5. Discussion
5.4. Conclusion
41
42
References
Abubakar, F. M., & Ahmad, A. P. (2013). The Moderating Effect of Technology Awareness on the Relationship between UTAUT Constructs and Behavioural Intention to Use Technology: A Conceptual Paper. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 14-23.
Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992). Perceived usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication. MIS Quarterly, 227-247.
Ajzen, I. (1985). From Intentions to Actions: A theory of Planned Behavior. Berlin: Springer.
Balta-Ozkan, N., Davidson, R., Bicket, M., & Whitmarsh, L. (2013). Social barriers to the adoption of smart homes. Energy Policy, 363-374.
Baptista, G., & Oliveira, T. (2015). Understanding mobile banking: The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology combined with cultural moderators. Computers in Human Behavior, 418-430.
Borja, R., de la Pinta, J., Alvares, A., & Maestre, J. (2013). Integration of service robots in the smart home by means of UPnP: A surveillance robot case study. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 153-160.
Cambridge. (2020). vacuum cleaner. Retrieved from definitions:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/vacuum-cleaner
Canals, S. (2018, August 29). Dutch consumers not really interested in adopting smart home
technology - yet. Retrieved from Silicon Canals: https://siliconcanals.com/news/smart-home-trends-2018/
CBS. (2019, december 25). Statline. Retrieved from CBS Statline:
https://opendata.cbs.nl/statline/#/CBS/nl/dataset/82905NED/table?fromstatweb
Chang, S.-J., Witteloostuijn, A., & Eden, L. (2010). Common Method Variance in International Business Research. Journal of International Business Studies, 178-184.
Choi, J. P., & Jeon, D.-S. (2020). Two-Sided Platforms and Biases in Technology Adoption. Munich:
cesifo working papers.
Crosby, L. A., & Muehling, D. D. (1983). External Variables and the Fishbeinmodel: Mediation, Moderation, or Direct Effects? Advances in Consumer Research, 94-99.
Davis, F. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. Computer and Information Systems Graduate School of Business Administration.
Ehrenhard, M., Kijl, B., & Nieuwenhuis, L. (2014). Market adoption barriers of multi-stakeholder technology: Smart homes for the aging population. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 306-315.
Ezer, N., Fisk, A., & Rogers, W. (2009). Attitudinal and Intentional Acceptance of Domestic Robots by Younger and Older Adults. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 39-48.
Fink, J., Bauwens, V., Mubin, O., Kaplan, F., & Dillenbourg, P. (2011). People's perception of domestic service robots: same household same opinion? Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 204-213.
Forlizzi, J., & DiSalvo, C. (2006). Service Robots in the Domestic Environment: A study of the Roomba Vacuum in the Home. HRI'06, (pp. 258-265). Salt Lake City.
43 Gallaugher, J. (2013). Platforms. Network Effects, and Competing in a Winner-Take-All World. In J.
Gallaugher, Information Systems: A Manager's Guide to Harnessing Technology (pp. 211-233). Boston: Boston Academic Publishing, Inc., d.b.a. FlatWorld.
Gao, L., & Bai, S. (2014). A unified perspective on the factors influencing consumer acceptance of internet of things technology. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 211-231.
Gates, B. (2007). A robot in every home. Scientific American.
Goldenberg, J., Libai, B., & Muller, E. (2010). The chilling effects of network externalities. Intern J.
of Research in Marketing, 4-15.
Guldentops, B. (2018). Consumenten en Internet of Things: een onderzoek naar drijfveren en
barrières in acceptatie van Internet of Things door de Vlaamse consument, de aanzet naar een algemeen model. Brussel: Vrije universiteit Brussel.
Hall, A., Backonja, U., Painter, I., Cakmak, M., Sung, M. L., & Demiris, G. (2019). Acceptance and perceived usefulness of robots to assist with activities of daily living and healthcare tasks. The official journal of RESNA, 133-140.
Hong, A., Nam, C., & Kim, S. (2020). What will be the possible barriers to consumers'a doption of smart home services. Telecommunications Policy, 1-15.
Hong, J., Shin, J., & Lee, D. (2016). Strategic management of next-generation connected life:
Focusing on smart key and car-home connectivity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 11-20.
Hsu, C.-L., & Lin, J. C.-C. (2016). An empirical examination of consumer adoption of Internet of Things services: Network externalities and concern for information privacy perspectives.
Computers in Human Behavior, 516-527.
Hubert, M., Blut, M., Borck, C., Wenjiao Zhang, R., Koch, V., & Riedl, R. (2019). The influence of acceptance and adoption drivers on smart home usage. European Journal of Marketing, 1073-1098.
Insights, F. B. (2020, january). Information & Technology. Retrieved from Fortune Business Insights:
https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/industry-reports/smart-home-market-101900 Insights, F. B. (2020, jan 25). Robotic Vacuum Cleaners Market. Retrieved from
Fortunebusinessinsights.com: https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/industry-reports/robotic-vacuum-cleaners-market-100645
Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network Externalities, Competition and Compatibility. American Economic Review, 424-440.
Kim, Y., Park, Y., & Choi, J. (2017). A study on the adoption of IoT smart home service: using Value-based Adoption Model. Total Quality Management, 1149-1165.
Kuebel, H., Hanner, N., & Zarnekow, R. (2015). An Expert View on the Role of Complementary Assets for the Adoption of Smart Home Platforms. Berlin: Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems.
Lee, H. R., Sung, J., Sabanovic, S., & Han, J. (2012). Cultural Design of Domestic Robots: A study of user expectations in Korea and the United States. (pp. 803-808). Paris: International
Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.
44 Lin, C.-P., & Bhattacherjee, A. (2008). Elucidating Individual Intention to Use Interactive Information
Technologies: The role of Network Externalities. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 85-108.
Lin, K.-Y., & Lu, H.-P. (2011). Why people use social netowkring sites: An empirical study
integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 1152-1161.
Monitor, S. H. (2020, march). Smart home markt groeit tot 2,5 miljard euro. Retrieved from multiscope: http://www.multiscope.nl/persberichten/smart-home-markt-groeit.html
Nikou, S. (2019). Factors driving the adoption of smart home technology: An empirical assessment.
Telematics and Informatics.
Nomura, T., & Nakazawa, T. (2017). Gender Difference in Expectations for Domestic Robots.
International Conference on Social Robotics, 423-431.
Park, K., Kwak, C., Lee, J., & Ahn, J.-H. (2018). The effect of platform characteristics on the adoption of smart home speakers: Empirical evidence in South Korea. Telematics and Informatics, 2118-2132.
Prassler, E., Ritter, A., Schaeffer, C., & Fiorini, P. (2000). A Short History of Cleaning Robots.
Autonomous Robots, 211-226.
Ramoly, N., Bouzeghoub, A., & Finance, B. (2018). A Framework for Service Robots in Smart Home:
An Efficient Solution for Domestic Healthcare. IRBM, 413-420.
Renaud, K., & van Biljon, J. (2008). Predicting Technology Acceptance and Adoption by the Elderly:
A Qualitative study. Proceedings of the 2008 Annual Research Conference of the South African institute of Computer Scientists and information Technologists on IT Research in Developing Countries: Riding the Wave Technology (pp. 210-219). New York: ACM.
Schiffhauer, B., Bernotat, J., Eyssel, F., Bröhl, R., & Adriaans, J. (2018). Let the User Decide! User Preferences Regarding Functions, Apps and Interfaces of a Smart Home and a Service Robot.
International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 15-22.
Sharma, S., Durand, R. M., & Gur-Arie, O. (1981). Identification and Analysis of Moderator Variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 291-301.
Shin, D.-H. (2017). Conceptualizing and measuring quality of experience of the internet of things:
Exploring how quality is perceived by users. Information & Management, 998-1011.
Shin, J., Park, Y., & Lee, D. (2018). Who will be smart home users? An analysis of adoption and diffusion of smart homes. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 246-253.
Singh, D., Kropf, J., Psychoula, I., & Hanke, S. (2018). Users's Perceptions and attitudes towards smart home technologies. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 203-214.
Smits, M., & Damen, F. (2011). Maatschappelijke vraagstukken van de nieuwe generatie robots: een verkenning. Den Haag: Rathenau Instituut.
Srnicek, N. (2017). The challenges of platform capitalism: Understanding the logic of a new business model. Juncture, 254-257.
Steijn, W., Luiijf, E., & van der Beek, D. (2016). Opkomend risico voor arbeidsveiligheid door inzet van robots op de werkvloer. Utrecht: TNO.
45 Sun, H., & Zhang, P. (2006). The rol of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. Int. J.
Human-Computer Studies, 53-78.
Sundmaeker, H., Guillemin, P., Friess, P., & Woelfflé, S. (2010). Vision and Challenges for Realising the Internet of Things. Brussel: European Commision Information Society and Media.
Sung, J., Christensen, H., & Grinter, R. (2009). Sketching the Future: Assessing User Needs for Domestic Robots. Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 1-6.
Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics, Fourth Edition. Needam Heights:
MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Trochim, W. M., Donnelly, J. P., & Arora, K. (2016). 11.2 Conclusion Validity. In W. M. Trochim, J.
P. Donnelly, & K. Arora, Research Methods The Essesntial Knowledge Base (pp. 281-287).
Boston: Cengage Learning.
Trochim, W. M., Donnelly, J. P., & Arora, K. (2016). 4.3. External Validity. In W. M. Trochim, J. P.
Donnelly, & K. Arora, Research Methods The Essential Knowledge Base (pp. 83-85). Boston:
Cengage Learning.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model:
Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 186-204.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 1157-178.
Wilson, C., Hargreaves, T., & Hauxwell-Baldwin, R. (2017). Benefits and risks of smart home technologies. Energy Policy, 72-83.
Xiao, L., Fu, B., & Liu, W. (2018). Understanding consumer repurchase intention on 020 platforms:
an integrated model of network externalities and trust transfer theory. Serivce Business, 7310756.
Xu, X., Venkatesh, V. T., & Hong, S.-J. (2010). Model of Migration and Use of Platforms: Role of hierarchy, Current Generation and Complementarities in Consumer settings. Management Science, 1304-1323.
Yang, L., & Mao, M. (2014). Antecedents of Online Group Buying Behaviour: from Price Leverage and Crowd effect Perspectives. The Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems.
Yi Man Li, R., Ching Yu Li, H., Kei Mak, C., & Beiqi Tang, T. (2016). Sustainable Smart Home and Home Automation: Big Data Analytics Approach. International Journal of Smart Home, 177-198.
Zhao, L., & Lu, Y. (2012). Enhancing perceived interactivity through network externalities: An empirical study on micro-blogging service satisfaction and continuance intention. Decision Support Systems, 825-834.
46