities of the Past? The Histories of the
NIEO and the Travails of Criti que’, Journal of the History of
International Law, 2018, te verschijnen.
16 Gardner, R.N.,
17 Toye, R., ‘The International Trade Organization’, in: M. Daunton, A. Narlikar, & R. M. Stern (red.). The Oxford
Hand-book on the World Trade Orga-nization, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012, p. 95. 18 Wilcox, C., ‘The Promise of the
World Trade Charter’, Foreign
Affairs, 27(3), 1949, p. 496. 19 Graz, J.C., Aux sources de l’OMC:
La Charte de La Havane, 1999. 20 Schrijver, N., Permanent
Sove-reignty over Natural Resources, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1997; UNGA Res. 1803 (XVII) van 14 december 1962.
21 UN GA Res. 1785 (XVII 1962, na de aanbeveling van ECOSOC, Res. 917 (XXXIV).
22 ‘Joint Declaration of the Se ventySeven Countries’, uitge geven door UNCTAD op 15 juni 1964 (www.g77.org). Bed jaoui, M., ‘Nonalignement et droit international’, Recueil
des Cours, 1976, 151(III), p. 337; Toye, J., ‘Assessing the G77: 50 Years After UNCTAD and 40 Years After the NIEO’, Third
World Quarterly, 2014, 35(10), p. 1759.
23 Sacerdoti, G., ‘New Internatio nal Economic Order (NIEO)’, in: R. Wolfrum (red.), Max
Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford
University Press, Oxford 2011; Anghie, A., ‘Legal Aspects of the New International Econo mic Order. Humanity: An International Journal of Hu man Rights’,
Humanitarian-ism, and Development, 2015, 6(1), p 145.
24 Sauvant, K.P., ‘The Negotiati ons of the United Nations Code of Conduct on Transna tional Corporations’, Journal
of World Investment & Trade,
2015, 16, pp. 1187; Bair, J., ‘Cor porations at the United Nati ons: Echoes of the New Inter national Economic Order? Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights’,
Humanitarianism, and Deve-lopment, 2015, 6(1), pp. 159171. 25 A/RES/3201(SVI) (actiepro
gramma) and A/RES/3202(S VI) (Declaration), beide aan genomen op 1 mei 1974. 26 Geciteerd in Meagher, R.F., An
International Redistribution of Wealth and Power: A Study of the Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States, Perga mon, New York 1979, p. 3. 27 CERDS: Charter of Economic
Rights and Duties of States (Handvest van de economi sche rechten en plichten van staten); A/RES/29/3281(XXIX), aangenomen op 12 december 1974.
28 A/PV.2315 en Corr. 1, punt 47. 29 Pahuja, S., Decolonizing
Inter-national Law: Development, Economic Growth and the Poli-tics of Universality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2011; Venzke, I., ‘An Extended Critique of International Investment Arbitration’, in: L. Gradoni & H. RuizFabri (red.),
Debacles: Illusions and Failures in the History of International Adjudication, Oxford Univer sity Press, Oxford 2018. 30 A/PV.2315 en Corr. 1, punt 130. 31 Broches, A., ‘The Convention on the Settlement of Invest ment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States’,
Recueil des Cours, 136, 1972, p. 343.
32 Idem, p. 345.
33 Özsu, U., ‘Neoliberalism and the New International Econo mic Order: A History of ‘Con temporary Legal Thought’’, in: C. L. Tomlins & J. Desautels Stein (red.), In Search of
Con-temporary Legal Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2017.
34 Geciteerd in: Moyn, S., ‘Justice Delayed: The Political Origins and Uncertain Future of Glo bal Justice’, ABC Religion and
Ethics, 2016 (www.abc.net.au/ religion/articles/2016/01/ 27/ 4395512.htm, 26 maart 2017).
35 Zie ook: Sabel, C. & Zeitlin, J., ‘Historical Alternatives to Mass Production: Politics, Markets and Technology in NineteenthCentury Industri alization’, Past and Present, 108, 1985, pp. 161162. 36 Honneth, A., Die Idee des
Sozi-alismus, Surhkamp, Berlin 2016, p. 114; Wright, E.O.,
Envi-sioning Real Utopias, Verso, Londen 2010.
37 Bernstorff, J. von & Dann, P. eds., The Battle for
Internatio-nal Law in the Decolonization Era, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2018, te verschijnen. 38 Artikel 140 en 144 UNCLOS. 39 Zie ook de klassieker Wal
lerstein, I., Historical
Capita-lism: With Capitalist Civiliza-tion, Verso, Londen 1983. 40 Juma, C., How the EU starves
Africa into submission, 2016. 41 Hoegen, M., High duties keep
food imports from poor coun-tries out of Europe, 2010 (www. dw.com/en/highdutieskeep foodimportsfrompoor countriesoutof europe/a5127705).
42 Rodrik, D., The Globalization
Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy, Norton, New York 2012, p. 57.
87